Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why do you insist on recreating thread after thread after thread to whine about the exact same things? Can someone explain that to me? Is CD so starved for attention that he purposefully makes an ass out of himself because bad attention is still attention? Is it megalomania? Enqiring minds want to know!
As for the "tree fort", why is it you post what it is for and then pretend you're a complete dumbshit and have no idea what it was there for? The city of NY built it in 1999 so that the government of NYC would have a place to go in the event of an attack. It, along with the rest of WTC 7, was evacuated after the planes crashed. Barry Jennings and Michael Hess visited the center after the South tower was hit and the room was empty. So much for piloting the planes and setting the explosives from there.
So tell us again why you are so convinced the "tree fort" is the reason why WTC 7 was blown up. Got any evidence to support your bullshit?
August 25, 2001 - Raytheon and the U.S. Air Force successfully auto lands a pilot-less FedEx Boeing 727 six times at Holloman AFB, NM using a military GPS landing system that will enable ground control to take control of a hijacked airplane and force land it.
Civil-Military Interoperability For GPS Assisted Aircraft Landings Demonstrated
The JPALS system is being developed to meet the Defense Department's need for an anti-jam, secure, all weather Category II/III aircraft landing system that will be fully interoperable with planned civil systems utilizing the same technology.
Marlborough - Oct. 1, 2001
A government-industry team accomplished the first precision approach by a civil aircraft using a military Global Positioning System (GPS) landing system Aug. 25 at Holloman AFB, N.M., Raytheon Company announced today.
I would like someone to explain why a tree fort was created in World Trade Center 7.
Just one high floor in Building 7 had its floors, walls, windows, etc reinforced to resist explosions, debris, etc making it basically a tree fort....why?
I would like someone to explain why a tree fort was created in World Trade Center 7.
Just one high floor in Building 7 had its floors, walls, windows, etc reinforced to resist explosions, debris, etc making it basically a tree fort....why?
What in the fuck are you babbling about?
I would like someone to explain why a tree fort was created in World Trade Center 7.
Just one high floor in Building 7 had its floors, walls, windows, etc reinforced to resist explosions, debris, etc making it basically a tree fort....why?
What in the fuck are you babbling about?
World Trade Center 7 had one floor in it completely reinforced to resist impacts etc...this high floor had an office for "fighting terrorism"...
No. If you believe differently, present the evidence that backs up your argument.Why do you insist on recreating thread after thread after thread to whine about the exact same things? Can someone explain that to me? Is CD so starved for attention that he purposefully makes an ass out of himself because bad attention is still attention? Is it megalomania? Enqiring minds want to know!
As for the "tree fort", why is it you post what it is for and then pretend you're a complete dumbshit and have no idea what it was there for? The city of NY built it in 1999 so that the government of NYC would have a place to go in the event of an attack. It, along with the rest of WTC 7, was evacuated after the planes crashed. Barry Jennings and Michael Hess visited the center after the South tower was hit and the room was empty. So much for piloting the planes and setting the explosives from there.
So tell us again why you are so convinced the "tree fort" is the reason why WTC 7 was blown up. Got any evidence to support your bullshit?
Was this tree fort the 9/11 cockpit?
No. The software has to be on the planes, not in a building.creativedreams said:Could this tree fort have the computer equipment to take over "hijacked" planes?
Why would one need to protect computer programs? Why not just run the software somewhere away from Ground Zero? It's not like you have to be RIGHT THERE.creativedreams said:Was it reinforced to protect computer programs to remote operate "hijacked" planes?
Bullshit, CreativeBullshit. I've never denied the technology exists. That is something YOU have to lie about in order to pretend you actually got something right.creativedreams said:Here is a recap on what you continued to lie about saying it didn't exist...
What in the fuck are you babbling about?
World Trade Center 7 had one floor in it completely reinforced to resist impacts etc...this high floor had an office for "fighting terrorism"...
So who gives a fuck? Log off and seek help.
How could I have evidence that the terrorism fighting office tree fort in WTC7 was the 9/11 cockpit with the programs to take over "hijacked" planes when the crime scene was destroyed?No. If you believe differently, present the evidence that backs up your argument.
Software also has to be in the building with the programs to take over "hijacked" planes...No. The software has to be on the planes, not in a building.
Like I said before...Building 7 would be the perfect place to do it and destroy any evidence from an upcoming investigation...Why would one need to protect computer programs? Why not just run the software somewhere away from Ground Zero? It's not like you have to be RIGHT THERE.
You have denied the issue about the technology used to take over hijacked planes with remote operation many times and placed many spins on the issue....fact of the matter is the technology was developed for terrorism fighting and to take over passenger planes by remote control in the event they were hijacked...I've never denied the technology exists. That is something YOU have to lie about in order to pretend you actually got something right.
Then how do you know your bullshit claims are true? That's RIGHT! You're only guessing!How could I have evidence that the terrorism fighting office tree fort in WTC7 was the 9/11 cockpit with the programs to take over "hijacked" planes when the crime scene was destroyed?No. If you believe differently, present the evidence that backs up your argument.
Thanks for finally admitting all your bullshit arguments are nothing but the deranged rantings of a seriously delusional twisted fuck!Really? What is your evidence of this? Seems to me you could just write the programs and have everything self contained. Or does that make too much sense for your little pea brain to comprehend?creativedreams said:Software also has to be in the building with the programs to take over "hijacked" planes...No. The software has to be on the planes, not in a building.
And like I've said before, BULLSHIT. You can't explain why WTC 7 would be the perfect place because the software could be run from ANYWHERE. No need to destroy evidence because nobody would be looking for it anywhere else. Reality has, once again, exposed your bullshit for the seriously fucked up rantings that they are.creativedreams said:Like I said before...Building 7 would be the perfect place to do it and destroy any evidence from an upcoming investigation...Why would one need to protect computer programs? Why not just run the software somewhere away from Ground Zero? It's not like you have to be RIGHT THERE.
And I have never denied the technology existed. I have denied your bullshit claims that these systems were used. You have no evidence to back up your claims BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION, yet you insist it is all true. That is, by definition, delusional.creativedreams said:You have denied the issue about the technology used to take over hijacked planes with remote operation many times and placed many spins on the issue....fact of the matter is the technology was developed for terrorism fighting and to take over passenger planes by remote control in the event they were hijacked...I've never denied the technology exists. That is something YOU have to lie about in order to pretend you actually got something right.
I think you've finally stroked out on us.creativedreams said:The tree fort floor in Building 7 that was reinforced to resist impacts had a terrorism fighting office...
That makes no sense even for one as fucked up as you are.How could I have evidence that the terrorism fighting office tree fort in WTC7 was the 9/11 cockpit with the programs to take over "hijacked" planes when the crime scene was destroyed?No. If you believe differently, present the evidence that backs up your argument.
I would like someone to explain why a tree fort was created in World Trade Center 7.
Just one high floor in Building 7 had its floors, walls, windows, etc reinforced to resist explosions, debris, etc making it basically a tree fort....why?
What in the fuck are you babbling about?
I would like someone to explain why a tree fort was created in World Trade Center 7.
Just one high floor in Building 7 had its floors, walls, windows, etc reinforced to resist explosions, debris, etc making it basically a tree fort....why?
How could I have evidence that the terrorism fighting office tree fort in WTC7 was the 9/11 cockpit with the programs to take over "hijacked" planes when the crime scene was destroyed?
I would like someone to explain why a tree fort was created in World Trade Center 7.
Just one high floor in Building 7 had its floors, walls, windows, etc reinforced to resist explosions, debris, etc making it basically a tree fort....why?
This is hysterical. You just posted this:
How could I have evidence that the terrorism fighting office tree fort in WTC7 was the 9/11 cockpit with the programs to take over "hijacked" planes when the crime scene was destroyed?
So you're asking someone to explain why something was built when you admit there is no evidence that it existed?
Oh the NYC Office Of Emergency Management existed. There is no doubt about that. CreativeBullshit has no evidence beyond the fact it existed. All the rest of his bullshit lies are just the delusional rantings of a very sick mind.
Oh the NYC Office Of Emergency Management existed. There is no doubt about that. CreativeBullshit has no evidence beyond the fact it existed. All the rest of his bullshit lies are just the delusional rantings of a very sick mind.
Sick mind? Try inquisitive mind piecing together indisputable facts....facts are facts....like pieces to a puzzle....you like to cloud the indisputable facts with a smokescreen of bullshit in between the lines...
How the indisputable facts piece together is how they piece together...the garbage you fill in between the lines creating a cloud of bs and a smokescreen around all of the basic indisputable facts does not take away the fact they are there...
Oh the NYC Office Of Emergency Management existed. There is no doubt about that. CreativeBullshit has no evidence beyond the fact it existed. All the rest of his bullshit lies are just the delusional rantings of a very sick mind.
Sick mind? Try inquisitive mind piecing together indisputable facts....facts are facts....like pieces to a puzzle....you like to cloud the indisputable facts with a smokescreen of bullshit in between the lines...
How the indisputable facts piece together is how they piece together...the garbage you fill in between the lines creating a cloud of bs and a smokescreen around all of the basic indisputable facts does not take away the fact they are there...
CreativeBullshit, I have one word for you..... BULLSHIT!!!!
Taking disparate facts, putting them together into a conspiracy theory, and PRETENDING that since it COULD HAVE HAPPENED LIKE THAT that it DID HAPPEN LIKE THAT is nothing short of ignorance on an epic scale.
Putting together "facts" together into an unrelated theory while ignoring common sense like "why would they do it that way and face massive risk of getting caught" only makes you the worlds biggest retard. Want proof? Why do you ignore the fact that the OEM was visited shortly after the second tower was hit and it was EMPTY? According to you they were feverishly working on setting the timing for the explosive charges that there is absolutely zero evidence for. Right there you have a direct, irrefutable fact that proves your theory is bullshit, yet you go right on pretending.
Pretending in the face of evidence to the contrary is, by definition, delusional. Actually pretending it is real is a sure sign of a seriously sick mind.
many disturbing indisputable facts
