OffensivelyOpenMinded
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
Of all the Jews America could have saved from Nazi Germany, why in the hell did we save the Frankfurt School Jews(yes they were ALL secular Jews)? They deserved to be gassed.Read this, Then you will know why just like I do.That is who I am really mad at, but the more militant trans activist get the more I hate them too.Well, it's important to remember that more likely than not, these people are suffering from a mental illness. If you want to be angry, you should be angry at the medical/psychiatric community for lying down to liberal demands.
I pity them, but feeding their delusions is not helping them, and that much is obvious. Why the leftists insist on continuing on with things that do not work, we may never know.
"
The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to corrupt
By Timothy Matthews
Hardcopy Issue Date: March 2009
Online Publication Date: Mar 17, 2009, 22:36
Western civilization at the present day is passing through a crisis which is essentially different from anything that has been previously experienced. Other societies in the past have changed their social institutions or their religious beliefs under the influence of external forces or the slow development of internal growth. But none, like our own, has ever consciously faced the prospect of a fundamental alteration of the beliefs and institutions on which the whole fabric of social life rests ... Civilization is being uprooted from its foundations in nature and tradition and is being reconstituted in a new organisation which is as artificial and mechanical as a modern factory.
Christopher Dawson. Enquiries into Religion and Culture, p. 259.
Most of Satanâs work in the world he takes care to keep hidden. But two small shafts of light have been thrown onto his work for me just recently. The first, a short article in the Association of Catholic Womenâs ACW Review; the second, a remark (which at first surprised me) from a priest in Russia who claimed that we now, in the West, live in a Communist society. These shafts of light help, especially, to explain the onslaught of officialdom which in many countries worldwide has so successfully been removing the rights of parents to be the primary educators and protectors of their children.
The ACW Review examined the corrosive work of the âFrankfurt Schoolâ - a group of German-American scholars who developed highly provocative and original perspectives on contemporary society and culture, drawing on Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, and Weber. Not that their idea of a âcultural revolutionâ was particularly new. âUntil nowâ, wrote Joseph, Comte de Maistre (1753-1821) who for fifteen years was a Freemason, ânations were killed by conquest, that is by invasion: But here an important question arises; can a nation not die on its own soil, without resettlement or invasion, by allowing the flies of decomposition to corrupt to the very core those original and constituent principles which make it what it is.'
What was the Frankfurt School? Well, in the days following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, it was believed that workersâ revolution would sweep into Europe and, eventually, into the United States. But it did not do so. Towards the end of 1922 the Communist International (Comintern) began to consider what were the reasons. On Leninâs initiative a meeting was organised at the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow.
The aim of the meeting was to clarify the concept of, and give concrete effect to, a Marxist cultural revolution. Amongst those present were Georg Lukacs (a Hungarian aristocrat, son of a banker, who had become a Communist during World War I ; a good Marxist theoretician he developed the idea of âRevolution and Erosâ - sexual instinct used as an instrument of destruction) and Willi Munzenberg (whose proposed solution was to âorganise the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilisation stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariatâ) âIt wasâ, said Ralph de Toledano (1916-2007) the conservative author and co-founder of the âNational Reviewâ, a meeting âperhaps more harmful to Western civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.'
Lenin died in 1924. By this time, however, Stalin was beginning to look on Munzenberg, Lukacs and like-thinkers as ârevisionistsâ. In June 1940, MĂźnzenberg fled to the south of France where, on Stalinâs orders, a NKVD assassination squad caught up with him and hanged him from a tree.
In the summer of 1924, after being attacked for his writings by the 5th Comintern Congress, Lukacs moved to Germany, where he chaired the first meeting of a group of Communist-oriented sociologists, a gathering that was to lead to the foundation of the Frankfurt School.
This âSchoolâ (designed to put flesh on their revolutionary programme) was started at the University of Frankfurt in the Institut fĂźr Sozialforschung. To begin with school and institute were indistinguishable. In 1923 the Institute was officially established, and funded by Felix Weil (1898-1975). Weil was born in Argentina and at the age of nine was sent to attend school in Germany. He attended the universities in TĂźbingen and Frankfurt, where he graduated with a doctoral degree in political science. While at these universities he became increasingly interested in socialism and Marxism. According to the intellectual historian Martin Jay, the topic of his dissertation was âthe practical problems of implementing socialism.'
Carl GrĂźnberg, the Instituteâs director from 1923-1929, was an avowed Marxist, although the Institute did not have any official party affiliations. But in 1930 Max Horkheimer assumed control and he believed that Marxâs theory should be the basis of the Instituteâs research. When Hitler came to power, the Institut was closed and its members, by various routes, fled to the United States and migrated to major US universitiesâColumbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley.
The School included among its members the 1960s guru of the New Left Herbert Marcuse (denounced by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which âopens the way for licence cloaked as libertyâ), Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, the popular writer Erich Fromm, Leo Lowenthal, and Jurgen Habermas - possibly the Schoolâs most influential representative.
Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the âoppressiveâ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virusââcontinuing the work of the Western Marxists by other meansâ as one of their members noted.
To further the advance of their âquietâ cultural revolution - but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future - the School recommended (among other things):
1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schoolsâ and teachersâ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family
One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freudâs idea of âpansexualismâ - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:
⢠attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
⢠abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
⢠abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces
⢠declare women to be an âoppressed classâ and men as âoppressorsâ
Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt Schoolâs long-term operation thus: âWe will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.'
The School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) political and (b) cultural. Cultural revolution demolishes from within. âModern forms of subjection are marked by mildnessâ. They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.
The Family
The Schoolâs âCritical Theoryâ preached that the âauthoritarian personalityâ is a product of the patriarchal family - an idea directly linked to Engelsâ Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State, which promoted matriarchy. Already Karl Marx had written, in the âCommunist Manifestoâ, about the radical notion of a âcommunity of womenâ and in The German Ideology of 1845, written disparagingly about the idea of the family as the basic unit of society. This was one of the basic tenets of the âCritical Theoryâ : the necessity of breaking down the contemporary family. The Institute scholars preached that âEven a partial breakdown of parental authority in the family might tend to increase the readiness of a coming generation to accept social change.â
Following Karl Marx, the School stressed how the âauthoritarian personalityâ is a product of the patriarchal familyâit was Marx who wrote so disparagingly about the idea of the family being the basic unit of society. All this prepared the way for the warfare against the masculine gender promoted by Marcuse under the guise of âwomenâs liberationâ and by the New Left movement in the 1960s.
They proposed transforming our culture into a female-dominated one. In 1933, Wilhelm Reich, one of their members, wrote in The Mass Psychology of Fascism that matriarchy was the only genuine family type of ânatural society.â Eric Fromm was also an active advocate of matriarchal theory. Masculinity and femininity, he claimed, were not reflections of âessentialâ sexual differences, as the Romantics had thought but were derived instead from differences in life functions, which were in part socially determined.â His dogma was the precedent for the radical feminist pronouncements that, today, appear in nearly every major newspaper and television programme.
The revolutionaries knew exactly what they wanted to do and how to do it. They have succeeded."
The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to corrupt
I'm sorry, but when I start off reading something and it says "Satan's work" then I can not take anything in it seriously anymore.
The fanatically fucked-up society Western nations have had to endure - up until now - all came from the minds of Marxist-Leninist monsters, the spawn of Satan himself and everything from Political Correctness to the perversion of Gender roles and even Gender itself can be laid at their door.
Every aim they laid out has happened and also every aim they laid out we on the Right in Western nations will now systematically begin to reverse and destroy.