Trump Concedes it Was the Russians... Now What?

[TNHarley]

Wonder why Obama never does anything about other private entities getting hacked by foreigners?
And if they knew Russia was hacking the DNC months ago, why did it not be a big deal until AFTER The election?

First of all, what more could they do to North Korea for the Sony hack? North Korea is already under some of the strictest sanctions in the world.

Secondly, Obama did warn Russia about the hack long before the election. And they didn't have all the information to make such a highly regarded assessment that it was the Russians until recently. So that bullshit, "After the election" stuff is not true.

link?

The fact you need a link to that shows you don't pay attention to the news and therefor have no credibility in the comments you make on here.

"So in early September when I saw President Putin in China, I felt that the most effective way to ensure that that didn't happen was to talk to him directly and tell him to cut it out and there were going to be serious consequences if he didn't. And in fact, we did not see further tampering of the election process—but the leaks... had already occurred," Mr Obama said.

The Kremlin has responded to hacking allegations for the first time

dude, you fucking said the DNC was the govt. Give me a break.
Thanks for the link

 

[Lewdog]

Wonder why Obama never does anything about other private entities getting hacked by foreigners?
And if they knew Russia was hacking the DNC months ago, why did it not be a big deal until AFTER The election?

First of all, what more could they do to North Korea for the Sony hack? North Korea is already under some of the strictest sanctions in the world.

Secondly, Obama did warn Russia about the hack long before the election. And they didn't have all the information to make such a highly regarded assessment that it was the Russians until recently. So that bullshit, "After the election" stuff is not true.

link?

The fact you need a link to that shows you don't pay attention to the news and therefor have no credibility in the comments you make on here.

"So in early September when I saw President Putin in China, I felt that the most effective way to ensure that that didn't happen was to talk to him directly and tell him to cut it out and there were going to be serious consequences if he didn't. And in fact, we did not see further tampering of the election process—but the leaks... had already occurred," Mr Obama said.

The Kremlin has responded to hacking allegations for the first time

dude, you fucking said the DNC was the govt. Give me a break.
Thanks for the link

I made a typo... and I said that. I didn't argue that the DNC was the government. Get over it fuckstick.

 

[Art__Allm]

Спасибо Американские GOP приспешников за кланяться к нашему великому президенту Путину. Теперь, когда Дональд Трамп работает для Владимира Путина, мир больше не будет находиться под угрозой бывшей демократической Соединенных Штатов. Вы найдете мир лучше под нашим совместным и великого лидера Владимира Путина.
Да здравствует Россия. Приветствуйте филиал GOP единой российской партии!

Your "Russian" is as authentic as the "Russian attacks".

Any imbecile can translate English text into Russia via Google translator, but if he does not speak Russian, he only makes a fool of himself, because he does not know what he is pasting.

Any foreign tourist can get access to the Internet in Russia and access an American server, using old Ukrainian malware, and leaving on the American server a Russian IP- address.

That is an old news, but some people have the Chutzpah to present this as something new, as a prove that Putin hacked American elections, and Trump is supposedly now admitting it.

How pathetic!

 

[Art__Allm]

When an outside entity can "influence" an American election by telling the American electorate the truth...what does that say about how our own main stream media is doing it's job?

Very good point.
USA became sovietized, the big Party, called "Establishment", controls the media and the voters are fooled by fake news, like "Trump does not have any chance".

Today there is more freedom in Russia, than in the USA, and Americans have to be informed about the corruption of their politicians by foreign entities. There is no prove, that this was the Russian government, but America, the former land of the free, looks very pathetic in this "hacking-affair".

 

[Art__Allm]

He did NOT admit the Russians hacked the election dumb ass. They may have admitted there is evidence the Russians hacked the DNC which IS NOT the election., Obama was clear on Friday NO ONE hacked the election.

Trump cannot "admit" anything.
He can just trust or not trust the intelligent reports.
And one of the reports says that some anonymous entities in Russia (it could even be a tourist, not a Russian citizen, who got the Internet connection in Russia) tried to hack an American server with old Ukrainian malware.

So Trump said that he trusts this report, that is all.

But the hacking attempt was not successful.

BTW, how many Russian servers are daily attacked by Internet connections, that can be traced to the USA?

Are Russians whining about "American hacking", because somebody with an American IP- Address tried to hack an American server?




People use anti-Virus programs to protect their computers, but Killary was too stupid to install an anti-Virus software on her private servers that she was illegally using for official communications.

What they present in this thread is old news, nothing new at all, and Trump did not "admit" anything, "admit" is the false word.

 

[Againsheila]

Anybody else think all this Russia crap is to take focus away from the fact that during the recount in Michigan they discovered they had more votes for Hillary in Detroit than they had voters?

No, because a foreign government hacked a political party and released their information to influence the election. That's vastly more important. We already know why that happened in Detroit. It was because they were using fucked up machines that kept jamming. There is no conspiracy to it.

And the room filled with boxes of votes for Hillary? The box labeled, 300 votes that had less than 50? You think that was all messed up machines? No proof the Russians hacked the DNC, there can't be since the DNC will not let the FBI even look at their servers, only a report on their servers.

Never heard such a thing... did you get that off Info Wars?

Human error, including duct tape, hampered recount

Detroit recount observer: Box marked '306' ballots - only had 50 inside - The American Mirror

REVEALED: Michigan Recount Uncovers Serious Voter Fraud in Detroit- VOTES COUNTED UP TO 6 TIMES

 

[Lewdog]

Anybody else think all this Russia crap is to take focus away from the fact that during the recount in Michigan they discovered they had more votes for Hillary in Detroit than they had voters?

No, because a foreign government hacked a political party and released their information to influence the election. That's vastly more important. We already know why that happened in Detroit. It was because they were using fucked up machines that kept jamming. There is no conspiracy to it.

And the room filled with boxes of votes for Hillary? The box labeled, 300 votes that had less than 50? You think that was all messed up machines? No proof the Russians hacked the DNC, there can't be since the DNC will not let the FBI even look at their servers, only a report on their servers.

Never heard such a thing... did you get that off Info Wars?

Human error, including duct tape, hampered recount

Detroit recount observer: Box marked '306' ballots - only had 50 inside - The American Mirror

REVEALED: Michigan Recount Uncovers Serious Voter Fraud in Detroit- VOTES COUNTED UP TO 6 TIMES

Again... why do you keep bringing up the problem with the machines? They knew the machines were malfunctioning and had asked for new machines and they weren't replaced. What part of that do you not understand? As I said all through the recount process, these are the exact reasons we needed them... to find out the problems out there. Why were these leaned towards the Democrats? The machines happened to be broken in an area where mostly people voted Democrat...

"The American Mirror?" Come on... Really? That's the best link you can give?

 

[LeftofLeft]

Oooooh junior has his dander up. It's a goddamn good thing you never strayed off topic. LOL.

As for the topic I don't give shit who hacked or leaked the emails and the CIA may well change the story in a few weeks anyway.

what matters to me is the corruption in the Democrat party. The corrupt ones are those that only care about who spilled the beans.

So you don't believe in rights? Is it ok to you if a cop searches someone illegally and finds stuff to make them guilty? That's exactly the position you are taking here with your comments.

Donna Brazile believes in rights......her right to disseminate Presidential debate questions in advance to one side. How did the Russians make her do that???

Was that unethical? Yep... was it illegal? Do you really think the RNC is a bunch of choir boys?

The point being, none of the information made available to the voters was false, and the voters made a legitimate decision based on the information they had.

Also, you're a hypocrite for getting your panties in a ruffle over "Russian hacking", while simply shrugging off any attempts on the Democrats' side to skew election results.

What 'attempts' would these be then?

The fact that I stated one in and around Donna Brazile and you don't believe that to be the case is a major problem.

 

[Lewdog]

So you don't believe in rights? Is it ok to you if a cop searches someone illegally and finds stuff to make them guilty? That's exactly the position you are taking here with your comments.

Donna Brazile believes in rights......her right to disseminate Presidential debate questions in advance to one side. How did the Russians make her do that???

Was that unethical? Yep... was it illegal? Do you really think the RNC is a bunch of choir boys?

The point being, none of the information made available to the voters was false, and the voters made a legitimate decision based on the information they had.

Also, you're a hypocrite for getting your panties in a ruffle over "Russian hacking", while simply shrugging off any attempts on the Democrats' side to skew election results.

What 'attempts' would these be then?

The fact that I stated one in and around Donna Brazile and you don't believe that to be the case is a major problem.

Look goof, even when pressed point blank about it, that piece of work Preibus admitted that the Russian hack is of more importance than what the DNC was doing. Why is it that you lemmings can't understand that as well?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Donna Brazile believes in rights......her right to disseminate Presidential debate questions in advance to one side. How did the Russians make her do that???

Was that unethical? Yep... was it illegal? Do you really think the RNC is a bunch of choir boys?

The point being, none of the information made available to the voters was false, and the voters made a legitimate decision based on the information they had.

Also, you're a hypocrite for getting your panties in a ruffle over "Russian hacking", while simply shrugging off any attempts on the Democrats' side to skew election results.

WTF is wrong with you? A foreign entity hacked a political party in our country with intentions to influence the election and you blame the Democrats. Victim blame much?

It's been explained to you numerous times that the problem is the Democrat's corruption. You don't give a fuck about that, just who spilled the beans. That's clear.

What isn't clear is why you want to continuously make a fool of yourself.

Wrong numbnuts... I know there is corruption in politics, and that goes for both sides. However more important is a foreign government hacking into our government and releasing private information to influence the election.

Seriously, why do you put aside your ethics and morals when it best suits you to? Or do you not have any to begin with? I guess you are also one of those people that blames a woman for getting sexually assaulted because she dresses "slutty?"

The DNC IS NOT now and has NEVER been the Government.

 

[mudwhistle]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President-elect Donald Trump accepts the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia engaged in cyber attacks affecting the U.S. presidential election and may take actions in response, his incoming chief of staff said on Sunday.

Reince Priebus said Trump believes Russia was behind the intrusions into the Democratic Party organizations, though he did not clarify whether the president-elect agreed that the hacks were directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"He accepts the fact that this particular case was entities in Russia so that's not the issue," Priebus said on "Fox News Sunday.""

Trump accepts U.S. intelligence on Russia hacking, top aide says

Trump finally... though not publicly, and by himself... admits it was the Russians that hacked the DNC. So now what? Shouldn't this change his position with Putin and Russia? Why hasn't he denounced their actions? Why hasn't he tweeted about Assange? Seriously... If his non-actions here doesn't tell you something, nothing ever will.

You're a liar. The cyber attacks didn't effect the election....and your own link says it thusly........

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President-elect Donald Trump accepts the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia engaged in cyber attacks during the U.S. presidential election and may take action in response, his incoming chief of staff said on Sunday."


​

It doesn't mention that the attempts had any effect on the election.

 

[Lewdog]

Was that unethical? Yep... was it illegal? Do you really think the RNC is a bunch of choir boys?

The point being, none of the information made available to the voters was false, and the voters made a legitimate decision based on the information they had.

Also, you're a hypocrite for getting your panties in a ruffle over "Russian hacking", while simply shrugging off any attempts on the Democrats' side to skew election results.

WTF is wrong with you? A foreign entity hacked a political party in our country with intentions to influence the election and you blame the Democrats. Victim blame much?

It's been explained to you numerous times that the problem is the Democrat's corruption. You don't give a fuck about that, just who spilled the beans. That's clear.

What isn't clear is why you want to continuously make a fool of yourself.

Wrong numbnuts... I know there is corruption in politics, and that goes for both sides. However more important is a foreign government hacking into our government and releasing private information to influence the election.

Seriously, why do you put aside your ethics and morals when it best suits you to? Or do you not have any to begin with? I guess you are also one of those people that blames a woman for getting sexually assaulted because she dresses "slutty?"

The DNC IS NOT now and has NEVER been the Government.

I already said that was a typo...

 

[Lewdog]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President-elect Donald Trump accepts the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia engaged in cyber attacks affecting the U.S. presidential election and may take actions in response, his incoming chief of staff said on Sunday.

Reince Priebus said Trump believes Russia was behind the intrusions into the Democratic Party organizations, though he did not clarify whether the president-elect agreed that the hacks were directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"He accepts the fact that this particular case was entities in Russia so that's not the issue," Priebus said on "Fox News Sunday.""

Trump accepts U.S. intelligence on Russia hacking, top aide says

Trump finally... though not publicly, and by himself... admits it was the Russians that hacked the DNC. So now what? Shouldn't this change his position with Putin and Russia? Why hasn't he denounced their actions? Why hasn't he tweeted about Assange? Seriously... If his non-actions here doesn't tell you something, nothing ever will.

You're a liar. The cyber attacks didn't effect the election....and your own link says it thusly........

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President-elect Donald Trump accepts the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia engaged in cyber attacks during the U.S. presidential election and may take action in response, his incoming chief of staff said on Sunday."


​

It doesn't mention that the attempts had any effect on the election.

You can't PROVE that it did or didn't effect the election... there is absolutely no way to prove otherwise. Simple question I asked someone in another thread... are you saying that the DNC emails weren't important or damning?

 

[Againsheila]

Anybody else think all this Russia crap is to take focus away from the fact that during the recount in Michigan they discovered they had more votes for Hillary in Detroit than they had voters?

No, because a foreign government hacked a political party and released their information to influence the election. That's vastly more important. We already know why that happened in Detroit. It was because they were using fucked up machines that kept jamming. There is no conspiracy to it.

And the room filled with boxes of votes for Hillary? The box labeled, 300 votes that had less than 50? You think that was all messed up machines? No proof the Russians hacked the DNC, there can't be since the DNC will not let the FBI even look at their servers, only a report on their servers.

Never heard such a thing... did you get that off Info Wars?

Human error, including duct tape, hampered recount

Detroit recount observer: Box marked '306' ballots - only had 50 inside - The American Mirror

REVEALED: Michigan Recount Uncovers Serious Voter Fraud in Detroit- VOTES COUNTED UP TO 6 TIMES

Again... why do you keep bringing up the problem with the machines? They knew the machines were malfunctioning and had asked for new machines and they weren't replaced. What part of that do you not understand? As I said all through the recount process, these are the exact reasons we needed them... to find out the problems out there. Why were these leaned towards the Democrats? The machines happened to be broken in an area where mostly people voted Democrat...

"The American Mirror?" Come on... Really? That's the best link you can give?

You're the one who brought up the machines. I come up with 2 different cites to prove my point and you pick out one and question the cite? Use the other one then, they have the exact same information in them.

 

[Lewdog]

No, because a foreign government hacked a political party and released their information to influence the election. That's vastly more important. We already know why that happened in Detroit. It was because they were using fucked up machines that kept jamming. There is no conspiracy to it.

And the room filled with boxes of votes for Hillary? The box labeled, 300 votes that had less than 50? You think that was all messed up machines? No proof the Russians hacked the DNC, there can't be since the DNC will not let the FBI even look at their servers, only a report on their servers.

Never heard such a thing... did you get that off Info Wars?

Human error, including duct tape, hampered recount

Detroit recount observer: Box marked '306' ballots - only had 50 inside - The American Mirror

REVEALED: Michigan Recount Uncovers Serious Voter Fraud in Detroit- VOTES COUNTED UP TO 6 TIMES

Again... why do you keep bringing up the problem with the machines? They knew the machines were malfunctioning and had asked for new machines and they weren't replaced. What part of that do you not understand? As I said all through the recount process, these are the exact reasons we needed them... to find out the problems out there. Why were these leaned towards the Democrats? The machines happened to be broken in an area where mostly people voted Democrat...

"The American Mirror?" Come on... Really? That's the best link you can give?

You're the one who brought up the machines. I come up with 2 different cites to prove my point and you pick out one and question the cite? Use the other one then, they have the exact same information in them.

The one about the box of ballots is from the American Mirror... you got a more reputable source than that?

 

[Againsheila]

And the room filled with boxes of votes for Hillary? The box labeled, 300 votes that had less than 50? You think that was all messed up machines? No proof the Russians hacked the DNC, there can't be since the DNC will not let the FBI even look at their servers, only a report on their servers.

Never heard such a thing... did you get that off Info Wars?

Human error, including duct tape, hampered recount

Detroit recount observer: Box marked '306' ballots - only had 50 inside - The American Mirror

REVEALED: Michigan Recount Uncovers Serious Voter Fraud in Detroit- VOTES COUNTED UP TO 6 TIMES

Again... why do you keep bringing up the problem with the machines? They knew the machines were malfunctioning and had asked for new machines and they weren't replaced. What part of that do you not understand? As I said all through the recount process, these are the exact reasons we needed them... to find out the problems out there. Why were these leaned towards the Democrats? The machines happened to be broken in an area where mostly people voted Democrat...

"The American Mirror?" Come on... Really? That's the best link you can give?

You're the one who brought up the machines. I come up with 2 different cites to prove my point and you pick out one and question the cite? Use the other one then, they have the exact same information in them.

The one about the box of ballots is from the American Mirror... you got a more reputable source than that?

look it up yourself, there are literally dozens of cites for it.

 

[Lewdog]

Never heard such a thing... did you get that off Info Wars?

Human error, including duct tape, hampered recount

Detroit recount observer: Box marked '306' ballots - only had 50 inside - The American Mirror

REVEALED: Michigan Recount Uncovers Serious Voter Fraud in Detroit- VOTES COUNTED UP TO 6 TIMES

Again... why do you keep bringing up the problem with the machines? They knew the machines were malfunctioning and had asked for new machines and they weren't replaced. What part of that do you not understand? As I said all through the recount process, these are the exact reasons we needed them... to find out the problems out there. Why were these leaned towards the Democrats? The machines happened to be broken in an area where mostly people voted Democrat...

"The American Mirror?" Come on... Really? That's the best link you can give?

You're the one who brought up the machines. I come up with 2 different cites to prove my point and you pick out one and question the cite? Use the other one then, they have the exact same information in them.

The one about the box of ballots is from the American Mirror... you got a more reputable source than that?

look it up yourself, there are literally dozens of cites for it.

Funny doing a search the ones that come up so far are the American Mirror and Info Wars... I'm sorry but that isn't going to cut it.

 

[mudwhistle]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President-elect Donald Trump accepts the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia engaged in cyber attacks affecting the U.S. presidential election and may take actions in response, his incoming chief of staff said on Sunday.

Reince Priebus said Trump believes Russia was behind the intrusions into the Democratic Party organizations, though he did not clarify whether the president-elect agreed that the hacks were directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"He accepts the fact that this particular case was entities in Russia so that's not the issue," Priebus said on "Fox News Sunday.""

Trump accepts U.S. intelligence on Russia hacking, top aide says

Trump finally... though not publicly, and by himself... admits it was the Russians that hacked the DNC. So now what? Shouldn't this change his position with Putin and Russia? Why hasn't he denounced their actions? Why hasn't he tweeted about Assange? Seriously... If his non-actions here doesn't tell you something, nothing ever will.

You're a liar. The cyber attacks didn't effect the election....and your own link says it thusly........

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President-elect Donald Trump accepts the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia engaged in cyber attacks during the U.S. presidential election and may take action in response, his incoming chief of staff said on Sunday."


​

It doesn't mention that the attempts had any effect on the election.

You can't PROVE that it did or didn't effect the election... there is absolutely no way to prove otherwise. Simple question I asked someone in another thread... are you saying that the DNC emails weren't important or damning?

You assholes have claimed that Russia hacked the election. Now you say it can't be proved either way.
So

 

[Lewdog]

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President-elect Donald Trump accepts the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia engaged in cyber attacks affecting the U.S. presidential election and may take actions in response, his incoming chief of staff said on Sunday.

Reince Priebus said Trump believes Russia was behind the intrusions into the Democratic Party organizations, though he did not clarify whether the president-elect agreed that the hacks were directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"He accepts the fact that this particular case was entities in Russia so that's not the issue," Priebus said on "Fox News Sunday.""

Trump accepts U.S. intelligence on Russia hacking, top aide says

Trump finally... though not publicly, and by himself... admits it was the Russians that hacked the DNC. So now what? Shouldn't this change his position with Putin and Russia? Why hasn't he denounced their actions? Why hasn't he tweeted about Assange? Seriously... If his non-actions here doesn't tell you something, nothing ever will.

You're a liar. The cyber attacks didn't effect the election....and your own link says it thusly........

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President-elect Donald Trump accepts the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia engaged in cyber attacks during the U.S. presidential election and may take action in response, his incoming chief of staff said on Sunday."


​

It doesn't mention that the attempts had any effect on the election.

You can't PROVE that it did or didn't effect the election... there is absolutely no way to prove otherwise. Simple question I asked someone in another thread... are you saying that the DNC emails weren't important or damning?

You assholes have claimed that Russia hacked the election. Now you say it can't be proved either way.
So

No I've always claimed they hacked the DNC with the purpose of influencing the election in favor of Trump. The findings of the intelligence agencies concur with me. I did at some point question whether voting machines may have been compromised... but that didn't happen and I concede that.

 

[Art__Allm]

Again... why do you keep bringing up the problem with the machines? They knew the machines were malfunctioning and had asked for new machines and they weren't replaced.

What is your point?
The Russian Bear damaged American machines?
Or maybe this Bear damaged the brains of people who were using these American machines?

The machines happened to be broken in an area where mostly people voted Democrat...

Wow! The Russian Bear broke the machines, and therefore democrats had to cheat, the machines counted way more voices, than they deserved.
Or maybe this has nothing to do with machines? The Russian Bear selectively corrupted Democrats, and therefore USA has to declare war on Russia.