Trump Concedes it Was the Russians... Now What?

[Lewdog]

"My first statement?" His Chief of Staff who is his secretary passed along a message from him. Did you watch the video of the interview? Did you see that Preibus was in on the same intelligence briefing as Trump? Of course you didn't, because Trump supporters seldomly EVER read the articles provided or watch the videos provided but ALWAYS feel compelled to comment on every thread. I criticize him for not taking action? No I criticize him because he wants to reverse the actions of Obama against Russia, and then do the token action of setting up a special cyber-security team. Do you even understand the deflection he is doing? He's quick to condemn the U.S. intelligence agencies and say Putin is a smart man on Twitter, yet when he finds out Putin lied he doesn't say a goddamn thing about it.

1. Trump never said he believes Russia influenced the election in his favor and helped him win.

2. Trump never said he was going to reverse Obama's actions - you even state in your initial statement, saying Trump supposedly said he 'may take actions in response'. That's a helluva big difference from claiming he will reverse Obama actions.

1. Again, I NEVER said that Trump said the hack influenced the election. I said he now admits Russia hacked the DNC.

2. It is being reported all over the place that Trump is going to reverse Obama's actions against Russia. Even Putin is counting on Trump to do so. Trump has made it quite clear that he plans to increase relations with Russia... through his tweets where he flat out says so. How do you improve relations when you have heavy sanctions in place?

 

[Iceweasel]

LOL You went /there/?!? Really? None of our 17 agencies looked at the DNC rigs that were hacked.

Never claimed to be a specialist, but I was coding viruses and anti-viruses in the late 80s/early 90s and I've been coding ever since. My 26 years of experience in the realm of computer speak tells me you pretty much can't tie a malware to any person nor country - and defiantly not a malware that's available for public download in the dark web underworld. I also know that "political trolls and propaganda TV" does not equate to "probably hacking." I know that Guccifer was undeniably Ukranian, and that Guccifer 2.0 has /repeatedly/ stated that he was also Ukrainian. I know that the Malware claims to be Ukrainian. I know that Mendax has repeatedly said that his source was not Russian, and that it was a DNC leak, specifically that it was a Bernie fan - and I know from personal quite intimate experience how emotionally imbalanced those folks are. I also know that a /professional/ hacker wouldn't be using kiddy script, well known, malware to do hack another government, and I find it real hard to buy that the Russians would do so given that they are some of the best hackers in the world. I know that the gov knew /all/ of this hacking shit, as well as the opinion it was Russia, before Trump was even the GOP nominee. So, to /now/ suddenly make a big deal out of it, and to proclaim that it was all done to help Trump win stinks of partisan bullshit so bad we're going to need to replace the carpet and leave the windows open.

All I hear is

You've not seen the evidence... You've not seen how they actually tracked where the malware sent the information back to Russia. The DNC wasn't the only placed hacked, so where Democratic headquarters in various states... and so was Lyndsey Graham, and who knows who else. But you guys just keep victim blaming the DNC, it's pathetic.

I'm sorry but I'm an American that believes in rights. And for rights to work, they have to cover everyone... so even those that are unethical or immoral get rights too. That's what America is based on, as I quoted Ben Franklin in another thread, it's better that 100 criminals go free than to have 1 innocent person suffer. But hey, you all want to blame the DNC for being the victim of the Russian hack... that says a lot about your character.

You keep kicking your strawman argument around hoping to impress. It doesn't. No one said the Democrats didn't have the right to lie, mislead and stack the deck for their sham of a primary.

But we don't know who spilled the beans. Attacking a country (especially Russia) for the sake of political expediency is foolish and downright dangerous. The "report" has no evidence. Period.

And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high.

 

[Lewdog]

LOL You went /there/?!? Really? None of our 17 agencies looked at the DNC rigs that were hacked.

Never claimed to be a specialist, but I was coding viruses and anti-viruses in the late 80s/early 90s and I've been coding ever since. My 26 years of experience in the realm of computer speak tells me you pretty much can't tie a malware to any person nor country - and defiantly not a malware that's available for public download in the dark web underworld. I also know that "political trolls and propaganda TV" does not equate to "probably hacking." I know that Guccifer was undeniably Ukranian, and that Guccifer 2.0 has /repeatedly/ stated that he was also Ukrainian. I know that the Malware claims to be Ukrainian. I know that Mendax has repeatedly said that his source was not Russian, and that it was a DNC leak, specifically that it was a Bernie fan - and I know from personal quite intimate experience how emotionally imbalanced those folks are. I also know that a /professional/ hacker wouldn't be using kiddy script, well known, malware to do hack another government, and I find it real hard to buy that the Russians would do so given that they are some of the best hackers in the world. I know that the gov knew /all/ of this hacking shit, as well as the opinion it was Russia, before Trump was even the GOP nominee. So, to /now/ suddenly make a big deal out of it, and to proclaim that it was all done to help Trump win stinks of partisan bullshit so bad we're going to need to replace the carpet and leave the windows open.

All I hear is

You've not seen the evidence... You've not seen how they actually tracked where the malware sent the information back to Russia. The DNC wasn't the only placed hacked, so where Democratic headquarters in various states... and so was Lyndsey Graham, and who knows who else. But you guys just keep victim blaming the DNC, it's pathetic.

I'm sorry but I'm an American that believes in rights. And for rights to work, they have to cover everyone... so even those that are unethical or immoral get rights too. That's what America is based on, as I quoted Ben Franklin in another thread, it's better that 100 criminals go free than to have 1 innocent person suffer. But hey, you all want to blame the DNC for being the victim of the Russian hack... that says a lot about your character.

You keep kicking your strawman argument around hoping to impress. It doesn't. No one said the Democrats didn't have the right to lie, mislead and stack the deck for their sham of a primary.

But we don't know who spilled the beans. Attacking a country (especially Russia) for the sake of political expediency is foolish and downright dangerous. The "report" has no evidence. Period.

And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high.

So you keep victim blaming...

Why won't you answer my question? Do you also blame a woman that gets sexually assaulted because she dressed "slutty?" That's the same thing you are doing here.

 

[Iceweasel]

The point being, none of the information made available to the voters was false, and the voters made a legitimate decision based on the information they had.

Also, you're a hypocrite for getting your panties in a ruffle over "Russian hacking", while simply shrugging off any attempts on the Democrats' side to skew election results.

WTF is wrong with you? A foreign entity hacked a political party in our country with intentions to influence the election and you blame the Democrats. Victim blame much?

More topic-hopping. A sure sign that you know your argument is bullshit.

Topic-hopping? What argument are you calling bullshit? I can't keep things straight with the double-talk of Trump supporters. Like father like son I guess.

No, you just throw so much shit around you can't keep track of it.

Wrong... I've never seen supporters of a candidate so often try to use two contradicting sides to an argument to make their point. It's maddening. Either the emails were damaging and therefor their illegal release influenced the election or not.

I never said they were damaging, said just the opposite in fact. You are simply too stupid to follow conversations.

I doubt any Hillary or Trump supporter changed their mind. Bear in mind the left was prancing in victory all during the Wikileaks releases taunting the right about them being inconsequential. The hypocrisy is all on the left and you can't spin it away.

 

[Iceweasel]

LOL You went /there/?!? Really? None of our 17 agencies looked at the DNC rigs that were hacked.

Never claimed to be a specialist, but I was coding viruses and anti-viruses in the late 80s/early 90s and I've been coding ever since. My 26 years of experience in the realm of computer speak tells me you pretty much can't tie a malware to any person nor country - and defiantly not a malware that's available for public download in the dark web underworld. I also know that "political trolls and propaganda TV" does not equate to "probably hacking." I know that Guccifer was undeniably Ukranian, and that Guccifer 2.0 has /repeatedly/ stated that he was also Ukrainian. I know that the Malware claims to be Ukrainian. I know that Mendax has repeatedly said that his source was not Russian, and that it was a DNC leak, specifically that it was a Bernie fan - and I know from personal quite intimate experience how emotionally imbalanced those folks are. I also know that a /professional/ hacker wouldn't be using kiddy script, well known, malware to do hack another government, and I find it real hard to buy that the Russians would do so given that they are some of the best hackers in the world. I know that the gov knew /all/ of this hacking shit, as well as the opinion it was Russia, before Trump was even the GOP nominee. So, to /now/ suddenly make a big deal out of it, and to proclaim that it was all done to help Trump win stinks of partisan bullshit so bad we're going to need to replace the carpet and leave the windows open.

All I hear is

You've not seen the evidence... You've not seen how they actually tracked where the malware sent the information back to Russia. The DNC wasn't the only placed hacked, so where Democratic headquarters in various states... and so was Lyndsey Graham, and who knows who else. But you guys just keep victim blaming the DNC, it's pathetic.

I'm sorry but I'm an American that believes in rights. And for rights to work, they have to cover everyone... so even those that are unethical or immoral get rights too. That's what America is based on, as I quoted Ben Franklin in another thread, it's better that 100 criminals go free than to have 1 innocent person suffer. But hey, you all want to blame the DNC for being the victim of the Russian hack... that says a lot about your character.

You keep kicking your strawman argument around hoping to impress. It doesn't. No one said the Democrats didn't have the right to lie, mislead and stack the deck for their sham of a primary.

But we don't know who spilled the beans. Attacking a country (especially Russia) for the sake of political expediency is foolish and downright dangerous. The "report" has no evidence. Period.

And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high.

So you keep victim blaming...

Why won't you answer my question? Do you also blame a woman that gets sexually assaulted because she dressed "slutty?" That's the same thing you are doing here.

You can't read. Your CJ degree won't get you a loss prevention job at Walmart.

"And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high."

 

[Lewdog]

LOL You went /there/?!? Really? None of our 17 agencies looked at the DNC rigs that were hacked.

Never claimed to be a specialist, but I was coding viruses and anti-viruses in the late 80s/early 90s and I've been coding ever since. My 26 years of experience in the realm of computer speak tells me you pretty much can't tie a malware to any person nor country - and defiantly not a malware that's available for public download in the dark web underworld. I also know that "political trolls and propaganda TV" does not equate to "probably hacking." I know that Guccifer was undeniably Ukranian, and that Guccifer 2.0 has /repeatedly/ stated that he was also Ukrainian. I know that the Malware claims to be Ukrainian. I know that Mendax has repeatedly said that his source was not Russian, and that it was a DNC leak, specifically that it was a Bernie fan - and I know from personal quite intimate experience how emotionally imbalanced those folks are. I also know that a /professional/ hacker wouldn't be using kiddy script, well known, malware to do hack another government, and I find it real hard to buy that the Russians would do so given that they are some of the best hackers in the world. I know that the gov knew /all/ of this hacking shit, as well as the opinion it was Russia, before Trump was even the GOP nominee. So, to /now/ suddenly make a big deal out of it, and to proclaim that it was all done to help Trump win stinks of partisan bullshit so bad we're going to need to replace the carpet and leave the windows open.

All I hear is

You've not seen the evidence... You've not seen how they actually tracked where the malware sent the information back to Russia. The DNC wasn't the only placed hacked, so where Democratic headquarters in various states... and so was Lyndsey Graham, and who knows who else. But you guys just keep victim blaming the DNC, it's pathetic.

I'm sorry but I'm an American that believes in rights. And for rights to work, they have to cover everyone... so even those that are unethical or immoral get rights too. That's what America is based on, as I quoted Ben Franklin in another thread, it's better that 100 criminals go free than to have 1 innocent person suffer. But hey, you all want to blame the DNC for being the victim of the Russian hack... that says a lot about your character.

You keep kicking your strawman argument around hoping to impress. It doesn't. No one said the Democrats didn't have the right to lie, mislead and stack the deck for their sham of a primary.

But we don't know who spilled the beans. Attacking a country (especially Russia) for the sake of political expediency is foolish and downright dangerous. The "report" has no evidence. Period.

And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high.

So you keep victim blaming...

Why won't you answer my question? Do you also blame a woman that gets sexually assaulted because she dressed "slutty?" That's the same thing you are doing here.

You can't read. Your CJ degree won't get you a loss prevention job at Walmart.

"And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high."

I can read... and you are full of shit.

Just like in two consecutive posts you just contradicted yourself.

One post you say no one voted based on the emails that were released, and then the next you brag about how corrupt the Democratic party is based on the emails. You're fucking as dumb as a box of rocks... and what makes it even more funny, is that you then go on to insult me and say I can't read and that my degree is worthless.

Do you even understand what you are typing?

 

[Iceweasel]

LOL You went /there/?!? Really? None of our 17 agencies looked at the DNC rigs that were hacked.

Never claimed to be a specialist, but I was coding viruses and anti-viruses in the late 80s/early 90s and I've been coding ever since. My 26 years of experience in the realm of computer speak tells me you pretty much can't tie a malware to any person nor country - and defiantly not a malware that's available for public download in the dark web underworld. I also know that "political trolls and propaganda TV" does not equate to "probably hacking." I know that Guccifer was undeniably Ukranian, and that Guccifer 2.0 has /repeatedly/ stated that he was also Ukrainian. I know that the Malware claims to be Ukrainian. I know that Mendax has repeatedly said that his source was not Russian, and that it was a DNC leak, specifically that it was a Bernie fan - and I know from personal quite intimate experience how emotionally imbalanced those folks are. I also know that a /professional/ hacker wouldn't be using kiddy script, well known, malware to do hack another government, and I find it real hard to buy that the Russians would do so given that they are some of the best hackers in the world. I know that the gov knew /all/ of this hacking shit, as well as the opinion it was Russia, before Trump was even the GOP nominee. So, to /now/ suddenly make a big deal out of it, and to proclaim that it was all done to help Trump win stinks of partisan bullshit so bad we're going to need to replace the carpet and leave the windows open.

All I hear is

You've not seen the evidence... You've not seen how they actually tracked where the malware sent the information back to Russia. The DNC wasn't the only placed hacked, so where Democratic headquarters in various states... and so was Lyndsey Graham, and who knows who else. But you guys just keep victim blaming the DNC, it's pathetic.

I'm sorry but I'm an American that believes in rights. And for rights to work, they have to cover everyone... so even those that are unethical or immoral get rights too. That's what America is based on, as I quoted Ben Franklin in another thread, it's better that 100 criminals go free than to have 1 innocent person suffer. But hey, you all want to blame the DNC for being the victim of the Russian hack... that says a lot about your character.

You keep kicking your strawman argument around hoping to impress. It doesn't. No one said the Democrats didn't have the right to lie, mislead and stack the deck for their sham of a primary.

But we don't know who spilled the beans. Attacking a country (especially Russia) for the sake of political expediency is foolish and downright dangerous. The "report" has no evidence. Period.

And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high.

So you keep victim blaming...

Why won't you answer my question? Do you also blame a woman that gets sexually assaulted because she dressed "slutty?" That's the same thing you are doing here.

You can't read. Your CJ degree won't get you a loss prevention job at Walmart.

"And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high."

I can read... and you are full of shit.

Just like in two consecutive posts you just contradicted yourself.

One post you say no one voted based on the emails that were released, and then the next you brag about how corrupt the Democratic party is based on the emails. You're fucking as dumb as a box of rocks... and what makes it even more funny, is that you then go on to insult me and say I can't read and that my degree is worthless.

Do you even understand what you are typing?

You keep projecting your stupid thoughts on me. The two statements aren't about the same issue.

One is the hacking of email and the other is the possible outcome of their revelation. I said all along it didn't influence the election, said it numerous times and from the beginning. If you are NOT trolling you are one dumb motherfucker. I said we on the right already knew about Democrat corruption and the left doesn't care.

It the LEFT that is making a big stink about it, not me. Not the right. The point there is you and they are too stupid to understand what you are really complaining about is your corruption being revealed. I never siad it mattered. That's YOUR position, not mine.

The fact is you can't prove it changed anything and throwing around you butthurt dirty baby diapers won't change anything. You are just proving your inability.

 

[Lewdog]

All I hear is

You've not seen the evidence... You've not seen how they actually tracked where the malware sent the information back to Russia. The DNC wasn't the only placed hacked, so where Democratic headquarters in various states... and so was Lyndsey Graham, and who knows who else. But you guys just keep victim blaming the DNC, it's pathetic.

I'm sorry but I'm an American that believes in rights. And for rights to work, they have to cover everyone... so even those that are unethical or immoral get rights too. That's what America is based on, as I quoted Ben Franklin in another thread, it's better that 100 criminals go free than to have 1 innocent person suffer. But hey, you all want to blame the DNC for being the victim of the Russian hack... that says a lot about your character.

You keep kicking your strawman argument around hoping to impress. It doesn't. No one said the Democrats didn't have the right to lie, mislead and stack the deck for their sham of a primary.

But we don't know who spilled the beans. Attacking a country (especially Russia) for the sake of political expediency is foolish and downright dangerous. The "report" has no evidence. Period.

And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high.

So you keep victim blaming...

Why won't you answer my question? Do you also blame a woman that gets sexually assaulted because she dressed "slutty?" That's the same thing you are doing here.

You can't read. Your CJ degree won't get you a loss prevention job at Walmart.

"And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high."

I can read... and you are full of shit.

Just like in two consecutive posts you just contradicted yourself.

One post you say no one voted based on the emails that were released, and then the next you brag about how corrupt the Democratic party is based on the emails. You're fucking as dumb as a box of rocks... and what makes it even more funny, is that you then go on to insult me and say I can't read and that my degree is worthless.

Do you even understand what you are typing?

You keep projecting your stupid thoughts on me. The two statements aren't about the same issue.

One is the hacking of email and the other is the possible outcome of their revelation. I said all along it didn't influence the election, said it numerous times and from the beginning. If you are NOT trolling you are one dumb motherfucker. I said we on the right already knew about Democrat corruption and the left doesn't care.

It the LEFT that is making a big stink about it, not me. Not the right. The point there is you and they are too stupid to understand what you are really complaining about is your corruption being revealed. I never siad it mattered. That's YOUR position, not mine.

The fact is you can't prove it changed anything and throwing around you butthurt dirty baby diapers won't change anything. You are just proving your inability.

Yes, yes they are the same issue. Quit being the ignorant douche bag you always are and read what you type.

You say the Democratic Party is full of corruption... how was that proven? By released hacked emails...

Then you say the emails weren't damaging... BUT WAIT... you just said the Democratic Party was full of corruption. Is corruption a good word where you come from?

cor·rup·tion
/kəˈrəpSH(ə)n/
noun

• 1.dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery:"the journalist who wants to expose corruption in high places"synonyms:dishonesty, unscrupulousness, double-dealing, fraud, fraudulence, ... moreantonyms:honesty
• 2.the process by which something, typically a word or expression, is changed from its original use or meaning to one that is regarded as erroneous or debased.synonyms:alteration, bastardization, debasement, adulteration

Ok...yeah that doesn't sound good...

So let's see, the Democratic Party was exposed as corrupt due to the release of the hacked emails, BUT you say the release of those emails weren't damaging. Again, you are talking out of both sides of your mouth. WHICH the fuck is it?

 

[Iceweasel]

You keep kicking your strawman argument around hoping to impress. It doesn't. No one said the Democrats didn't have the right to lie, mislead and stack the deck for their sham of a primary.

But we don't know who spilled the beans. Attacking a country (especially Russia) for the sake of political expediency is foolish and downright dangerous. The "report" has no evidence. Period.

And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high.

So you keep victim blaming...

Why won't you answer my question? Do you also blame a woman that gets sexually assaulted because she dressed "slutty?" That's the same thing you are doing here.

You can't read. Your CJ degree won't get you a loss prevention job at Walmart.

"And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high."

I can read... and you are full of shit.

Just like in two consecutive posts you just contradicted yourself.

One post you say no one voted based on the emails that were released, and then the next you brag about how corrupt the Democratic party is based on the emails. You're fucking as dumb as a box of rocks... and what makes it even more funny, is that you then go on to insult me and say I can't read and that my degree is worthless.

Do you even understand what you are typing?

You keep projecting your stupid thoughts on me. The two statements aren't about the same issue.

One is the hacking of email and the other is the possible outcome of their revelation. I said all along it didn't influence the election, said it numerous times and from the beginning. If you are NOT trolling you are one dumb motherfucker. I said we on the right already knew about Democrat corruption and the left doesn't care.

It the LEFT that is making a big stink about it, not me. Not the right. The point there is you and they are too stupid to understand what you are really complaining about is your corruption being revealed. I never siad it mattered. That's YOUR position, not mine.

The fact is you can't prove it changed anything and throwing around you butthurt dirty baby diapers won't change anything. You are just proving your inability.

Yes, yes they are the same issue. Quit being the ignorant douche bag you always are and read what you type.

You say the Democratic Party is full of corruption... how was that proven? By released hacked emails...

Then you say the emails weren't damaging... BUT WAIT... you just said the Democratic Party was full of corruption. Is corruption a good word where you come from?

cor·rup·tion
/kəˈrəpSH(ə)n/
noun

• 1.dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery:"the journalist who wants to expose corruption in high places"synonyms:dishonesty, unscrupulousness, double-dealing, fraud, fraudulence, ... moreantonyms:honesty
• 2.the process by which something, typically a word or expression, is changed from its original use or meaning to one that is regarded as erroneous or debased.synonyms:alteration, bastardization, debasement, adulteration

Ok...yeah that doesn't sound good...

So let's see, the Democratic Party was exposed as corrupt due to the release of the hacked emails, BUT you say the release of those emails weren't damaging. Again, you are talking out of both sides of your mouth. WHICH the fuck is it?

Everyone paying attention to politics knew the Dems were/are corrupt. One side cares, the other not. No it isn't the same thing as getting hacked. No, it doesn't prove it altered the election. You are full of shit and can't back up your assertion. Then you call people idiots for not agreeing with you.

At this point I am 100% certain you are the asshole that kept coming back to officer.com under new names. Exact same MO.

 

[Lewdog]

So you keep victim blaming...

Why won't you answer my question? Do you also blame a woman that gets sexually assaulted because she dressed "slutty?" That's the same thing you are doing here.

You can't read. Your CJ degree won't get you a loss prevention job at Walmart.

"And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high."

I can read... and you are full of shit.

Just like in two consecutive posts you just contradicted yourself.

One post you say no one voted based on the emails that were released, and then the next you brag about how corrupt the Democratic party is based on the emails. You're fucking as dumb as a box of rocks... and what makes it even more funny, is that you then go on to insult me and say I can't read and that my degree is worthless.

Do you even understand what you are typing?

You keep projecting your stupid thoughts on me. The two statements aren't about the same issue.

One is the hacking of email and the other is the possible outcome of their revelation. I said all along it didn't influence the election, said it numerous times and from the beginning. If you are NOT trolling you are one dumb motherfucker. I said we on the right already knew about Democrat corruption and the left doesn't care.

It the LEFT that is making a big stink about it, not me. Not the right. The point there is you and they are too stupid to understand what you are really complaining about is your corruption being revealed. I never siad it mattered. That's YOUR position, not mine.

The fact is you can't prove it changed anything and throwing around you butthurt dirty baby diapers won't change anything. You are just proving your inability.

Yes, yes they are the same issue. Quit being the ignorant douche bag you always are and read what you type.

You say the Democratic Party is full of corruption... how was that proven? By released hacked emails...

Then you say the emails weren't damaging... BUT WAIT... you just said the Democratic Party was full of corruption. Is corruption a good word where you come from?

cor·rup·tion
/kəˈrəpSH(ə)n/
noun

• 1.dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery:"the journalist who wants to expose corruption in high places"synonyms:dishonesty, unscrupulousness, double-dealing, fraud, fraudulence, ... moreantonyms:honesty
• 2.the process by which something, typically a word or expression, is changed from its original use or meaning to one that is regarded as erroneous or debased.synonyms:alteration, bastardization, debasement, adulteration

Ok...yeah that doesn't sound good...

So let's see, the Democratic Party was exposed as corrupt due to the release of the hacked emails, BUT you say the release of those emails weren't damaging. Again, you are talking out of both sides of your mouth. WHICH the fuck is it?

Everyone paying attention to politics knew the Dems were/are corrupt. One side cares, the other not. No it isn't the same thing as getting hacked. No, it doesn't prove it altered the election. You are full of shit and can't back up your assertion. Then you call people idiots for not agreeing with you.

At this point I am 100% certain you are the asshole that kept coming back to officer.com under new names. Exact same MO.

No, not everyone KNEW they were screwing Bernie. Not everyone KNEW Donna Brazile was giving the questions to Hillary. Not everyone KNEW about operation Taco Bowl... want me to keep going on?

And no, I had never been to that forum in my entire life until you said that was the Law Enforcement forum you got your education from.

 

[Dragonlady]

he'll still bend over & grab his ankles anytime putin tells him to.

Trump whooped your ass in the election, he rolled into Dem territory like a tank and took your blue states away from Hillary. PA, MI, WI funniest damn thing I ever saw. Who got bent over?

You did you dumb fuck.

Trump didn't roll over anyone. He didn't even win the popular vote. He squeaked in because daily leaks of damaging Democratic emails kept the focus on Hillary's emails and many Democrats stayed home.

The alt right, seeing an opportunity to put a white nationalist into the White House turned out though, in full force.



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[charwin95]

he'll still bend over & grab his ankles anytime putin tells him to.

Trump whooped your ass in the election, he rolled into Dem territory like a tank and took your blue states away from Hillary. PA, MI, WI funniest damn thing I ever saw. Who got bent over?

Trump won the election with less votes despite with a very large crowds like 20,000+. That means there are more people that don't believe Trump deserves or mentally fit to be the POTUS.

 

[bendog]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President-elect Donald Trump accepts the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia engaged in cyber attacks affecting the U.S. presidential election and may take actions in response, his incoming chief of staff said on Sunday.

Reince Priebus said Trump believes Russia was behind the intrusions into the Democratic Party organizations, though he did not clarify whether the president-elect agreed that the hacks were directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"He accepts the fact that this particular case was entities in Russia so that's not the issue," Priebus said on "Fox News Sunday.""

Trump accepts U.S. intelligence on Russia hacking, top aide says

Trump finally... though not publicly, and by himself... admits it was the Russians that hacked the DNC. So now what? Shouldn't this change his position with Putin and Russia? Why hasn't he denounced their actions? Why hasn't he tweeted about Assange? Seriously... If his non-actions here doesn't tell you something, nothing ever will.

Trump Towers II coming to Moscow in 2018! LOL

 

[Lewdog]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President-elect Donald Trump accepts the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia engaged in cyber attacks affecting the U.S. presidential election and may take actions in response, his incoming chief of staff said on Sunday.

Reince Priebus said Trump believes Russia was behind the intrusions into the Democratic Party organizations, though he did not clarify whether the president-elect agreed that the hacks were directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"He accepts the fact that this particular case was entities in Russia so that's not the issue," Priebus said on "Fox News Sunday.""

Trump accepts U.S. intelligence on Russia hacking, top aide says

Trump finally... though not publicly, and by himself... admits it was the Russians that hacked the DNC. So now what? Shouldn't this change his position with Putin and Russia? Why hasn't he denounced their actions? Why hasn't he tweeted about Assange? Seriously... If his non-actions here doesn't tell you something, nothing ever will.

Trump Towers II coming to Moscow in 2018! LOL

Do you know how Trump towers actually works? Did you know he doesn't actually own those buildings?

 

[bendog]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President-elect Donald Trump accepts the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia engaged in cyber attacks affecting the U.S. presidential election and may take actions in response, his incoming chief of staff said on Sunday.

Reince Priebus said Trump believes Russia was behind the intrusions into the Democratic Party organizations, though he did not clarify whether the president-elect agreed that the hacks were directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"He accepts the fact that this particular case was entities in Russia so that's not the issue," Priebus said on "Fox News Sunday.""

Trump accepts U.S. intelligence on Russia hacking, top aide says

Trump finally... though not publicly, and by himself... admits it was the Russians that hacked the DNC. So now what? Shouldn't this change his position with Putin and Russia? Why hasn't he denounced their actions? Why hasn't he tweeted about Assange? Seriously... If his non-actions here doesn't tell you something, nothing ever will.

Trump Towers II coming to Moscow in 2018! LOL

Do you know how Trump towers actually works? Did you know he doesn't actually own those buildings?

Putin will own the fcking thing. (-: And Ivanka will be shopping with his girlfriend.

 

[charwin95]

McAfee has been a white hacker forever, like since the beginning, if he's laying out his opinion on this, I'm going to listen to him rather than some partisan hack on a political forum.

Does it really make any difference? Even if the evidence is painted to your face you still don't believe anything coming from FBI, CIA & NSA ........................ But you believed anything coming from Russia your homeland.

High IQ doesn't constitute you are smart and actually some are dumb. You might be an expert of your *specialties or book smart* which make someone look like intelligently smart but that doesn't mean you have high IQ.

You can be intelligently smart but socially idiot. Etc.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Should I point out (perhaps especially in this,) that McAfee is not only one of the most recognized anti-virus software's, but the company also specializes in malware?

I know exactly what I did. I also know malware, and programing, and hacking. I'm a bit more informed than your MSM reporters.

You are.... ok.... can you please tell me then, how someone can be considered reputable when they make a decision on a subject without seeing the evidence?

So let me get this straight, you have over a 200 IQ and you are now a hacking, malware, programming specialist?

You mean like the FBI and CIA did?

They saw the evidence...

Simple fucking question... you sit in on a jury for a murder trial to decide if someone goes to jail for the rest of their life or gets the death penalty. You HEAR the evidence provided for you. Sometimes you even hear how the evidence was collected and who collected the evidence. Are you not able to make a decision of guilt because YOU didn't collect the evidence yourself?

There is no credible evidence the party that supposedly did the investigation has a beef with Russia and surprise surprise they find Russia at fault.

 

[Lewdog]

Should I point out (perhaps especially in this,) that McAfee is not only one of the most recognized anti-virus software's, but the company also specializes in malware?

I know exactly what I did. I also know malware, and programing, and hacking. I'm a bit more informed than your MSM reporters.

You are.... ok.... can you please tell me then, how someone can be considered reputable when they make a decision on a subject without seeing the evidence?

So let me get this straight, you have over a 200 IQ and you are now a hacking, malware, programming specialist?

You mean like the FBI and CIA did?

They saw the evidence...

Simple fucking question... you sit in on a jury for a murder trial to decide if someone goes to jail for the rest of their life or gets the death penalty. You HEAR the evidence provided for you. Sometimes you even hear how the evidence was collected and who collected the evidence. Are you not able to make a decision of guilt because YOU didn't collect the evidence yourself?

There is no credible evidence the party that supposedly did the investigation has a beef with Russia and surprise surprise they find Russia at fault.

When are you guys going to give up? Even Sessions said today that he believes the Russians did it... and that there is "no evidence" to say otherwise. These are people that have seen ALL the evidence... and you guys still want to argue this. It makes zero sense.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

LOL You went /there/?!? Really? None of our 17 agencies looked at the DNC rigs that were hacked.

Never claimed to be a specialist, but I was coding viruses and anti-viruses in the late 80s/early 90s and I've been coding ever since. My 26 years of experience in the realm of computer speak tells me you pretty much can't tie a malware to any person nor country - and defiantly not a malware that's available for public download in the dark web underworld. I also know that "political trolls and propaganda TV" does not equate to "probably hacking." I know that Guccifer was undeniably Ukranian, and that Guccifer 2.0 has /repeatedly/ stated that he was also Ukrainian. I know that the Malware claims to be Ukrainian. I know that Mendax has repeatedly said that his source was not Russian, and that it was a DNC leak, specifically that it was a Bernie fan - and I know from personal quite intimate experience how emotionally imbalanced those folks are. I also know that a /professional/ hacker wouldn't be using kiddy script, well known, malware to do hack another government, and I find it real hard to buy that the Russians would do so given that they are some of the best hackers in the world. I know that the gov knew /all/ of this hacking shit, as well as the opinion it was Russia, before Trump was even the GOP nominee. So, to /now/ suddenly make a big deal out of it, and to proclaim that it was all done to help Trump win stinks of partisan bullshit so bad we're going to need to replace the carpet and leave the windows open.

All I hear is

You've not seen the evidence... You've not seen how they actually tracked where the malware sent the information back to Russia. The DNC wasn't the only placed hacked, so where Democratic headquarters in various states... and so was Lyndsey Graham, and who knows who else. But you guys just keep victim blaming the DNC, it's pathetic.

I'm sorry but I'm an American that believes in rights. And for rights to work, they have to cover everyone... so even those that are unethical or immoral get rights too. That's what America is based on, as I quoted Ben Franklin in another thread, it's better that 100 criminals go free than to have 1 innocent person suffer. But hey, you all want to blame the DNC for being the victim of the Russian hack... that says a lot about your character.

You keep kicking your strawman argument around hoping to impress. It doesn't. No one said the Democrats didn't have the right to lie, mislead and stack the deck for their sham of a primary.

But we don't know who spilled the beans. Attacking a country (especially Russia) for the sake of political expediency is foolish and downright dangerous. The "report" has no evidence. Period.

And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high.

So you keep victim blaming...

Why won't you answer my question? Do you also blame a woman that gets sexually assaulted because she dressed "slutty?" That's the same thing you are doing here.

You can't read. Your CJ degree won't get you a loss prevention job at Walmart.

"And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high."

I can read... and you are full of shit.

Just like in two consecutive posts you just contradicted yourself.

One post you say no one voted based on the emails that were released, and then the next you brag about how corrupt the Democratic party is based on the emails. You're fucking as dumb as a box of rocks... and what makes it even more funny, is that you then go on to insult me and say I can't read and that my degree is worthless.

Do you even understand what you are typing?

No one that was going to vote for Hillary was effected by the leak the polls prove it. She got the percentages the polls said she would.

 

[Lewdog]

All I hear is

You've not seen the evidence... You've not seen how they actually tracked where the malware sent the information back to Russia. The DNC wasn't the only placed hacked, so where Democratic headquarters in various states... and so was Lyndsey Graham, and who knows who else. But you guys just keep victim blaming the DNC, it's pathetic.

I'm sorry but I'm an American that believes in rights. And for rights to work, they have to cover everyone... so even those that are unethical or immoral get rights too. That's what America is based on, as I quoted Ben Franklin in another thread, it's better that 100 criminals go free than to have 1 innocent person suffer. But hey, you all want to blame the DNC for being the victim of the Russian hack... that says a lot about your character.

You keep kicking your strawman argument around hoping to impress. It doesn't. No one said the Democrats didn't have the right to lie, mislead and stack the deck for their sham of a primary.

But we don't know who spilled the beans. Attacking a country (especially Russia) for the sake of political expediency is foolish and downright dangerous. The "report" has no evidence. Period.

And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high.

So you keep victim blaming...

Why won't you answer my question? Do you also blame a woman that gets sexually assaulted because she dressed "slutty?" That's the same thing you are doing here.

You can't read. Your CJ degree won't get you a loss prevention job at Walmart.

"And it goddamn sure won't take the focus off the heart of the matter. Democrat corruption stacked a mile high."

I can read... and you are full of shit.

Just like in two consecutive posts you just contradicted yourself.

One post you say no one voted based on the emails that were released, and then the next you brag about how corrupt the Democratic party is based on the emails. You're fucking as dumb as a box of rocks... and what makes it even more funny, is that you then go on to insult me and say I can't read and that my degree is worthless.

Do you even understand what you are typing?

No one that was going to vote for Hillary was effected by the leak the polls prove it. She got the percentages the polls said she would.

That's not true and you know it. You don't think Operation Taco Bowl hurt her with the Hispanic vote that Trump did surprising well in?

It's absolutely amazing that you Trump supporters were all over each email release bragging about how much damage it was going to do to Hillary... and now when it is a negative to your position, they were no big deal and didn't change anything.