Justin Richardson
Diamond Member
- Apr 15, 2019
- 4,365
- 4,596
- 1,970
As long as it's not a Democrat" that isn't wasting money...it's a "waste of money".Waste of money but whatever
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
As long as it's not a Democrat" that isn't wasting money...it's a "waste of money".Waste of money but whatever
Is an incinerator what’s used for cremation?Waste of money but whatever
True, it is much less expensive to throw the remains of babies in the trash, than it is to treat them with respect.
Perhaps you would rather they use a garbage disposal ?
What?As long as it's not a Democrat" that isn't wasting money...it's a "waste of money".Waste of money but whatever
Opps my bad...misread your statement to the post.What?
You’re talking about the fetus. We know exactly how much respect Republicans have for human beings.You don't get that we Respectfully burry dead humans?
.
You’re talking about the fetus. We know exactly how much respect Republicans have for human beings.You don't get that we Respectfully burry dead humans?
.
Waste of money but whatever
Tossing them in a fire is cheaper and less work. You can toss the ashes in the wind and say sime words if you want.What happened to throwing human remains in a vat and composting them?
Spending money on magical rituals that none of the parties involved want or care about is neither wise nor productiveWaste of money but whatever
Kindly elaborate.
Spending money on magical rituals that none of the parties involved want or care about is neither wise nor productiveWaste of money but whatever
Kindly elaborate.
What other reason do you want them buried? Plenty of other ways to provide respect.Spending money on magical rituals that none of the parties involved want or care about is neither wise nor productiveWaste of money but whatever
Kindly elaborate.
Where does it state "magical ritual". How do you conflate that with simple respect?
Supreme Court leaves intact block on one Indiana abortion restriction, but allows fetal burial to go into effect
The Supreme Court overturned this part:
a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by race, sex or disability.
Republicans want to force women to have retarded babies or babies that die right after birth.
The Supreme Court said no.
And they’re saying that an abortion has to be treated like a funeral or cremation.
But the justices also allowed a part of an Indiana law to go into effect that requires that fetal tissue be buried or cremated.
So what are they doing? They’re trying to be moral and be morbidly weird at the same time? I don’t get it.
Thought process from the Republicans are just a mystery to me. Remember, these are people that think putting babies in cages is a great idea. And that poor people have too much health care.
What other reason do you want them buried? Plenty of other ways to provide respect.
You will go to hell.Spending money on magical rituals that none of the parties involved want or care about is neither wise nor productiveWaste of money but whatever
Kindly elaborate.
He can't, the lord there won't have him. . ..You will go to hell.Spending money on magical rituals that none of the parties involved want or care about is neither wise nor productiveWaste of money but whatever
Kindly elaborate.
Supreme Court leaves intact block on one Indiana abortion restriction, but allows fetal burial to go into effect
The Supreme Court overturned this part:
a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by race, sex or disability.
Republicans want to force women to have retarded babies or babies that die right after birth.
The Supreme Court said no.
And they’re saying that an abortion has to be treated like a funeral or cremation.
But the justices also allowed a part of an Indiana law to go into effect that requires that fetal tissue be buried or cremated.
So what are they doing? They’re trying to be moral and be morbidly weird at the same time? I don’t get it.
Thought process from the Republicans are just a mystery to me. Remember, these are people that think putting babies in cages is a great idea. And that poor people have too much health care.
Why do you need "common sense" abortion control? What sense does a "national abortion registry" make? There is no "need to know" involved. Why would any level of government need anyone's name. The woman will take care of the decision-making, and neither you nor Big Government needs to be concerned nor involved.