Trump Takes Putin's Word Over The US Intelligence Community...Again

[iceberg]

I remember when left wing MSM thugs argued about whether wearing the American Flag on T.V. would be offensive while they applauded left wing thugs smashing the Ten Commandments off Court House Walls. How refreshing it is to hear the President say "it's O.K. to say Merry Christmas again" . You had to practically break Hussein's hand to put it over his heart during the National Anthem and how many Veteran's days did Hussein bow down to foreign dictators and apologize for America's decadence? If Putin influenced America's election it was Hussein's fault and so far Hussein thugs ain't talking.

When did you EVER see someone saying that wearing a flag pin was offensive? You heard complaints because someone not wearing a flag pin was called unpatriotic by the crazy right.

The Supreme Court agreed that the ten commandments weren't constitutional in court houses. Ho long have you disagreed with the constitution?

You, and everyone else, have been saying Merry Christmas any time you want. You don't have the right to demand others do.

Trump-0 needs to be reminded to put his hand over his heart.


Trump did do a little curtsy for the Saudi King, but you forgot to mention how often he kissed Putin's ass.

Do you believe a Russian spy or the entire US investigative community?

CIA analyst John Nixon who interrogated Iraq’s erstwhile dictator Saddam Hussein has said the United States was wrong about Iraq and the dictator.



In a recent interview, the official of the US spying agency said CIA’s stance on Saddam having chemical weapons and attitude for using it was wrong.

The analyst said he asked Saddam if he had ever thought of using chemical weapons against the US. 'US was wrong about him', says CIA agent who interrogated Saddam - The Express Tribune

The CIA's decision that there were no WMD was based on a lot more than just that interview.

I don't know if you know that the job of the intels is bring their own assessment to the President. But then the President is the one to decide on what to do about what has been reported. But it is not the Intels decision to make the decision over the president's rulings. They has step out of line when they are giving orders. The President is the decision maker, not the Intels.


The Carter efforts to shake up and "moralize" foreign policy (and the State Department) were paralleled by efforts to clean up the CIA. Responsibility for the latter task fell largely to a fellow navy man, Admiral Stansfield Turner. President Ford had already made a step toward requiring greater CIA accountability in February 1976, by limiting the function of intelligence in Executive Order (EO) 11905. Ford's order was best known for its ban on assassinations—a direct response to the Senate's hearings on the subject.26 An August 1976 CIA briefing for candidate and then-Governor Carter stressed that EO 11905 spelled out guidelines for "the conduct of intelligence operations within Constitutional limits," while creating the "Operations Advisory Group" to replace "the NSC subcommittee known under various MJ12 Research: Halloween Massacre & the CIA

Yes, everybody knows the president makes his own decisions, no matter how stupid, as evidenced by our orange fool in chief. Do you, like our goofy president, take the word of Putin over our own security agencies? That's a YES/NO question.

you take the word of hillary and obama over FISA.

just when do we trust people vs. our government? when it suits your views only or as a general rule?

pretty much a YES/NO/IGNORE question.

 

[BULLDOG]

When did you EVER see someone saying that wearing a flag pin was offensive? You heard complaints because someone not wearing a flag pin was called unpatriotic by the crazy right.

The Supreme Court agreed that the ten commandments weren't constitutional in court houses. Ho long have you disagreed with the constitution?

You, and everyone else, have been saying Merry Christmas any time you want. You don't have the right to demand others do.

Trump-0 needs to be reminded to put his hand over his heart.


Trump did do a little curtsy for the Saudi King, but you forgot to mention how often he kissed Putin's ass.

Do you believe a Russian spy or the entire US investigative community?

CIA analyst John Nixon who interrogated Iraq’s erstwhile dictator Saddam Hussein has said the United States was wrong about Iraq and the dictator.



In a recent interview, the official of the US spying agency said CIA’s stance on Saddam having chemical weapons and attitude for using it was wrong.

The analyst said he asked Saddam if he had ever thought of using chemical weapons against the US. 'US was wrong about him', says CIA agent who interrogated Saddam - The Express Tribune

The CIA's decision that there were no WMD was based on a lot more than just that interview.

I don't know if you know that the job of the intels is bring their own assessment to the President. But then the President is the one to decide on what to do about what has been reported. But it is not the Intels decision to make the decision over the president's rulings. They has step out of line when they are giving orders. The President is the decision maker, not the Intels.


The Carter efforts to shake up and "moralize" foreign policy (and the State Department) were paralleled by efforts to clean up the CIA. Responsibility for the latter task fell largely to a fellow navy man, Admiral Stansfield Turner. President Ford had already made a step toward requiring greater CIA accountability in February 1976, by limiting the function of intelligence in Executive Order (EO) 11905. Ford's order was best known for its ban on assassinations—a direct response to the Senate's hearings on the subject.26 An August 1976 CIA briefing for candidate and then-Governor Carter stressed that EO 11905 spelled out guidelines for "the conduct of intelligence operations within Constitutional limits," while creating the "Operations Advisory Group" to replace "the NSC subcommittee known under various MJ12 Research: Halloween Massacre & the CIA

Yes, everybody knows the president makes his own decisions, no matter how stupid, as evidenced by our orange fool in chief. Do you, like our goofy president, take the word of Putin over our own security agencies? That's a YES/NO question.

you take the word of hillary and obama over FISA.

just when do we trust people vs. our government? when it suits your views only or as a general rule?

pretty much a YES/NO/IGNORE question.

Typical right wing move. Say anything to avoid answering the question.

 

[PredFan]

Again with the “gotcha” bull shit. This ones too stupid to respond to.

Nothing to do with gotcha. Do you believe Putin is a truth teller, and our government are liars, or not?

I already answered the question dip shit. Learn to read.

It was a yes or no question.

Fuck you. It was a loaded question and I answered it truthfully and evaded the trap. Learn to read dip shit.

You avoided answering the question coward.

Go away, learn to read, then you can comment without saying stupid shit.

Dismissed.

 

[iceberg]

CIA analyst John Nixon who interrogated Iraq’s erstwhile dictator Saddam Hussein has said the United States was wrong about Iraq and the dictator.



In a recent interview, the official of the US spying agency said CIA’s stance on Saddam having chemical weapons and attitude for using it was wrong.

The analyst said he asked Saddam if he had ever thought of using chemical weapons against the US. 'US was wrong about him', says CIA agent who interrogated Saddam - The Express Tribune

The CIA's decision that there were no WMD was based on a lot more than just that interview.

I don't know if you know that the job of the intels is bring their own assessment to the President. But then the President is the one to decide on what to do about what has been reported. But it is not the Intels decision to make the decision over the president's rulings. They has step out of line when they are giving orders. The President is the decision maker, not the Intels.


The Carter efforts to shake up and "moralize" foreign policy (and the State Department) were paralleled by efforts to clean up the CIA. Responsibility for the latter task fell largely to a fellow navy man, Admiral Stansfield Turner. President Ford had already made a step toward requiring greater CIA accountability in February 1976, by limiting the function of intelligence in Executive Order (EO) 11905. Ford's order was best known for its ban on assassinations—a direct response to the Senate's hearings on the subject.26 An August 1976 CIA briefing for candidate and then-Governor Carter stressed that EO 11905 spelled out guidelines for "the conduct of intelligence operations within Constitutional limits," while creating the "Operations Advisory Group" to replace "the NSC subcommittee known under various MJ12 Research: Halloween Massacre & the CIA

Yes, everybody knows the president makes his own decisions, no matter how stupid, as evidenced by our orange fool in chief. Do you, like our goofy president, take the word of Putin over our own security agencies? That's a YES/NO question.

you take the word of hillary and obama over FISA.

just when do we trust people vs. our government? when it suits your views only or as a general rule?

pretty much a YES/NO/IGNORE question.

Typical right wing move. Say anything to avoid answering the question.

you mean like you didn't answer my question?

if trump is guilty, lock him up. i want *all* corrupt politicians locked up at this point and i don't care which side.

HOWEVER - how i *FEEL* about someone doesn't make them guilty about things. you don't see me calling obama / hillary and others on the left jr high insult nicknames - that would be you. this tells me you're just whipping your horse as long as you can and have no intention of being fair or objective.

this seems to be typical YOU - and i won't bother to stereotype. this is you doing deflection and accusing others for doing the very things you are also doing.

kinda funny when you pull your dogs out of the race.

 

[BULLDOG]

Nothing to do with gotcha. Do you believe Putin is a truth teller, and our government are liars, or not?

I already answered the question dip shit. Learn to read.

It was a yes or no question.

Fuck you. It was a loaded question and I answered it truthfully and evaded the trap. Learn to read dip shit.

You avoided answering the question coward.

Go away, learn to read, then you can comment without saying stupid shit.

Dismissed.

You can't dismiss anyone, but it's obvious that you are afraid to answer questions.

 

[BULLDOG]

The CIA's decision that there were no WMD was based on a lot more than just that interview.

I don't know if you know that the job of the intels is bring their own assessment to the President. But then the President is the one to decide on what to do about what has been reported. But it is not the Intels decision to make the decision over the president's rulings. They has step out of line when they are giving orders. The President is the decision maker, not the Intels.


The Carter efforts to shake up and "moralize" foreign policy (and the State Department) were paralleled by efforts to clean up the CIA. Responsibility for the latter task fell largely to a fellow navy man, Admiral Stansfield Turner. President Ford had already made a step toward requiring greater CIA accountability in February 1976, by limiting the function of intelligence in Executive Order (EO) 11905. Ford's order was best known for its ban on assassinations—a direct response to the Senate's hearings on the subject.26 An August 1976 CIA briefing for candidate and then-Governor Carter stressed that EO 11905 spelled out guidelines for "the conduct of intelligence operations within Constitutional limits," while creating the "Operations Advisory Group" to replace "the NSC subcommittee known under various MJ12 Research: Halloween Massacre & the CIA

Yes, everybody knows the president makes his own decisions, no matter how stupid, as evidenced by our orange fool in chief. Do you, like our goofy president, take the word of Putin over our own security agencies? That's a YES/NO question.

you take the word of hillary and obama over FISA.

just when do we trust people vs. our government? when it suits your views only or as a general rule?

pretty much a YES/NO/IGNORE question.

Typical right wing move. Say anything to avoid answering the question.

you mean like you didn't answer my question?

if trump is guilty, lock him up. i want *all* corrupt politicians locked up at this point and i don't care which side.

HOWEVER - how i *FEEL* about someone doesn't make them guilty about things. you don't see me calling obama / hillary and others on the left jr high insult nicknames - that would be you. this tells me you're just whipping your horse as long as you can and have no intention of being fair or objective.

this seems to be typical YOU - and i won't bother to stereotype. this is you doing deflection and accusing others for doing the very things you are also doing.

kinda funny when you pull your dogs out of the race.

I asked first. Answer, and then I will.

 

[iceberg]

I don't know if you know that the job of the intels is bring their own assessment to the President. But then the President is the one to decide on what to do about what has been reported. But it is not the Intels decision to make the decision over the president's rulings. They has step out of line when they are giving orders. The President is the decision maker, not the Intels.


The Carter efforts to shake up and "moralize" foreign policy (and the State Department) were paralleled by efforts to clean up the CIA. Responsibility for the latter task fell largely to a fellow navy man, Admiral Stansfield Turner. President Ford had already made a step toward requiring greater CIA accountability in February 1976, by limiting the function of intelligence in Executive Order (EO) 11905. Ford's order was best known for its ban on assassinations—a direct response to the Senate's hearings on the subject.26 An August 1976 CIA briefing for candidate and then-Governor Carter stressed that EO 11905 spelled out guidelines for "the conduct of intelligence operations within Constitutional limits," while creating the "Operations Advisory Group" to replace "the NSC subcommittee known under various MJ12 Research: Halloween Massacre & the CIA

Yes, everybody knows the president makes his own decisions, no matter how stupid, as evidenced by our orange fool in chief. Do you, like our goofy president, take the word of Putin over our own security agencies? That's a YES/NO question.

you take the word of hillary and obama over FISA.

just when do we trust people vs. our government? when it suits your views only or as a general rule?

pretty much a YES/NO/IGNORE question.

Typical right wing move. Say anything to avoid answering the question.

you mean like you didn't answer my question?

if trump is guilty, lock him up. i want *all* corrupt politicians locked up at this point and i don't care which side.

HOWEVER - how i *FEEL* about someone doesn't make them guilty about things. you don't see me calling obama / hillary and others on the left jr high insult nicknames - that would be you. this tells me you're just whipping your horse as long as you can and have no intention of being fair or objective.

this seems to be typical YOU - and i won't bother to stereotype. this is you doing deflection and accusing others for doing the very things you are also doing.

kinda funny when you pull your dogs out of the race.

I asked first. Answer, and then I will.

well then you tell me first. you seem to like to offer up baited questions knowing someone is going to see your game and not want to play then go AHA! YOU REFUSE and giggle yourself some pyrrhic victory.

i don't play the "in this situation it's ok because of xyz but when you do it, it's wrong cause of 123" crap. i take the overall law/rule/whatever and try to apply it evenly to both sides. you game it up and try to say why the rules don't apply due to how you FEEL about something.

doesn't work that way.

 

[BULLDOG]

Yes, everybody knows the president makes his own decisions, no matter how stupid, as evidenced by our orange fool in chief. Do you, like our goofy president, take the word of Putin over our own security agencies? That's a YES/NO question.

you take the word of hillary and obama over FISA.

just when do we trust people vs. our government? when it suits your views only or as a general rule?

pretty much a YES/NO/IGNORE question.

Typical right wing move. Say anything to avoid answering the question.

you mean like you didn't answer my question?

if trump is guilty, lock him up. i want *all* corrupt politicians locked up at this point and i don't care which side.

HOWEVER - how i *FEEL* about someone doesn't make them guilty about things. you don't see me calling obama / hillary and others on the left jr high insult nicknames - that would be you. this tells me you're just whipping your horse as long as you can and have no intention of being fair or objective.

this seems to be typical YOU - and i won't bother to stereotype. this is you doing deflection and accusing others for doing the very things you are also doing.

kinda funny when you pull your dogs out of the race.

I asked first. Answer, and then I will.

well then you tell me first. you seem to like to offer up baited questions knowing someone is going to see your game and not want to play then go AHA! YOU REFUSE and giggle yourself some pyrrhic victory.

i don't play the "in this situation it's ok because of xyz but when you do it, it's wrong cause of 123" crap. i take the overall law/rule/whatever and try to apply it evenly to both sides. you game it up and try to say why the rules don't apply due to how you FEEL about something.

doesn't work that way.

Not a gotcha question. No ABC or 123 involved in it. Do you believe Putin over our own intelligence agencies.
I'm not sure that Hillary or Obama even made a response to the FISA comment. Do you care to give a link to their statements on the subject?

 

[iceberg]

you take the word of hillary and obama over FISA.

just when do we trust people vs. our government? when it suits your views only or as a general rule?

pretty much a YES/NO/IGNORE question.

Typical right wing move. Say anything to avoid answering the question.

you mean like you didn't answer my question?

if trump is guilty, lock him up. i want *all* corrupt politicians locked up at this point and i don't care which side.

HOWEVER - how i *FEEL* about someone doesn't make them guilty about things. you don't see me calling obama / hillary and others on the left jr high insult nicknames - that would be you. this tells me you're just whipping your horse as long as you can and have no intention of being fair or objective.

this seems to be typical YOU - and i won't bother to stereotype. this is you doing deflection and accusing others for doing the very things you are also doing.

kinda funny when you pull your dogs out of the race.

I asked first. Answer, and then I will.

well then you tell me first. you seem to like to offer up baited questions knowing someone is going to see your game and not want to play then go AHA! YOU REFUSE and giggle yourself some pyrrhic victory.

i don't play the "in this situation it's ok because of xyz but when you do it, it's wrong cause of 123" crap. i take the overall law/rule/whatever and try to apply it evenly to both sides. you game it up and try to say why the rules don't apply due to how you FEEL about something.

doesn't work that way.

Not a gotcha question. No ABC or 123 involved in it. Do you believe Putin over our own intelligence agencies.
I'm not sure that Hillary or Obama even made a response to the FISA comment. Do you care to give a link to their statements on the subject?

it is a "gotcha" question. and i don't need to give their statements on it, i can give FISAs statements and all the liberals saying they're full of shit, or OBAMA DIDN'T DO IT, shielding him from blame but laying all blame for everything at trumps feet.

i get tired of people changing the rules based on whether or not they like someone. i don't defend trump. he brings his shit upon himself. but i do dig into people who get emo with their "logic" and can't apply the rules they push on others on themselves.

let me know when you're up for that. til then i'm not puppydoggin around with you playing your 1-off games distracting from the overall topic. it's plain as day to see you have different rules for people you like vs. don't like and that is EXACTLY what got trump elected.

keep it up. we may be starting a trump dynasty now for several generations to come cause y'all had to be *THIS* stupid.

 

[BULLDOG]

Typical right wing move. Say anything to avoid answering the question.

you mean like you didn't answer my question?

if trump is guilty, lock him up. i want *all* corrupt politicians locked up at this point and i don't care which side.

HOWEVER - how i *FEEL* about someone doesn't make them guilty about things. you don't see me calling obama / hillary and others on the left jr high insult nicknames - that would be you. this tells me you're just whipping your horse as long as you can and have no intention of being fair or objective.

this seems to be typical YOU - and i won't bother to stereotype. this is you doing deflection and accusing others for doing the very things you are also doing.

kinda funny when you pull your dogs out of the race.

I asked first. Answer, and then I will.

well then you tell me first. you seem to like to offer up baited questions knowing someone is going to see your game and not want to play then go AHA! YOU REFUSE and giggle yourself some pyrrhic victory.

i don't play the "in this situation it's ok because of xyz but when you do it, it's wrong cause of 123" crap. i take the overall law/rule/whatever and try to apply it evenly to both sides. you game it up and try to say why the rules don't apply due to how you FEEL about something.

doesn't work that way.

Not a gotcha question. No ABC or 123 involved in it. Do you believe Putin over our own intelligence agencies.
I'm not sure that Hillary or Obama even made a response to the FISA comment. Do you care to give a link to their statements on the subject?

it is a "gotcha" question. and i don't need to give their statements on it, i can give FISAs statements and all the liberals saying they're full of shit, or OBAMA DIDN'T DO IT, shielding him from blame but laying all blame for everything at trumps feet.

i get tired of people changing the rules based on whether or not they like someone. i don't defend trump. he brings his shit upon himself. but i do dig into people who get emo with their "logic" and can't apply the rules they push on others on themselves.

let me know when you're up for that. til then i'm not puppydoggin around with you playing your 1-off games distracting from the overall topic. it's plain as day to see you have different rules for people you like vs. don't like and that is EXACTLY what got trump elected.

keep it up. we may be starting a trump dynasty now for several generations to come cause y'all had to be *THIS* stupid.

You refuse to answer my question, and now you say your own question is a gotcha question? How do you expect me to decide who is right or wrong if I don't even know what was said? I guess you right wingers don't have a problem with making a judgment without facts.

 

[iceberg]

you mean like you didn't answer my question?

if trump is guilty, lock him up. i want *all* corrupt politicians locked up at this point and i don't care which side.

HOWEVER - how i *FEEL* about someone doesn't make them guilty about things. you don't see me calling obama / hillary and others on the left jr high insult nicknames - that would be you. this tells me you're just whipping your horse as long as you can and have no intention of being fair or objective.

this seems to be typical YOU - and i won't bother to stereotype. this is you doing deflection and accusing others for doing the very things you are also doing.

kinda funny when you pull your dogs out of the race.

I asked first. Answer, and then I will.

well then you tell me first. you seem to like to offer up baited questions knowing someone is going to see your game and not want to play then go AHA! YOU REFUSE and giggle yourself some pyrrhic victory.

i don't play the "in this situation it's ok because of xyz but when you do it, it's wrong cause of 123" crap. i take the overall law/rule/whatever and try to apply it evenly to both sides. you game it up and try to say why the rules don't apply due to how you FEEL about something.

doesn't work that way.

Not a gotcha question. No ABC or 123 involved in it. Do you believe Putin over our own intelligence agencies.
I'm not sure that Hillary or Obama even made a response to the FISA comment. Do you care to give a link to their statements on the subject?

it is a "gotcha" question. and i don't need to give their statements on it, i can give FISAs statements and all the liberals saying they're full of shit, or OBAMA DIDN'T DO IT, shielding him from blame but laying all blame for everything at trumps feet.

i get tired of people changing the rules based on whether or not they like someone. i don't defend trump. he brings his shit upon himself. but i do dig into people who get emo with their "logic" and can't apply the rules they push on others on themselves.

let me know when you're up for that. til then i'm not puppydoggin around with you playing your 1-off games distracting from the overall topic. it's plain as day to see you have different rules for people you like vs. don't like and that is EXACTLY what got trump elected.

keep it up. we may be starting a trump dynasty now for several generations to come cause y'all had to be *THIS* stupid.

You refuse to answer my question, and now you say your own question is a gotcha question? How do you expect me to decide who is right or wrong if I don't even know what was said? I guess you right wingers don't have a problem with making a judgment without facts.

because you do it off who you like and don't like - that is a HUGE barometer for who you trust and/or don't.

seen you post enough to know this is true. there are a few in here i can talk deeply with and i appreciate the hell out of that. those who just lob shots around and giggle i tend to lose a lot of interest in for either side.

i quit being 12 40 years ago.

 

[BULLDOG]

I asked first. Answer, and then I will.

well then you tell me first. you seem to like to offer up baited questions knowing someone is going to see your game and not want to play then go AHA! YOU REFUSE and giggle yourself some pyrrhic victory.

i don't play the "in this situation it's ok because of xyz but when you do it, it's wrong cause of 123" crap. i take the overall law/rule/whatever and try to apply it evenly to both sides. you game it up and try to say why the rules don't apply due to how you FEEL about something.

doesn't work that way.

Not a gotcha question. No ABC or 123 involved in it. Do you believe Putin over our own intelligence agencies.
I'm not sure that Hillary or Obama even made a response to the FISA comment. Do you care to give a link to their statements on the subject?

it is a "gotcha" question. and i don't need to give their statements on it, i can give FISAs statements and all the liberals saying they're full of shit, or OBAMA DIDN'T DO IT, shielding him from blame but laying all blame for everything at trumps feet.

i get tired of people changing the rules based on whether or not they like someone. i don't defend trump. he brings his shit upon himself. but i do dig into people who get emo with their "logic" and can't apply the rules they push on others on themselves.

let me know when you're up for that. til then i'm not puppydoggin around with you playing your 1-off games distracting from the overall topic. it's plain as day to see you have different rules for people you like vs. don't like and that is EXACTLY what got trump elected.

keep it up. we may be starting a trump dynasty now for several generations to come cause y'all had to be *THIS* stupid.

You refuse to answer my question, and now you say your own question is a gotcha question? How do you expect me to decide who is right or wrong if I don't even know what was said? I guess you right wingers don't have a problem with making a judgment without facts.

because you do it off who you like and don't like - that is a HUGE barometer for who you trust and/or don't.

seen you post enough to know this is true. there are a few in here i can talk deeply with and i appreciate the hell out of that. those who just lob shots around and giggle i tend to lose a lot of interest in for either side.

i quit being 12 40 years ago.

I haven't giggled for 50 years. You won't answer my question, and you won't provide information so I an answer yours. Why did you even post your last few threads?

 

[iceberg]

well then you tell me first. you seem to like to offer up baited questions knowing someone is going to see your game and not want to play then go AHA! YOU REFUSE and giggle yourself some pyrrhic victory.

i don't play the "in this situation it's ok because of xyz but when you do it, it's wrong cause of 123" crap. i take the overall law/rule/whatever and try to apply it evenly to both sides. you game it up and try to say why the rules don't apply due to how you FEEL about something.

doesn't work that way.

Not a gotcha question. No ABC or 123 involved in it. Do you believe Putin over our own intelligence agencies.
I'm not sure that Hillary or Obama even made a response to the FISA comment. Do you care to give a link to their statements on the subject?

it is a "gotcha" question. and i don't need to give their statements on it, i can give FISAs statements and all the liberals saying they're full of shit, or OBAMA DIDN'T DO IT, shielding him from blame but laying all blame for everything at trumps feet.

i get tired of people changing the rules based on whether or not they like someone. i don't defend trump. he brings his shit upon himself. but i do dig into people who get emo with their "logic" and can't apply the rules they push on others on themselves.

let me know when you're up for that. til then i'm not puppydoggin around with you playing your 1-off games distracting from the overall topic. it's plain as day to see you have different rules for people you like vs. don't like and that is EXACTLY what got trump elected.

keep it up. we may be starting a trump dynasty now for several generations to come cause y'all had to be *THIS* stupid.

You refuse to answer my question, and now you say your own question is a gotcha question? How do you expect me to decide who is right or wrong if I don't even know what was said? I guess you right wingers don't have a problem with making a judgment without facts.

because you do it off who you like and don't like - that is a HUGE barometer for who you trust and/or don't.

seen you post enough to know this is true. there are a few in here i can talk deeply with and i appreciate the hell out of that. those who just lob shots around and giggle i tend to lose a lot of interest in for either side.

i quit being 12 40 years ago.

I haven't giggled for 50 years. You won't answer my question, and you won't provide information so I an answer yours. Why did you even post your last few threads?

at this point i've lost track.

have a nice day bashing trump and not caring what "your side" does.

 

[Aletheia4u]

I remember when left wing MSM thugs argued about whether wearing the American Flag on T.V. would be offensive while they applauded left wing thugs smashing the Ten Commandments off Court House Walls. How refreshing it is to hear the President say "it's O.K. to say Merry Christmas again" . You had to practically break Hussein's hand to put it over his heart during the National Anthem and how many Veteran's days did Hussein bow down to foreign dictators and apologize for America's decadence? If Putin influenced America's election it was Hussein's fault and so far Hussein thugs ain't talking.

When did you EVER see someone saying that wearing a flag pin was offensive? You heard complaints because someone not wearing a flag pin was called unpatriotic by the crazy right.

The Supreme Court agreed that the ten commandments weren't constitutional in court houses. Ho long have you disagreed with the constitution?

You, and everyone else, have been saying Merry Christmas any time you want. You don't have the right to demand others do.

Trump-0 needs to be reminded to put his hand over his heart.


Trump did do a little curtsy for the Saudi King, but you forgot to mention how often he kissed Putin's ass.

Do you believe a Russian spy or the entire US investigative community?

CIA analyst John Nixon who interrogated Iraq’s erstwhile dictator Saddam Hussein has said the United States was wrong about Iraq and the dictator.



In a recent interview, the official of the US spying agency said CIA’s stance on Saddam having chemical weapons and attitude for using it was wrong.

The analyst said he asked Saddam if he had ever thought of using chemical weapons against the US. 'US was wrong about him', says CIA agent who interrogated Saddam - The Express Tribune

The CIA's decision that there were no WMD was based on a lot more than just that interview.

I don't know if you know that the job of the intels is bring their own assessment to the President. But then the President is the one to decide on what to do about what has been reported. But it is not the Intels decision to make the decision over the president's rulings. They has step out of line when they are giving orders. The President is the decision maker, not the Intels.


The Carter efforts to shake up and "moralize" foreign policy (and the State Department) were paralleled by efforts to clean up the CIA. Responsibility for the latter task fell largely to a fellow navy man, Admiral Stansfield Turner. President Ford had already made a step toward requiring greater CIA accountability in February 1976, by limiting the function of intelligence in Executive Order (EO) 11905. Ford's order was best known for its ban on assassinations—a direct response to the Senate's hearings on the subject.26 An August 1976 CIA briefing for candidate and then-Governor Carter stressed that EO 11905 spelled out guidelines for "the conduct of intelligence operations within Constitutional limits," while creating the "Operations Advisory Group" to replace "the NSC subcommittee known under various MJ12 Research: Halloween Massacre & the CIA

Yes, everybody knows the president makes his own decisions, no matter how stupid, as evidenced by our orange fool in chief. Do you, like our goofy president, take the word of Putin over our own security agencies? That's a YES/NO question.

I certainly do..

 

[BULLDOG]

When did you EVER see someone saying that wearing a flag pin was offensive? You heard complaints because someone not wearing a flag pin was called unpatriotic by the crazy right.

The Supreme Court agreed that the ten commandments weren't constitutional in court houses. Ho long have you disagreed with the constitution?

You, and everyone else, have been saying Merry Christmas any time you want. You don't have the right to demand others do.

Trump-0 needs to be reminded to put his hand over his heart.


Trump did do a little curtsy for the Saudi King, but you forgot to mention how often he kissed Putin's ass.

Do you believe a Russian spy or the entire US investigative community?

CIA analyst John Nixon who interrogated Iraq’s erstwhile dictator Saddam Hussein has said the United States was wrong about Iraq and the dictator.



In a recent interview, the official of the US spying agency said CIA’s stance on Saddam having chemical weapons and attitude for using it was wrong.

The analyst said he asked Saddam if he had ever thought of using chemical weapons against the US. 'US was wrong about him', says CIA agent who interrogated Saddam - The Express Tribune

The CIA's decision that there were no WMD was based on a lot more than just that interview.

I don't know if you know that the job of the intels is bring their own assessment to the President. But then the President is the one to decide on what to do about what has been reported. But it is not the Intels decision to make the decision over the president's rulings. They has step out of line when they are giving orders. The President is the decision maker, not the Intels.


The Carter efforts to shake up and "moralize" foreign policy (and the State Department) were paralleled by efforts to clean up the CIA. Responsibility for the latter task fell largely to a fellow navy man, Admiral Stansfield Turner. President Ford had already made a step toward requiring greater CIA accountability in February 1976, by limiting the function of intelligence in Executive Order (EO) 11905. Ford's order was best known for its ban on assassinations—a direct response to the Senate's hearings on the subject.26 An August 1976 CIA briefing for candidate and then-Governor Carter stressed that EO 11905 spelled out guidelines for "the conduct of intelligence operations within Constitutional limits," while creating the "Operations Advisory Group" to replace "the NSC subcommittee known under various MJ12 Research: Halloween Massacre & the CIA

Yes, everybody knows the president makes his own decisions, no matter how stupid, as evidenced by our orange fool in chief. Do you, like our goofy president, take the word of Putin over our own security agencies? That's a YES/NO question.

I certainly do..

How unpatriotic of you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You're a few pages behind, professor.

Not only did I miss the day when the left considered Russia an evil empire, but obviously I also missed the day when the CIA became a reliable source of intel.

Unfortunately for your contrived bullshit (and, make no mistake, everything you are posting is contrived bullshit, and has NOTHING to do with your embarrassing state of denial), this assessment comes from more than the CIA. And "good or evil Russia" has absolutely nothing to do with any of this. This is about a hostile foreign power meddling in our election, and the collusion of a campaign with them to do so.

Barry mocked Romney for suggeting Russia was a threat.

Barry KNEW of Russia's crimes and intervention yet he did nothing.

It took Hillary's loss and the erasure of his 'Legacy' to get Barry to give a crap about Russian intervention.

Haha, poor guy and your Obama Tourette's syndrome. You cant even help yourself, can you? Poor little baby isn't content with 100 obama threads a day for 8 years...has to parrot-squawk "Obama! " every time he hears Trump's name....

Do I get a dime for every Blame BushTM post I can find after 2008?

Is that your only defense for your embarrassing behavior? So it's everyone else's fault that you act like an idiot? That's special.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I asked first. Answer, and then I will.

well then you tell me first. you seem to like to offer up baited questions knowing someone is going to see your game and not want to play then go AHA! YOU REFUSE and giggle yourself some pyrrhic victory.

i don't play the "in this situation it's ok because of xyz but when you do it, it's wrong cause of 123" crap. i take the overall law/rule/whatever and try to apply it evenly to both sides. you game it up and try to say why the rules don't apply due to how you FEEL about something.

doesn't work that way.

Not a gotcha question. No ABC or 123 involved in it. Do you believe Putin over our own intelligence agencies.
I'm not sure that Hillary or Obama even made a response to the FISA comment. Do you care to give a link to their statements on the subject?

it is a "gotcha" question. and i don't need to give their statements on it, i can give FISAs statements and all the liberals saying they're full of shit, or OBAMA DIDN'T DO IT, shielding him from blame but laying all blame for everything at trumps feet.

i get tired of people changing the rules based on whether or not they like someone. i don't defend trump. he brings his shit upon himself. but i do dig into people who get emo with their "logic" and can't apply the rules they push on others on themselves.

let me know when you're up for that. til then i'm not puppydoggin around with you playing your 1-off games distracting from the overall topic. it's plain as day to see you have different rules for people you like vs. don't like and that is EXACTLY what got trump elected.

keep it up. we may be starting a trump dynasty now for several generations to come cause y'all had to be *THIS* stupid.

You refuse to answer my question, and now you say your own question is a gotcha question? How do you expect me to decide who is right or wrong if I don't even know what was said? I guess you right wingers don't have a problem with making a judgment without facts.

because you do it off who you like and don't like - that is a HUGE barometer for who you trust and/or don't.

seen you post enough to know this is true. there are a few in here i can talk deeply with and i appreciate the hell out of that. those who just lob shots around and giggle i tend to lose a lot of interest in for either side.

i quit being 12 40 years ago.

All your tapdancing and dodging is kind of embarrassing to watch.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Not only did I miss the day when the left considered Russia an evil empire, but obviously I also missed the day when the CIA became a reliable source of intel.

Unfortunately for your contrived bullshit (and, make no mistake, everything you are posting is contrived bullshit, and has NOTHING to do with your embarrassing state of denial), this assessment comes from more than the CIA. And "good or evil Russia" has absolutely nothing to do with any of this. This is about a hostile foreign power meddling in our election, and the collusion of a campaign with them to do so.

Barry mocked Romney for suggeting Russia was a threat.

Barry KNEW of Russia's crimes and intervention yet he did nothing.

It took Hillary's loss and the erasure of his 'Legacy' to get Barry to give a crap about Russian intervention.

Haha, poor guy and your Obama Tourette's syndrome. You cant even help yourself, can you? Poor little baby isn't content with 100 obama threads a day for 8 years...has to parrot-squawk "Obama! " every time he hears Trump's name....

Do I get a dime for every Blame BushTM post I can find after 2008?

Is that your only defense for your embarrassing behavior? So it's everyone else's fault that you act like an idiot? That's special.

Humiliating you is a hobby of mine, sorry.

 

[BULLDOG]

Unfortunately for your contrived bullshit (and, make no mistake, everything you are posting is contrived bullshit, and has NOTHING to do with your embarrassing state of denial), this assessment comes from more than the CIA. And "good or evil Russia" has absolutely nothing to do with any of this. This is about a hostile foreign power meddling in our election, and the collusion of a campaign with them to do so.

Barry mocked Romney for suggeting Russia was a threat.

Barry KNEW of Russia's crimes and intervention yet he did nothing.

It took Hillary's loss and the erasure of his 'Legacy' to get Barry to give a crap about Russian intervention.

Haha, poor guy and your Obama Tourette's syndrome. You cant even help yourself, can you? Poor little baby isn't content with 100 obama threads a day for 8 years...has to parrot-squawk "Obama! " every time he hears Trump's name....

Do I get a dime for every Blame BushTM post I can find after 2008?

Is that your only defense for your embarrassing behavior? So it's everyone else's fault that you act like an idiot? That's special.

Humiliating you is a hobby of mine, sorry.

You're humiliating yourself.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Unfortunately for your contrived bullshit (and, make no mistake, everything you are posting is contrived bullshit, and has NOTHING to do with your embarrassing state of denial), this assessment comes from more than the CIA. And "good or evil Russia" has absolutely nothing to do with any of this. This is about a hostile foreign power meddling in our election, and the collusion of a campaign with them to do so.

Barry mocked Romney for suggeting Russia was a threat.

Barry KNEW of Russia's crimes and intervention yet he did nothing.

It took Hillary's loss and the erasure of his 'Legacy' to get Barry to give a crap about Russian intervention.

Haha, poor guy and your Obama Tourette's syndrome. You cant even help yourself, can you? Poor little baby isn't content with 100 obama threads a day for 8 years...has to parrot-squawk "Obama! " every time he hears Trump's name....

Do I get a dime for every Blame BushTM post I can find after 2008?

Is that your only defense for your embarrassing behavior? So it's everyone else's fault that you act like an idiot? That's special.

Humiliating you is a hobby of mine, sorry.

Ah yes, Weatherman's nightly declaration of victory, always right on the heels of embarrassing himself. I sometimes wonder why people like you post on forums. Why bother? Cut out the middle man and go lick a mirror.