Trump's Jewish mediator condemns Palestinian violence

Of course he should be disqualified. It would be like having a German Nazi as a mediator between the Republicans and Franco Fascists during the Spanish Civil war. LOL

All Arabs should also be disqualified, by this reasoning, as you are conflating nationality with ethnicity. If you equate Israeli to Jewish, then we should also equate Palestinian to Arab.

Alternatively, if you insist upon your ludicrous "Jewish is just a religion" argument then all Muslims should be disqualified, for then you would be conflating nationality with religion.
It is the Israelis who conflate their nationality with being Jewish. Israelis consider their country a Jewish state. Therefore, it stands to reason that a Jew from Israel's one ally in the world, the USA, cannot be trusted to be a fair and balanced mediator.

Did you ever hear of J Street?
No, I do not watch American TV shows.

J Street is a left-leaning Jewish lobby group for Israel, here in America. They are a pro-two-state-solution lobby, and they are often critical of the current Israeli government. Many Jews in America consider them to be traitors. So, would you be in favor of someone from that group being a mediator for the Middle East peace process? Or do you want someone like Tinmore or monte who wants the State of Israel to be destroyed?
 
Of course he should be disqualified. It would be like having a German Nazi as a mediator between the Republicans and Franco Fascists during the Spanish Civil war. LOL

All Arabs should also be disqualified, by this reasoning, as you are conflating nationality with ethnicity. If you equate Israeli to Jewish, then we should also equate Palestinian to Arab.

Alternatively, if you insist upon your ludicrous "Jewish is just a religion" argument then all Muslims should be disqualified, for then you would be conflating nationality with religion.
It is the Israelis who conflate their nationality with being Jewish. Israelis consider their country a Jewish state. Therefore, it stands to reason that a Jew from Israel's one ally in the world, the USA, cannot be trusted to be a fair and balanced mediator.

Did you ever hear of J Street?
Even J Street believes that Israel should be able to keep everything it has stolen.
 
Of course he should be disqualified. It would be like having a German Nazi as a mediator between the Republicans and Franco Fascists during the Spanish Civil war. LOL

All Arabs should also be disqualified, by this reasoning, as you are conflating nationality with ethnicity. If you equate Israeli to Jewish, then we should also equate Palestinian to Arab.

Alternatively, if you insist upon your ludicrous "Jewish is just a religion" argument then all Muslims should be disqualified, for then you would be conflating nationality with religion.
It is the Israelis who conflate their nationality with being Jewish. Israelis consider their country a Jewish state. Therefore, it stands to reason that a Jew from Israel's one ally in the world, the USA, cannot be trusted to be a fair and balanced mediator.

Did you ever hear of J Street?
No, I do not watch American TV shows.

J Street is a left-leaning Jewish lobby group for Israel, here in America. They are a pro-two-state-solution lobby, and they are often critical of the current Israeli government. Many Jews in America consider them to be traitors. So, would you be in favor of someone from that group being a mediator for the Middle East peace process? Or do you want someone like Tinmore or monte who wants the State of Israel to be destroyed?

You are a lying piece of crap. I have always said that given the impossibility of a two-state solution, I support the establishment of a secular state where people of all religions have equal rights. Like any modern Western democracy.
 
Jew Jason Greenblatt who is Donald Trump's Special Representative for International Negotiations working for peace between the Jewish State of Israel and Palestinians condemned the killing of a Jewish "border" policewoman Staff Sgt. Hadas Malka by a Palestinian armed with a knife. Israelis claimed that two other Palestinians were also attacking the police which is why they were shot dead.

Greenblatt will be working with First Son-in-Law Jared Kushner who is also a Jew to act as mediators between Jewish Israelis and Palestinians to bring peace to Israel and the Palestinian Territories. Both Greenblatt and Kushner will be in Israel this week.
US envoy Greenblatt bemoans ‘intolerable’ violence that killed border guard

There is no record of Greenblatt ever condemning any Israeli act of terrorism against Palestinians or the conduct of the sectarian Israeli "border" police.

border%20police_zpsbipqydnj.jpg

Routine humiliation of Palestinian youth at an Israeli "border" police checkpoint in the Occupied Territories



So, you would prefer a peace process without jew involvement?


LOL!!!
 
Jew Jason Greenblatt who is Donald Trump's Special Representative for International Negotiations working for peace between the Jewish State of Israel and Palestinians condemned the killing of a Jewish "border" policewoman Staff Sgt. Hadas Malka by a Palestinian armed with a knife. Israelis claimed that two other Palestinians were also attacking the police which is why they were shot dead.

Greenblatt will be working with First Son-in-Law Jared Kushner who is also a Jew to act as mediators between Jewish Israelis and Palestinians to bring peace to Israel and the Palestinian Territories. Both Greenblatt and Kushner will be in Israel this week.
US envoy Greenblatt bemoans ‘intolerable’ violence that killed border guard

There is no record of Greenblatt ever condemning any Israeli act of terrorism against Palestinians or the conduct of the sectarian Israeli "border" police.

border%20police_zpsbipqydnj.jpg

Routine humiliation of Palestinian youth at an Israeli "border" police checkpoint in the Occupied Territories
Can we predict that Trumps "peace process" will go nowhere?

Yeah, we can put our money on that.


As opposed to all the other sooooo much more successful ones?
 
Jew Jason Greenblatt who is Donald Trump's Special Representative for International Negotiations working for peace between the Jewish State of Israel and Palestinians condemned the killing of a Jewish "border" policewoman Staff Sgt. Hadas Malka by a Palestinian armed with a knife. Israelis claimed that two other Palestinians were also attacking the police which is why they were shot dead.

Greenblatt will be working with First Son-in-Law Jared Kushner who is also a Jew to act as mediators between Jewish Israelis and Palestinians to bring peace to Israel and the Palestinian Territories. Both Greenblatt and Kushner will be in Israel this week.
US envoy Greenblatt bemoans ‘intolerable’ violence that killed border guard

There is no record of Greenblatt ever condemning any Israeli act of terrorism against Palestinians or the conduct of the sectarian Israeli "border" police.

border%20police_zpsbipqydnj.jpg

Routine humiliation of Palestinian youth at an Israeli "border" police checkpoint in the Occupied Territories
Can we predict that Trumps "peace process" will go nowhere?

Yeah, we can put our money on that.


As opposed to all the other sooooo much more successful ones?
So, do you think Trump will bring peace.

I think he will be samo, samo, which means no.
 
Jew Jason Greenblatt who is Donald Trump's Special Representative for International Negotiations working for peace between the Jewish State of Israel and Palestinians condemned the killing of a Jewish "border" policewoman Staff Sgt. Hadas Malka by a Palestinian armed with a knife. Israelis claimed that two other Palestinians were also attacking the police which is why they were shot dead.

Greenblatt will be working with First Son-in-Law Jared Kushner who is also a Jew to act as mediators between Jewish Israelis and Palestinians to bring peace to Israel and the Palestinian Territories. Both Greenblatt and Kushner will be in Israel this week.
US envoy Greenblatt bemoans ‘intolerable’ violence that killed border guard

There is no record of Greenblatt ever condemning any Israeli act of terrorism against Palestinians or the conduct of the sectarian Israeli "border" police.

border%20police_zpsbipqydnj.jpg

Routine humiliation of Palestinian youth at an Israeli "border" police checkpoint in the Occupied Territories
Can we predict that Trumps "peace process" will go nowhere?

Yeah, we can put our money on that.


As opposed to all the other sooooo much more successful ones?
So, do you think Trump will bring peace.

I think he will be samo, samo, which means no.


Nothing I typed in any way suggested that I think that Trump will bring peace.


I don't know what happened to the communication process during the portion of the process that took place between my words on your screen and your mind, but something went very wrong.
 
Of course he should be disqualified. It would be like having a German Nazi as a mediator between the Republicans and Franco Fascists during the Spanish Civil war. LOL

All Arabs should also be disqualified, by this reasoning, as you are conflating nationality with ethnicity. If you equate Israeli to Jewish, then we should also equate Palestinian to Arab.

Alternatively, if you insist upon your ludicrous "Jewish is just a religion" argument then all Muslims should be disqualified, for then you would be conflating nationality with religion.
It is the Israelis who conflate their nationality with being Jewish. Israelis consider their country a Jewish state. Therefore, it stands to reason that a Jew from Israel's one ally in the world, the USA, cannot be trusted to be a fair and balanced mediator.

Did you ever hear of J Street?
No, I do not watch American TV shows.

J Street is a left-leaning Jewish lobby group for Israel, here in America. They are a pro-two-state-solution lobby, and they are often critical of the current Israeli government. Many Jews in America consider them to be traitors. So, would you be in favor of someone from that group being a mediator for the Middle East peace process? Or do you want someone like Tinmore or monte who wants the State of Israel to be destroyed?
No, I believe an American Jewish group would be conflicted between its already stated position and those of the Israeli government. It would be better for Israel to end the occupation/blockade and begin to have friendly relations with its nearest neighbors, the Palestinians. If a mediator is needed, the United Nations could help.
 
All Arabs should also be disqualified, by this reasoning, as you are conflating nationality with ethnicity. If you equate Israeli to Jewish, then we should also equate Palestinian to Arab.

Alternatively, if you insist upon your ludicrous "Jewish is just a religion" argument then all Muslims should be disqualified, for then you would be conflating nationality with religion.
It is the Israelis who conflate their nationality with being Jewish. Israelis consider their country a Jewish state. Therefore, it stands to reason that a Jew from Israel's one ally in the world, the USA, cannot be trusted to be a fair and balanced mediator.

Did you ever hear of J Street?
No, I do not watch American TV shows.

J Street is a left-leaning Jewish lobby group for Israel, here in America. They are a pro-two-state-solution lobby, and they are often critical of the current Israeli government. Many Jews in America consider them to be traitors. So, would you be in favor of someone from that group being a mediator for the Middle East peace process? Or do you want someone like Tinmore or monte who wants the State of Israel to be destroyed?
No, I believe an American Jewish group would be conflicted between its already stated position and those of the Israeli government. It would be better for Israel to end the occupation/blockade and begin to have friendly relations with its nearest neighbors, the Palestinians. If a mediator is needed, the United Nations could help.


The Palestinians want to destroy Israel. Mediation is not going to solve that.
 
It is the Israelis who conflate their nationality with being Jewish. Israelis consider their country a Jewish state. Therefore, it stands to reason that a Jew from Israel's one ally in the world, the USA, cannot be trusted to be a fair and balanced mediator.

Did you ever hear of J Street?
No, I do not watch American TV shows.

J Street is a left-leaning Jewish lobby group for Israel, here in America. They are a pro-two-state-solution lobby, and they are often critical of the current Israeli government. Many Jews in America consider them to be traitors. So, would you be in favor of someone from that group being a mediator for the Middle East peace process? Or do you want someone like Tinmore or monte who wants the State of Israel to be destroyed?
No, I believe an American Jewish group would be conflicted between its already stated position and those of the Israeli government. It would be better for Israel to end the occupation/blockade and begin to have friendly relations with its nearest neighbors, the Palestinians. If a mediator is needed, the United Nations could help.


The Palestinians want to destroy Israel. Mediation is not going to solve that.
Haven't you guys burned out that talking point yet?
 
Did you ever hear of J Street?
No, I do not watch American TV shows.

J Street is a left-leaning Jewish lobby group for Israel, here in America. They are a pro-two-state-solution lobby, and they are often critical of the current Israeli government. Many Jews in America consider them to be traitors. So, would you be in favor of someone from that group being a mediator for the Middle East peace process? Or do you want someone like Tinmore or monte who wants the State of Israel to be destroyed?
No, I believe an American Jewish group would be conflicted between its already stated position and those of the Israeli government. It would be better for Israel to end the occupation/blockade and begin to have friendly relations with its nearest neighbors, the Palestinians. If a mediator is needed, the United Nations could help.


The Palestinians want to destroy Israel. Mediation is not going to solve that.
Haven't you guys burned out that talking point yet?

Ignoring the hostile intent of one of the parties in not a rational act.
 
No, I do not watch American TV shows.

J Street is a left-leaning Jewish lobby group for Israel, here in America. They are a pro-two-state-solution lobby, and they are often critical of the current Israeli government. Many Jews in America consider them to be traitors. So, would you be in favor of someone from that group being a mediator for the Middle East peace process? Or do you want someone like Tinmore or monte who wants the State of Israel to be destroyed?
No, I believe an American Jewish group would be conflicted between its already stated position and those of the Israeli government. It would be better for Israel to end the occupation/blockade and begin to have friendly relations with its nearest neighbors, the Palestinians. If a mediator is needed, the United Nations could help.


The Palestinians want to destroy Israel. Mediation is not going to solve that.
Haven't you guys burned out that talking point yet?

Ignoring the hostile intent of one of the parties in not a rational act.
Zionist colonization is the first hostility.
 
J Street is a left-leaning Jewish lobby group for Israel, here in America. They are a pro-two-state-solution lobby, and they are often critical of the current Israeli government. Many Jews in America consider them to be traitors. So, would you be in favor of someone from that group being a mediator for the Middle East peace process? Or do you want someone like Tinmore or monte who wants the State of Israel to be destroyed?
No, I believe an American Jewish group would be conflicted between its already stated position and those of the Israeli government. It would be better for Israel to end the occupation/blockade and begin to have friendly relations with its nearest neighbors, the Palestinians. If a mediator is needed, the United Nations could help.


The Palestinians want to destroy Israel. Mediation is not going to solve that.
Haven't you guys burned out that talking point yet?

Ignoring the hostile intent of one of the parties in not a rational act.
Zionist colonization is the first hostility.

You call simple act of surviving the Third Reich an act of hositily?

What kind of things you sniff?!
 
Zionist colonization is the first hostility.

The presence of Jewish people on the historical, ancestral, cultural and religious homeland of the Jewish people is not an act of hostility. Neither is the desire for Jewish self-determination and self-government an act of hostility. (Just as neither of those things is an act of hostility when committed by Arabs).

The first act of hostility was the Arab antagonism toward Jewish rights to be present in their homeland and to have self-determination in that homeland.
 
Zionist colonization is the first hostility.

The presence of Jewish people on the historical, ancestral, cultural and religious homeland of the Jewish people is not an act of hostility. Neither is the desire for Jewish self-determination and self-government an act of hostility. (Just as neither of those things is an act of hostility when committed by Arabs).

The first act of hostility was the Arab antagonism toward Jewish rights to be present in their homeland and to have self-determination in that homeland.
It does not work that way. Claiming other people's land for any reason, even a spurious one such as a biblical right, is illegal and those who act on it are trouble-makers.
 
It does not work that way. Claiming other people's land for any reason ... is illegal and those who act on it are trouble-makers.

It doesn't work what way? You have no possible way to win this argument. The Jewish people, without doubt, originated on that land and are an indigenous peoples on that land. To dispute that is just foolish.

Therefore, you have only two choices. Either an indigenous peoples has rights to be present on that homeland and have self-determination on that land, even if they have been, in the past, ethnically cleansed from that land by genocide and forced removal. OR An indigenous peoples, having been, in the past, ethnically cleansed from that land by genocide and forced removal, have lost all rights to that homeland.

Either way, the Jewish people have AT LEAST equal rights to that land -- either as an indigenous peoples (if you go with option 1) or as the latest and most successful invaders/colonizers (if you go with option 2).


Either way, the presence of a people who are indigenous to that land and have had a continuous presence in that land for 3000 years is not an act of hostility.
 
Let me put it another way. You claim "other peoples land" (not Jewish land).

When did it cease to be Jewish land? By what mechanism did it cease to be Jewish land?
 
De facto when the Romans made Judea a client state, de jure when the Romans implemented direct rule and definitively when the native inhabitants converted to Christianity in the 4th century.
 
No, I believe an American Jewish group would be conflicted between its already stated position and those of the Israeli government. It would be better for Israel to end the occupation/blockade and begin to have friendly relations with its nearest neighbors, the Palestinians. If a mediator is needed, the United Nations could help.


The Palestinians want to destroy Israel. Mediation is not going to solve that.
Haven't you guys burned out that talking point yet?

Ignoring the hostile intent of one of the parties in not a rational act.
Zionist colonization is the first hostility.

You call simple act of surviving the Third Reich an act of hositily?

What kind of things you sniff?!
It is when you bounce the Palestinians for what the Nazis did.
 

Forum List

Back
Top