Zincwarrior
Platinum Member
- Nov 18, 2021
- 17,217
- 10,456
- 1,138
Unlike MAGAs, no,dipshit.Who exactly is the "we"? Are you in a cult?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Unlike MAGAs, no,dipshit.Who exactly is the "we"? Are you in a cult?
Of course Trump did get a chance to defend himself on several.allegations during the trial.You are what we call, a liar.
Losers. Should gave nominated a better candidate.Of course Trump did get a chance to defend himself on several.allegations during the trial.
Unfortunately for him, the evidence was overwhelming. Soverwhelming, that a summary judgment occured.,
We know this….Trump claimed to have 500 million not in line with his lawyers claim that he doesn’t . This claim was on forms he needed to fill out to secure a loan…You have no clue what was in any deposition or transcript, and an even lesser interest in the laws. You have already proven that over and over, so GFY.
This is what his lawyers actually told the appeals court:We know this….Trump claimed to have 500 million not in line with his lawyers claim that he doesn’t . This claim was on forms he needed to fill out to secure a loan…
This is what his lawyers actually told the appeals court:
1. Posting a Full Undertaking Is a Practical Impossibility.
In the Opening Brief, when their efforts to obtain such a bond were still ongoing, Defendants stated their expectation that it would be "impossible to secure and post a complete bond."
Diligent efforts since that time, including "countless hours negotiating with one of the largest insurance companies in the world," have proven that "obtaining an appeal bond in the full amount" of the Judgment "is not possible under the circumstances presented."
The amount of the judgment, with interest, exceeds $464 million, and very few bonding companies will consider a bond of anything approaching that magnitude.
The remaining handful will not "accept hard assets such as real estate as collateral," but "will only accept cash or cash equivalents (such as marketable securities)."
Moreover, sureties would typically "require collateral of approximately 120% of the amount of the judgment," which "would require Defendants to hand over collateral in the form of cash or cash equivalents of approximately" $557 million.
In addition, sureties would likely charge bond premiums of approximately 2 percent per year with two years in advance-an upfront cost over $18 million.
In short, "a bond of this size is rarely, if ever, seen. In the unusual circumstance that a bond of this size is issued, it is provided to the largest public companies in the world, not to individuals or privately held businesses."
The actual amount of cash or cash equivalents required "to collateralize the bond and have sufficient capital to run the business and satisfy its other obligations" "approach[es] $1 billion.
Ha ha….This is what his lawyers actually told the appeals court:
1. Posting a Full Undertaking Is a Practical Impossibility.
In the Opening Brief, when their efforts to obtain such a bond were still ongoing, Defendants stated their expectation that it would be "impossible to secure and post a complete bond."
Diligent efforts since that time, including "countless hours negotiating with one of the largest insurance companies in the world," have proven that "obtaining an appeal bond in the full amount" of the Judgment "is not possible under the circumstances presented."
The amount of the judgment, with interest, exceeds $464 million, and very few bonding companies will consider a bond of anything approaching that magnitude.
The remaining handful will not "accept hard assets such as real estate as collateral," but "will only accept cash or cash equivalents (such as marketable securities)."
Moreover, sureties would typically "require collateral of approximately 120% of the amount of the judgment," which "would require Defendants to hand over collateral in the form of cash or cash equivalents of approximately" $557 million.
In addition, sureties would likely charge bond premiums of approximately 2 percent per year with two years in advance-an upfront cost over $18 million.
In short, "a bond of this size is rarely, if ever, seen. In the unusual circumstance that a bond of this size is issued, it is provided to the largest public companies in the world, not to individuals or privately held businesses."
The actual amount of cash or cash equivalents required "to collateralize the bond and have sufficient capital to run the business and satisfy its other obligations" "approach[es] $1 billion.
You're the NAZI, dumbass.
Will they have a close up sweat camera on him?Since FPOTUS#45 told the world that he had $500 Million in case, he can do it as an escrow account, therefore he dosen't need the bond.
Or does FPOTUS#45 not have the $500 Million he said he had.
Either way, tomorrow will be a hoot.
WW
Will they have a close up sweat camera on him?
They should cancel the appealIf he fails to make the bond or escrow, FPOTUS#45 will not be anywhere near the court room in New York.
WW
They should cancel the appeal
When you find the trick to tell the difference between the trumpers and bots, let us know.Nope, 'fraid not.
Not real sure what that has to do with my post though.
The unresponsiveness makes me wonder how many "republicans" here are actually bots.
He can.He can't appeal without it is my understanding here.
The Democrats are destroying New York. Listen to Kevin O Leary from Shark Tank. He admits he is not a Trump fan but his focus on the idiocy of the Democrats!
So often they quote my post and then go off into left field with something completely unrelated, like the guy who responded to a post about bonds with "well you're the nazi". Absolutely nothing to do with anything going on around it, like a poorly programmed bot response.When you find the trick to tell the difference between the trumpers and bots, let us know.