Tilly
Platinum Member
Yes, I was rather rude to you, and I apologise, but you often come across as arrogant and snide, hence my response. You seem to now be suggesting that only conservatives engage in undesirabl behaviour.Thank you for the article. If things are indeed that sensitized at campuses across the country, perhaps it is being taken too far. I'd like to hear the other side of it, I guess, or have some actual experience on a campus these days before I say yay or nay. But may I remind everyone of the intention of this vile hushing of conservative voices: to prohibit the “insulting, teasing, mocking, degrading or ridiculing another person or group.” Now, based on your posts, I realize that's not something you agree with, Tilly, but a lot of people do try to live by those standards. The issue seems to be students who are ultra-sensitive to words that insult or degrade when no harm was meant, or such ultra sensitivity to an opposing view that it is prohibited when it has no intention to degrade anyone, is just a different stance. Maybe administrators are so anxious to keep their jobs that they are catering to those sensitivities to the point of the ludicrous. Maybe.And more:
...Instead, the politically correct university is a world of land mines, where faculty and students have no idea what innocuous comment might be seen as an offense. In December 2014, the president of Smith College, Kathleen McCartney, sent an email to the student body in the wake of the outcry over two different grand juries failing to indict police officers who killed African-American men. The subject heading read “All Lives Matter” and the email opened with, “As members of the Smith community we are struggling, and we are hurting.” She wrote, “We raise our voices in protest.” She outlined campus actions that would be taken to “heal those in pain” and to “teach, learn and share what we know” and to “work for equity and justice.”
Shortly thereafter, McCartney sent another email. This one was to apologize for the first. What had she done? She explained she had been informed by students “the phrase/hashtag ‘all lives matter’ has been used by some to draw attention away from the focus on institutional violence against black people.” She quoted two students, one of whom said, “The black students at this school deserve to have their specific struggles and pain recognized, not dissolved into the larger student body.” The Daily Hampshire Gazette reported that a Smith sophomore complained that by writing “All Lives Matter,” “It felt like [McCartney] was invalidating the experience of black lives.” Another Smith sophomore told the Gazette, “A lot of my news feed was negative remarks about her as a person.” In her apology email McCartney closed by affirming her commitment to “working as a white ally.”
McCartney clearly was trying to support the students and was sympathetic to their concerns and issues. Despite the best of intentions, she caused grievous offense. The result of a simple mistake was personal condemnation by students. If nefarious motives are imputed in this situation, it’s not hard to extrapolate what would, and does, happen to actual critics who are not obsequiously affirming the illiberal left....
How Liberals Ruined College
.
If so, that is absurd. Regardless, rudeness and derision etc doesn't kill anyone, and to come up with so many measures to literally prevent free speech and to protect delicate little snowflakes form hearing stuff they don't like is both sinister and absurd, and all this in places of learning no less!