Sunni Man
Diamond Member
The artist of the painting should be thrown in jail. .....The painting is indeed protected free speech.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The artist of the painting should be thrown in jail. .....The painting is indeed protected free speech.
Wonder if we can find an institution of higher learning to hang this artwork in?
And yet, your headling here states the painting "sparks debate", doesn't it.Hillary is holding on to the hero's leg.
Anyway, of course if a conservative wanted to come speak there, they would claim it's hate speech and ban the person from coming.
This painting though is just fine.
Trump severed head painting at UAA sparks debate
ANCHORAGE (KTUU) - Editors note: Some readers may view the image of the painting mentioned in this story as graphic or disturbing. Click here to view the painting.
A painting on display at a University of Alaska Anchorage art gallery, which depicts the severed head of President Donald Trump, is sparking debate about free speech rights and whether the image is appropriate for display, at a public institution.
The artwork, created by Assistant Professor of Painting Thomas Chung, is part of a faculty art exhibition, at the UAA Fine Arts building.
In describing his painting, Chung said, "It's an image of the actor who plays Captain America, and two eagles are sort of screaming into his ears, and he's holding the severed head of Trump, and there's a young Hillary Clinton clinging to his leg. I was reminded of those 80's rock posters, where there's a woman in tattered clothes clinging to a strong male hero's leg."
Chung says the motivation for the painting was his dismay over the results of the presidential election.
Trump severed head painting at UAA sparks debate
Oh, look... another lying rightard. <smh>When are you going to admit I was right and you were wrong about the majority of voters voted against Hillary ?
Still won't man-up ehh ? No surprise.
Hillary received 2.1 percent more votes than the Orange Anus
Your original statement was:
"Fact, most voters voted against Trump"
I then posted:
"Fact, most voters voted against Hillary"
You then went on to say that, I knew that wasn't true.
I then pointed out that it was true, and you never conceded that I was right.
By the way, the majority of Americans rejected Hillary. Fact.
Clinton received 65,844,610 votes, or 48.2% of the total vote.I then pointed out that it was true, and you never conceded that I was right.
Lets cancel both the first amendment and the second....just for giggles...The artist of the painting should be thrown in jail. .....The painting is indeed protected free speech.
The painting is indeed protected free speech.
(1) no, no one "has a right to express their opinion the way the way to express them." That is false. You don't get to shoot up a church because your opinion is different, for example."Had the roles been reversed, and it was Obama's head hanging there, I think the outrage would be fantastic," Berger said. "As a free speech advocate, everyone has a right to express their opinion the way they want to express them. But as a parent and a citizen, there's a discussion. In a university setting, what's appropriate?"
agreed.
Only "Politically Correct" allowed Right Sugar MagnoliaThe painting is indeed protected free speech.
They have the right to paint it they don't have the right to have it displayed this University's funding needs to be cut immediately.
Only "Politically Correct" allowed Right Sugar MagnoliaThe painting is indeed protected free speech.
They have the right to paint it they don't have the right to have it displayed this University's funding needs to be cut immediately.
(1) no, no one "has a right to express their opinion the way the way to express them." That is false. You don't get to shoot up a church because your opinion is different, for example."Had the roles been reversed, and it was Obama's head hanging there, I think the outrage would be fantastic," Berger said. "As a free speech advocate, everyone has a right to express their opinion the way they want to express them. But as a parent and a citizen, there's a discussion. In a university setting, what's appropriate?"
agreed.
(2) in a university, the painting is appropriate
What kind of painting is that? So macabre...Hillary is holding on to the hero's leg.
Anyway, of course if a conservative wanted to come speak there, they would claim it's hate speech and ban the person from coming.
This painting though is just fine.
Trump severed head painting at UAA sparks debate
ANCHORAGE (KTUU) - Editors note: Some readers may view the image of the painting mentioned in this story as graphic or disturbing. Click here to view the painting.
A painting on display at a University of Alaska Anchorage art gallery, which depicts the severed head of President Donald Trump, is sparking debate about free speech rights and whether the image is appropriate for display, at a public institution.
The artwork, created by Assistant Professor of Painting Thomas Chung, is part of a faculty art exhibition, at the UAA Fine Arts building.
In describing his painting, Chung said, "It's an image of the actor who plays Captain America, and two eagles are sort of screaming into his ears, and he's holding the severed head of Trump, and there's a young Hillary Clinton clinging to his leg. I was reminded of those 80's rock posters, where there's a woman in tattered clothes clinging to a strong male hero's leg."
Chung says the motivation for the painting was his dismay over the results of the presidential election.
Trump severed head painting at UAA sparks debate
Hillary is holding on to the hero's leg.
Anyway, of course if a conservative wanted to come speak there, they would claim it's hate speech and ban the person from coming.
This painting though is just fine.
Trump severed head painting at UAA sparks debate
ANCHORAGE (KTUU) - Editors note: Some readers may view the image of the painting mentioned in this story as graphic or disturbing. Click here to view the painting.
A painting on display at a University of Alaska Anchorage art gallery, which depicts the severed head of President Donald Trump, is sparking debate about free speech rights and whether the image is appropriate for display, at a public institution.
The artwork, created by Assistant Professor of Painting Thomas Chung, is part of a faculty art exhibition, at the UAA Fine Arts building.
In describing his painting, Chung said, "It's an image of the actor who plays Captain America, and two eagles are sort of screaming into his ears, and he's holding the severed head of Trump, and there's a young Hillary Clinton clinging to his leg. I was reminded of those 80's rock posters, where there's a woman in tattered clothes clinging to a strong male hero's leg."
Chung says the motivation for the painting was his dismay over the results of the presidential election.
Trump severed head painting at UAA sparks debate
Hillary is holding on to the hero's leg.
Anyway, of course if a conservative wanted to come speak there, they would claim it's hate speech and ban the person from coming.
This painting though is just fine.
Trump severed head painting at UAA sparks debate
ANCHORAGE (KTUU) - Editors note: Some readers may view the image of the painting mentioned in this story as graphic or disturbing. Click here to view the painting.
A painting on display at a University of Alaska Anchorage art gallery, which depicts the severed head of President Donald Trump, is sparking debate about free speech rights and whether the image is appropriate for display, at a public institution.
The artwork, created by Assistant Professor of Painting Thomas Chung, is part of a faculty art exhibition, at the UAA Fine Arts building.
In describing his painting, Chung said, "It's an image of the actor who plays Captain America, and two eagles are sort of screaming into his ears, and he's holding the severed head of Trump, and there's a young Hillary Clinton clinging to his leg. I was reminded of those 80's rock posters, where there's a woman in tattered clothes clinging to a strong male hero's leg."
Chung says the motivation for the painting was his dismay over the results of the presidential election.
Trump severed head painting at UAA sparks debate
.
Hillary hanging onto the guys leg is a bit misogynist.
Stupid kids should have photo shopped Bill Clinton's head onto the guy.
Oh, look... another lying rightard. <smh>When are you going to admit I was right and you were wrong about the majority of voters voted against Hillary ?
Still won't man-up ehh ? No surprise.
Hillary received 2.1 percent more votes than the Orange Anus
Your original statement was:
"Fact, most voters voted against Trump"
I then posted:
"Fact, most voters voted against Hillary"
You then went on to say that, I knew that wasn't true.
I then pointed out that it was true, and you never conceded that I was right.
No, lying rightard, you did not say most voters voted against Hillary, as you falsely quote yourself now. What you actually said was...
... to which TyroneSlothrop accurately pointed out was not true.By the way, the majority of Americans rejected Hillary. Fact.
So why'd you change your quote from what you said then to what you falsely claim it is now?
Clinton received 65,844,610 votes, or 48.2% of the total vote.I then pointed out that it was true, and you never conceded that I was right.
Trump received 62,979,636 votes, or 46.1% of the total vote. (That's a difference of 2.86 million votes.)...not only did Trump lose the popular vote to Clinton by 2.86 million votes an additional 5.7 % voted for someone other than the Orange Anus ....
The remaining 5.7% of the vote went to other candidates, like Gary Johnson, Jill Stein, Evan McMullin, and, I don't know, write-ins for flesh-eating bacteria.
Here you are you silly ass Trump prostitute LOL...I am not conceding you are Right because you are wrong