Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, was paid by Russia

[Billo_Really]

True, he is a liar. Trump and the whole lot of them are liars.

And he's parading his family around like they're the Romanoff's.

 

[Billo_Really]

You lefty poor sports, get over it. Americans, not Russians, elected Trump because they didn't want Hillary or more obama or another democrat.
You need to move on dot org.

I have one word for you...

WATERTRUMP!​

 

[Nia88]

Of course Trumpsters are downplaying this. Trump and his goons could all be in jail and you'd all be saying "Its not that big of a deal, so what he committed treason? He's a billionaire and was trying to MAGA. "

 

[rightwinger]

Manafort had deep financial ties with Russia

There is nothing wrong with that. It is legal
But it needed to be disclosed BEFORE he took the job running Trumps campaign

Manaforts actions during the campaign reveal he was not finished with his ties to Russia. Why would he be in contact with Russia during a campaign? Why was the only change to the GOP platform demanded by Team Trump the removal of wording providing military aid to Ukraine?


Looks dirty...especially with leaks coming out immediately after that wording was taken out

Manafort will be charged with not registering as a foreign agent....that will just be the start as more information is coming out

 

[rightwinger]

Does Trump actually VET the people he has working for him?

Not knowing that your Campaign Chairman was on the Russian payroll for $10 million a year?

 

[dannyboys]

2005 really has nothing to do with Trump. It is not against the law to do business with Russia and it certainly wasn't in 2005.

We do business with Russia today. We pay them millions of dollars to take our astronauts to and from the space station.

Facts don't matter to these shills. They think anyone that has ever spoken to a Russian is guilty of "collusion". Unless of course that person was a Democrat.

I once dated a Russian girl, I'm sure that qualifies me as "having ties with Putin".

You people are getting scared.

This 'Russia' bullshit is going to blow up in the DEM's face.
Just about the time President Trump orders investigations into the ties John Posada's brother and the Clintons have/had with Putin over the years.
Should be fun to watch Bill explain how he was personally paid 500K by the Russians for a fifteen minute talk on how he makes beet soup.
This desperate DEM straw clutching is starting to smell like what happened to the LIBs on this forum after the dead horses they wouldn't get off in the 'T-Bone'/Big Mike/ Baltimore cases.
They NEVER miss an opportunity to make fucking fools of themselves.
Their very best performance was screaming about how the "Orange Clown" would NEVER even win the nomination.

 

[rightwinger]

2005 really has nothing to do with Trump. It is not against the law to do business with Russia and it certainly wasn't in 2005.

We do business with Russia today. We pay them millions of dollars to take our astronauts to and from the space station.

Facts don't matter to these shills. They think anyone that has ever spoken to a Russian is guilty of "collusion". Unless of course that person was a Democrat.

I once dated a Russian girl, I'm sure that qualifies me as "having ties with Putin".

You people are getting scared.

This 'Russia' bullshit is going to blow up in the DEM's face.
Just about the time President Trump orders investigations into the ties John Posada's brother and the Clintons have/had with Putin over the years.
Should be fun to watch Bill explain how he was personally paid 500K by the Russians for a fifteen minute talk on how he makes beet soup.
This desperate DEM straw clutching is starting to smell like what happened to the LIBs on this forum after the dead horses they wouldn't get off in the 'T-Bone'/Big Mike/ Baltimore cases.
They NEVER miss an opportunity to make fucking fools of themselves.
Their very best performance was screaming about how the "Orange Clown" would NEVER even win the nomination.

Whistling past a graveyard

 

[theHawk]

Does Trump actually VET the people he has working for him?

Not knowing that your Campaign Chairman was on the Russian payroll for $10 million a year?

Was it illegal to work for a Russian company? Nope.

You can't just fabricate laws in order to claim people broke them.

 

[rightwinger]

Does Trump actually VET the people he has working for him?

Not knowing that your Campaign Chairman was on the Russian payroll for $10 million a year?

Was it illegal to work for a Russian company? Nope.

You can't just fabricate laws in order to claim people broke them.

Know what vetting means? Finding out about their past
If you claim Trump knew and was OK with it........We will bring that up in the future when Trump denies all knowlege

 

[theHawk]

Does Trump actually VET the people he has working for him?

Not knowing that your Campaign Chairman was on the Russian payroll for $10 million a year?

Was it illegal to work for a Russian company? Nope.

You can't just fabricate laws in order to claim people broke them.

Know what vetting means? Finding out about their past
If you claim Trump knew and was OK with it........We will bring that up in the future when Trump denies all knowlege

What does he need to deny, if no law was broken?

 

[JohnnyApplesack]

Well, well, well, looky what we have here...

Paul Manafort, President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman reportedly entangled in an FBI investigation for his possible involvement in Russian election interference, secretly worked for a Putin-allied Russian billionaire to advance Russia’s interests abroad, the Associated Press reported Wednesday. Manafort lobbied on behalf of Russian aluminum magnate Oleg Deripaskia for $10 million a year from 2005 to around 2009. Deripaska was known as one Putin’s closest allies during that time.​

...after Trump's campaign manager Paul Manafort said he was not working for the Russians...

In early November, Manafort told NBC News that he “never had ties to Russian president Vladimir Putin, or had dealings with Putin and his government.”​

...it turns out he was working for the Russians.

But in 2005, Manafort penned a memo to Deripaska that laid out his plan to prop up Russia’s global standing, even though the Eastern European power’s relationship with the U.S. was deteriorating at that time.

“We are now of the belief that this model can greatly benefit the Putin Government if employed at the correct levels with the appropriate commitment to success,” Manafort wrote.
​

You might as well start calling this WATERTRUMP!

Might want to reread your two quotes.

First one he states he never had dealings with Putin, nor his government.

Second one is about a letter to a Russian Billionaire, about setting up a plan that would help Putin.
(which doesn't mean he contacted Putin or his government)

Media is now all TrumpPutinGate 24/7

I'd LOVE to be a fly on the wall in Trump's penthouse palace lol

 

[westwall]

Yeah, he was, because he was breaking the law. The trumpsters people were doing nothing more than the shrilary's podesta group. Thus, your constant hysteria about the trumpster, while ignoring hers is hypocritical at best. Furthermore we KNOW that she accepted bribes to approve the uranium deal with russia when she was SOS. You have to ask yourself a simple question....do you wish to live in a free country, or do you wish to sell your soul to the progressive elite who don't give a flying fuck about you save at election time when they count on ignorant people to keep electing them... all the while they are screwing you.

When are you going to wake up dude? It should be pretty fucking obvious to a thinking person who the enemy of the people is, and it ain't the trumpster. Not when the political elite from both Party's are attacking him. Time for you to get a clue.

You're looking at Liddy through the lens of hindsight; I was referring to liddy through the lens of foresight. At the time Liddy's actions came to light, Nixon was not in the hot seat. Same condition we have here in 2017.

BTW, have you ever read this book?



Here's a little excerpt for you to think about in regards to Heir Trump...

"some key conditions that Arendt connected with the emergence of totalitarianism were increasing xenophobia, racism and anti-Semitism, and hostility toward elites and mainstream political parties. Along with these, she cited an intensified alienation of the “masses” from government coupled with the willingness of alarming numbers of people to abandon facts or to “escape from reality into fiction.” Additionally, she noted an exponential increase in the number of refugees and stateless peoples, whose rights nation-states were unable to guarantee."
​

My my, hey hey,
our way of life, might go away,
its better to turn down, than be a bitch,
before the stateless masses, succumb to the rich!

​

Yes, all revolutions begin with a hostility towards the elites. Take a look at our own revolution. That is the nature of mankind and his relationship with government as a whole. The elites eventually become so onerous that the people rise up against them. In a good revolution you get a Republic. In a bad one you get a authoritarian dictatorship. You whistle dixie and allow the elite to rape the middle class and expect a different outcome from well known social evolutions.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

You lefty poor sports, get over it. Americans, not Russians, elected Trump because they didn't want Hillary or more obama or another democrat.
You need to move on dot org.

I have one word for you...

WATERTRUMP!​

You lost. Get over it.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

And he didn't give away any US uranium.

Gee...I wonder who was behind that uranium deal?

 

[JohnnyApplesack]

JUST IN:

Second Intel Dem Confirms Trump-Russia Evidence 'More Than Circumstantial'

Two members of the House Intelligence Committee have told The Daily Beast that they have now seen "more than circumstantial" evidence of collusion between Trump associates and Russia.

"The evidence is more than circumstantial," said Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the committee said. Rep. Mike Quigley, another Democrat on the committee, said in a separate conversation Thursday he had seen the same as Schiff.

Schiff said that the public would have to wait until the panel completed its investigation into Russian interference with the U.S. election to see the evidence he’s referencing.

"I certainly think at the conclusion of the investigation we ought to disclose as much as we can, but I don't think we should be disclosing evidence during the investigation," Schiff told The Daily Beast.

drip drip drip

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

JUST IN:

Second Intel Dem Confirms Trump-Russia Evidence 'More Than Circumstantial'

Two members of the House Intelligence Committee have told The Daily Beast that they have now seen "more than circumstantial" evidence of collusion between Trump associates and Russia.

"The evidence is more than circumstantial," said Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the committee said. Rep. Mike Quigley, another Democrat on the committee, said in a separate conversation Thursday he had seen the same as Schiff.

Schiff said that the public would have to wait until the panel completed its investigation into Russian interference with the U.S. election to see the evidence he’s referencing.

"I certainly think at the conclusion of the investigation we ought to disclose as much as we can, but I don't think we should be disclosing evidence during the investigation," Schiff told The Daily Beast.

drip drip drip

Your homofascist party lost. Get over it.

 

[JohnnyApplesack]

JUST IN:

Second Intel Dem Confirms Trump-Russia Evidence 'More Than Circumstantial'

Two members of the House Intelligence Committee have told The Daily Beast that they have now seen "more than circumstantial" evidence of collusion between Trump associates and Russia.

"The evidence is more than circumstantial," said Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the committee said. Rep. Mike Quigley, another Democrat on the committee, said in a separate conversation Thursday he had seen the same as Schiff.

Schiff said that the public would have to wait until the panel completed its investigation into Russian interference with the U.S. election to see the evidence he’s referencing.

"I certainly think at the conclusion of the investigation we ought to disclose as much as we can, but I don't think we should be disclosing evidence during the investigation," Schiff told The Daily Beast.

drip drip drip

Your homofascist party lost. Get over it.

desperation noted

 

[Auld Phart]

JUST IN:

Second Intel Dem Confirms Trump-Russia Evidence 'More Than Circumstantial'

Two members of the House Intelligence Committee have told The Daily Beast that they have now seen "more than circumstantial" evidence of collusion between Trump associates and Russia.

"The evidence is more than circumstantial," said Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the committee said. Rep. Mike Quigley, another Democrat on the committee, said in a separate conversation Thursday he had seen the same as Schiff.

Schiff said that the public would have to wait until the panel completed its investigation into Russian interference with the U.S. election to see the evidence he’s referencing.

"I certainly think at the conclusion of the investigation we ought to disclose as much as we can, but I don't think we should be disclosing evidence during the investigation," Schiff told The Daily Beast.

drip drip drip

Your homofascist party lost. Get over it.

desperation noted

desperation noted

Yours?

Been obvious for days

 

[PredFan]

Another in the endless chain of fail threads buy the butthurt left.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

JUST IN:

Second Intel Dem Confirms Trump-Russia Evidence 'More Than Circumstantial'

Two members of the House Intelligence Committee have told The Daily Beast that they have now seen "more than circumstantial" evidence of collusion between Trump associates and Russia.

"The evidence is more than circumstantial," said Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the committee said. Rep. Mike Quigley, another Democrat on the committee, said in a separate conversation Thursday he had seen the same as Schiff.

Schiff said that the public would have to wait until the panel completed its investigation into Russian interference with the U.S. election to see the evidence he’s referencing.

"I certainly think at the conclusion of the investigation we ought to disclose as much as we can, but I don't think we should be disclosing evidence during the investigation," Schiff told The Daily Beast.

drip drip drip

Your homofascist party lost. Get over it.

desperation noted

Your desperation. That's why your idiots didn't consider this Russian nonsense until after you lost to the American voters.
You're logic challenged.