Update! ‘whistleblower’ Identified As Eric Ciaramella?

So what? His claims have been shown to be true.
Even if so, and they have not, why do they need him when he heard it 2nd hand and we have a firsthand transcript?

We didn't have the transcript, or the other information presented when he came forward. At this point, we don't need him other than to fill in some details about how he came to have that information.

You don’t have information called evidence, it’s hearsay and you don’t start a case.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I knew that ploy was going to fail. What will Schiff for Brains do now? And what do you know, it leads us back to the "Russia! Russia! Russia!" hoax.

UPDATE! 'WHISTLEBLOWER' IDENTIFIED AS ERIC CIARAMELLA? - Patriots' Soapbox 24/7 News Network

October 11, 2019 – Since the initial publishing of our article last night about the potential identity of the alleged whistleblower, more information has been uncovered that may help to corroborate the story.

In October of 2016, Department of State records show that former Obama NSC for Ukraine, Eric Ciaramella, attended a dinner in honor of the Italian Prime Minister. He was a guest of the Executive Office of VP (EOVP), along with other swamp creatures:

This is interesting because we know Italy played a key role in the Spygate drama. U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham were recently in Italy allegedly to hear a secret tape of a deposition given by the shadowy ‘Maltese professor’ Joseph Mifsud. That Mifsud was a Western intelligence operative, and not a Russian spy, is quite apparent at this point.

Thanks for the 9th thread about this fake news! you must have gotten you talking points email late, you might want to look in to that.

Eric Ciaramella has been accused of being a leaker since 2017 and even had to quit his job with the NSC because of death threats due to totally unsubstantiated accusations.

And yet here he is again...same unsubstantiated accusations, and you sheep eat it up like pigs eating slop.
He should have been prosecuted and jailed. This needs to start happening to traitors.
 
I knew that ploy was going to fail. What will Schiff for Brains do now? And what do you know, it leads us back to the "Russia! Russia! Russia!" hoax.

UPDATE! 'WHISTLEBLOWER' IDENTIFIED AS ERIC CIARAMELLA? - Patriots' Soapbox 24/7 News Network

October 11, 2019 – Since the initial publishing of our article last night about the potential identity of the alleged whistleblower, more information has been uncovered that may help to corroborate the story.

In October of 2016, Department of State records show that former Obama NSC for Ukraine, Eric Ciaramella, attended a dinner in honor of the Italian Prime Minister. He was a guest of the Executive Office of VP (EOVP), along with other swamp creatures:

This is interesting because we know Italy played a key role in the Spygate drama. U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham were recently in Italy allegedly to hear a secret tape of a deposition given by the shadowy ‘Maltese professor’ Joseph Mifsud. That Mifsud was a Western intelligence operative, and not a Russian spy, is quite apparent at this point.

Thanks for the 9th thread about this fake news! you must have gotten you talking points email late, you might want to look in to that.

Eric Ciaramella has been accused of being a leaker since 2017 and even had to quit his job with the NSC because of death threats due to totally unsubstantiated accusations.

And yet here he is again...same unsubstantiated accusations, and you sheep eat it up like pigs eating slop.
He should have been prosecuted and jailed. This needs to start happening to traitors.

you are just like the “we have Trump now” people...wanting to arrest people although zero evidence of wrong doing.
 
That Mifsud was a Western intelligence operative, and not a Russian spy, is quite apparent at this point.

OH there's going to be hell to pay for that one!

Mifsud was listed in the mueller report as a russian agent...Mifsud is the key to PROVING that russai-collusion was a made up hoax which makes it a coup attempt!

What have you been privy to, that no one else has.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

People who pay attention have it.

That came from the mouth of congressman devin nunes on sunday morning futures with maria barteromo about a month & a half ago.
 
So, we should have a National Holiday to Celebrate this truly patriotic, courageous, "Great American".

Eric Day or, Ciaramella Day?
 
Welp...the suns up...is poor poor eric still with us?

For that matter...how about christine blassy ford? :)
 
So what? His claims have been shown to be true.
Even if so, and they have not, why do they need him when he heard it 2nd hand and we have a firsthand transcript?

We didn't have the transcript, or the other information presented when he came forward. At this point, we don't need him other than to fill in some details about how he came to have that information.
Yep. And the transcript is not conclusive to show anything. Per Alan Dershowitz your fellow Democrat. We are once again spinning our wheels and wasting time and $$
 
Na, not really

So which specific claim has been shown to be not true?




The proper question to ask is which one has?

And that answer is none

Really? They didn't move the record of the call to a separate more unacceptable storage?


Really, what made it unacceptable?

.

Auto correct. That was supposed to be inaccessible.


Considering the leaks that have occurred can you blame them?

.
 
That Mifsud was a Western intelligence operative, and not a Russian spy, is quite apparent at this point.

OH there's going to be hell to pay for that one!

Mifsud was listed in the mueller report as a russian agent...Mifsud is the key to PROVING that russai-collusion was a made up hoax which makes it a coup attempt!

What have you been privy to, that no one else has.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

People who pay attention have it.

That came from the mouth of congressman devin nunes on sunday morning futures with maria barteromo about a month & a half ago.

I know it was completely manufactured. When the real details eventually come out, its payback time. Donnie should not let go of anything.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Figures Pelousy would be involved in money laundering....add it to the long list of her financial crimes....insider trading, letting no-bid contracts to her husband's company, misuse of government aircraft for personal transportation, and tax evasion. What I wouldn't give to see her put under arrest and led down the Capitol steps like the common criminal she is.
 
So what? His claims have been shown to be true.
Even if so, and they have not, why do they need him when he heard it 2nd hand and we have a firsthand transcript?

We didn't have the transcript, or the other information presented when he came forward. At this point, we don't need him other than to fill in some details about how he came to have that information.


We need to know much more, like who did he talk to prior to submitting the complaint and who assisted in completing the complaint. Why did he cite new articles in the complaint and much more. Of course the commies don't want those questions answered, it might show complicity with the commies in congress to fabricate the complaint.

.
 
I know it was completely manufactured. When the real details eventually come out, its payback time. Donnie should not let go of anything.

You are right!

President Trump signaled that he was willing to let by-gones be by-gones when he said right after the election..."the clintons are good people".

I can't imagine that still applies!

We are more than likely going to life-prison-terms and possibly executions!
 
So which specific claim has been shown to be not true?




The proper question to ask is which one has?

And that answer is none

Really? They didn't move the record of the call to a separate more unacceptable storage?


Really, what made it unacceptable?

.

Auto correct. That was supposed to be inaccessible.


Considering the leaks that have occurred can you blame them?

.
No
 
So what? His claims have been shown to be true.
Even if so, and they have not, why do they need him when he heard it 2nd hand and we have a firsthand transcript?

We didn't have the transcript, or the other information presented when he came forward. At this point, we don't need him other than to fill in some details about how he came to have that information.
Yep. And the transcript is not conclusive to show anything. Per Alan Dershowitz your fellow Democrat. We are once again spinning our wheels and wasting time and $$
avoidance to help trump, or cough cough americans is in year three
 
So which specific claim has been shown to be not true?




The proper question to ask is which one has?

And that answer is none

Really? They didn't move the record of the call to a separate more unacceptable storage?


Really, what made it unacceptable?

.

Auto correct. That was supposed to be inaccessible.


Considering the leaks that have occurred can you blame them?

.

Yes
 
I knew that ploy was going to fail. What will Schiff for Brains do now? And what do you know, it leads us back to the "Russia! Russia! Russia!" hoax.

UPDATE! 'WHISTLEBLOWER' IDENTIFIED AS ERIC CIARAMELLA? - Patriots' Soapbox 24/7 News Network

October 11, 2019 – Since the initial publishing of our article last night about the potential identity of the alleged whistleblower, more information has been uncovered that may help to corroborate the story.

In October of 2016, Department of State records show that former Obama NSC for Ukraine, Eric Ciaramella, attended a dinner in honor of the Italian Prime Minister. He was a guest of the Executive Office of VP (EOVP), along with other swamp creatures:

This is interesting because we know Italy played a key role in the Spygate drama. U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham were recently in Italy allegedly to hear a secret tape of a deposition given by the shadowy ‘Maltese professor’ Joseph Mifsud. That Mifsud was a Western intelligence operative, and not a Russian spy, is quite apparent at this point.
And?
 
So what? His claims have been shown to be true.
Even if so, and they have not, why do they need him when he heard it 2nd hand and we have a firsthand transcript?

We didn't have the transcript, or the other information presented when he came forward. At this point, we don't need him other than to fill in some details about how he came to have that information.


We need to know much more, like who did he talk to prior to submitting the complaint and who assisted in completing the complaint. Why did he cite new articles in the complaint and much more. Of course the commies don't want those questions answered, it might show complicity with the commies in congress to fabricate the complaint.

.

So he put it in a form that couldn't be dismissed on it's face. It probably took a lawyer to help him. Big deal. What difference does it make who he talked to if the claims are verified? Does it mean Trump didn't do what was claimed just because the whistle blower talked to somebody?
 
I knew that ploy was going to fail. What will Schiff for Brains do now? And what do you know, it leads us back to the "Russia! Russia! Russia!" hoax.

UPDATE! 'WHISTLEBLOWER' IDENTIFIED AS ERIC CIARAMELLA? - Patriots' Soapbox 24/7 News Network

October 11, 2019 – Since the initial publishing of our article last night about the potential identity of the alleged whistleblower, more information has been uncovered that may help to corroborate the story.

In October of 2016, Department of State records show that former Obama NSC for Ukraine, Eric Ciaramella, attended a dinner in honor of the Italian Prime Minister. He was a guest of the Executive Office of VP (EOVP), along with other swamp creatures:

This is interesting because we know Italy played a key role in the Spygate drama. U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham were recently in Italy allegedly to hear a secret tape of a deposition given by the shadowy ‘Maltese professor’ Joseph Mifsud. That Mifsud was a Western intelligence operative, and not a Russian spy, is quite apparent at this point.
I'm going to put the odds of this being accurate at about eleventy trillion to one.
 

Forum List

Back
Top