flacaltenn
Diamond Member
No one on this forum comes close to your ability to mangle facts on "consensus" and ignore evidence in front of your face. 99% of peer reviewed publications SAY WHAT? And where the fuck do you get the silly idea that EVERY climate paper is a vote in some random poll??
Sounds like lunatic fringe stuff Bullwinky...
On what do you base your belief that the common cold is caused by a rhinovirus?
On what do you base your belief that the sun operates by the fusion of hydrogen?
On what do you base your belief that the speed of light is the ultimate speed limit?
On what do you base your belief that homo sapiens evolved from more primitive hominids?
On what do you base your belief that Bose-Einstein condensates exist?
On what do you base your belief that the Higgs boson has been detected?
Am I working for you now? Where can I send an invoice.
Probably have documented cause and effect on rhinovirus. Probably also have it's DNA sequenced. The others either are conceptual models and/or are accepted because they are the best plausible explanation. But before you go off uncocked, NONE of those are modeling predictions of future performance that have failed as spectacularly in the short term as AGW models.
And for most of the advanced physics, I wouldn't hold my breath for actual empirical data on Bose-Einstein condensates or Dark Matter.
I don't think predicting temperature falls into the same realm as those esoteric mental exercises that ya got there. In fact -- MOST of those theories are protected by very unknowable nature of their subjects..
The point was simply that you accept these theorems as the explanations for phenomena most likely to be correct due not to your personal experience but due to your knowledge that a consensus exists accepting their accuracy among the experts in the respective pertinent fields. These denier objections to science by consensus - calling it mob rule and the like - are complete bullshit since it is by consensus among the experts that ALL accepted scientific theory is identified.
I do NOT accept due to some consensus of experts. I accept them because they have adequately been explained IN THE OPEN without all the hype and hysteria. And because there is some HUMILITY shown for what the scientists DON'T KNOW.. Get some of that humility.. It'll help sell whatever warmingchangedisruption you're selling this week.
Humility? Bullshit. The listed items are considered settled science because a strong majority of the experts in those fields - based on the exercise of the scientific method, accept them as valid.
You're such a stubborn ass.. Why would mankind be spending $$BILLs on massive colliders to SEE a boson if the "science is settled" on that one? You are good entertainment value. Can you do a boson imitation and disappear?