Trump hires nothing but the "best"......

[LordBrownTrout]

Yup, guessing you must of heard

Had you graduated from junior high, you too would know that the proper way of writing (and speaking is to state, "you must have heard"....and NOT the above......

Thank me later for the lesson......LOL

Is that your way of pretending you aren't a complete fool?

Gnat is the grammar queen. It gives him a heroin rush when he sees a misplaced comma. Thats his only chance for glory.

 

[tycho1572]

Yup, guessing you must of heard

Had you graduated from junior high, you too would know that the proper way of writing (and speaking is to state, "you must have heard"....and NOT the above......

Thank me later for the lesson......LOL

Is that your way of pretending you aren't a complete fool?

Gnat is the grammar queen. It gives him a heroin rush when he sees a misplaced comma. Thats his only chance for glory.

People like nat4900 are desperate to be right about something. It doesn't matter how trivial it is.

 

[radical right]

You know you have to provide proof of a crime, in order to get any of those warrants.

Actually you don't have to provide any proof of a crime to get those things, from what I understand one of the FISA warrants was based on the debunked Russia dossier, but all that has to be provided is there is a reasonable suspicion that evidence of a crime might be found. Warrants are designed to get the proof, they are not proof by themselves, many warrants provide no evidence at all.


.

What is Probable Cause? - Definition & Examples - Video & Lesson Transcript | Study.com

Definition of Probable Cause
Probable cause is the basis that police must have in order to make an arrest, perform a search of a person or property, or obtain a warrant. It is a standard that officers must meet to show reasonable grounds to believe that a crime was committed. In other words, the police cannot just have the suspicion of a crime. There must be some reasoning in order to make an arrest, perform a search or get a warrant.

 

[OKTexas]

You know you have to provide proof of a crime, in order to get any of those warrants.

Actually you don't have to provide any proof of a crime to get those things, from what I understand one of the FISA warrants was based on the debunked Russia dossier, but all that has to be provided is there is a reasonable suspicion that evidence of a crime might be found. Warrants are designed to get the proof, they are not proof by themselves, many warrants provide no evidence at all.


.

What is Probable Cause? - Definition & Examples - Video & Lesson Transcript | Study.com

Definition of Probable Cause
Probable cause is the basis that police must have in order to make an arrest, perform a search of a person or property, or obtain a warrant. It is a standard that officers must meet to show reasonable grounds to believe that a crime was committed. In other words, the police cannot just have the suspicion of a crime. There must be some reasoning in order to make an arrest, perform a search or get a warrant.

So you repeating what I said, with slightly different wording, alters the validity of what I said, HOW??


.

 

[rightwinger]

Who cares?

Trump doesn't listen to his advisors anyway

 

[radical right]

You know you have to provide proof of a crime, in order to get any of those warrants.

Actually you don't have to provide any proof of a crime to get those things,
.

officers must meet to show reasonable grounds to believe that a crime was committed. .

So you repeating what I said, with slightly different wording, alters the validity of what I said, HOW??
.

Slightly different words? You're fruity as a nutcake.

 

[nat4900]

Trump doesn't listen to his advisors anyway

Well, to be "fair",Trump DOES listen to his chief adviser..........Uncle Vlad......

 

[OKTexas]

You know you have to provide proof of a crime, in order to get any of those warrants.

Actually you don't have to provide any proof of a crime to get those things,
.

officers must meet to show reasonable grounds to believe that a crime was committed. .

So you repeating what I said, with slightly different wording, alters the validity of what I said, HOW??
.

Slightly different words? You're fruity as a nutcake.

So you engage in selective editing and think you proved something? Fuck you're not even smart enough to repeat a colloquialism correctly, it's "nutty as a fruit cake".

But this is what I actually said:

Actually you don't have to provide any proof of a crime to get those things, from what I understand one of the FISA warrants was based on the debunked Russia dossier, but all that has to be provided is there is a reasonable suspicion that evidence of a crime might be found. Warrants are designed to get the proof, they are not proof by themselves, many warrants provide no evidence at all.

How is that substantially different than what you posted?


.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

So Tony Podesta's company worked to lobby to lift sanctions against PUTIN'S BANK and Manafort is the only one under suspicion. You liberal assholes are disgusting because you don't or won't even recognize what hypocrites you are.

Well, TinyBrainCells........take that up with Trump's DOJ and know that Tony Podesta was NOT chairman of any campaign....BUT, Manafort certainly was.........LOL

Better Tiny than Shit-For-Brains like you.

It's September 20th. Over 10 months since you lost.

It was going to be over in 3 months.

Then it was going to be over in 6 months.

This after you ran a thread assuring Clinton's victory.

You pathetic losers are good for a huge laugh.

Suck on it.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Trump doesn't listen to his advisors anyway

Well, to be "fair",Trump DOES listen to his chief adviser..........Uncle Vlad......

And you suck John Podesta's dick.

 

[nat4900]

And you suck John Podesta's dick.

WOW.......Try next Shakespearean love sonnets.....it seems you have the flair of the wordsmith...

(What an LOL).

 

[Sun Devil 92]

And you suck John Podesta's dick.

WOW.......Try next Shakespearean love sonnets.....it seems you have the flair of the wordsmith...

(What an LOL).

Can't help that you butthurt cocksuckers can't get over it.

 

[radical right]

But this is what I actually said:

Actually you don't have to provide any proof of a crime to get those things, from what I understand one of the FISA warrants was based on the debunked Russia dossier, but all that has to be provided is there is a reasonable suspicion that evidence of a crime might be found. Warrants are designed to get the proof, they are not proof by themselves, many warrants provide no evidence at all.

How is that substantially different than what you posted?


.

That's because you're wrong. You say they don't have to prove a crime happened, but only that evidence of a crime may exist. But you don't explain how there can be evidence of a crime, without there having been a crime.

 

[radical right]

And you suck John Podesta's dick.

WOW.......Try next Shakespearean love sonnets.....it seems you have the flair of the wordsmith...

(What an LOL).

Can't help that you butthurt cocksuckers can't get over it.

I can't understand your fascination with same sex oral copulation. Something happened to you as a child you want to discuss?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

And you suck John Podesta's dick.

WOW.......Try next Shakespearean love sonnets.....it seems you have the flair of the wordsmith...

(What an LOL).

Can't help that you butthurt cocksuckers can't get over it.

I can't understand your fascination with same sex oral copulation. Something happened to you as a child you want to discuss?

What you don't understand would fill a couple of semi's.

Discuss ? Like you'd be capable of any thought.......

 

[radical right]

I can't understand your fascination with same sex oral copulation. Something happened to you as a child you want to discuss?

What you don't understand would fill a couple of semi's.

Discuss ? Like you'd be capable of any thought.......

Try me, give it a shot, you might get years of denial off your chest.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

I can't understand your fascination with same sex oral copulation. Something happened to you as a child you want to discuss?

What you don't understand would fill a couple of semi's.

Discuss ? Like you'd be capable of any thought.......

Try me, give it a shot, you might get years of denial off your chest.

Sure...

We are ten months plus since Trump won.

The left is still posting hopeful threads about Russian and other things.

But that isn't butthurt.......ROTFLMAO

 

[radical right]

We are ten months plus since Trump won.

The left is still posting hopeful threads about Russian and other things.

But that isn't butthurt.......ROTFLMAO

Trump won. you should be celebrating, but instead you're an angry man with an oral fixation. It's like you would have been happier if Hillary won, so you would have someone to bitch about.

You're the dog who finally caught the bus he was chasing, and you throw yourself under it.

 

[charwin95]

Let me know when Hillaryous wins the election challenge. I suggest a 4000 calorie a day diet while you wait, snowflake.

What is this has to do with Hillary? Deflection or you just don't have a clue?

 

[charwin95]

Right wingers on here (also known as Trump Cult Members) are trying desperately to defend the latest revelations about Paul Manafort...

• This guy has been investigated for over a decade for having off shore accounts which may well be a scam for money laundering for foreign oligarchs.....

• This guy worked for Russian stooges to undermine the Ukraine's pro-west stances....

• ....and This guy failed to register himself under the FARA (note.......The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) is a United States law passed in 1938 requiring that agents representing the interests of foreign powers in a "political or quasi-political capacity" disclose their relationship with the foreign government and information about related activities and finances. The purpose is to facilitate "evaluation by the government and the American people of the statements and activities of such persons." The law is administered by the FARA Registration Unit of the Counterespionage Section (CES) in the National Security Division (NSD) of the United States Department of Justice.

Sooooooo, what does Trump do in his "impeccable" vetting as to whom he hires???? He appoints Manafort to be his campaign manager (or, more likely, Trump was TOLD to hire Manafort.)

Good luck with defending Manafort who has been directly told that he WILL be indicted.

He did not hired the best. He hired what he think are his buddy buddy for more control. Look at the one he hired most are chimps stomping chest.