- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,408
- 142,833
- 2,615
The Republicans have not elected a President without a Bush or Nixon on the ticket since 1928
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah that's why he gave a keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention... the party elites were test marketing him to see if was short list material.Obama's candidacy was completely unpredicted.
Which doesn't make a hill of beans if the party bosses and big money donors don't support a candidate, sorry to burst your bubble but he wasn't this out of nowhere, unknown that defied the odds to win, he was on the party elites short list long before the nomination process ever began.He ran a great ground game and used modern technology for funding.
What's the difference? so the Republican Party elites telegraphed their short list earlier than the Democratic Party elites telegraphed theirs, big deal, same process, different timing.Who were the last Republican candidates?
With the exception of Ronald Reagan, all of them were the "next in line"..
Yikes are doing that "War on Women" Thing Pete ?Fiorina will fade away, I have little doubt about that.
She couldn't even beat Boxer...
The other problem she will have is that she stiffed her campaign staff for 6 years and didn't pay them till she decided to go for POTUS.
If she somehow comes up with a good excuse I'd like to hear it, but until that time I'll never support her and I doubt many working people will.
I have seen the "I am mad as hell " Republicans before. They became the TeaTards of 2009. They used to flock to the Ron Paul's or Palins before. Now they claim to love Trump and Carson.There's little doubt that the 4 names mentioned in the thread's title will be winning the nomination in the first half-dozen or so primaries next year.
O'rly?
December 2007. Look who is on the bottom:
That graph points to a common trend among Republicans. Their initial responses in a campaign are of the "I'm mad as hell, I want someone new" variety
That is how we get candidates like Palin, Bachmann, Cain or Gingrich polling well in 2012 and see Trump, Carson and Fiorina polling well today
Once the primaries start, the moderates take over and more traditional candidates take the lead
In past elections, I knew what you said today was correct. Not this time!
I, like you, believe that Trump is going to go away. He doesn't have credible answers for the problems he points out. His whole shtick is, "who do you want handling it other than Trump!" That is NOT a good answer.
On the other hand, everything that he has brought up will propel the eventual winner to the GOP nomination, when whomever it is brings up plausible solutions, besides "I am Trump, and am great." This is exactly why the moderates are done. The questions and problems being addressed have changed. Oh sure, we want to know about Putin, Iran, taxes, and all of the other things GOP voters always look at. But now we want to know about illegal immigration. We want to know about caps on legal immigration. We want to know about energy policy going forward, and this incessant climate change joke being taken out of it.
All of the extras I posted will determine who the GOP nominee is. Most of the rest of the stuff is cookie cutter between all of them. But if you notice, the NEW issues in this cycle have the person who brought them up in the lead, and those who also go along with it in 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. Also notice, that NONE of the moderates (establishment) go along with it.
No Mr RW, you are going to get a different animal this time from the GOP. Look at what Mr Statistics (your pal I am sure) has posted...............that basically over 60% of the GOP think they got hosed by the GOP in Washington. (I am paraphrasing, not quoting, but you get the drift) Do you actually believe we are going to change course and vote Bush or Kasich? If you believe that, I have some swampland in Florida I will sell you too.
And then, may I suggest as a good citizen that you pay attention to your own post on how things can change quickly. I, like you, never buy into polls this far out. In politics, things change weekly, sometimes daily.
Here is something you can bring back to haunt me later, but I am 90% sure I am correct. Bernie Sanders will not beat ANY of the GOP candidates if he is the nominee, no matter what the polls say today. Not going to happen, no matter how hard people try to convince everyone it is so.
Unless Hillary Clinton comes out smelling like a rose; in other words exonerated before spring of next year, every GOP candidate in the top 5 will beat her, with the possible exception of Trump....and that is a toss-up.
Your "this time is different" claims will fall away as will Trump and Carson.
Once the real voting begins, the real republicans will come out. You may call them RINOs. They are the ones who determine the Republican candidate
None of the candidates in the GOP clown car are capable of beating Hillary or Biden. Mr Trump has proven that