Orangecat
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 16,667
- 18,457
- 2,288
Because no crime was committed.Why hasnt he been charged with a crime over this ?
Learn contractions, moron.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Because no crime was committed.Why hasnt he been charged with a crime over this ?
Especially after the fraud allegations in Edison county.He wanted them to do a recount. That was a prudent request.
THey hadn't yet voted.He intimidated them.
1. he, the president of the United states, called them.
2. he pressured them to change their vote.
It wasn't massive coordinated fraud. Biden is in the office due to 40,000 votes in three states. Think about that.Merry Christmas Rawley!
Did ya get to read the link yet? Basically, 5 of the 10 REPUBLICAN candidates running for Governor, needed 15,000 petitioners to sign a form supporting each one as a candidate, to qualify for their names on the ballot in their REPUBLICAN primary....
The 10 candidates turned in over the 15,000 needed to get in the primary race, but when they were checked by the board of elections only 5 of them really qualified because the other 5 had as much as 40% of their signatures, fraudulent signatures. They hired outside firms paid to collect the signatures instead of using their own workers so the candidates likely did not know the people who collected them, faked them...imo.
Note that they were CAUGHT by the system of checks and balances, which is important!
It's not that I don't believe there are not people out there that would try to commit election fraud, I am just pretty certain with all the checks in the system for election fraud that could affect the results of the election, are pretty solid.... (I've spent a lot, and I truly mean a lot... of time researching them all)
Know, I don't expect you to just believe me....I certainly didn't believe anyone else on our election security, so it was only after I spent time researching it all, do I feel confident that the checks and balances in place, will catch any attempts at massive, coordinated, election fraud.
It is flat out, AGAINST election law in place via U.S. CODE, silly one! As it should be and has always been. How could you not know this....???Of course…he was running. candidates are expected to interfere in the elections
What a stupid question
So what is your point?It is flat out, AGAINST election law in place via U.S. CODE, silly one! As it should be and has always been. How could you not know this....???
Especially after the fraud allegations in Edison county.
From what I understand they had voted, changed their vote, then then Trump and Ronna tried to convince them to change their vote back....?THey hadn't yet voted.
So the first change was fine by you, but suggesting it should be changed back is not? Lol.From what I understand they had voted, changed their vote, then then Trump and Ronna tried to convince them to change their vote back....?
I'm almost never wrong.Point....
You are and were, wrong!
Seems they must have had a voice vote, but they refused to sign the certification.From what I understand they had voted, changed their vote, then then Trump and Ronna tried to convince them to change their vote back....?
Nothing Burger.Karl Rove says Ronna McDaniel ‘in trouble’ over Trump’s Michigan call
Republican strategist Karl Rove claimed Republican National Committee (RNC) Chair Ronna McDaniel is “in trouble” over reported recordings of a phone call with former President Trump in November 202…thehill.com
Why hasnt he been charged with a crime over this ? America has been far too leniant in dealing with this law breaking.
Mcdaniel also has a case to answer.
It will take a generation to clean up American politics after trump.
nb A previous post on this subject was deleted by a trump mod.
OrangetabbyThe state was lost by the orange fuckup by over 150,000 votes.
What do you see whore.I only see Joe Biden using the power of his office to prevent the People from voting their choice. Only the Democrats are forcing ONE PARTY RULE
In other words, you are in a cult of cucks.....like I said you wereIt makes us people who dont believe a fucking word any of you lunatics say.
Trumpers are literally arguing that presidents are above the law....but, only the president they currently worship at the time...The SC did not turn down reviewing it, it simply turned down reviewing it before the appeals court reviewing it and their decisions....
The SC will end up ruling with Jack Smith on it, once they take it up.... The President is not immune from the crimes he commits while in office....no man is above the law....
"Especially after the fraud allegations in Edison county."
What code?It is flat out, AGAINST election law in place via U.S. CODE, silly one! As it should be and has always been. How could you not know this....???
Trumpers are literally arguing that presidents are above the law....