Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
bill maher isn't the voice of a political party.
rushbot is...
maybe if you stop letting him call the shots?
Look how the looney left spins thins... It's fucking hysterical...
Maher is a comedian, so it's "ok" and Rush is a "political leader", so it's NOT "ok"...
Amazing.... Absolutely amazing...
And not only that, but TRUE.
Look how the looney left spins thins... It's fucking hysterical...
Maher is a comedian, so it's "ok" and Rush is a "political leader", so it's NOT "ok"...
Amazing.... Absolutely amazing...
And not only that, but TRUE.
What exactly do you think is true there? Rush isnt a political leader. He's a political commentator.
And the list of Real Time sponsers who are so offended by his remarks that they will cease advertise with HBO
""
Ah, fell better lewy?
What sponsors?
bill maher isn't the voice of a political party.
rushbot is...
maybe if you stop letting him call the shots?
I know of only one conservative that WORSHIPED Rush; female, smart but selfish. One man I know goes nuts over Beck. I've seem Chris Wallace referred to as BOTH liberal and conservative, so he MAY be the best of the lot.False equivalency.
And Sarah Palin IS a ****.
I wonder what the Sledbilly Bimbo did with all that PAC money?
Bill Maher is a comedian and the Democratic party does not embrace him as a spokesperson, unlike the addled-brained Republicans who worship Mr. LimpBalls.
Nope ... I say he does. 1 Million bucks!
Hello Dr. House, I find neither OK.Look how the looney left spins thins... It's fucking hysterical...
Maher is a comedian, so it's "ok" and Rush is a "political leader", so it's NOT "ok"...
Amazing.... Absolutely amazing...
False equivalency.
And Sarah Palin IS a ****.
the difference between Bill Maher doing this and Rush doing this is that Rush is dependent on sponsors and his program is broadcast on public radio. Bill Maher has no sponsors and an individual must pay a fee in order to watch his show, due to the fact that its on HBO. HBO could though fire him if they disagreed with his views. Rush owns and operates his own show and he answers only to himself and his sponsors. Bill Maher actually went into to detail about this on his shown last friday.
its the idea of private broadcast vs. public broadcast. similar to when Howard Stern when from public broadcast to satellite.
Hello Dr. House, I find neither OK.Look how the looney left spins thins... It's fucking hysterical...
Maher is a comedian, so it's "ok" and Rush is a "political leader", so it's NOT "ok"...
Amazing.... Absolutely amazing...
And the list of Real Time sponsers who are so offended by his remarks that they will cease advertise with HBO
""
Ah, fell better lewy?
What sponsors?
That's what I'd like to know. When has he had sponsors? I think one of main reasons he is on HBO is because he couldnt make it with sponsors.
Rush has just as much influence with the GOP as Grover Norquist and his never gonna raise taxes idea he thought up when he was 12.bill maher isn't the voice of a political party.
rushbot is...
maybe if you stop letting him call the shots?
Rush is a PAID entertainer, he is neither a politician nor the voice of the GOP, you liar. If by your definition Rush is the leader of the GOP then Mayer is by our definition the leader of the DEMs. pretty simple concept. Both are paid entertainers.
You get all in a bunch cause a paid entertainer makes a comment but only if he is to the right politically, those to the left, as evidenced by this thread are somehow exempt from your anger, I wonder why that is?
if Rush was on satellite radio, and was not considered a political influence this would not be near as big of an issue. Howard Stern used to stir controversy all the time on the public airwaves. now since he has made his move to satellite, there is not controversy because people pay to listen to him. maybe Rush should do the same.the difference between Bill Maher doing this and Rush doing this is that Rush is dependent on sponsors and his program is broadcast on public radio. Bill Maher has no sponsors and an individual must pay a fee in order to watch his show, due to the fact that its on HBO. HBO could though fire him if they disagreed with his views. Rush owns and operates his own show and he answers only to himself and his sponsors. Bill Maher actually went into to detail about this on his shown last friday.
its the idea of private broadcast vs. public broadcast. similar to when Howard Stern when from public broadcast to satellite.
This has nothing to do with sponsorship and money for shows. It has everything to do with the hypocrisy of being able to call someone whatever you want if you are on the left and not being able to if you are on the right. The word Slut is able to be said over the public airwaves. Rush would have been in trouble with the FCC if he would have said the word ****. That is the only difference.
What sponsors?
That's what I'd like to know. When has he had sponsors? I think one of main reasons he is on HBO is because he couldnt make it with sponsors.
Hmmm, so Bill Maher's show is on different footing that Rush Limbaugh's.
if Rush was on satellite radio, and was not considered a political influence this would not be near as big of an issue. Howard Stern used to stir controversy all the time on the public airwaves. now since he has made his move to satellite, there is not controversy because people pay to listen to him. maybe Rush should do the same.the difference between Bill Maher doing this and Rush doing this is that Rush is dependent on sponsors and his program is broadcast on public radio. Bill Maher has no sponsors and an individual must pay a fee in order to watch his show, due to the fact that its on HBO. HBO could though fire him if they disagreed with his views. Rush owns and operates his own show and he answers only to himself and his sponsors. Bill Maher actually went into to detail about this on his shown last friday.
its the idea of private broadcast vs. public broadcast. similar to when Howard Stern when from public broadcast to satellite.
This has nothing to do with sponsorship and money for shows. It has everything to do with the hypocrisy of being able to call someone whatever you want if you are on the left and not being able to if you are on the right. The word Slut is able to be said over the public airwaves. Rush would have been in trouble with the FCC if he would have said the word ****. That is the only difference.
the major difference is people pay to listen to Maher on HBO and can thus be uncensored. Rush is heard on the public airwaves and has to abide by a different standard since people are not paying to listen to his rants.
the difference between Bill Maher doing this and Rush doing this is that Rush is dependent on sponsors and his program is broadcast on public radio. Bill Maher has no sponsors and an individual must pay a fee in order to watch his show, due to the fact that its on HBO. HBO could though fire him if they disagreed with his views. Rush owns and operates his own show and he answers only to himself and his sponsors. Bill Maher actually went into to detail about this on his shown last friday.
its the idea of private broadcast vs. public broadcast. similar to when Howard Stern when from public broadcast to satellite.
This has nothing to do with sponsorship and money for shows. It has everything to do with the hypocrisy of being able to call someone whatever you want if you are on the left and not being able to if you are on the right. The word Slut is able to be said over the public airwaves. Rush would have been in trouble with the FCC if he would have said the word ****. That is the only difference.
That's what I'd like to know. When has he had sponsors? I think one of main reasons he is on HBO is because he couldnt make it with sponsors.
Hmmm, so Bill Maher's show is on different footing that Rush Limbaugh's.
Yep but his comments were just as bad ... worse really. What's your point?
