thanatos144
Gold Member
I should always be allowed to call a dummy a dummy. Liberals hate cause most of the time they are the fucking dummy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Has it been libs or Cons that for the last two years have pontificated on '2nd Amendment solutions'? You fellows have been doing the extreme yap-yap for a couple of years now. Even though that insane bastard may not have been part of this, he acted in the manner that you people have been talking. And the American citizens are now looking at what you have been saying, and wondering if a few of you are not close to the edge.
Get used to it. You people have brought it on to yourselves.
Reality is that there is no evidence as to why this guy went off on the shooting spree as of yet.
There is a lot of finger pointing as to why...with no evidence.
Exactly, and what I've said all along. LIEability suggests I'm a liar and worse because I posted the exact same idea as you Meister (strange, huh) with a caution. The caution being we don't know if he was influenced by the language used by Gov. Palin and Rep. Bachmann and candidate Angle. The point being we don't know.
LIEability states he knows and offers no evidence but for one person who attended college with the shooter. A friend or an aquaintance is not likely to know everything about a person, especially a person a bit odd.
No, liar. You lie. That's why I called you a liar.
What I have maintained is that YOU don't know what motivated the shooter. Neither do I. The difference is, I don't pretend to know.
You attempt to switch the burden of proof because in addition to being a liar, you are also unequipped to handle the rules of logic.
You also do not post your alleged "thoughts" with any appreciable clarity.
It really isn't my fault that you are a liar, a scumbag inarticulate poseur and a douche.
As one example of you lying, you liar: you just claimed that I EVER said that I know why the murderer did what he did. I never said any such thing. Indeed, I said the opposite. (But, your ignorance notwithstanding, we do have some clues. You are too stupid to even grasp that.)
Why must you always lie, you lowlife scumbag stupid piece of shit?
Respectfully and civilly yours,
you pal,
and your moral and intellectual superior in every conceivable way,
Liability
Has it been libs or Cons that for the last two years have pontificated on '2nd Amendment solutions'? You fellows have been doing the extreme yap-yap for a couple of years now. Even though that insane bastard may not have been part of this, he acted in the manner that you people have been talking. And the American citizens are now looking at what you have been saying, and wondering if a few of you are not close to the edge.
Get used to it. You people have brought it on to yourselves.
) Only a moron would think that.
Has it been libs or Cons that for the last two years have pontificated on '2nd Amendment solutions'? You fellows have been doing the extreme yap-yap for a couple of years now. Even though that insane bastard may not have been part of this, he acted in the manner that you people have been talking. And the American citizens are now looking at what you have been saying, and wondering if a few of you are not close to the edge.
Get used to it. You people have brought it on to yourselves.
) Only a moron would think that.
Says the fool with Megadeath as an avatar.
Has it been libs or Cons that for the last two years have pontificated on '2nd Amendment solutions'? You fellows have been doing the extreme yap-yap for a couple of years now. Even though that insane bastard may not have been part of this, he acted in the manner that you people have been talking. And the American citizens are now looking at what you have been saying, and wondering if a few of you are not close to the edge.
Get used to it. You people have brought it on to yourselves.
Reality is that there is no evidence as to why this guy went off on the shooting spree as of yet.
There is a lot of finger pointing as to why...with no evidence.
Are any of you leftist morons EVER going to get around to proving Laughner was influenced by right-wing rhetoric?Another apology for evil, the right has presented many, but none wipe away the tragic actions that the atmosphere of hatred of government caused in Arizona. Arizona itself is simply one part of the constant rhetoric that demonizes the other, to excuse this as the right does is to believe ideas grow out of nowhere, it is nothing more than a naive and childish excuse making. It refuses to accept responsibility for words that for two years have created the scene Keen describes so well.
Has it been libs or Cons that for the last two years have pontificated on '2nd Amendment solutions'? You fellows have been doing the extreme yap-yap for a couple of years now. Even though that insane bastard may not have been part of this, he acted in the manner that you people have been talking. And the American citizens are now looking at what you have been saying, and wondering if a few of you are not close to the edge.
Get used to it. You people have brought it on to yourselves.
Ah hah! See? It's the right wing's fault for not continuing to violate the constitution! They're to blame for this tragedy because they won't disarm the populace! They enabled him and share in his guilt!Rush has 20 million listeners. Loughner was not one of them.
Beck, Oberman, Hannity, Rhodes, Levin, Lykis, all have their followers. Loughner was not one of them
Nothing any of these people said (And I will note that in my very small sample of the words of Oberman and Rhodes, they are a lot more violent than anything I have heard from my very large samples of Beck, Levin or Rush) had any relation to Loughner. He was as ignorant of them and their ideas and arguments and style as he was of Logic, grammar, or Quantum mechanics.
Loughner went out and purchased a gun and used it enterely of his own volition. He was not compelled, coerced, or convinced by any of them. The only blame is his alone. The only action was his.
As a listener to Rush, I was one of the 20million who did not try and assassinate a congressmen last weekend. I was one of the millions of Beck listeners who did not shoot up a grocery store. I was one of the millions of readers of Michelle Malkin who didn't shoot anybody.
Blaming free speech of the totally unrelated actions of a loon from the fever swamps where the ideas of Marx and Hitler are seen as both valid on political entertainers who despise the various peculiar views of Loughner for short term points is dishonest and cowardly.
Congratulations on not killing anyone this week. Someone did, someone who purchased a gun and a large magazine - a magazine he could not have purchased had the Brady Bill remained law.
A gun he might not have been able to purchase had an effective background check been the law.
Of course you err when you state, " He was not compelled, coerced, or convinced by any of them"; them being conservative radio and TV personalites. You don't know that. The evidence I assume you will present as proof is hearsay and suspect. The 'friend' who made such a claim did not live with the shooter; he was not with him 24/7. Neither he nor you know what antecedents contributed to the horrific behavior of Jard Loughner. No one will ever know for sure.
Shoot em all and let Gaia sort em out? That's my divination of Crocksiepoo's desires at least. After all, we're allowed to be mind readers now.Has it been libs or Cons that for the last two years have pontificated on '2nd Amendment solutions'? You fellows have been doing the extreme yap-yap for a couple of years now. Even though that insane bastard may not have been part of this, he acted in the manner that you people have been talking. And the American citizens are now looking at what you have been saying, and wondering if a few of you are not close to the edge.
Get used to it. You people have brought it on to yourselves.
So what's your solution? I'm tired of you leftists impotently bitching. What do you propose to do about all these dangerous right-wingers?
Man up, Rocks. Tell us what you would do if you had the power.
I want to hear one of them describe their final solution in their own words.Shoot em all and let Gaia sort em out? That's my divination of Crocksiepoo's desires at least. After all, we're allowed to be mind readers now.Has it been libs or Cons that for the last two years have pontificated on '2nd Amendment solutions'? You fellows have been doing the extreme yap-yap for a couple of years now. Even though that insane bastard may not have been part of this, he acted in the manner that you people have been talking. And the American citizens are now looking at what you have been saying, and wondering if a few of you are not close to the edge.
Get used to it. You people have brought it on to yourselves.
So what's your solution? I'm tired of you leftists impotently bitching. What do you propose to do about all these dangerous right-wingers?
Man up, Rocks. Tell us what you would do if you had the power.
No Conservative Speech Allowed
No Conservative books allowed
That's why New York lit the empire state building up in red. yep.
No no... those are only the voices in their head.I want to hear one of them describe their final solution in their own words.Shoot em all and let Gaia sort em out? That's my divination of Crocksiepoo's desires at least. After all, we're allowed to be mind readers now.So what's your solution? I'm tired of you leftists impotently bitching. What do you propose to do about all these dangerous right-wingers?
Man up, Rocks. Tell us what you would do if you had the power.
Oh, and only leftists can read minds.
Rush has 20 million listeners. Loughner was not one of them.
Beck, Oberman, Hannity, Rhodes, Levin, Lykis, all have their followers. Loughner was not one of them
Nothing any of these people said (And I will note that in my very small sample of the words of Oberman and Rhodes, they are a lot more violent than anything I have heard from my very large samples of Beck, Levin or Rush) had any relation to Loughner. He was as ignorant of them and their ideas and arguments and style as he was of Logic, grammar, or Quantum mechanics.
Loughner went out and purchased a gun and used it enterely of his own volition. He was not compelled, coerced, or convinced by any of them. The only blame is his alone. The only action was his.
As a listener to Rush, I was one of the 20million who did not try and assassinate a congressmen last weekend. I was one of the millions of Beck listeners who did not shoot up a grocery store. I was one of the millions of readers of Michelle Malkin who didn't shoot anybody.
Blaming free speech of the totally unrelated actions of a loon from the fever swamps where the ideas of Marx and Hitler are seen as both valid on political entertainers who despise the various peculiar views of Loughner for short term points is dishonest and cowardly.
Congratulations on not killing anyone this week. Someone did, someone who purchased a gun and a large magazine - a magazine he could not have purchased had the Brady Bill remained law.
A gun he might not have been able to purchase had an effective background check been the law.
Of course you err when you state, " He was not compelled, coerced, or convinced by any of them"; them being conservative radio and TV personalites. You don't know that. The evidence I assume you will present as proof is hearsay and suspect. The 'friend' who made such a claim did not live with the shooter; he was not with him 24/7. Neither he nor you know what antecedents contributed to the horrific behavior of Jard Loughner. No one will ever know for sure.
Reality is that there is no evidence as to why this guy went off on the shooting spree as of yet.
There is a lot of finger pointing as to why...with no evidence.
Exactly, and what I've said all along. LIEability suggests I'm a liar and worse because I posted the exact same idea as you Meister (strange, huh) with a caution. The caution being we don't know if he was influenced by the language used by Gov. Palin and Rep. Bachmann and candidate Angle. The point being we don't know.
LIEability states he knows and offers no evidence but for one person who attended college with the shooter. A friend or an aquaintance is not likely to know everything about a person, especially a person a bit odd.
No, liar. You lie. That's why I called you a liar.
What I have maintained is that YOU don't know what motivated the shooter. Neither do I. The difference is, I don't pretend to know.
You attempt to switch the burden of proof because in addition to being a liar, you are also unequipped to handle the rules of logic.
You also do not post your alleged "thoughts" with any appreciable clarity.
It really isn't my fault that you are a liar, a scumbag inarticulate poseur and a douche.
As one example of you lying, you liar: you just claimed that I EVER said that I know why the murderer did what he did. I never said any such thing. Indeed, I said the opposite. (But, your ignorance notwithstanding, we do have some clues. You are too stupid to even grasp that.) YOU STATED THE SHOOTER WAS NOT INFLUENCED BY RW RHETORIC. YET YOU ARGUE YOU DO NOT KNOWING WHY HE DID THE SHOOTING; IT IS A LOGICAL INFERENCE TO SUGGEST YOU CLAIM TO KNOW WHAT DIDN'T INFLUENCE HIM; AND BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION NO ONE KNOWS WHAT DID OR DIDN'T INFLUENCE HIM. Why must you always lie, you lowlife scumbag stupid piece of shit?
Respectfully and civilly yours,
you pal,
and your moral and intellectual superior in every conceivable way,
Liability
Please provide the exact quotes of what those two people said...I haven't seen anyone blame Rush, et al for the murders.So no one blamed them. Got it. Just another thread using victims as tools.
Raving Dishonesty cannot post at all without relying on her massive supply of lies.
Yes, shithead. Krugman blamed right-wing discourse. That stupid joke of a Sheriff did, too. Now, we even see one of the victims trying that baseless ploy. And a great deal of the scumbag liberal propaganda ministry main stream media couldn't contain themselves from dutifully reporting the baseless speculation as though it somehow constituted actual "news."
If you were bound by honesty, you filthy rag, you'd never post again.
Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik once again blames conservative rhetoric as the reasons for the attempted assassination of Rep. Gabby Giffords (AZ).
"The kind of rhetoric that flows from people like Rush Limbaugh, in my judgment, he's irresponsible; uses partial information, sometimes wrong information. Attacks people, angers them against government, angers them against elected officials and that kind of behavior, in my opinion, is without consequence and I think he's irresponsible," Sheriff Dupnik told ABC News.
Exactly, and what I've said all along. LIEability suggests I'm a liar and worse because I posted the exact same idea as you Meister (strange, huh) with a caution. The caution being we don't know if he was influenced by the language used by Gov. Palin and Rep. Bachmann and candidate Angle. The point being we don't know.
LIEability states he knows and offers no evidence but for one person who attended college with the shooter. A friend or an aquaintance is not likely to know everything about a person, especially a person a bit odd.
No, liar. You lie. That's why I called you a liar.
What I have maintained is that YOU don't know what motivated the shooter. Neither do I. The difference is, I don't pretend to know.
You attempt to switch the burden of proof because in addition to being a liar, you are also unequipped to handle the rules of logic.
You also do not post your alleged "thoughts" with any appreciable clarity.
It really isn't my fault that you are a liar, a scumbag inarticulate poseur and a douche.
As one example of you lying, you liar: you just claimed that I EVER said that I know why the murderer did what he did. I never said any such thing. Indeed, I said the opposite. (But, your ignorance notwithstanding, we do have some clues. You are too stupid to even grasp that.)
Why must you always lie, you lowlife scumbag stupid piece of shit?
Respectfully and civilly yours,
you pal,
and your moral and intellectual superior in every conceivable way,
Liability
A most wonderful demonstration of why the American Citizen is now taking a hard look at what the Conservatives are saying in their rhetoric. And making harsh and accurate judgements about the mental condition of the kind of people that make this kind of statements.