Tolerant libs to ban sugary soda sales on county property

Drinking a giant pepsi right now.

Yum yum. Eatin taco bell, drinkin my pepsi...life is good. On county property, even.

In another thread, you went on and on about how you eat so healthy.

What will it be tomorrow?

And its not just libs who are pushing against GMOs and HFCS.

Anybody with a brain wants real food instead of factory junk.

Having said that, I don't much care if all you nutter rw's slam down the corn syrup all day long.


LOL.....

you would be amazed at the choices people make when it comes to junk food... brain cells or not..

and if the libs felt that way... no caring what the nutters slam down...then why try and nanny state the choices away?

There is a thing called self control ya know.
 
Last edited:
Drinking a giant pepsi right now.

Yum yum. Eatin taco bell, drinkin my pepsi...life is good. On county property, even.

In another thread, you went on and on about how you eat so healthy.

What will it be tomorrow?

And its not just libs who are pushing against GMOs and HFCS.

Anybody with a brain wants real food instead of factory junk.

Having said that, I don't much care if all you nutter rw's slam down the corn syrup all day long.


LOL.....

you would be amazed at the choices people make when it comes to junk food... brain cells or not..

and if the libs felt that way... no caring what the nutters slam down...then why try and nanny state the choices away?

There is a think called self control ya know.

This concept is foreign to many who sit there and eat themselves into a caloric stupor. The government steps in because of these lazy bastards and we all pay the prices. Just unreal.....:mad: Life was so much simpler when all I wanted was my MTV.
 
Md. county bans sugary drink sales on its property - WTOP.com

So long as libs get sodomy and abortion the rest if your life is subject to total govt control


I had no idea it was government's duty to support the sale of sodas. Where does it say that in the Constitution?

I had no idea it was the government's duty to ban the sale of soda's. Where does it say that in the Constitution?


The sale of sodas is only prohibited on county property. Is the country supposed to allow anyone to sell whatever they want on county property? I wanna open up a porno video stand on the county fair grounds - they have no right to stop me, do they?
 
The mindless oinkers love the government thinking for them.

Tolerant libs to ban sugary soda sales on county property

Liberals, why?^^^

Government isn't what's thinking for you people. FOX News and the Koch Brothers are doing your thinking.

Seriously you guys don't even think that government has a right to regulate what businesses can and can't sell to public middle school students on public middle school grounds. For real? I suppose if someone wants to open up a cotton candy stand at the exact same spot that the school caferteria lunch line starts the country has no right to stop them, right?
 
Last edited:
In another thread, you went on and on about how you eat so healthy.

What will it be tomorrow?

And its not just libs who are pushing against GMOs and HFCS.

Anybody with a brain wants real food instead of factory junk.

Having said that, I don't much care if all you nutter rw's slam down the corn syrup all day long.


LOL.....

you would be amazed at the choices people make when it comes to junk food... brain cells or not..

and if the libs felt that way... no caring what the nutters slam down...then why try and nanny state the choices away?

There is a think called self control ya know.

This concept is foreign to many who sit there and eat themselves into a caloric stupor. The government steps in because of these lazy bastards and we all pay the prices. Just unreal.....:mad: Life was so much simpler when all I wanted was my MTV.

I'm sorry, what "price" are you paying? Do you work on county property in Howard county? If so - here's an idea - buy you soda at the store and bring it to work. WOW. Other than that I fail to see what "price" you're paying here. Please elaborate on your damages.
 
Buy your pop elsewhere.
You wouldn't complain if a business didn't sell pop at their private business, why would complain if a county doesn't want to sell it?
 
How about let people choose what they want to drink?

Dude, this law is easy to get around! Just buy your soda at a gas station. Or the grocery store. Or any of the innumerable businesses that do not operate on the property of Howard County. Are you retarded or something?
 
Last edited:
You have to laugh at these "states rights" posters having a fit when a local government decides not to contribute to the obesity problem.

I honestly think half of them are just knee jerk reactionaries who didn't even read the OP to find out this law only applies to sales on county property and not the 99% of businesses that operate on private property.

The other half are genuine idiots.
 
Last edited:
Why are more Americans obese now than their were 30 years ago?

Because the nanny state allows them to sit on their ass collecting welfare checks and food stamps. Unless you don't think there is a correlation between obesity and poverty.

So anyone I see that is fat is unemployed and on welfare? Safe assumption to make?

rush_limbaugh3.jpg

Yes it is to a degree. But I guess I have to point out the obvious to idiots such as yourself. There is exceptions to every rule.

Chances for obesity in men tend to be the same regardless of income level, as for women obesity increases as income decreases according to the CDC.
 
Because the nanny state allows them to sit on their ass collecting welfare checks and food stamps. Unless you don't think there is a correlation between obesity and poverty.

So anyone I see that is fat is unemployed and on welfare? Safe assumption to make?

rush_limbaugh3.jpg

Yes it is to a degree. But I guess I have to point out the obvious to idiots such as yourself. There is exceptions to every rule.


That's a lot of exceptions

b232fzuef9.jpg


7zgdcgm43d.jpg


tumblr_lwmo5in0vf1qf10tro1_1280.jpg



Chances for obesity in men tend to be the same regardless of income level, as for women obesity increases as income decreases according to the CDC.
So we've gone from all fat people are on welfare - to there are exceptions - to actually it doesn't make a difference for men and for women there's a statistically higher chance if she's poor she's obese but it isn't a general rule and it depends on her income not her entitlement status as you originally suggested.

Got it.

What a strong statement.
 
Last edited:
So anyone I see that is fat is unemployed and on welfare? Safe assumption to make?

rush_limbaugh3.jpg

Yes it is to a degree. But I guess I have to point out the obvious to idiots such as yourself. There is exceptions to every rule.


That's a lot of exceptions

b232fzuef9.jpg


7zgdcgm43d.jpg


tumblr_lwmo5in0vf1qf10tro1_1280.jpg



Chances for obesity in men tend to be the same regardless of income level, as for women obesity increases as income decreases according to the CDC.
So we've gone from all fat people are on welfare - to there are exceptions - to actually it doesn't make a difference for men and for women there's a statistically higher chance if she's poor she's obese but it isn't a general rule and it depends on her income not her entitlement status as you originally suggested.

Got it.

What a strong statement.

You've proved yourself to be a real dumbass. Did you read the ENTIRE TWO sentences of my post?

NO you only read what you wanted to read then conducted yourself as the brainless moron that you are.

Go back to school you retarded puke!
 
Yes it is to a degree. But I guess I have to point out the obvious to idiots such as yourself. There is exceptions to every rule.


That's a lot of exceptions

b232fzuef9.jpg


7zgdcgm43d.jpg


tumblr_lwmo5in0vf1qf10tro1_1280.jpg




So we've gone from all fat people are on welfare - to there are exceptions - to actually it doesn't make a difference for men and for women there's a statistically higher chance if she's poor she's obese but it isn't a general rule and it depends on her income not her entitlement status as you originally suggested.

Got it.

What a strong statement.

You've proved yourself to be a real dumbass. Did you read the ENTIRE TWO sentences of my post?

NO you only read what you wanted to read then conducted yourself as the brainless moron that you are.

Go back to school you retarded puke!


Not only did I read and respond to both sentences, I also read your previous post, in which you claimed the reason for the obesity epidemic is welfare, and failed to support it with quantitative numbers.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top