Trump told McGhan to do crazy .... about the Mueller investigation

They are holding Barr in contempt to see the full report. What are you smoking?
The Democrats may issue a contempt citation, but it will mean nothing, just more political theater. If they do cite him for contempt, the issue will go to the courts to determine if Congress had legitimate grounds for demanding the unredacted version, and we won't know the decision for three or four years. The question is if the Democrats are really interested in seeing the unredacted report, why have any of them Barr invited to view it come to see it. Clearly, the Democrats are just putting on a show.
A contempt citation is a legally binding document. Again, what are these cultists smoking? Are you suggesting team Trump is above the law? Are you in favor of trashing the Constitution and the rule of law? if not, then the citation means a lot.
Are you too stupid to understand that any kind of contempt citation issue will go to federal court and after the three or four years it will take for the SC to decide the case, the citation will just disappear, just like the contempt citation issued to Holder in the fast and furious case.
It won't be three or four years. We aren't dealing with a jaywalking charge here.
The level of ignorance you bring to a discussion continues to astonish. It took nearly four years when Obama refused to turn over documents relating to the fast and furious debacle and Holder was cited for contempt. The House Democrats are just putting on a show for you.
And nothing was found. So smoke some of that. Here, it's a different story. Just ask hundreds of prosecutors; Hundreds of former federal prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he wasn't president
 
If that isn't obstruction, I don't know what is. //www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/melber-report-details-potential-hanging-of-a-thread-of-the-trump-presidency-1498708547541 Everything we knew about Trump has come true. Trump and his team picked oranges over apples, when the report is filled with apples.


There are plenty of attorneys on Mueller's investigative team that have come out & stated that if Trump were not POTUS, he would have already been indicted for obstruction.

I have no doubt Mueller will state the same in his coming testimony before the Nadler committee.
No doubt. Lol! It's kind of funny, but we found out more about obstruction by Trump and Barr, that we would never discovered, compliments of the Mueller report itself. Even with the report, Barr and Trump have been constantly trying to cover up the truth and the facts. These two are pathetic and disgusting pigs.
Can't wait for Barr to expose the corruption of the democrats. Hold on to your Fruit of the Looms, BWK
If only he could. Just like Hillary and Obama. Found nothing and only ended up with a bucket of shit.
You and the other sheep don't have Eric or Loretta to run cover for your party any longer.....remember?
 
It will take that long.
hmm, no. There is much more will to pursue this than there was in the other instance you noted.
lol Only in your troubled imagination.
Well that was childish and not compelling.

Oh Yes, there is much more will this time around.
Look, the House Democrats are putting on a show for you. Sit back and enjoy it, but don't confuse it with reality. The reality is that Nadler and others are just huffing and puffing to try to save face, but they know they are powerless. Try not to get confused.
Hundreds of former federal prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he wasn't president

Prosecutors sure aren't confused.
Well, if they aren't confused, then clearly they are lying.
 
If that isn't obstruction, I don't know what is. //www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/melber-report-details-potential-hanging-of-a-thread-of-the-trump-presidency-1498708547541 Everything we knew about Trump has come true. Trump and his team picked oranges over apples, when the report is filled with apples.


There are plenty of attorneys on Mueller's investigative team that have come out & stated that if Trump were not POTUS, he would have already been indicted for obstruction.

I have no doubt Mueller will state the same in his coming testimony before the Nadler committee.
No doubt. Lol! It's kind of funny, but we found out more about obstruction by Trump and Barr, that we would never discovered, compliments of the Mueller report itself. Even with the report, Barr and Trump have been constantly trying to cover up the truth and the facts. These two are pathetic and disgusting pigs.
Can't wait for Barr to expose the corruption of the democrats. Hold on to your Fruit of the Looms, BWK
If only he could. Just like Hillary and Obama. Found nothing and only ended up with a bucket of shit.
You and the other sheep don't have Eric or Loretta to run cover for your party any longer.....remember?
And you have Bill Barr who has been exposed for committing perjury in front of Congress and has been asked to resign while Trump has been found guilty of obstruction. Do you really think anyone is going to pay attention to your parties distractions after this? Hell no! The part has become a joke. Republicans are a laughing stock. They've been exposed. Their bs is over. The world knows everything now. Get a grip on reality. Trumps lawyer is going to jail for crimes Trump orchestrated. Do you honestly think anything Trump does or Barr does will be taken seriously? Barr in all likely hood maybe impeached for perjury? Trump will end up in jail for multiple felonies. The Republican shit show is over.
 
The Democrats may issue a contempt citation, but it will mean nothing, just more political theater. If they do cite him for contempt, the issue will go to the courts to determine if Congress had legitimate grounds for demanding the unredacted version, and we won't know the decision for three or four years. The question is if the Democrats are really interested in seeing the unredacted report, why have any of them Barr invited to view it come to see it. Clearly, the Democrats are just putting on a show.
A contempt citation is a legally binding document. Again, what are these cultists smoking? Are you suggesting team Trump is above the law? Are you in favor of trashing the Constitution and the rule of law? if not, then the citation means a lot.
Are you too stupid to understand that any kind of contempt citation issue will go to federal court and after the three or four years it will take for the SC to decide the case, the citation will just disappear, just like the contempt citation issued to Holder in the fast and furious case.
It won't be three or four years. We aren't dealing with a jaywalking charge here.
The level of ignorance you bring to a discussion continues to astonish. It took nearly four years when Obama refused to turn over documents relating to the fast and furious debacle and Holder was cited for contempt. The House Democrats are just putting on a show for you.
And nothing was found. So smoke some of that. Here, it's a different story. Just ask hundreds of prosecutors; Hundreds of former federal prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he wasn't president
lol No, the SC decided against Obama, and he had to turn the documents over to Congress, but by then Congress had moved on to other issues and the Justice Department refused to prosecute Holder.
 
hmm, no. There is much more will to pursue this than there was in the other instance you noted.
lol Only in your troubled imagination.
Well that was childish and not compelling.

Oh Yes, there is much more will this time around.
Look, the House Democrats are putting on a show for you. Sit back and enjoy it, but don't confuse it with reality. The reality is that Nadler and others are just huffing and puffing to try to save face, but they know they are powerless. Try not to get confused.
Hundreds of former federal prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he wasn't president

Prosecutors sure aren't confused.
Well, if they aren't confused, then clearly they are lying.
Right! Republicans too I guess? You keep smoking that shit, and it's going to be a real "Debbie Downer" for you in the end. Hundreds of prosecutors, many Republicans are on record saying that Trump would be charged with obstruction. Why? Because the case is abundantly clear. The cultists won't see it, because they don't understand reality. You being one of them. 370 prosecutors are on record here. The bs is over for Trump and Barr. Time they answered for their sins.
 
Last edited:
A contempt citation is a legally binding document. Again, what are these cultists smoking? Are you suggesting team Trump is above the law? Are you in favor of trashing the Constitution and the rule of law? if not, then the citation means a lot.
Are you too stupid to understand that any kind of contempt citation issue will go to federal court and after the three or four years it will take for the SC to decide the case, the citation will just disappear, just like the contempt citation issued to Holder in the fast and furious case.
It won't be three or four years. We aren't dealing with a jaywalking charge here.
The level of ignorance you bring to a discussion continues to astonish. It took nearly four years when Obama refused to turn over documents relating to the fast and furious debacle and Holder was cited for contempt. The House Democrats are just putting on a show for you.
And nothing was found. So smoke some of that. Here, it's a different story. Just ask hundreds of prosecutors; Hundreds of former federal prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he wasn't president
lol No, the SC decided against Obama, and he had to turn the documents over to Congress, but by then Congress had moved on to other issues and the Justice Department refused to prosecute Holder.
Prosecute for what? Nothing! And thanks for playing a game that takes you no where.
 
lol Only in your troubled imagination.
Well that was childish and not compelling.

Oh Yes, there is much more will this time around.
Look, the House Democrats are putting on a show for you. Sit back and enjoy it, but don't confuse it with reality. The reality is that Nadler and others are just huffing and puffing to try to save face, but they know they are powerless. Try not to get confused.
Hundreds of former federal prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he wasn't president

Prosecutors sure aren't confused.
Well, if they aren't confused, then clearly they are lying.
Right! Republicans too I guess? You keep smoking that shit, and it's going to be a real "Debbie Downer" for you in the end. Hundreds of prosecutors, many Republicans are on record saying that Trump would be charged with obstruction. Why? Because the case is abundantly clear. The cultists won't see it, because they don't understand reality. You being one of them. 370 prosecutors are on record here. The bs is over for Trump and Barr. Time they answered for their sins.
If it is so clear that Trump is guilty of obstruction, then why didn't Mueller say so and state that he should be indicted once he leaves office? He didn't because Mueller understood that the evidence did not support that conclusion.
 
Are you too stupid to understand that any kind of contempt citation issue will go to federal court and after the three or four years it will take for the SC to decide the case, the citation will just disappear, just like the contempt citation issued to Holder in the fast and furious case.
It won't be three or four years. We aren't dealing with a jaywalking charge here.
The level of ignorance you bring to a discussion continues to astonish. It took nearly four years when Obama refused to turn over documents relating to the fast and furious debacle and Holder was cited for contempt. The House Democrats are just putting on a show for you.
And nothing was found. So smoke some of that. Here, it's a different story. Just ask hundreds of prosecutors; Hundreds of former federal prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he wasn't president
lol No, the SC decided against Obama, and he had to turn the documents over to Congress, but by then Congress had moved on to other issues and the Justice Department refused to prosecute Holder.
Prosecute for what? Nothing! And thanks for playing a game that takes you no where.
lol You continue to astonish with your ignorance. Holder was cited for criminal contempt. That means a criminal referral was sent to the Justice Department, but Justice is not bound by the citation, and it chose not to prosecute.
 
If that isn't obstruction, I don't know what is. //www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/melber-report-details-potential-hanging-of-a-thread-of-the-trump-presidency-1498708547541 Everything we knew about Trump has come true. Trump and his team picked oranges over apples, when the report is filled with apples.


There are plenty of attorneys on Mueller's investigative team that have come out & stated that if Trump were not POTUS, he would have already been indicted for obstruction.

I have no doubt Mueller will state the same in his coming testimony before the Nadler committee.
No doubt. Lol! It's kind of funny, but we found out more about obstruction by Trump and Barr, that we would never discovered, compliments of the Mueller report itself. Even with the report, Barr and Trump have been constantly trying to cover up the truth and the facts. These two are pathetic and disgusting pigs.
Can't wait for Barr to expose the corruption of the democrats. Hold on to your Fruit of the Looms, BWK
If only he could. Just like Hillary and Obama. Found nothing and only ended up with a bucket of shit.
You and the other sheep don't have Eric or Loretta to run cover for your party any longer.....remember?
No, we have the House and the rule of law on our side.
 
It won't be three or four years. We aren't dealing with a jaywalking charge here.
The level of ignorance you bring to a discussion continues to astonish. It took nearly four years when Obama refused to turn over documents relating to the fast and furious debacle and Holder was cited for contempt. The House Democrats are just putting on a show for you.
And nothing was found. So smoke some of that. Here, it's a different story. Just ask hundreds of prosecutors; Hundreds of former federal prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he wasn't president
lol No, the SC decided against Obama, and he had to turn the documents over to Congress, but by then Congress had moved on to other issues and the Justice Department refused to prosecute Holder.
Prosecute for what? Nothing! And thanks for playing a game that takes you no where.
lol You continue to astonish with your ignorance. Holder was cited for criminal contempt. That means a criminal referral was sent to the Justice Department, but Justice is not bound by the citation, and it chose not to prosecute.
Because there was nothing to prosecute about. Fast and Furious was a manufactured scandal from the start.
 
The level of ignorance you bring to a discussion continues to astonish. It took nearly four years when Obama refused to turn over documents relating to the fast and furious debacle and Holder was cited for contempt. The House Democrats are just putting on a show for you.
And nothing was found. So smoke some of that. Here, it's a different story. Just ask hundreds of prosecutors; Hundreds of former federal prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he wasn't president
lol No, the SC decided against Obama, and he had to turn the documents over to Congress, but by then Congress had moved on to other issues and the Justice Department refused to prosecute Holder.
Prosecute for what? Nothing! And thanks for playing a game that takes you no where.
lol You continue to astonish with your ignorance. Holder was cited for criminal contempt. That means a criminal referral was sent to the Justice Department, but Justice is not bound by the citation, and it chose not to prosecute.
Because there was nothing to prosecute about. Fast and Furious was a manufactured scandal from the start.
Clearly, Obama, Holder and the SC didn't think so.
 
And nothing was found. So smoke some of that. Here, it's a different story. Just ask hundreds of prosecutors; Hundreds of former federal prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he wasn't president
lol No, the SC decided against Obama, and he had to turn the documents over to Congress, but by then Congress had moved on to other issues and the Justice Department refused to prosecute Holder.
Prosecute for what? Nothing! And thanks for playing a game that takes you no where.
lol You continue to astonish with your ignorance. Holder was cited for criminal contempt. That means a criminal referral was sent to the Justice Department, but Justice is not bound by the citation, and it chose not to prosecute.
Because there was nothing to prosecute about. Fast and Furious was a manufactured scandal from the start.
Clearly, Obama, Holder and the SC didn't think so.
Republicans never worried about too much guns until Obama got in office. Believe me, Obama, Holder, and anyone who knows anything about it, knew it was another excuse to create a false scandal. The Real Scandal of Fast and Furious It was a fake scandal from the beginning.

And why are you talking about this? Because it distracts from the OP, and the Right is getting their asses kicked over the facts.
 
lol No, the SC decided against Obama, and he had to turn the documents over to Congress, but by then Congress had moved on to other issues and the Justice Department refused to prosecute Holder.
Prosecute for what? Nothing! And thanks for playing a game that takes you no where.
lol You continue to astonish with your ignorance. Holder was cited for criminal contempt. That means a criminal referral was sent to the Justice Department, but Justice is not bound by the citation, and it chose not to prosecute.
Because there was nothing to prosecute about. Fast and Furious was a manufactured scandal from the start.
Clearly, Obama, Holder and the SC didn't think so.
Republicans never worried about too much guns until Obama got in office. Believe me, Obama, Holder, and anyone who knows anything about it, knew it was another excuse to create a false scandal. The Real Scandal of Fast and Furious It was a fake scandal from the beginning.

And why are you talking about this? Because it distracts from the OP, and the Right is getting their asses kicked over the facts.
No, moron, I brought it up to show how long it takes to go through the courts when a President refuses to comply with a Congressional subpoena.
 
Prosecute for what? Nothing! And thanks for playing a game that takes you no where.
lol You continue to astonish with your ignorance. Holder was cited for criminal contempt. That means a criminal referral was sent to the Justice Department, but Justice is not bound by the citation, and it chose not to prosecute.
Because there was nothing to prosecute about. Fast and Furious was a manufactured scandal from the start.
Clearly, Obama, Holder and the SC didn't think so.
Republicans never worried about too much guns until Obama got in office. Believe me, Obama, Holder, and anyone who knows anything about it, knew it was another excuse to create a false scandal. The Real Scandal of Fast and Furious It was a fake scandal from the beginning.

And why are you talking about this? Because it distracts from the OP, and the Right is getting their asses kicked over the facts.
No, moron, I brought it up to show how long it takes to go through the courts when a President refuses to comply with a Congressional subpoena.
And we're seeing all that in real time by Barr being in contempt, and Trumps secretary of Treasury refusing to hand over Trump's taxes taxes. If you were so outraged by Obama, wouldn't you have the same problem with Trump? Lol!
 
lol You continue to astonish with your ignorance. Holder was cited for criminal contempt. That means a criminal referral was sent to the Justice Department, but Justice is not bound by the citation, and it chose not to prosecute.
Because there was nothing to prosecute about. Fast and Furious was a manufactured scandal from the start.
Clearly, Obama, Holder and the SC didn't think so.
Republicans never worried about too much guns until Obama got in office. Believe me, Obama, Holder, and anyone who knows anything about it, knew it was another excuse to create a false scandal. The Real Scandal of Fast and Furious It was a fake scandal from the beginning.

And why are you talking about this? Because it distracts from the OP, and the Right is getting their asses kicked over the facts.
No, moron, I brought it up to show how long it takes to go through the courts when a President refuses to comply with a Congressional subpoena.
And we're seeing all that in real time by Barr being in contempt, and Trumps secretary of Treasury refusing to hand over Trump's taxes taxes. If you were so outraged by Obama, wouldn't you have the same problem with Trump? Lol!
Moron, I never said I was outraged about what Obama did. I was just giving you an example of how long it takes when the President refuses to comply with a Congressional subpoena.
 
Trump cultists need to grab a hold of reality, and understand that 372 federal prosecutors, many who are prominent Republicans, have concluded a slam dunk case for obstruction. Trump is a walking con man as we speak. And in the meantime, Trump and Barr are obstructing the Mueller report. This is worse than what Nixon did. Trump and Barr are walking head first into impeachment.
 

Forum List

Back
Top