truth movement dead

[daws101]

RKOwens4's Channel - YouTube

 

[eots]

RKOwens4's Channel - YouTube

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1LetB0z8_o]WTC 7 Foreknowledge - YouTube[/ame]

 

[eots]

 

[daws101]

RKOwens4's Channel - YouTube

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1LetB0z8_o]WTC 7 Foreknowledge - YouTube[/ame]

two major piles of shit!!!

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Bad Ass Skyscraper Fires and Destruction!! Awesome!! - YouTube

agent dogshit ignores facts like the trade center emitted black smoke which means it was oxygen starved,hardly hot enough to melt steel.and the steel did melt.many witnesses reported seeing pools of molten steel for MONTHS they could not put out. this video shows dawgshit can only fling shit in defeat like the monkey troll he is the fact that it was lit up like a torch and burned for HOURS but did not collapse.dawgshit also ignores that jet fuel only burns at 1800. where steel doesnt melt till it reachs temps of 2800.and that many buildings next door much closer to it than bld 7 were damaged far more extensively as these pics prove yet they did not collapse like bld 7 did.

 

[daws101]

Bad Ass Skyscraper Fires and Destruction!! Awesome!! - YouTube

again eots can't tell the difference between a burning hotel with fire crews fighting the fire and wtc1,2 & 7 which did not.

 

[daws101]

Bad Ass Skyscraper Fires and Destruction!! Awesome!! - YouTube

agent dogshit ignores facts like the trade center emitted black smoke which means it was oxygen starved,hardly hot enough to melt steel.and the steel did melt.many witnesses reported seeing pools of molten steel for MONTHS they could not put out. this video shows dawgshit can only fling shit in defeat like the monkey troll he is the fact that it was lit up like a torch and burned for HOURS but did not collapse.dawgshit also ignores that jet fuel only burns at 1800. where steel doesnt melt till it reachs temps of 2800.and that many buildings next door much closer to it than bld 7 were damaged far more extensively as these pics prove yet they did not collapse like bld 7 did.

The story...

Black smoke in photos of the WTC fires showed they were oxygen-starved and could have been controlled.

Our take...

There is no absolute rule of “black smoke = an oxygen-starved fire”. It’s not as simple as that. You need to consider the materials that are burning, for instance.

Large fires involving plastics produce copious quantities of black smoke..
http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/hsl_pdf/2004/hsl0414.pdf

Experienced fire investigator John J Lentini doesn’t appear to believe you can tell much from smoke colour:

While it is true that flammable liquids produce black smoke, so does any petroleum-based product. The color of the initial flame and smoke might have been important in the 1940s and 1950s when our furniture was made of cotton and wood, but most furniture today is made of nylon, polyester, and polyurethane. Even wood fires, deprived of oxygen, will produce black smoke. According to NFPA 921, Paragraph 3.6:

“Smoke color is not necessarily an indicator of what is burning. While wood smoke from a well ventilated or fuel controlled wood fire is light colored or gray, the same fuel under low-oxygen conditions, or ventilation-controlled conditions in a post-flashover fire can be quite dark or black. Black smoke can also be produced by the burning of other materials including most plastics or ignitable liquids.”

Light smoke may indicate that there are no petroleum products burning. Black smoke
indicates nothing meaningful.
Applied Technical Services : 404 - File not found

And as you can see from other photos, a simplistic “black smoke = oxygen starved” interpretation is a little simplistic.


Black Smoke

 

[LA RAM FAN]

two farts in a row dagshit.congrats.

 

[daws101]

two farts in a row dagshit.congrats.

 

[eots]

bad ass skyscraper fires and destruction!! Awesome!! - youtube

again eots can't tell the difference between a burning hotel with fire crews fighting the fire and wtc1,2 & 7 which did not.

1 and 2 had fire fighting crews and they made it to the impact area...wtc 7 had sprinkler systems operating on several floors clearly there where no firefighters inside the the buildings featured in the video posted and the superficial efforts of videos spraying water on them as the where fully engaged was essentially useless and the buildings fires in fact simply burned themselves out after many, many hours

 

[eots]

This in fact is just what one would logically expect to see occur with the other three buildings in question..especially wtc 7

 

[daws101]

This in fact is just what one would logically expect to see occur with the other three buildings in question..especially wtc 7

bullshit on all three counts .
wtc7 the fires burned many hours longer than then the amount water the roof tanks were designed hold..FAIL
WTC1&2 NO WATER WAS PUT ON EITHER FIRE, BOTH WERE STILL BURNING WHEN THEY COLLAPSED...FAIL

logically......ONLY USE WORDS THAT YOU KNOW...

BTW what you're attempting is called a false comparison...
other points you ignored about the difference between the wtc's and the hotel
1. the hotel was not damaged by aircraft impacts.
2.the hotel was not damaged by a near by collapsing 1000ft tower.
3.the hotel did not burn for 8 hours
4.the hotel was unfinshed.....much less fuel to burn.
taken together these facts are irefutable proof that your false comparison, is based on a false premise .
so blow me!

 

[LA RAM FAN]

bad ass skyscraper fires and destruction!! Awesome!! - youtube

again eots can't tell the difference between a burning hotel with fire crews fighting the fire and wtc1,2 & 7 which did not.

1 and 2 had fire fighting crews and they made it to the impact area...wtc 7 had sprinkler systems operating on several floors clearly there where no firefighters inside the the buildings featured in the video posted and the superficial efforts of videos spraying water on them as the where fully engaged was essentially useless and the buildings fires in fact simply burned themselves out after many, many hours

as usual,dawgshit gets his ass owned by Eots. theres really no point in arguing with dawgshit.neither him or any of the trolls have ever been able to debunk barry jennings testimony,the smoking gun of 9/11.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Bad Ass Skyscraper Fires and Destruction!! Awesome!! - YouTube

agent dogshit ignores facts like the trade center emitted black smoke which means it was oxygen starved,hardly hot enough to melt steel.and the steel did melt.many witnesses reported seeing pools of molten steel for MONTHS they could not put out. this video shows dawgshit can only fling shit in defeat like the monkey troll he is the fact that it was lit up like a torch and burned for HOURS but did not collapse.dawgshit also ignores that jet fuel only burns at 1800. where steel doesnt melt till it reachs temps of 2800.and that many buildings next door much closer to it than bld 7 were damaged far more extensively as these pics prove yet they did not collapse like bld 7 did.

Hey everybody, look at this oxygen starved fire in open air...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV1jhYRT1qA]Schianto jet a Bever (GR) 19.12.2010 - YouTube[/ame]

OK, how about this one...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTFq4kYVliE]Large Tire Fire Seen From Illinois At 22nd And Missouri In Gary Indiana - YouTube[/ame]

Or this one...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUEhNKBi4DY]B-52 Crash at Fairchild Air Force Base - YouTube[/ame]

 

[daws101]

again eots can't tell the difference between a burning hotel with fire crews fighting the fire and wtc1,2 & 7 which did not.

1 and 2 had fire fighting crews and they made it to the impact area...wtc 7 had sprinkler systems operating on several floors clearly there where no firefighters inside the the buildings featured in the video posted and the superficial efforts of videos spraying water on them as the where fully engaged was essentially useless and the buildings fires in fact simply burned themselves out after many, many hours

as usual,dawgshit gets his ass owned by Eots. theres really no point in arguing with dawgshit.neither him or any of the trolls have ever been able to debunk barry jennings testimony,the smoking gun of 9/11.

"First, you're lying and misrepresenting Jennings' story. It's a FACT that Jennings DENOUNCED THE 9/11 TROOFERS. Jennings made it clear that the 9/11 troof movement took his statements out of context in service of their hidden agenda.

FACT: Jennings never claimed that bombs were in the building. This claim is a fabrication put forth by YOUR LYING "TRUTH" MOVEMENT.

FACT: Barry Jennings claimed that he heard an explosion, but he never attributed the alleged "explosion" to bombs."
Screw Loose Change: Spammers for 9/11 Truth


BARRY DEBUNKED ......HANDJOB CAN'T READ!

 

[Obamerican]

1 and 2 had fire fighting crews and they made it to the impact area...wtc 7 had sprinkler systems operating on several floors clearly there where no firefighters inside the the buildings featured in the video posted and the superficial efforts of videos spraying water on them as the where fully engaged was essentially useless and the buildings fires in fact simply burned themselves out after many, many hours

as usual,dawgshit gets his ass owned by Eots. theres really no point in arguing with dawgshit.neither him or any of the trolls have ever been able to debunk barry jennings testimony,the smoking gun of 9/11.

"First, you're lying and misrepresenting Jennings' story. It's a FACT that Jennings DENOUNCED THE 9/11 TROOFERS. Jennings made it clear that the 9/11 troof movement took his statements out of context in service of their hidden agenda.

FACT: Jennings never claimed that bombs were in the building. This claim is a fabrication put forth by YOUR LYING "TRUTH" MOVEMENT.

FACT: Barry Jennings claimed that he heard an explosion, but he never attributed the alleged "explosion" to bombs."
Screw Loose Change: Spammers for 9/11 Truth


BARRY DEBUNKED ......HANDJOB CAN'T READ!

Rimjob is an illiterate moron.