teapartysamurai
Gold Member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 20,056
- 2,562
- 290
- Thread starter
- #21
The criticisms of the IPCC are about the upper management, not the majority of scientists working in the background. It is not the scientists fault that their research has been twisted into 'declaring the science settled' , when in fact it is not.
Quite a few have bitterly complained when the information that they provided and signed their name to, was morphed into something else with the uncertainties removed by the time the IPCC reports were published.
I don't care who is at fault. The fact is, hacks like Al Gore are using this "settled science" bit to claim there is no longer a debate about global warming it's "settled."
The fact is, as conservatives has said for more than 20 years, nothing is settled and it's pretty obvious there are huge gaping holes in global warming "science."