Tucker Carlson: US Out of Iraq for Good!

[iceberg]

why? i know full and well any link i give you you're going to discredit, demean and the like. i see no need for me to look up links for you to dismiss. feel free to bring some to the table on your own and "practice what you preach" in this regard.

or keep blithering hate around and pretend other people are the issue and you and only you see things so clearly.

There are no links to look up.

so there are no links on the killed iranian general to show you what he's done in his history to warrant being a "terrorist target".

ok. like i said, no need for me to go look then, is there?

You also noted about what he was up to. Links or dismissed. I provided you links.

someone who's lived around him. i suppose she could be lying also, but hey - why? unless you just don't like what she is saying so she's "biased".

If the people of Iran want changes only they can do that.

and if someone like this is attacking us - we can and will stop it.

all that happened.

 

[iceberg]

why? i know full and well any link i give you you're going to discredit, demean and the like. i see no need for me to look up links for you to dismiss. feel free to bring some to the table on your own and "practice what you preach" in this regard.

or keep blithering hate around and pretend other people are the issue and you and only you see things so clearly.

There are no links to look up.

so there are no links on the killed iranian general to show you what he's done in his history to warrant being a "terrorist target".

ok. like i said, no need for me to go look then, is there?

You also noted about what he was up to. Links or dismissed. I provided you links.

there are no links in this post. i'm not following you or anyone round like a puppy dog so if you posted something earth shattering while talking to someone else, i've missed it.

You said you had never saw me condemn Obama. I provided you where I had......

well god damn - i need to be hanging out on other forums.

actually, since you said you condemned obama also - i let it go. i have no idea if you ever did or not and take you at your word if you say so.

 

[kyzr]

So noted. Please tell me that you are also okay with terrorists having access to nukes.
Since Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism, I can imagine that many of their subsidiary terror groups will also have nukes. That okay too?

We have armed far more terrorists than Iran. People defending their own countries are not terrorists either.

Please answer the Y/N question before bloviating and setting up straw-men.

1. Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Y/N?

I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.

2. We do not arm terrorists who kill innocents and behead people do we?

We armed ISIS. We armed, funded and trained OBL. We assisted Saddam in getting chemical weapons.

3. Al-Qaeda and ISIS are not defending their own countries are they?

Yes they are.

1. Stop running away from answering the simple Y/N question.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Y/N?
I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.
Any of these terrorists for example: Islamic terrorism - Wikipedia

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about arming ISIS. We trained OBL to fight in AFG against the Russians as freedom fighters, not as terrorists. True the CIA helped Saddam get chemical weapons in the war with Iran to maintain equilibrium. The CIA apparently didn't want either side to win.
Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran

3. What countries are ISIS and AQ defending?

Your link lists the Taliban as a terrorist organization. You can like it or not they were the government of Afghanistan. That's the problem. Any group we dislike we label as terrorists. The Taliban was condemned for destroying cultural sites but Trump threatened the same thing. Why shouldnt Iran consider us a terrorist nation?

No you can't consider a group "freedom fighters" when out side and terrorists when they are not. They are doing the same thing I each case, the target just changes.

ISIS is nothing more than the people of the countries we are invading. ISIS is something we created. They aren't going to name themselves something not even understood in their language.

You accused me of not responding to posts, and now you are refusing to answer fair questions. Are you that hypocritical and/or chikin-shit?
LAST FUCKING TIME I'M POSTING THESE:
1. Stop tap-dancing and running away from answering the simple Y/N question. No more stupid "Taliban" dodges or you lose the debate.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Yes/No?

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about the US arming ISIS, otherwise I call bullshit, and you lose.

3. There are thousands of ISIS fighters in prisons that are from 50 countries. ISIS is an international Caliphate of Islamic extremists, not country based "freedom fighters" repelling invaders, thanks for playing.
Nobody Has a Plan for ISIS Fighters Detained by Kurds in Syria
There Is No Plan B for ISIS Prisoners

 

[pknopp]

There are no links to look up.

so there are no links on the killed iranian general to show you what he's done in his history to warrant being a "terrorist target".

ok. like i said, no need for me to go look then, is there?

You also noted about what he was up to. Links or dismissed. I provided you links.

someone who's lived around him. i suppose she could be lying also, but hey - why? unless you just don't like what she is saying so she's "biased".

If the people of Iran want changes only they can do that.

and if someone like this is attacking us - we can and will stop it.

all that happened.

If they ever do that........sorry, trying to drive us out of where we do not belong is not the same thing.

 

[pknopp]

We have armed far more terrorists than Iran. People defending their own countries are not terrorists either.

Please answer the Y/N question before bloviating and setting up straw-men.

1. Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Y/N?

I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.

2. We do not arm terrorists who kill innocents and behead people do we?

We armed ISIS. We armed, funded and trained OBL. We assisted Saddam in getting chemical weapons.

3. Al-Qaeda and ISIS are not defending their own countries are they?

Yes they are.

1. Stop running away from answering the simple Y/N question.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Y/N?
I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.
Any of these terrorists for example: Islamic terrorism - Wikipedia

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about arming ISIS. We trained OBL to fight in AFG against the Russians as freedom fighters, not as terrorists. True the CIA helped Saddam get chemical weapons in the war with Iran to maintain equilibrium. The CIA apparently didn't want either side to win.
Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran

3. What countries are ISIS and AQ defending?

Your link lists the Taliban as a terrorist organization. You can like it or not they were the government of Afghanistan. That's the problem. Any group we dislike we label as terrorists. The Taliban was condemned for destroying cultural sites but Trump threatened the same thing. Why shouldnt Iran consider us a terrorist nation?

No you can't consider a group "freedom fighters" when out side and terrorists when they are not. They are doing the same thing I each case, the target just changes.

ISIS is nothing more than the people of the countries we are invading. ISIS is something we created. They aren't going to name themselves something not even understood in their language.

You accused me of not responding to posts, and now you are refusing to answer fair questions. Are you that hypocritical and/or chikin-shit?
LAST FUCKING TIME I'M POSTING THESE:
1. Stop tap-dancing and running away from answering the simple Y/N question. No more stupid "Taliban" dodges or you lose the debate.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Yes/No?

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about the US arming ISIS, otherwise I call bullshit, and you lose.

3. There are thousands of ISIS fighters in prisons that are from 50 countries. ISIS is an international Caliphate of Islamic extremists, not country based "freedom fighters" repelling invaders, thanks for playing.
Nobody Has a Plan for ISIS Fighters Detained by Kurds in Syria
There Is No Plan B for ISIS Prisoners

Sorry, I have answered your terrorist question. We call Iran a terrorist nation. I have no problem with them being nuclear. It will keep our psychotic war mongers at bay.

Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq | Seumas Milne

The people in ISIS are the same people that we have invaded and killed their friends, wives and children.

 

[Circe]

There were no weapons of mass destruction. We should have left long ago. Now our troops are in harm's way for people who don't appreciate them. TROOPS OUT!

It's what I want, and most people, probably --- especially including the last two presidents.

But considering ISIS promptly took over a huge area of Iraq and Syria the minute Obama pulled troops out, and considering Iran repeatedly has bombed Saudi pipelines just this past year --- there does seem to be a problem. A big problem. Nobody cares about Iraqis, of course: they are just the occupied enemy. But an ISIS takeover and an Iranian takeover -- and war with Israel -- those are big issues, IMO.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

If we can have nukes we have no business telling anyone else they can not. I believe having nukes is a good deterrent to keep our psychotic war mongers at bay so I am good with it.

So noted. Please tell me that you are also okay with terrorists having access to nukes.
Since Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism, I can imagine that many of their subsidiary terror groups will also have nukes. That okay too?

We have armed far more terrorists than Iran. People defending their own countries are not terrorists either.

Please answer the Y/N question before bloviating and setting up straw-men.

1. Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Y/N?

I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.

2. We do not arm terrorists who kill innocents and behead people do we?

We armed ISIS. We armed, funded and trained OBL. We assisted Saddam in getting chemical weapons.

3. Al-Qaeda and ISIS are not defending their own countries are they?

Yes they are.

1. Stop running away from answering the simple Y/N question.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Y/N?
I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.
Any of these terrorists for example: Islamic terrorism - Wikipedia

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about arming ISIS. We trained OBL to fight in AFG against the Russians as freedom fighters, not as terrorists. True the CIA helped Saddam get chemical weapons in the war with Iran to maintain equilibrium. The CIA apparently didn't want either side to win.
Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran

3. What countries are ISIS and AQ defending?

The only country in the history of the world to ever use a nuclear weapon on innocent civilians is the UNITED STATES.....even though we didn't have to, but we wanted to send a message.....


That message was received..thus is why other countries got nukes too....

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

There were no weapons of mass destruction. We should have left long ago. Now our troops are in harm's way for people who don't appreciate them. TROOPS OUT!

It's what I want, and most people, probably --- especially including the last two presidents.

But considering ISIS promptly took over a huge area of Iraq and Syria the minute Obama pulled troops out, and considering Iran repeatedly has bombed Saudi pipelines just this past year --- there does seem to be a problem. A big problem. Nobody cares about Iraqis, of course: they are just the occupied enemy. But an ISIS takeover and an Iranian takeover -- and war with Israel -- those are big issues, IMO.

So let Saudi Arabia defend their own pipelines.....

Besides, we were always told that this isn't about oil....

 

[gipper]

why? i know full and well any link i give you you're going to discredit, demean and the like. i see no need for me to look up links for you to dismiss. feel free to bring some to the table on your own and "practice what you preach" in this regard.

or keep blithering hate around and pretend other people are the issue and you and only you see things so clearly.

There are no links to look up.

so there are no links on the killed iranian general to show you what he's done in his history to warrant being a "terrorist target".

ok. like i said, no need for me to go look then, is there?

You also noted about what he was up to. Links or dismissed. I provided you links.

someone who's lived around him. i suppose she could be lying also, but hey - why? unless you just don't like what she is saying so she's "biased".

Thank YOU. TRUTH!

Truth is lies and lies are truth. You really are a character out of Orwell’s 1984.

 

[YoursTruly]

That speech Trump made yesterday should be enough to convince anyone that he is dangerously incompetent as commander in chief. We should all be questioning his ability to handle threats in a tactically responsible way.

I'm surprised the Trump supporters aren't wondering why Trump's not blowing Iran off the face of the earth right now.
Trump fired first, killing their top general. They fired missiles back. And then suddenly Trump backs down.

If this had happened to Obama, the republicans would've been calling him weak.

 

[iceberg]

Please answer the Y/N question before bloviating and setting up straw-men.

1. Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Y/N?

I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.

2. We do not arm terrorists who kill innocents and behead people do we?

We armed ISIS. We armed, funded and trained OBL. We assisted Saddam in getting chemical weapons.

3. Al-Qaeda and ISIS are not defending their own countries are they?

Yes they are.

1. Stop running away from answering the simple Y/N question.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Y/N?
I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.
Any of these terrorists for example: Islamic terrorism - Wikipedia

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about arming ISIS. We trained OBL to fight in AFG against the Russians as freedom fighters, not as terrorists. True the CIA helped Saddam get chemical weapons in the war with Iran to maintain equilibrium. The CIA apparently didn't want either side to win.
Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran

3. What countries are ISIS and AQ defending?

Your link lists the Taliban as a terrorist organization. You can like it or not they were the government of Afghanistan. That's the problem. Any group we dislike we label as terrorists. The Taliban was condemned for destroying cultural sites but Trump threatened the same thing. Why shouldnt Iran consider us a terrorist nation?

No you can't consider a group "freedom fighters" when out side and terrorists when they are not. They are doing the same thing I each case, the target just changes.

ISIS is nothing more than the people of the countries we are invading. ISIS is something we created. They aren't going to name themselves something not even understood in their language.

You accused me of not responding to posts, and now you are refusing to answer fair questions. Are you that hypocritical and/or chikin-shit?
LAST FUCKING TIME I'M POSTING THESE:
1. Stop tap-dancing and running away from answering the simple Y/N question. No more stupid "Taliban" dodges or you lose the debate.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Yes/No?

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about the US arming ISIS, otherwise I call bullshit, and you lose.

3. There are thousands of ISIS fighters in prisons that are from 50 countries. ISIS is an international Caliphate of Islamic extremists, not country based "freedom fighters" repelling invaders, thanks for playing.
Nobody Has a Plan for ISIS Fighters Detained by Kurds in Syria
There Is No Plan B for ISIS Prisoners

Sorry, I have answered your terrorist question. We call Iran a terrorist nation. I have no problem with them being nuclear. It will keep our psychotic war mongers at bay.

Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq | Seumas Milne

The people in ISIS are the same people that we have invaded and killed their friends, wives and children.

really? when does our leadership scream DEATH TO ALL and say as soon as they can, they will wipe their enemies off the face of the earth?

 

[kyzr]

Please answer the Y/N question before bloviating and setting up straw-men.

1. Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Y/N?

I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.

2. We do not arm terrorists who kill innocents and behead people do we?

We armed ISIS. We armed, funded and trained OBL. We assisted Saddam in getting chemical weapons.

3. Al-Qaeda and ISIS are not defending their own countries are they?

Yes they are.

1. Stop running away from answering the simple Y/N question.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Y/N?
I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.
Any of these terrorists for example: Islamic terrorism - Wikipedia

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about arming ISIS. We trained OBL to fight in AFG against the Russians as freedom fighters, not as terrorists. True the CIA helped Saddam get chemical weapons in the war with Iran to maintain equilibrium. The CIA apparently didn't want either side to win.
Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran

3. What countries are ISIS and AQ defending?

Your link lists the Taliban as a terrorist organization. You can like it or not they were the government of Afghanistan. That's the problem. Any group we dislike we label as terrorists. The Taliban was condemned for destroying cultural sites but Trump threatened the same thing. Why shouldnt Iran consider us a terrorist nation?

No you can't consider a group "freedom fighters" when out side and terrorists when they are not. They are doing the same thing I each case, the target just changes.

ISIS is nothing more than the people of the countries we are invading. ISIS is something we created. They aren't going to name themselves something not even understood in their language.

You accused me of not responding to posts, and now you are refusing to answer fair questions. Are you that hypocritical and/or chikin-shit?
LAST FUCKING TIME I'M POSTING THESE:
1. Stop tap-dancing and running away from answering the simple Y/N question. No more stupid "Taliban" dodges or you lose the debate.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Yes/No?

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about the US arming ISIS, otherwise I call bullshit, and you lose.

3. There are thousands of ISIS fighters in prisons that are from 50 countries. ISIS is an international Caliphate of Islamic extremists, not country based "freedom fighters" repelling invaders, thanks for playing.
Nobody Has a Plan for ISIS Fighters Detained by Kurds in Syria
There Is No Plan B for ISIS Prisoners

Sorry, I have answered your terrorist question. We call Iran a terrorist nation. I have no problem with them being nuclear. It will keep our psychotic war mongers at bay.

Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq | Seumas Milne

The people in ISIS are the same people that we have invaded and killed their friends, wives and children.

1. You chikin-shit, refuse to answer the simple "terrorist group" question with a YES or a NO, so thanks for playing. We're done.

2. Copied from your link. Says that the BRITISH, not the US, armed ISIS to oppose Assad. Lying chikin-shit.
"On Monday the trial in London of a Swedish man, Bherlin Gildo, accused of terrorism in Syria, collapsed after it became clear British intelligence had been arming the same rebel groups the defendant was charged with supporting.
The prosecution abandoned the case, apparently to avoid embarrassing the intelligence services. The defence argued that going ahead with the trial would have been an “affront to justice” when there was plenty of evidence the British state was itself providing “extensive support” to the armed Syrian opposition."

3. Lying again, ISIS has NOTHING to do with repelling "invaders" Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant - Wikipedia
"ISIS is a terrorist militant group and a former unrecognised proto-state[88] that follows a fundamentalist, Salafi jihadist doctrine of Sunni Islam.[89][90] ISIL gained global prominence in early 2014 when it drove Iraqi government forces out of key cities in its Western Iraq offensive,[91] followed by its capture of Mosul[92] and the Sinjar massacre.[93]

 

[iceberg]

That speech Trump made yesterday should be enough to convince anyone that he is dangerously incompetent as commander in chief. We should all be questioning his ability to handle threats in a tactically responsible way.

I'm surprised the Trump supporters aren't wondering why Trump's not blowing Iran off the face of the earth right now.
Trump fired first, killing their top general. They fired missiles back. And then suddenly Trump backs down.

If this had happened to Obama, the republicans would've been calling him weak.

you missed quite a bit but that's fine. you're here to pin this on trump, so have fun being an idiot.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

That speech Trump made yesterday should be enough to convince anyone that he is dangerously incompetent as commander in chief. We should all be questioning his ability to handle threats in a tactically responsible way.

I'm surprised the Trump supporters aren't wondering why Trump's not blowing Iran off the face of the earth right now.
Trump fired first, killing their top general. They fired missiles back. And then suddenly Trump backs down.

If this had happened to Obama, the republicans would've been calling him weak.

You lie or are stupid. Which is it?

Iran fired first, firing rockets into a base in northern Iraq that killed a contractor and wounded American troops. Did you conveniently forget that or intentionally ignore it?

 

[Circe]

Besides, we were always told that this isn't about oil....

Wait ---- and you believed it??

(Just kidding.)

 

[Circe]

That speech Trump made yesterday should be enough to convince anyone that he is dangerously incompetent as commander in chief. We should all be questioning his ability to handle threats in a tactically responsible way.

I'm surprised the Trump supporters aren't wondering why Trump's not blowing Iran off the face of the earth right now.
Trump fired first, killing their top general. They fired missiles back. And then suddenly Trump backs down.

If this had happened to Obama, the republicans would've been calling him weak.

Well, there are some mitigating circumstances......

56 Iranians died and hundreds were injured stampeding themselves like these types always do in their big milling mobs. Pakistanis always stampede and now Iran has started.

The news this morning is that Iran SHOT DOWN that Ukrainian jet that unfortunately took off at the same time they decided to shell our base in Iraq, presumably by mistake, but there were dozens of Canadians on that plane apparently (no idea why) and a whole lot of Iranians. So they've killed a LOT of their own, none of ours. Maybe they get some points for that ------------------------------- I'm so confused.

Also, this was a demonstration of capacity: they now can do pinpoint bombing. They actually proved that earlier when they shelled a Saudi pipeline last summer, but nobody noticed (except our military, I bet they noticed) -- because Americans don't notice things that happen outside the borders of our country or unless a lot of Americans are involved. Now they've finally got our attention. We need to think about things now that we see they can do pinpoint targeting. Consider the implications of that, the potential. Don't forget our Navy carriers.

 

[pknopp]

I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.



We armed ISIS. We armed, funded and trained OBL. We assisted Saddam in getting chemical weapons.

Yes they are.

1. Stop running away from answering the simple Y/N question.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Y/N?
I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.
Any of these terrorists for example: Islamic terrorism - Wikipedia

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about arming ISIS. We trained OBL to fight in AFG against the Russians as freedom fighters, not as terrorists. True the CIA helped Saddam get chemical weapons in the war with Iran to maintain equilibrium. The CIA apparently didn't want either side to win.
Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran

3. What countries are ISIS and AQ defending?

Your link lists the Taliban as a terrorist organization. You can like it or not they were the government of Afghanistan. That's the problem. Any group we dislike we label as terrorists. The Taliban was condemned for destroying cultural sites but Trump threatened the same thing. Why shouldnt Iran consider us a terrorist nation?

No you can't consider a group "freedom fighters" when out side and terrorists when they are not. They are doing the same thing I each case, the target just changes.

ISIS is nothing more than the people of the countries we are invading. ISIS is something we created. They aren't going to name themselves something not even understood in their language.

You accused me of not responding to posts, and now you are refusing to answer fair questions. Are you that hypocritical and/or chikin-shit?
LAST FUCKING TIME I'M POSTING THESE:
1. Stop tap-dancing and running away from answering the simple Y/N question. No more stupid "Taliban" dodges or you lose the debate.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Yes/No?

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about the US arming ISIS, otherwise I call bullshit, and you lose.

3. There are thousands of ISIS fighters in prisons that are from 50 countries. ISIS is an international Caliphate of Islamic extremists, not country based "freedom fighters" repelling invaders, thanks for playing.
Nobody Has a Plan for ISIS Fighters Detained by Kurds in Syria
There Is No Plan B for ISIS Prisoners

Sorry, I have answered your terrorist question. We call Iran a terrorist nation. I have no problem with them being nuclear. It will keep our psychotic war mongers at bay.

Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq | Seumas Milne

The people in ISIS are the same people that we have invaded and killed their friends, wives and children.

really? when does our leadership scream DEATH TO ALL and say as soon as they can, they will wipe their enemies off the face of the earth?

We are saying that every time we threaten them.

 

[pknopp]

I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.



We armed ISIS. We armed, funded and trained OBL. We assisted Saddam in getting chemical weapons.

Yes they are.

1. Stop running away from answering the simple Y/N question.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Y/N?
I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.
Any of these terrorists for example: Islamic terrorism - Wikipedia

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about arming ISIS. We trained OBL to fight in AFG against the Russians as freedom fighters, not as terrorists. True the CIA helped Saddam get chemical weapons in the war with Iran to maintain equilibrium. The CIA apparently didn't want either side to win.
Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran

3. What countries are ISIS and AQ defending?

Your link lists the Taliban as a terrorist organization. You can like it or not they were the government of Afghanistan. That's the problem. Any group we dislike we label as terrorists. The Taliban was condemned for destroying cultural sites but Trump threatened the same thing. Why shouldnt Iran consider us a terrorist nation?

No you can't consider a group "freedom fighters" when out side and terrorists when they are not. They are doing the same thing I each case, the target just changes.

ISIS is nothing more than the people of the countries we are invading. ISIS is something we created. They aren't going to name themselves something not even understood in their language.

You accused me of not responding to posts, and now you are refusing to answer fair questions. Are you that hypocritical and/or chikin-shit?
LAST FUCKING TIME I'M POSTING THESE:
1. Stop tap-dancing and running away from answering the simple Y/N question. No more stupid "Taliban" dodges or you lose the debate.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Yes/No?

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about the US arming ISIS, otherwise I call bullshit, and you lose.

3. There are thousands of ISIS fighters in prisons that are from 50 countries. ISIS is an international Caliphate of Islamic extremists, not country based "freedom fighters" repelling invaders, thanks for playing.
Nobody Has a Plan for ISIS Fighters Detained by Kurds in Syria
There Is No Plan B for ISIS Prisoners

Sorry, I have answered your terrorist question. We call Iran a terrorist nation. I have no problem with them being nuclear. It will keep our psychotic war mongers at bay.

Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq | Seumas Milne

The people in ISIS are the same people that we have invaded and killed their friends, wives and children.

1. You chikin-shit, refuse to answer the simple "terrorist group" question with a YES or a NO, so thanks for playing. We're done.

2. Copied from your link. Says that the BRITISH, not the US, armed ISIS to oppose Assad. Lying chikin-shit.
"On Monday the trial in London of a Swedish man, Bherlin Gildo, accused of terrorism in Syria, collapsed after it became clear British intelligence had been arming the same rebel groups the defendant was charged with supporting.
The prosecution abandoned the case, apparently to avoid embarrassing the intelligence services. The defence argued that going ahead with the trial would have been an “affront to justice” when there was plenty of evidence the British state was itself providing “extensive support” to the armed Syrian opposition."

3. Lying again, ISIS has NOTHING to do with repelling "invaders" Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant - Wikipedia
"ISIS is a terrorist militant group and a former unrecognised proto-state[88] that follows a fundamentalist, Salafi jihadist doctrine of Sunni Islam.[89][90] ISIL gained global prominence in early 2014 when it drove Iraqi government forces out of key cities in its Western Iraq offensive,[91] followed by its capture of Mosul[92] and the Sinjar massacre.[93]

Do you consider Iran to be a terrorist nation?

As I said, I have NO problem with them becoming nuclear.

I can't answer any further as we do not agree with who are terrorists and who are not. If you want a more specific answer you need and ask a more specific question.

 

[iceberg]

1. Stop running away from answering the simple Y/N question.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Y/N?
I Need to know who you are defining as terrorists.
Any of these terrorists for example: Islamic terrorism - Wikipedia

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about arming ISIS. We trained OBL to fight in AFG against the Russians as freedom fighters, not as terrorists. True the CIA helped Saddam get chemical weapons in the war with Iran to maintain equilibrium. The CIA apparently didn't want either side to win.
Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran

3. What countries are ISIS and AQ defending?

Your link lists the Taliban as a terrorist organization. You can like it or not they were the government of Afghanistan. That's the problem. Any group we dislike we label as terrorists. The Taliban was condemned for destroying cultural sites but Trump threatened the same thing. Why shouldnt Iran consider us a terrorist nation?

No you can't consider a group "freedom fighters" when out side and terrorists when they are not. They are doing the same thing I each case, the target just changes.

ISIS is nothing more than the people of the countries we are invading. ISIS is something we created. They aren't going to name themselves something not even understood in their language.

You accused me of not responding to posts, and now you are refusing to answer fair questions. Are you that hypocritical and/or chikin-shit?
LAST FUCKING TIME I'M POSTING THESE:
1. Stop tap-dancing and running away from answering the simple Y/N question. No more stupid "Taliban" dodges or you lose the debate.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Yes/No?

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about the US arming ISIS, otherwise I call bullshit, and you lose.

3. There are thousands of ISIS fighters in prisons that are from 50 countries. ISIS is an international Caliphate of Islamic extremists, not country based "freedom fighters" repelling invaders, thanks for playing.
Nobody Has a Plan for ISIS Fighters Detained by Kurds in Syria
There Is No Plan B for ISIS Prisoners

Sorry, I have answered your terrorist question. We call Iran a terrorist nation. I have no problem with them being nuclear. It will keep our psychotic war mongers at bay.

Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq | Seumas Milne

The people in ISIS are the same people that we have invaded and killed their friends, wives and children.

really? when does our leadership scream DEATH TO ALL and say as soon as they can, they will wipe their enemies off the face of the earth?

We are saying that every time we threaten them.

please show me a video of trump, obama, bush, clinton - any of our leaders - advocating DEATH TO THE INFIDELS.

your hidden implications you're choosing to find and assign to doesn't count. i can find where they've said they will - for example - blow up israel as soon as they can.

so when you can show me our leadership saying as soon as they can, they're making iraq a glass parking lot - you have a comparison. if you can't do that, you're stretching things for your own views.

 

[pknopp]

Your link lists the Taliban as a terrorist organization. You can like it or not they were the government of Afghanistan. That's the problem. Any group we dislike we label as terrorists. The Taliban was condemned for destroying cultural sites but Trump threatened the same thing. Why shouldnt Iran consider us a terrorist nation?

No you can't consider a group "freedom fighters" when out side and terrorists when they are not. They are doing the same thing I each case, the target just changes.

ISIS is nothing more than the people of the countries we are invading. ISIS is something we created. They aren't going to name themselves something not even understood in their language.

You accused me of not responding to posts, and now you are refusing to answer fair questions. Are you that hypocritical and/or chikin-shit?
LAST FUCKING TIME I'M POSTING THESE:
1. Stop tap-dancing and running away from answering the simple Y/N question. No more stupid "Taliban" dodges or you lose the debate.
Are you okay with terrorist groups having nuclear weapons, Yes/No?

2. Please provide credible links to prove your assertion about the US arming ISIS, otherwise I call bullshit, and you lose.

3. There are thousands of ISIS fighters in prisons that are from 50 countries. ISIS is an international Caliphate of Islamic extremists, not country based "freedom fighters" repelling invaders, thanks for playing.
Nobody Has a Plan for ISIS Fighters Detained by Kurds in Syria
There Is No Plan B for ISIS Prisoners

Sorry, I have answered your terrorist question. We call Iran a terrorist nation. I have no problem with them being nuclear. It will keep our psychotic war mongers at bay.

Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq | Seumas Milne

The people in ISIS are the same people that we have invaded and killed their friends, wives and children.

really? when does our leadership scream DEATH TO ALL and say as soon as they can, they will wipe their enemies off the face of the earth?

We are saying that every time we threaten them.

please show me a video of trump, obama, bush, clinton - any of our leaders - advocating DEATH TO THE INFIDELS.

You sound like a 7 year old......"they are calling me names". No one has threatened us more than N. Korea. So what?

hidden implications you're choosing to find and assign to doesn't count. i can find where they've said they will - for example - blow up israel as soon as they can.

so when you can show me our leadership saying as soon as they can, they're making iraq a glass parking lot - you have a comparison. if you can't do that, you're stretching things for your own views.

I'm good with them threatening them with words. It's the bombs I have a problem with.