Update! ‘whistleblower’ Identified As Eric Ciaramella?

[Billy_Bob]

So what? His claims have been shown to be true.

Na, not really

So which specific claim has been shown to be not true?

As none of your claims hold water, how about you tell us which ones do....

 

[Thunk]

I think this is the very first "leak" that has worked in our favor!

 

[Thunk]

Poor poor eric...we hardly knew ye

 

[BULLDOG]

So what? His claims have been shown to be true.

Na, not really

So which specific claim has been shown to be not true?

The proper question to ask is which one has?

And that answer is none

Really? They didn't move the record of the call to a separate more unacceptable storage?

 

[Jitss617]

So what? His claims have been shown to be true.

Na, not really

So which specific claim has been shown to be not true?

The proper question to ask is which one has?

And that answer is none

Really? They didn't move the record of the call to a separate more unacceptable storage?

Pretty common

 

[BULLDOG]

So what? His claims have been shown to be true.

Na, not really

So which specific claim has been shown to be not true?

As none of your claims hold water, how about you tell us which ones do....

I'm not sure you even know what claims were made.

 

[BULLDOG]

So what? His claims have been shown to be true.

Na, not really

So which specific claim has been shown to be not true?

The proper question to ask is which one has?

And that answer is none

Really? They didn't move the record of the call to a separate more unacceptable storage?

Pretty common

Credible link?

 

[Billy_Bob]

So what? His claims have been shown to be true.

Na, not really

So which specific claim has been shown to be not true?

The proper question to ask is which one has?

And that answer is none

Really? They didn't move the record of the call to a separate more unacceptable storage?

Doesn't matter in the slightest... Secure conversations are necessary for every president and with the leaks happening he was justified in doing so.. Trump released the transcript in its entirety so you have absolutely Zero credibility...

 

[westwall]

So what? His claims have been shown to be true.

Na, not really

So which specific claim has been shown to be not true?

As none of your claims hold water, how about you tell us which ones do....

I'm not sure you even know what claims were made.

Then you are a troll, as well as an idiot

 

[Jitss617]

Na, not really

So which specific claim has been shown to be not true?

The proper question to ask is which one has?

And that answer is none

Really? They didn't move the record of the call to a separate more unacceptable storage?

Pretty common

Credible link?

Credible source they don’t

 

[WEATHER53]

He’s safe. He’s not after Hills.

 

[Billy_Bob]

So what? His claims have been shown to be true.

Na, not really

So which specific claim has been shown to be not true?

As none of your claims hold water, how about you tell us which ones do....

I'm not sure you even know what claims were made.

BWHAAAAAAA

I've read the transcript... What claims are you making?

 

[Billy_Bob]

He’s safe. He’s not after Hills.

But what he is exposing might take her down and that will not be allowed....

 

[Thunk]

He’s safe. He’s not after Hills.

Nope. As this unravels the democrats wont want poor poor eric being questioned by ANYBODY!

Dead men tell no tales!

Poor poor eric might be gone before the sunrise.

 

[WEATHER53]

Where’s the guy who was claiming the transcript is different than the words?

 

[Thunk]

It doesn't pay to get in bed with democrats!

 

[WEATHER53]

It doesn't pay to get in bed with democrats!

He could suffer self strangulation!

 

[Thunk]

It doesn't pay to get in bed with democrats!

He could suffer self strangulation!

Or shoot himself in the head 4 times.

 

[theHawk]

I knew that ploy was going to fail. What will Schiff for Brains do now? And what do you know, it leads us back to the "Russia! Russia! Russia!" hoax.

UPDATE! 'WHISTLEBLOWER' IDENTIFIED AS ERIC CIARAMELLA? - Patriots' Soapbox 24/7 News Network

October 11, 2019 – Since the initial publishing of our article last night about the potential identity of the alleged whistleblower, more information has been uncovered that may help to corroborate the story.

In October of 2016, Department of State records show that former Obama NSC for Ukraine, Eric Ciaramella, attended a dinner in honor of the Italian Prime Minister. He was a guest of the Executive Office of VP (EOVP), along with other swamp creatures:

This is interesting because we know Italy played a key role in the Spygate drama. U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham were recently in Italy allegedly to hear a secret tape of a deposition given by the shadowy ‘Maltese professor’ Joseph Mifsud. That Mifsud was a Western intelligence operative, and not a Russian spy, is quite apparent at this point.​

So the “whistleblower” is really just an Obama ass-licker.

What a surprise.

Next fake scandal.

 

[OKTexas]

So what? His claims have been shown to be true.

Na, not really

So which specific claim has been shown to be not true?

The proper question to ask is which one has?

And that answer is none

Really? They didn't move the record of the call to a separate more unacceptable storage?

Really, what made it unacceptable?

.