Mr. President
BOARD PRESIDENT..carry on
- Aug 22, 2008
- 1,423
- 346
- 98
Both of you shut already. We were having a delightful conversation about torture and killing and now you all are ruining it. Can we stay on track please? Thank You
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I've said all I have to say about torture for today, here: http://www.usmessageboard.com/1186706-post269.htmlBoth of you shut already. We were having a delightful conversation about torture and killing and now you all are ruining it. Can we stay on track please? Thank You
uh, no, if you dont wish to respond, NORMAL people just DONT REPLYIgnored.
Psst... By replying to people you wish to ignore, you are not ignoring them.
I don't wish to ignore the person. Just the post. I suppose I could put "not responding" or something like that. "Ignored" is easier and works fine.
it doesnt work to be direct with moronsI've said all I have to say about torture for today, here: http://www.usmessageboard.com/1186706-post269.htmlBoth of you shut already. We were having a delightful conversation about torture and killing and now you all are ruining it. Can we stay on track please? Thank You
But, I understand your desire to get back on topic. Have at it! I guess I should have just wrote whatshername a PM asking her to fuck-off with the "ignored" bullshit. My bad.
Are you saying it doesn't make a difference if they are American or not?
But again, why are "terrorists" expendable, and not serial murderers, child molesters, gang members, herion dealers, and the like?
And once we clarify that, if only "terrorists" are expendable and therefore not entitled to human rights, how do you know if they are terrorists? Who decides that, Governments? If an American is capture in Iran, and Iran says hes a terrorist, its OK for Iran to torture him and we have no right to complain?
... asshole ...
Ignored.
... asshole ...
Ignored.
Psst... By replying to people you wish to ignore, you are not ignoring them.
Ignored.
Psst... By replying to people you wish to ignore, you are not ignoring them.
She just likes the faux "drama".
We kill 3 pirates to save the life of one captain but the left is against the US using waterboarding to save the lives of many. Explain that logic!
The golden rule -- do onto others as you would have them do onto you.
I wouldn't want our guys getting legitimately waterboarded.
We kill 3 pirates to save the life of one captain but the left is against the US using waterboarding to save the lives of many. Explain that logic!
The golden rule -- do onto others as you would have them do onto you.
I wouldn't want our guys getting legitimately waterboarded.
Didn't see the pirates kill anyone so I guess we broke the rule there by killing them.
The golden rule -- do onto others as you would have them do onto you.
I wouldn't want our guys getting legitimately waterboarded.
Didn't see the pirates kill anyone so I guess we broke the rule there by killing them.
Not in my opinion.
Didn't see the pirates kill anyone so I guess we broke the rule there by killing them.
Not in my opinion.
then EXPLAIN your opinion
Not in my opinion.
then EXPLAIN your opinion
Since you asked nicely -- heh heh -- in my opinion it is completely legitimate to shoot pirates who are holding hostages at gun point.
then EXPLAIN your opinion
Since you asked nicely -- heh heh -- in my opinion it is completely legitimate to shoot pirates who are holding hostages at gun point.
Liberal logic: It's OK to kill someone who may murder someone but it's not Ok to waterboard (which doesn't kill) someone who may be part of a mass murder. Got it.
wrong, the GC says these guiys can be shot on the battle fieldSince you asked nicely -- heh heh -- in my opinion it is completely legitimate to shoot pirates who are holding hostages at gun point.
Liberal logic: It's OK to kill someone who may murder someone but it's not Ok to waterboard (which doesn't kill) someone who may be part of a mass murder. Got it.
That is not liberal logic, that is the Geneva Conventions. So you like to torture. How then are you any differant than the terrorists.
Since you asked nicely -- heh heh -- in my opinion it is completely legitimate to shoot pirates who are holding hostages at gun point.
Liberal logic: It's OK to kill someone who may murder someone but it's not Ok to waterboard (which doesn't kill) someone who may be part of a mass murder. Got it.
That is not liberal logic, that is the Geneva Conventions. So you like to torture. How then are you any differant than the terrorists.
they are covered under the same thing as spiesLiberal logic: It's OK to kill someone who may murder someone but it's not Ok to waterboard (which doesn't kill) someone who may be part of a mass murder. Got it.
That is not liberal logic, that is the Geneva Conventions. So you like to torture. How then are you any differant than the terrorists.
It's my understanding that terorists aren't even covered under the Geneva Convention.