sangha
Senior Member
- Jun 1, 2010
- 5,997
- 179
- 48
Please cite your evidence that BP 'caused' the oil to spill... it has yet to be determined at all... because that type of investigation can only properly be conducted with access to everything including the site, failed equipment, systems controlling the equipment, persons involved with the equipment at the time of failure and during the fix action, etc
So your argument is bush should have waited until the WTC finished buring and was carted away before we started figuring out who did it.
If BP is found negligent or criminal in it's actions... go after 'em
More wingnut logic. The govt has to show BP negligent or criminal BEFORE the investigation.
.
... knock yourself out... should BP be involved in the cleanup and responsible for it?? Yep, and have already stated they will be doing so
Not true. BP's liability is capped and the conservatives oppose removing this bit of govt interference in the economy. Conservatives hate when the govt interferes the economy; except when they don't
There is no root cause or reason for the incident...
And without an investigation, you know this....how?
Once again, you have revealed yourself as someone who prefers to make stuff up to avoid having to defend your own ideas.
as all necessary evidence to determine that is not yet available....
And without an investigation, you know this....how?
Once again, you have revealed yourself as someone who prefers to make stuff up to avoid having to defend your own ideas.
The winger's contention of a BP 'perp' or definite cause of the incident is utterly laughable
And without an investigation, you know this....how?
Once again, you have revealed yourself as someone who prefers to make stuff up to avoid having to defend your own ideas.