Trumps Lawyers Issue Legal Response Kicking House Democrats In The Balls

[Jitss617]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

The fact is, most hyper-partisan hacks, who have their head buried in Trump's posterior, would think that Trump's team kicked the "House Democrats In The Balls."
Where as liberal Constitutional scholars, think otherwise.
‘Alternative law:’ Constitutional scholar on the Dershowitz defense of Trump
So, there we have it! Each sides hyper-partisans have their take, but who is Constitutionally right?

Alan is a democrat and won’t vote for trump,, he’s telling all of you democrats you have TDS.. get help

My post is basically none partisan. But you are such a goose-stepping Little Trumpster, you think anyone who is not a Trunk butt-sniffer is a Democrat. Have you checked Trumpster's poll numbers with Independents & moderates?
My post takes neither side on who's approach is correct.
But your post clearly shows who really has "TDS".

de·range·ment
(dĕ-rānj'mĕnt)
1. A disturbance of the regular order or arrangement.
2. Older term for a mental disturbance or disorder.
derangement
You are highly obsessed with Trumpism, as demonstrated with your multiple posts in such a short period of time. If I am on here for fifteen years total,, I still won't reach your total post numbers for one year total. You are an obsessive, which is a mental health disorder. Fact.

Dude 57% of trump rallies are democrats lol that are switching parties it’s over you are on the fringe

you are in a extremist group called democrats now

 

[daveman]

I must register my disagreement with the thread title, though.

Democrats have no balls.

 

[kiwiman127]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

The fact is, most hyper-partisan hacks, who have their head buried in Trump's posterior, would think that Trump's team kicked the "House Democrats In The Balls."
Where as liberal Constitutional scholars, think otherwise.
‘Alternative law:’ Constitutional scholar on the Dershowitz defense of Trump
So, there we have it! Each sides hyper-partisans have their take, but who is Constitutionally right?

Alan is a democrat and won’t vote for trump,, he’s telling all of you democrats you have TDS.. get help

My post is basically none partisan. But you are such a goose-stepping Little Trumpster, you think anyone who is not a Trunk butt-sniffer is a Democrat. Have you checked Trumpster's poll numbers with Independents & moderates?
My post takes neither side on who's approach is correct.
But your post clearly shows who really has "TDS".

de·range·ment
(dĕ-rānj'mĕnt)
1. A disturbance of the regular order or arrangement.
2. Older term for a mental disturbance or disorder.
derangement
You are highly obsessed with Trumpism, as demonstrated with your multiple posts in such a short period of time. If I am on here for fifteen years total,, I still won't reach your total post numbers for one year total. You are an obsessive, which is a mental health disorder. Fact.

Democrats always exhibit one form or another of various derangements and mentall illnesses when a republican president is in office, but it's never been so severe as it is now with Trump.

It goes both ways. The complete obsession with Little Trumpsters is pretty concerning to the point that psychologists are comparing such loyalty to cultism.

 

[Jitss617]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

The fact is, most hyper-partisan hacks, who have their head buried in Trump's posterior, would think that Trump's team kicked the "House Democrats In The Balls."
Where as liberal Constitutional scholars, think otherwise.
‘Alternative law:’ Constitutional scholar on the Dershowitz defense of Trump
So, there we have it! Each sides hyper-partisans have their take, but who is Constitutionally right?

Alan is a democrat and won’t vote for trump,, he’s telling all of you democrats you have TDS.. get help

My post is basically none partisan. But you are such a goose-stepping Little Trumpster, you think anyone who is not a Trunk butt-sniffer is a Democrat. Have you checked Trumpster's poll numbers with Independents & moderates?
My post takes neither side on who's approach is correct.
But your post clearly shows who really has "TDS".

de·range·ment
(dĕ-rānj'mĕnt)
1. A disturbance of the regular order or arrangement.
2. Older term for a mental disturbance or disorder.
derangement
You are highly obsessed with Trumpism, as demonstrated with your multiple posts in such a short period of time. If I am on here for fifteen years total,, I still won't reach your total post numbers for one year total. You are an obsessive, which is a mental health disorder. Fact.

Democrats always exhibit one form or another of various derangements and mentall illnesses when a republican president is in office, but it's never been so severe as it is now with Trump.

It goes both ways. The complete obsession with Little Trumpsters is pretty concerning to the point that psychologists are comparing such loyalty to cultism.

You have extremist views

 

[Obiwan]

I must register my disagreement with the thread title, though.

Democrats have no balls.

Correction: Their women do (because they're actually "chicks with dicks")...

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

It's a childish, and ridiculous statement and defense, written for kindergarteners imo.

Geez, I hope he has a better defense than that......??

Of course it is, deary. Maybe you can point out specifically what you disagree with. Take your time. I know crayon is a hard medium to work in.

 

[mudwhistle]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

The fact is, most hyper-partisan hacks, who have their head buried in Trump's posterior, would think that Trump's team kicked the "House Democrats In The Balls."
Where as liberal Constitutional scholars, think otherwise.
‘Alternative law:’ Constitutional scholar on the Dershowitz defense of Trump
So, there we have it! Each sides hyper-partisans have their take, but who is Constitutionally right?

Alan is a democrat and won’t vote for trump,, he’s telling all of you democrats you have TDS.. get help

My post is basically none partisan. But you are such a goose-stepping Little Trumpster, you think anyone who is not a Trunk butt-sniffer is a Democrat. Have you checked Trumpster's poll numbers with Independents & moderates?
My post takes neither side on who's approach is correct.
But your post clearly shows who really has "TDS".

de·range·ment
(dĕ-rānj'mĕnt)
1. A disturbance of the regular order or arrangement.
2. Older term for a mental disturbance or disorder.
derangement
You are highly obsessed with Trumpism, as demonstrated with your multiple posts in such a short period of time. If I am on here for fifteen years total,, I still won't reach your total post numbers for one year total. You are an obsessive, which is a mental health disorder. Fact.

Democrats always exhibit one form or another of various derangements and mentall illnesses when a republican president is in office, but it's never been so severe as it is now with Trump.

It goes both ways. The complete obsession with Little Trumpsters is pretty concerning to the point that psychologists are comparing such loyalty to cultism.

I don't think it's an obsession.....more like common-sense.
It's clear that when the Democrat Party supports a country like Iran...and they're flooding the country with illegals....and they're trying to take away our rights to own a gun....the only sane thing to do is support who they oppose.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

The whole issue will come down to votes. I doubt republicans are likely to pay attention to democrat talking points, since they cite no crimes or impeachable offenses.

And I know for damned sure no democrats will jump ship. They have no scruples or ethics. "By any means necessary" is
the Alinskey/Communist code.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

I don't think it's an obsession.....more like common-sense.
It's clear that when the Democrat Party supports a country like Iran...and they're flooding the country with illegals....and they're trying to take away our rights to own a gun....the only sane thing to do is support who they oppose.

You might as well claim the colonists had an "obsession" with the British monarchy and self rule.

A party that is on the verge of being toppled by socialist progressives, that gives aid and comfort to enemies of America, that tries to flood the nation with illegal voters...that party doesn't deserve to exist. Not in this nation, anyway.

 

[mudwhistle]

I don't think it's an obsession.....more like common-sense.
It's clear that when the Democrat Party supports a country like Iran...and they're flooding the country with illegals....and they're trying to take away our rights to own a gun....the only sane thing to do is support who they oppose.

You might as well claim the colonists had an "obsession" with the British monarchy and self rule.

A party that is on the verge of being toppled by socialist progressives, that gives aid and comfort to enemies of America, that tries to flood the nation with illegal voters...that party doesn't deserve to exist. Not in this nation, anyway.

Even worse.....Democrats have become a party of spies who are a worse security risk than your average KGB member.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

It's a childish, and ridiculous statement and defense, written for kindergarteners imo.

Geez, I hope he has a better defense than that......??

And we are all simply STUNNED you feel this way.

 

[Roudy]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

It was wrong when Republicans did it, and since there wasn't even a crime committed, even more wrong now when Democrats are doing it.

So when are you going to officially come out of the closet? You literally begin and end all your responses with "assfuck"?

The Republicans weren't wrong.....but the standards of conduct by presidents have sunk so low since Bill Clinton....it seems like he was a victim.
They had a genuine purpose to impeach him. Removing him from office was possibly another thing entirely.

He was a married man and the president of the US who would obviously lie about having an extra marital affair. I don't think it amounted up to "high crimes".

 

[mudwhistle]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

It was wrong when Republicans did it, and since there wasn't even a crime committed, even more wrong now when Democrats are doing it.

So when are you going to officially come out of the closet? You literally begin and end all your responses with "assfuck"?

The Republicans weren't wrong.....but the standards of conduct by presidents have sunk so low since Bill Clinton....it seems like he was a victim.
They had a genuine purpose to impeach him. Removing him from office was possibly another thing entirely.

He was a married man and the president of the US who would obviously lie about having an extra marital affair. I don't think it amounted up to "high crimes".

Uh....Clinton was impeached for perjury in a sexual-harassment lawsuit.
Not for getting a BJ in the Oval Orifice.

My understanding is Clinton was guilty of worse crimes than perjury and obstruction...but they went after him on what he admitted to.

 

[Roudy]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

The fact is, most hyper-partisan hacks, who have their head buried in Trump's posterior, would think that Trump's team kicked the "House Democrats In The Balls."
Where as liberal Constitutional scholars, think otherwise.
‘Alternative law:’ Constitutional scholar on the Dershowitz defense of Trump
So, there we have it! Each sides hyper-partisans have their take, but who is Constitutionally right?

Alan is a democrat and won’t vote for trump,, he’s telling all of you democrats you have TDS.. get help

My post is basically none partisan. But you are such a goose-stepping Little Trumpster, you think anyone who is not a Trunk butt-sniffer is a Democrat. Have you checked Trumpster's poll numbers with Independents & moderates?
My post takes neither side on who's approach is correct.
But your post clearly shows who really has "TDS".

de·range·ment
(dĕ-rānj'mĕnt)
1. A disturbance of the regular order or arrangement.
2. Older term for a mental disturbance or disorder.
derangement
You are highly obsessed with Trumpism, as demonstrated with your multiple posts in such a short period of time. If I am on here for fifteen years total,, I still won't reach your total post numbers for one year total. You are an obsessive, which is a mental health disorder. Fact.

Democrats always exhibit one form or another of various derangements and mentall illnesses when a republican president is in office, but it's never been so severe as it is now with Trump.

It goes both ways. The complete obsession with Little Trumpsters is pretty concerning to the point that psychologists are comparing such loyalty to cultism.

That's where you're wrong. Trump supporters come from all walks of life and races, and in many liberal cities are hiding in plain sight. Democrats have literally gone over the cliff with their hatred of Trump and obsession for power. Most of them would be diagnosed as clinically insane.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's a childish, and ridiculous statement and defense, written for kindergarteners imo.

Geez, I hope he has a better defense than that......??

Was it above your reading level?

 

[Roudy]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

It was wrong when Republicans did it, and since there wasn't even a crime committed, even more wrong now when Democrats are doing it.

So when are you going to officially come out of the closet? You literally begin and end all your responses with "assfuck"?

The Republicans weren't wrong.....but the standards of conduct by presidents have sunk so low since Bill Clinton....it seems like he was a victim.
They had a genuine purpose to impeach him. Removing him from office was possibly another thing entirely.

He was a married man and the president of the US who would obviously lie about having an extra marital affair. I don't think it amounted up to "high crimes".

Uh....Clinton was impeached for perjury in a sexual-harassment lawsuit.
Not for getting a BJ in the Oval Orifice.

The pervert lied under oath for having sex with an intern old enough to be his daughter. He took his chances, and the republicans made him and the Democrats pay exposing the lie and impeaching him, leading to Bush being elected. Pelosi is trying to implement the same strategy, however with little success so far. If anything it's turned Trump into a victim and underdog in the eyes of the public, and Americans love underdogs.

 

[mudwhistle]

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

It was wrong when Republicans did it, and since there wasn't even a crime committed, even more wrong now when Democrats are doing it.

So when are you going to officially come out of the closet? You literally begin and end all your responses with "assfuck"?

The Republicans weren't wrong.....but the standards of conduct by presidents have sunk so low since Bill Clinton....it seems like he was a victim.
They had a genuine purpose to impeach him. Removing him from office was possibly another thing entirely.

He was a married man and the president of the US who would obviously lie about having an extra marital affair. I don't think it amounted up to "high crimes".

Uh....Clinton was impeached for perjury in a sexual-harassment lawsuit.
Not for getting a BJ in the Oval Orifice.

The pervert lied under oath for having sex with an intern old enough to be his daughter. He took his chances, and the republicans made him and the Democrats pay exposing the lie and impeaching him, leading to Bush being elected. Pelosi is trying to implement the same strategy, however with little success so far. If anything it's turned Trump into a victim and underdog in the eyes of the public, and Americans love underdogs.

I got the feeling that Clinton was up to some really bad shit.
He murdered families in WACO and Ruby Ridge.....he refused to give US forces and my team armored vehicles in Mogadishu which left us open to being shot in the street. All we had was a bit of Aluminum and glass to protect us from being wasted. Every other country had armor. Blackhawk Down and Benghazi is what happens when you don't give a shit about the people you put in harm's way.

 

[RealDave]

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

It was wrong when Republicans did it, and since there wasn't even a crime committed, even more wrong now when Democrats are doing it.

So when are you going to officially come out of the closet? You literally begin and end all your responses with "assfuck"?

The Republicans weren't wrong.....but the standards of conduct by presidents have sunk so low since Bill Clinton....it seems like he was a victim.
They had a genuine purpose to impeach him. Removing him from office was possibly another thing entirely.

He was a married man and the president of the US who would obviously lie about having an extra marital affair. I don't think it amounted up to "high crimes".

Uh....Clinton was impeached for perjury in a sexual-harassment lawsuit.
Not for getting a BJ in the Oval Orifice.

The pervert lied under oath for having sex with an intern old enough to be his daughter. He took his chances, and the republicans made him and the Democrats pay exposing the lie and impeaching him, leading to Bush being elected. Pelosi is trying to implement the same strategy, however with little success so far. If anything it's turned Trump into a victim and underdog in the eyes of the public, and Americans love underdogs.

She was an adult. The Sex was consensual.

Wjt the fuck were you asking questions about Bill Clinton getting head in the oval office?

As for age, Melania, is young enough she could be Trump's daughter. Oh wait, Trump lusts after his own daughter.

Trump is guilty as sin. And assfucks like you don't give a a shit. How pathetic that you trade your country for such a piece of shit like Trump.

 

[Crepitus]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

Lol, did anyone really expect them not to try something like this?

Vitriol doesn't make it right, it just makes it loud.

 

[RealDave]

It was wrong when Republicans did it, and since there wasn't even a crime committed, even more wrong now when Democrats are doing it.

So when are you going to officially come out of the closet? You literally begin and end all your responses with "assfuck"?

The Republicans weren't wrong.....but the standards of conduct by presidents have sunk so low since Bill Clinton....it seems like he was a victim.
They had a genuine purpose to impeach him. Removing him from office was possibly another thing entirely.

He was a married man and the president of the US who would obviously lie about having an extra marital affair. I don't think it amounted up to "high crimes".

Uh....Clinton was impeached for perjury in a sexual-harassment lawsuit.
Not for getting a BJ in the Oval Orifice.

The pervert lied under oath for having sex with an intern old enough to be his daughter. He took his chances, and the republicans made him and the Democrats pay exposing the lie and impeaching him, leading to Bush being elected. Pelosi is trying to implement the same strategy, however with little success so far. If anything it's turned Trump into a victim and underdog in the eyes of the public, and Americans love underdogs.

I got the feeling that Clinton was up to some really bad shit.
He murdered families in WACO and Ruby Ridge.....he refused to give US forces and my team armored vehicles in Mogadishu which left us open to being shot in the street. All we had was a bit of Aluminum and glass to protect us from being wasted. Every other country had armor. Blackhawk Down and Benghazi is what happens when you don't give a shit about the people you put in harm's way.

Oh please, GW Bush sent soldiers into Iraq without any body armor & unarmoued troop carriers.

Ruby Ridge was in 1992 you stupid fuck.
The Solalia action started in 1992
HW Bush was President.