Zone1 Trump braces for Supreme Court hearing on whether he can stay on 2024 ballots: Live

[Rawley]

This isn't about Trump....this is far more about jurisdictional purview. The POTUS election is a Federal activity....plain and simple. Should be 9-0!

Should be. But all CO's attorney is talking about is Trump.

 

[Flash]

Clarence Thomas to libtard lawyer: Do you have any historical examples that back up any of this?

Libtard: stammering, shaky, sputtering out

Clarence: So no examples like this, even from the Civil war?

Libtard: Well...uh...uh...

Clarence: What...are...the...examples?

— Jack Poso \uD83C\uDDFA\uD83C\uDDF8 (@JackPosobiec) February 8, 2024

 

[Flash]

Alito just telegraphed that red states could go after Biden for releasing money to Iran

"Would releasing funds to an avowed enemy of the US qualify as giving aid or comfort?"

— Jack Poso \uD83C\uDDFA\uD83C\uDDF8 (@JackPosobiec) February 8, 2024

 

[Flash]

Dumbass Negro



"I don't understand" - Ketanji Brown Jackson

— Jack Poso \uD83C\uDDFA\uD83C\uDDF8 (@JackPosobiec) February 8, 2024

 

[Flash]

 

[Flash]

When the TDS afflicted Libtards from Colorado refuse to obey the ruling then will say The Court got it wrong so CO will do it's own thing, just like Hawaii.

Such is life in the Leftest Banana Republic of America.

 

[justoffal]

Should be. But all CO's attorney is talking about is Trump.

Yes and that's fine it's his responsibility to represent CO....but the real answer here is that Trump is either qualified for all states or qualified for none and that it is not up to the state to decide on a federal activity. SCOTUS DOES NOT WANT TO DECIDE THIS ISSUE BASED ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF JAN 6....THEY ARE TOO FOGGY....AND TOO MUCH EVIDENCE OF FEDERAL TAMPERING.

It should be 9- zip.....but unfortunately it's going to be 6-3 or even 5-4.

Jo

 

[justoffal]

When the TDS afflicted Libtards from Colorado refuse to obey the ruling then will say The Court got it wrong so CO will do it's own thing, just like Hawaii.

Such is life in the Leftest Banana Republic of America.

Then the State GOP will do a Caucus...and the electors will be awarded by the FEC not the state. That simple. Annnnnnd with this new precedent the action will be repeated in future against Dem candidates whilst Harry Reid's children cry over it after inventing it.

 

[surada]

They would be setting bad precedence if they ruled against Trump. If Trump could be kept off the ballot, anyone could be kept off it in the future.

Would you elect another smarmy fool like Trump?

 

[Rawley]

Yes and that's fine it's his responsibility to represent CO....but the real answer here is that Trump is either qualified for all states or qualified for none and that it is not up to the state to decide on a federal activity. SCOTUS DOES NOT WANT TO DECIDE THIS ISSUE BASED ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF JAN 6....THEY ARE TOO FOGGY....AND TOO MUCH EVIDENCE OF FEDERAL TAMPERING.

It should be 9- zip.....but unfortunately it's going to be 6-3 or even 5-4.

Jo

I think worst case, it going to be 8-1. Sotomayor is total loon.

 

[Mac-7]

Would you elect another smarmy fool like Trump?

Smarmy is your opinion

But trump is no fool

That describes biden

 

[justoffal]

I think worst case, it going to be 8-1. Sotomayor is total loon.

Well yeah....it's actually not about Trump...it's about WHO SHOULD BE MAkING THIS DECISION. If they want Trump off the Ballot then bring the case forward to SCOTUS in that context....as a SCOTUS case not a state's right case. This is where they screwed up.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

You are saying, the Supreme Court decision will be based on evidence of whether or not he participated in an insurrection? You don't think they will look for a narrow ruling? That seems strange, in that only allowing 40 minutes for oral argument.
I do not think that is what The Supremes will be ruling on, at all. They would rather not get into this case at all, so definitely not going to eat the whole apple, with both sides only getting 40 minutes apiece. This is an appeal hearing, not a jury trial. You should read more on what the Supreme Court does.

There was no insurrection. And if the precedence is set that a state can decide it without due process, then the Russian Collusion Hoax can and will be called an insurrection and HItlery and the brown turd Obammy can be arrested for said attempt to overthrow the 2016 election. Is this what you want?

 

[White 6]

There was no insurrection. And if the precedence is set that a state can decide it without due process, then the Russian Collusion Hoax can and will be called an insurrection and HItlery and the brown turd Obammy can be arrested for said attempt to overthrow the 2016 election. Is this what you want?

The hearing is over. You missed it. The did not decide whether there was an insurrection. That is not, what was on tap to be decided.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Well yeah....it's actually not about Trump...it's about WHO SHOULD BE MAkING THIS DECISION. If they want Trump off the Ballot then bring the case forward to SCOTUS in that context....as a SCOTUS case not a state's right case. This is where they screwed up.

Except that also is not how this is going to play out. The SCOTUS will punt to the Congress.

 

[justoffal]

Except that also is not how this is going to play out. The SCOTUS will punt to the Congress.

Ahhhh.....you are most probably tight about that.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Ahhhh.....you are most probably tight about that.

Seems that way, especially after what I heard today in the hearing.

 

[justoffal]

Seems that way, especially after what I heard today in the hearing.

Roberts is good at DUCKING....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Roberts is good at DUCKING....

Yep. He knows that the majority opinions of his corrupt court will often just add to the embarrassment and loss of credibility of his court.

I am curious to see what he has to say about the insurrectionist's spouse not recusing himself from any cases, coming up.

 

[peacefan]

You know, democrats, if you're going to disallow a citizen from running for POTUS you have to have a whole lot more proof of his/her guilt of insurrection than your own biased opinion.

Democrats have become the leaders in undemocratic actions.

Trump has proven his guilt with those TV speeches that he made, aired on CNN a lot more than on your dear Fox News of course.