- Mar 16, 2012
- 59,290
- 17,604
- 2,180
And?Yes, Jews did fight to protect Hebron from the invading crusaders 800 years ago, a fact you refuse to acknowledge because it goes against your lie of there not being any Jews there. Jews have always been stuck between this endless holy war between Muslims and Christians (with Jerusalem as the prize) , so of course at different times in history they employed the strategy of an "enemy of my enemy is my friend". At the end of the day both religions have been fighting with each other, mainly over land that originally belonged to the Jews, and finally after centuries it's back in the hands of it's rightful owners and those that have been loving it for 4000 years.Meaningless post as you still didn't refute the fact that Muslims have been oppressing, persecuting, and killing Jews way before the creating of the state of Israel. In fact Hilter / the Nazis learned to use the yellow star for Jews from the Muslims.You prove just how fucking STUPID you are there are reams of Historical data that show Muslims slaughtering Jews and Christians even in the 20th century. They still do it today. They have been driving them out of their Countries for hundreds of years.
Muslims have not been "slaughtering" Christians in any number close to the number of Muslims we have slaughtered in the 20th century. As far as slaughtering Jews, I think we Christians hold a record that will never be beaten. Until recently, Muslims have never "driven" Christians out of the countries they conquered.The Muslims preferred to tax Christians and most Christinians converted to Islam to avoid said taxation.
Actually, Muslims and Jews have been allied against Christians until recently, historically speaking. Jews were with the Arab armies as auxiliaries when Christian Palestine fell to the Arabs in 637 AD. Not to mention the Jews in Moorish Spain.
It doesn't mean that Muslims didn't oppress, persecute, or commit massacres on Jews prior to the formation of the modern state of Israel.
Yes it does. Time for you stop reading Zionist lies and some real history written by historians and scholars, like this one a Jew, Prof. Mark Cohen of Princeton. Ruddy, it is amazing how wrong you always are. It's like you do it on purpose.
"The paradigm summarized here helps explain not only Muslim-Jewish coexistence but also why Jews were so open to Arab-Islamic culture. Other contributions to this book will describe this is detail. Here I shall limit myself to a few general comparative observations. For the Jews in the Middle East and Spain , Arabic was the key to an entirely new way of thinking. There, too, Jews abandoned Aramaic for the new language, but Arabic functioned both as the language of high culture and the common tongue of both Jews and Arabs in everyday exchange. It was at the same time linguistically akin to Aramaic and Hebrew, with morphological forms and cognates that facilitated transcribing Arabic into Hebrew letters and reading it—the form of Arabic we call Judeo-Arabic....The Arabic and Islamic “renaissance” laid the groundwork for other Jewish cultural innovations. The Bible was translated into Arabic. Hebrew as a language began to be studied “scientifically,” so to speak, using linguistic tools in vogue among Arab grammarians. But nearly everything Jews wrote they wrote in Arabic, and this was not limited to philosophy, for which Hebrew entirely lacked a vocabulary......The Arabic language gave Jews entrance to the corridors of Muslim power and made possible the remarkable careers of such luminaries as Samuel ha-Nagid ibn Naghrela in the eleventh century, head of the Jewish community, poet, Talmudist, and vizier of Granada (the father of the Jewish vizier assassinated in 1066), as well as scores of other Jewish denizens of Islamic courts, many of whom occupy pages in Islamic chronicles. Other dignitaries, as well as merchants, less well known because they did not leave books behind..."
https://press.princeton.edu/chapters/p10098.pdf