Trump suffers big loss in E. Jean Carroll defamation case, judge says he’s liable

E Jean Carroll is a Democrat Cypher. She will do and say anything the politburo can use.
 
There was no rape trial. There was a defamation civil trial. There never was a criminal rape trial. No one ever proved Trump raped anyone. Unless you can come up with a trial date, I'm going with that.


I understand that it is nearly impossible to believe that Grifty could find himself confirmed a rapist in a civil procedure.


But he did.


That is how fucking g'damned stupid that lug is.
 
I understand that it is nearly impossible to believe that Grifty could find himself confirmed a rapist in a civil procedure.


But he did.


That is how fucking g'damned stupid that lug is.

That is the problem. The ego of P01135809 is goddamn fragile he cannot accept losing. His whole miserable life he has paid other to do the hard work he did not want to do. He is so fucking absolutely fucking stupid. He has at best a third grade reading level. He was grandiose language to make up his own insecurity. P01135809 needs to boast, needs to be seen a bigger and smarter man because he simply is not.

He has to be the best. He is fact worst. He cheats on his wives. Grifts his followers. He treats Women as objects to used and abused. He is a pile of shit.
 
Trump White House Official Navarro Convicted of Contempt After Defying Jan. 6 Subpoena.


WASHINGTON (AP) — Trump White House official Peter Navarro was found guilty Thursday of contempt of Congress charges for refusing to cooperate with a congressional investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

The verdict came after a short trial for Navarro, who served as a White House trade adviser under President Donald Trump and later promoted the Republican’s baseless claims of mass voter fraud in the 2020 election he lost.

Navarro was the second Trump aide to face contempt of Congress charges after former White House adviser Steve Bannon. Bannon was convicted of two counts and was sentenced to four months behind bars, though he has been free pending appeal.

LOCK HIM UP!!!

LOCK HIM UP!!!

LOCK HIM UP!!!

LOCK HIM UP!!!
 
Last edited:
A federal judge on Wednesday ruled that Donald Trump is liable for defamatory statements he made about the writer E. Jean Carroll in 2019 when she went public with claims he had raped her decades earlier.

Judge Lewis Kaplan, as part of that ruling granting Carroll a partial summary judgment, said the upcoming trial for her civil lawsuit against Trump will only deal with the question of how much the former president should pay her in monetary damages.

The decision in U.S. District Court in Manhattan is the latest big loss for Trump in suits filed by Carroll.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/06/tru...ll-defamation-case-judge-says-hes-liable.html

When does all the winning start? The fat clown just can't keep his mouth shut.

Travesty.
Clearly since Jean Carrol offer to model lingerie by getting naked in front of Trump, she was the sexual aggressor.
 
Trump White House Official Navarro Convicted of Contempt After Defying Jan. 6 Subpoena.


WASHINGTON (AP) — Trump White House official Peter Navarro was found guilty Thursday of contempt of Congress charges for refusing to cooperate with a congressional investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

The verdict came after a short trial for Navarro, who served as a White House trade adviser under President Donald Trump and later promoted the Republican’s baseless claims of mass voter fraud in the 2020 election he lost.

Navarro was the second Trump aide to face contempt of Congress charges after former White House adviser Steve Bannon. Bannon was convicted of two counts and was sentenced to four months behind bars, though he has been free pending appeal.

LOCK HIM UP!!!

LOCK HIM UP!!!

LOCK HIM UP!!!

LOCK HIM UP!!!

It is illegal for congress to try to violate executive privilege.
 
A federal judge on Wednesday ruled that Donald Trump is liable for defamatory statements he made about the writer E. Jean Carroll in 2019 when she went public with claims he had raped her decades earlier.

Judge Lewis Kaplan, as part of that ruling granting Carroll a partial summary judgment, said the upcoming trial for her civil lawsuit against Trump will only deal with the question of how much the former president should pay her in monetary damages.

The decision in U.S. District Court in Manhattan is the latest big loss for Trump in suits filed by Carroll.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/06/tru...ll-defamation-case-judge-says-hes-liable.html

When does all the winning start? The fat clown just can't keep his mouth shut.
Judge appointed by Bill Clinton making judgement is a rape case :auiqs.jpg: ;)
 
Another disgraceful “legal” ruling. But since it goes against Trump, scumbags like big.08 applaud it.

What about he “disgraceful behaviour” that lead to this ruling? Not one word from the Cult about Trump’s disgusting behaviour towards his victims.

As always, Trump gets a pass from the Cult no matter what sick and deprived things he does.
 
Yep the said no rape get over yourself

No rape, but definitely sexual assault, physical abuse, slander and defamation. All of which you are discounting because she couldn’t tell whether it was his fingers or his penis.

The fact that you’re in denial that this man is a rapist, even though he admits to raping women, makes you ever the apologist for rape.

Your hero may be a liar and a rapist, but you are something even more vile for condoning such behaviour.
 
What about he “disgraceful behaviour” that lead to this ruling? Not one word from the Cult about Trump’s disgusting behaviour towards his victims.

Assumes a fact not established, LizardHo.
As always, Trump gets a pass from the Cult no matter what sick and deprived things he does.
Nonsense. Unlike you libturds, we just simply don’t assume guilt.
 
Assumes a fact not established, LizardHo.

Nonsense. Unlike you libturds, we just simply don’t assume guilt.

There was a finding of guilt on the sexual assault, the abuse, the slander and the libel. The only allegation there was a no finding on was the rape, because she didn't know if it was his fingers or his penis inside her.

Everything else was established, and had a finding of guilt and liability.
 
There was a finding of guilt on the sexual assault, the abuse, the slander and the libel. The only allegation there was a no finding on was the rape, because she didn't know if it was his fingers or his penis inside her.

Everything else was established, and had a finding of guilt and liability.
Wrong, retardedlizard.

There was no (and there could not possibly have been any) finding of “guilt.”

These weren’t criminal cases, you absolutely mindless imbecile.
 

Forum List

Back
Top