U.S. walks out as Iranian leader claims American link to 9/11

Gotta love it. Now if we just had some spine in Washington.

It's really great that foreign policy isn't dictated by the masses. Answer me this genius, why didn't your hero Bush bomb Iran during August of 2007 despite the urging of Cheney and other neocons in his circle?
 
Gotta love it. Now if we just had some spine in Washington.

It's really great that foreign policy isn't dictated by the masses. Answer me this genius, why didn't your hero Bush bomb Iran during August of 2007 despite the urging of Cheney and other neocons in his circle?

I haven't a clue. I was not privy to the information presented. Why didn't Carter attack in 79?
 
Gotta love it. Now if we just had some spine in Washington.

It's really great that foreign policy isn't dictated by the masses. Answer me this genius, why didn't your hero Bush bomb Iran during August of 2007 despite the urging of Cheney and other neocons in his circle?

I haven't a clue. I was not privy to the information presented. Why didn't Carter attack in 79?

The reason was that General Mullen's report indicated what the IAEC was saying all aong and Bush listened. Further, the neocons always thought small when it cames to opponents. Iraq, as hard as it was, was still a cakewalk in comparison to what Iran will be.

Now, the reason Obama hasn't got the "spine" to do it is really a msconception because while the foreign policy objective is still to control the Mid East, the real objective is ultimately to play Russia and China against one another via de facto control of mineral wealth in Central Asia. So they're thinking long term not short. That is why there was an Iraq war, and that is why there will eventually be a conflict with Iran. Right now if you look you'll find that the U.S. is effectively encircling Iran, but the short term strategy is containment, not invasion. And that is the vision Zbigniew Brzezinski who has Obama's ear and was the mastermind of defeating the Soviets in Aghanistan. He was also Carter's main foreign policy guru. He weilds incredible power in the OA. He's 100% an imperalist, and through his strategy he's trying to secure domniation of the world so to speak by the British and American empire for the next 100 years.
 
Last edited:
I think it would be really funny if Israel bombed Iran back to the stone ages while "I admit I'm a John" was over here telling us how he is going to destroy them.
 
There's one building that basically imploded by itself like it was taken out by a demolition crew, and that building wasn't hit by a plane. Like one guy said, you either believe the "official" version of 9/11 or you believe the laws of physics. Like with JFK, we'll never know the truth.
 
The Americans did 911. I am sure of this.

Only America is evil enough to do such a crime.

:lol::lol::lol::lol: You will find the Conspiracy Theories to be an ideal forum for your 'ideas'. Go play there and leave the growns ups to talk. There's a good boy.

I think that a case can be made that Ahmadinejad (Iran's President) is attempting to assume the mantle of leadership that once was possessed by Gamal Abdel Nasser who was President of Egypt.

Here is one analysis of Nasser's strategy:

"Nasser was a powerful communicator and a highly dangerous force. To advance his personal ambition, he used his power with fanatical determination to inflame public opinion throughout the Arab world, stoking discontent that had nothing to do with economics and everything to do with the politics of division. His propaganda consisted of non-factual yet powerful messages and lies that got repeated endlessly until the ordinary citizens of Iraq and other Arab countries began to accept them as truth."

The above was excerpted from the book: "Saving Iraq" by Nemir Kirdar (page 51)

The author says it was Nasser inspired revolutionaries that in 1958 overthrew the legitimate government of Iraq and replaced it with a dictatorship that brought Saddam Hussain to power. Perhaps Ahmadinejad (Iran's President) has similar aspirations to topple the current American supported government in Iraq, as Nasser helped to do in 1958?
 
Kind of funny & ironic in my opinion. This current Administration is full of Marxist 'Troofers',so why this staged walk-out? They're in agreement on this one no? Hmm?
 
The Americans did 911. I am sure of this.

Only America is evil enough to do such a crime.

You really are a stupid little retard, ain't ya?

You state that you're sure of this, yet you didn't post any link to ANYWHERE in support of your batshittery.

Since you're not an American, and have made a really STUPID statement, have a neg rep.
 
I'm sure if DA BOOOOOOOSH was still in there,the Socialists/Progressives in this country would be giving this little Hitler several standing ovations for this deranged rant. They will of course lie about this but they know who they are. I saw that kind of awful behavior from Socialists/Progressives on many occasions when DA BOOOOOOOSH was in there. Now their Hopey Changey One is in there so they stage a walk-out. I'm not buying it.
 
As they should have. This weird-beard bastard has NO legitimate purpose to speak to the UN about anything. He and his stolen Government have been in a proxy war against us since the Shah was deposed during the Carter Administration.

That government is one that arms/supports worldwide terrorism.

They should have been gotten rid of a long time ago. And it's still not too late to knock them down a few notches.

A shame that us taking down Iraq has helped them so much.
 

Forum List

Back
Top