Trump and Presidential Immunity

[StoneCold]

You will just have to sing "Billiejeans is not my lover," StneCold.

I only know enough about her that I would get the heebie jeebies if I was in the same room with her low IQ self.
I'm feeling ill just responding to her lowlife, ignorant posts.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

There's The Dook!

 

[SavannahMann]

Yeah, let's make every president afraid to make bold moves because they'll be skewered for it by the next guy.

Your fucktarded commie ass has no idea what decorum or respect or tradition is.

All you know is lust for power, power you will never have because you're not worthy of it.

If you ever happen to get your way? You'll be killed by masses of good people.

Ok. Tell me what is wrong with this scenario. The Supreme Court finds that Trump has Immunity from prosecution for anything done while in office. They can’t say it applies to only Trump. So they will say that the President, any President has this authority.

Biden orders the Secret Service to shoot Trump in the head. You can impeach him, if you can get a 2/3 majority in the Senate. But you can’t punish him. Biden as President has total immunity right?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

What if Harris throws out all the electoral votes in January 2025? She will have immunity under this Trumpian delusion,

 

[lennypartiv]

Should Thomas recuse from the DC case? His wife was involved.

After all liberal activists judges have done, Clarence Thomas should never recuse himself.

 

[StoneCold]

After all liberal activists judges have done, Clarence Thomas should never recuse himself.

Name the corruption from "activists" judges, please.

 

[lennypartiv]

---...he should be granted immunity from prosecution with regard to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election because he was acting within the bounds of his official duties when he took the actions.---

Trump Tells Appeals Panel He Should Have ‘Absolute Immunity’

Former President Donald Trump told a federal appeals panel on Saturday that he should be granted immunity from prosecution with regard to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election because he was acting within the bounds of his official duties when he took the actions.

www.bloomberg.com

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Lenny, you will be so disappointed.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Good one. But should Clarenc Thomas recuse himself?
Don't dodge or deflect. It's a simple yes no question.

No.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

She emailed election officials in several states to change votes.
Her 501c-3 provided buses for the 1/6 actions.
She helped pay for the rally before the "party" you people say didn't happen.
Stay in denial.

So? What of that list is illegal?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Ok. Tell me what is wrong with this scenario. The Supreme Court finds that Trump has Immunity from prosecution for anything done while in office. They can’t say it applies to only Trump. So they will say that the President, any President has this authority.

Biden orders the Secret Service to shoot Trump in the head. You can impeach him, if you can get a 2/3 majority in the Senate. But you can’t punish him. Biden as President has total immunity right?

Nice fantasy that could never happen.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump is creating a world where most anything could happen.

If immunity is delivered by Scotus, watch what happens when Harris opens the electoral vote count.

 

[lennypartiv]

What if Harris throws out all the electoral votes in January 2025? She will have immunity under this Trumpian delusion,

It would be a travesty to give immunity to Biden and Harris.

 

[SavannahMann]

Nice fantasy that could never happen.

What part? The part where the Supremes declare that Trump and by extension all Presidents are immune to prosecution?

 

[StoneCold]

So? What of that list is illegal?

That made her part of the coup! Planning and finacial support!
is a coup illegal?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

What part? The part where the Supremes declare that Trump and by extension all Presidents are immune to prosecution?

Anything you post seems to not be in any way connected to reality.

 

[Moonglow]

According to some, immunity should prevent Trump from being prosecuted. Trump's lawyers are seeking a judgement in their favor from the Supreme Court, where Gorsuch, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Barrett are seated. This could be a game changer.

---Former President Trump's legal team has filed its written response to Special Counsel Jack Smith's request that the U.S. Supreme Court hear Trump’s immunity claims in the election interference criminal case against him---

MSN

www.msn.com

Nixon had to be pardoned to keep the long arm of the law from getting him and what he did was all while he was president, immunity is not a carte blanche card for all occasions.

 

[SavannahMann]

Anything you post seems to not be in any way connected to reality.

For Trump to be correct. The argument that he is immune to prosecution because he was President at the time, then all Presidents then have divine immunity. They answer only to God if Congress doesn’t act. In that case, any action a President takes is perfectly valid isn’t it? Even murdering political opponents?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

For Trump to be correct. The argument that he is immune to prosecution because he was President at the time, then all Presidents then have divine immunity. They answer only to God if Congress doesn’t act. In that case, any action a President takes is perfectly valid isn’t it? Even murdering political opponents?

His argument is not as you are projecting it to be. Perhaps when you grow up, someone will explain the concept so that you will understand. He is arguing that his actions as President were the result of his being the President and would not have occurred if he was not. Should, to use your example, murder someone. Those acts would have nothing to do with his duties as President, and he could be prosecuted after impeachment, or he left office.

There is no charge for this lesson.

 

[SavannahMann]

His argument is not as you are projecting it to be. Perhaps when you grow up, someone will explain the concept so that you will understand. He is arguing that his actions as President were the result of his being the President and would not have occurred if he was not. Should, to use your example, murder someone. Those acts would have nothing to do with his duties as President, and he could be prosecuted after impeachment, or he left office.

There is no charge for this lesson.

No. His argument is the same as Nixons. That because he was President the actions were legal.

If in my scenario, Biden claims he was acting on best intelligence that Trump would be a Dictator and he took action to preserve the Union, then his actions are just as valid right?