The viewpoint that AGW is a valid description of the behavior of the Earth's climate is accepted by close to 100% of active climate scientists, by better than 99% of their peer reviewed publications and an extremely large majority of scientists in general. Coverage of your viewpoint is being dropped by mass media outlets like a putrescent hot potato, finally becoming aware that they'd allowed their "fair and impartial" guidelines to give the FlatEarthers a podium they'd never earned. The world may not be evinced to care enough about the threat of global warming, but the number of educated human beings that take your point of view has descended into complete statistical irrelevancy.
No one on this forum comes close to your ability to mangle facts on "consensus" and ignore evidence in front of your face. 99% of peer reviewed publications SAY WHAT? And where the fuck do you get the silly idea that EVERY climate paper is a vote in some random poll??
Sounds like lunatic fringe stuff Bullwinky...
On what do you base your belief that the common cold is caused by a rhinovirus?
On what do you base your belief that the sun operates by the fusion of hydrogen?
On what do you base your belief that the speed of light is the ultimate speed limit?
On what do you base your belief that homo sapiens evolved from more primitive hominids?
On what do you base your belief that Bose-Einstein condensates exist?
On what do you base your belief that the Higgs boson has been detected?