- May 20, 2009
- 144,267
- 66,579
- 2,330
Obama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Trump Scotus nominees are allowed to lie about Roe
- Thread starter CrusaderFrank
- Start date
- Banned
- #2
Personally I don't care about infringing on a bed wetter's capacity to destroy their own genetic garbage.
I can only see a positive outcome no matter how I look at it.
.
I can only see a positive outcome no matter how I look at it.
.
BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 94,084
- 30,400
- 2,250
Obama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
What specific lie do you think she told?
- May 20, 2009
- 144,267
- 66,579
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #4
That she supported 2AObama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
What specific lie do you think she told?
- Banned
- #5
Trump’s pick will certainly try to work Islamic ideology into our laws.Obama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
Tax Man
Gold Member
- Jan 30, 2015
- 5,923
- 1,095
- 170
Yes I am sure they will as religion is verboten in government.Trump’s pick will certainly try to work Islamic ideology into our laws.Obama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
Sun Devil 92
Diamond Member
- Apr 2, 2015
- 32,078
- 11,094
- 1,410
- Banned
- #7
Trump’s pick will certainly try to work Islamic ideology into our laws.Obama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
Good.
I hope you like Burkas.
- Mar 7, 2014
- 45,091
- 9,122
- 2,030
That she supported 2AObama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
What specific lie do you think she told?
And what does supporting the 2A mean?
Does it mean that you don't want to get rid of it?
Does it mean that you believe in the wacked out version of the 2A as peddled by wacked out NRA supporters?
The reality is, I've come on here and provided indisputable evidence that "bear arms" means "render military service" and "militia duty" and all the crazies just turn around and say "I don't care, I'm ignoring your evidence for what I want to believe".
Is that supporting the 2A? They think so.
They're just parroting their legislators who do the same damn thing... I've been in the house and senate chambers a gazillion times over the years (state) for deliberations & they be a bunch of emotionally driven, subjective be-otches & bastards, the house especially! (both sides of the aisle)That she supported 2AObama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
What specific lie do you think she told?
And what does supporting the 2A mean?
Does it mean that you don't want to get rid of it?
Does it mean that you believe in the wacked out version of the 2A as peddled by wacked out NRA supporters?
The reality is, I've come on here and provided indisputable evidence that "bear arms" means "render military service" and "militia duty" and all the crazies just turn around and say "I don't care, I'm ignoring your evidence for what I want to believe".
Is that supporting the 2A? They think so.
Last edited:
miketx
Diamond Member
- Dec 25, 2015
- 121,556
- 70,505
- 2,645
- Banned
- #13
All lies, as expected.That she supported 2AObama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
What specific lie do you think she told?
And what does supporting the 2A mean?
Does it mean that you don't want to get rid of it?
Does it mean that you believe in the wacked out version of the 2A as peddled by wacked out NRA supporters?
The reality is, I've come on here and provided indisputable evidence that "bear arms" means "render military service" and "militia duty" and all the crazies just turn around and say "I don't care, I'm ignoring your evidence for what I want to believe".
Is that supporting the 2A? They think so.
Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
They're just parroting their legislators who do the same damn thing... I've been in the house and senate chambers a gazillion times over the years (state) for deliberations & they be a bunch of emotionally driven, subjective be-otches & bastards, the house especially! (both sides of the isle)That she supported 2AObama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
What specific lie do you think she told?
And what does supporting the 2A mean?
Does it mean that you don't want to get rid of it?
Does it mean that you believe in the wacked out version of the 2A as peddled by wacked out NRA supporters?
The reality is, I've come on here and provided indisputable evidence that "bear arms" means "render military service" and "militia duty" and all the crazies just turn around and say "I don't care, I'm ignoring your evidence for what I want to believe".
Is that supporting the 2A? They think so.
Which island are you talking about?
Tks, Freudian slip...(Not) the VT isle utopia of progressivism located in the tumultuously partisan seas of New England. lolThey're just parroting their legislators who do the same damn thing... I've been in the house and senate chambers a gazillion times over the years (state) for deliberations & they be a bunch of emotionally driven, subjective be-otches & bastards, the house especially! (both sides of the isle)That she supported 2AObama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
What specific lie do you think she told?
And what does supporting the 2A mean?
Does it mean that you don't want to get rid of it?
Does it mean that you believe in the wacked out version of the 2A as peddled by wacked out NRA supporters?
The reality is, I've come on here and provided indisputable evidence that "bear arms" means "render military service" and "militia duty" and all the crazies just turn around and say "I don't care, I'm ignoring your evidence for what I want to believe".
Is that supporting the 2A? They think so.
Which island are you talking about?
BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 94,084
- 30,400
- 2,250
That she supported 2AObama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
What specific lie do you think she told?
And what makes you think she doesn't? Common sense regulation is not in conflict with the 2nd.
- May 20, 2009
- 144,267
- 66,579
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #17
"LEAHY: Thank you. And in the Second Circuit decision, Maloney v. Cuomo, you, in fact, recognized the Supreme Court decided in Heller that the personal right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the Constitution against federal law restrictions. Is that correct?
SOTOMAYOR: It is.
LEAHY: And you accept and applied the Heller decision when you decided Maloney?
SOTOMAYOR: Completely, sir. I accepted and applied established Supreme Court precedent that the Supreme Court in its own opinion in Heller acknowledged, answered the -- a different question.
LEAHY: Well, that -- let me -- let me refer to that, because Justice Scalia's opinion in the Heller case expressly left unresolved and explicitly reserved as a separate question whether the Second Amendment guarantee applies to the states and laws adopted by the - - by the states.
https://epic.org/privacy/sotomayor/sotomoyor_transcript.pdf
Then is 2010 in McDonald, she dissented that the 2A "I thus cannot find a historical consensus with respect to whether the right described by Heller is “fundamental” as our incorporation cases use that term. Nor can I find sufficient historical support for the majority’s conclusion that that right is “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition.” Instead, I find no more than ambiguity and uncertainty that perhaps even expert historians would find difficult to penetrate. And a historical record that is so ambiguous cannot itself provide an adequate basis for incorporating a private right of self-defense and applying it against the States."
McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010)
So, yeah Trump's nominees can say they had a friend who had an abortion
SOTOMAYOR: It is.
LEAHY: And you accept and applied the Heller decision when you decided Maloney?
SOTOMAYOR: Completely, sir. I accepted and applied established Supreme Court precedent that the Supreme Court in its own opinion in Heller acknowledged, answered the -- a different question.
LEAHY: Well, that -- let me -- let me refer to that, because Justice Scalia's opinion in the Heller case expressly left unresolved and explicitly reserved as a separate question whether the Second Amendment guarantee applies to the states and laws adopted by the - - by the states.
https://epic.org/privacy/sotomayor/sotomoyor_transcript.pdf
Then is 2010 in McDonald, she dissented that the 2A "I thus cannot find a historical consensus with respect to whether the right described by Heller is “fundamental” as our incorporation cases use that term. Nor can I find sufficient historical support for the majority’s conclusion that that right is “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition.” Instead, I find no more than ambiguity and uncertainty that perhaps even expert historians would find difficult to penetrate. And a historical record that is so ambiguous cannot itself provide an adequate basis for incorporating a private right of self-defense and applying it against the States."
McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010)
So, yeah Trump's nominees can say they had a friend who had an abortion
- May 20, 2009
- 144,267
- 66,579
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #18
That she supported 2AObama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
What specific lie do you think she told?
what ruling shows that she doesn't?
McDonald.
Last edited:
Obama's nominees lied about their support of 2A. Remember Sotomayors NRA brother?
Roe? Never heard of it? You mean salmon roe? Yummy!
Bleach bit? Is that a floor cleaning product?
Slashsnake
VIP Member
- Aug 5, 2016
- 589
- 48
- 68
Trump Scotus nominees are allowed to lie about Roe
A Supreme Court nomination shouldn't be based on one candidate's opinion(s) on one precedent that may change in the future. I'm more interested in hearing each candidates opinions of Obamacare and certain states having individual mandates to purchase health insurance. I'd also like to see the Supreme Court tackle states that restrict guns to those other than felons and with a known mental issue. For example, D.C's gun laws are unconstitutional, but the Supreme Court has done nothing to fix the issue.
The real problem here is Murkowski and Collins... Once again, these two can't act like Republicans. Someone should remind them to run as a Democrat the next time they're up for re-election.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 100
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 161
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 195
- Replies
- 126
- Views
- 2K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 37
- Views
- 185
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 1
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8047
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-