Title IX pays off

[martybegan]

My School didn't keep club levels for wrestling and volleyball. They just cut the teams totally.

So was there harm done to these men or not?

Answer the question.

Go to a school that has men’s wrestling and volleyball

Ending a situation where only men can get athletic scholarships does not make me feel sorry for the men

How? Schools were dropping these programs at the same time. It was systemic.

They could have taken demand into account when they did Title X, they chose the easy way out.

And typical progressive mindset. Hurting people is OK if it's people I don't like.

Wah!
Men don’t get all the scholarships anymore
Not fair

It's amazing you can't admit that some people were harmed to help others.

What a delusional twat you are.

Just a change in priorities
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose

You just can't bring yourself to admit these men were harmed.

In your socialist utopia no harm is done, at least not admitted to.

 

[rightwinger]

Go to a school that has men’s wrestling and volleyball

Ending a situation where only men can get athletic scholarships does not make me feel sorry for the men

How? Schools were dropping these programs at the same time. It was systemic.

They could have taken demand into account when they did Title X, they chose the easy way out.

And typical progressive mindset. Hurting people is OK if it's people I don't like.

Wah!
Men don’t get all the scholarships anymore
Not fair

It's amazing you can't admit that some people were harmed to help others.

What a delusional twat you are.

Just a change in priorities
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose

You just can't bring yourself to admit these men were harmed.

In your socialist utopia no harm is done, at least not admitted to.

Now the fair thing to do would have been to make the schools make up for decades of discrimination.
Instead, they just said from now on there must be an equal distribution between men and women

 

[rightwinger]

There was no justifiable reason why 80 percent of scholarships and athletic funding needed to go to men’s sports

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There was no justifiable reason why 80 percent of scholarships and athletic funding needed to go to men’s sports

Is interest exactly identical for men's and women's sports?
From both players and fans?

 

[Unkotare]

My School didn't keep club levels for wrestling and volleyball. They just cut the teams totally.

So was there harm done to these men or not?

Answer the question.

Go to a school that has men’s wrestling and volleyball

Ending a situation where only men can get athletic scholarships does not make me feel sorry for the men

How? Schools were dropping these programs at the same time. It was systemic.

They could have taken demand into account when they did Title X, they chose the easy way out.

And typical progressive mindset. Hurting people is OK if it's people I don't like.

Wah!
Men don’t get all the scholarships anymore
Not fair

It's amazing you can't admit that some people were harmed to help others.

What a delusional twat you are.

Just a change in priorities
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose

As has been said many times, the democrats couldn't give less of a shit who has to get hurt.

 

[martybegan]

How? Schools were dropping these programs at the same time. It was systemic.

They could have taken demand into account when they did Title X, they chose the easy way out.

And typical progressive mindset. Hurting people is OK if it's people I don't like.

Wah!
Men don’t get all the scholarships anymore
Not fair

It's amazing you can't admit that some people were harmed to help others.

What a delusional twat you are.

Just a change in priorities
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose

You just can't bring yourself to admit these men were harmed.

In your socialist utopia no harm is done, at least not admitted to.

Now the fair thing to do would have been to make the schools make up for decades of discrimination.
Instead, they just said from now on there must be an equal distribution between men and women

They ignored demand, and used the easy metric of enrollment.

Can you even admit that some men now had to suffer for the sins of the past to help women now?

 

[rightwinger]

In spite of constant whining from conservatives, Title IX has been a huge success

Why would you want to waste a scholarship on a woman?

 

[rightwinger]

Go to a school that has men’s wrestling and volleyball

Ending a situation where only men can get athletic scholarships does not make me feel sorry for the men

How? Schools were dropping these programs at the same time. It was systemic.

They could have taken demand into account when they did Title X, they chose the easy way out.

And typical progressive mindset. Hurting people is OK if it's people I don't like.

Wah!
Men don’t get all the scholarships anymore
Not fair

It's amazing you can't admit that some people were harmed to help others.

What a delusional twat you are.

Just a change in priorities
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose

As has been said many times, the democrats couldn't give less of a shit who has to get hurt.

Women were hurt prior to Title IX
It is only when men didn’t receive the majority of scholarships that you turned into a Snowflake

 

[martybegan]

In spite of constant whining from conservatives, Title IX has been a huge success

Why would you want to waste a scholarship on a woman?

It's success has come at a cost, and you refuse to admit that.

 

[rightwinger]

Nine Ways Title IX Has Helped Girls and Women in Education - NEA Today

 

[Unkotare]

How? Schools were dropping these programs at the same time. It was systemic.

They could have taken demand into account when they did Title X, they chose the easy way out.

And typical progressive mindset. Hurting people is OK if it's people I don't like.

Wah!
Men don’t get all the scholarships anymore
Not fair

It's amazing you can't admit that some people were harmed to help others.

What a delusional twat you are.

Just a change in priorities
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose

As has been said many times, the democrats couldn't give less of a shit who has to get hurt.

Women were hurt prior to Title IX....

And the only way democrats can think is to hurt men in revenge. Typical.

 

[Unkotare]

Harrison Bergeron

 

[martybegan]

Nine Ways Title IX Has Helped Girls and Women in Education - NEA Today

The issue isn't helping women, is that you can't admit that it has hurt men.

 

[Olde Europe]

...
Really, why is it that conservatives almost invariably choose the side of the privileged haves, and are inconsolable because of their "loss"? ....

It is deliberately dishonest that you keep avoiding, ignoring, and denying what I have told you many times about students who under any other circumstances you would weep about being among the "oppressed have nots" being harmed by this ill-considered policy. Until you can admit that by taking this position in many cases YOU are defending "privileged haves" at the expense of students from disadvantaged backgrounds, you are not a legitimate interlocutor. Just another partisan shill.

You are just a dumb fart, too enmeshed in your victim narrative to understand there are several fault lines separating haves from have-nots, in this case one of the haves who used to enjoy male privilege over females, while otherwise to be counted among have-nots. The point is, if you want more have-nots enjoying equal access to education, it's entirely hypocritical, intellectually lazy, and mendacious to target other have-nots and advocate for their continued exclusion - almost as if they were responsible for the fact that your much bemoaned "sacrificed male" no longer gets to enjoy his male privilege. They are not.

And now you can continue your whining if you absolutely have to.

 

[Unkotare]

...
Really, why is it that conservatives almost invariably choose the side of the privileged haves, and are inconsolable because of their "loss"? ....

It is deliberately dishonest that you keep avoiding, ignoring, and denying what I have told you many times about students who under any other circumstances you would weep about being among the "oppressed have nots" being harmed by this ill-considered policy. Until you can admit that by taking this position in many cases YOU are defending "privileged haves" at the expense of students from disadvantaged backgrounds, you are not a legitimate interlocutor. Just another partisan shill.

You are just a dumb fart, too enmeshed in your victim narrative to understand there are several fault lines separating haves from have-nots, in this case one of the haves who used to enjoy male privilege over females, while otherwise to be counted among have-nots. The point is, if you want more have-nots enjoying equal access to education, it's entirely hypocritical, intellectually lazy, and mendacious to target other have-nots and advocate for their continued exclusion - almost as if they were responsible for the fact that your much bemoaned "sacrificed male" no longer gets to enjoy his male privilege. They are not.

And now you can continue your whining if you absolutely have to.

So for you, “have” = male, no matter what conditions he lives in, and “have not” = female regardless of what conditions she lives in? Is that your position?

 

[22lcidw]

...
Really, why is it that conservatives almost invariably choose the side of the privileged haves, and are inconsolable because of their "loss"? ....

It is deliberately dishonest that you keep avoiding, ignoring, and denying what I have told you many times about students who under any other circumstances you would weep about being among the "oppressed have nots" being harmed by this ill-considered policy. Until you can admit that by taking this position in many cases YOU are defending "privileged haves" at the expense of students from disadvantaged backgrounds, you are not a legitimate interlocutor. Just another partisan shill.

You are just a dumb fart, too enmeshed in your victim narrative to understand there are several fault lines separating haves from have-nots, in this case one of the haves who used to enjoy male privilege over females, while otherwise to be counted among have-nots. The point is, if you want more have-nots enjoying equal access to education, it's entirely hypocritical, intellectually lazy, and mendacious to target other have-nots and advocate for their continued exclusion - almost as if they were responsible for the fact that your much bemoaned "sacrificed male" no longer gets to enjoy his male privilege. They are not.

And now you can continue your whining if you absolutely have to.

Those privileged males are purchasing guns at record pace. Why? Anyway there is a difference in being qualified and being better. We live in the qualified society now. The smart or concerned males in jobs affected need to manuver to stay together in different fields of work to produce the best that can be or for their own safety. People in the military are doing that now moreso as we see what qualified has done. We are falling behind in tech products as qualified has worked its way into our system. And this is going on in many other ways of employment. And as an added bonus males have been destroyed. And with the help of other males also.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

When Title IX, giving women parity in sports funding was passed....There was outrage

Why fund women’s sports?

Today, our women’s Soccer Team won the World Cup for the fourth time. Our men cant even qualify

US women dominate in Basketball, Gymnastics, Skiing, Ice Skating, Soccer,Track and Field

All because of Title IX

And all the gender retardation bullshit will sink Title IX.


I can't wait.

.

 

[Unkotare]

...
Really, why is it that conservatives almost invariably choose the side of the privileged haves, and are inconsolable because of their "loss"? ....

It is deliberately dishonest that you keep avoiding, ignoring, and denying what I have told you many times about students who under any other circumstances you would weep about being among the "oppressed have nots" being harmed by this ill-considered policy. Until you can admit that by taking this position in many cases YOU are defending "privileged haves" at the expense of students from disadvantaged backgrounds, you are not a legitimate interlocutor. Just another partisan shill.

It’s all about equal access to college athletics

Were you complaining about the poor women who couldn’t play college athletics?

I have always supported women's athletics. When I was in college, our team supported the women's sports more than any others. Today, I devote a large part of my life to helping female student athletes from the inner city achieve their goals. How about you, big mouth? What the fuck have you ever done other than dismissively write off the consequences of your politics because you couldn't care less about actual people?

Well, big mouth?

 

[HenryBHough]

They never understood that muscular men would ultimatelycompete against women in sports.

Now they do understand and whine loudly but they got what they wanted! They just didn't understand what they were asking for.

Soon come the crying for a "do over".

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Today, our women’s Soccer Team won the World Cup for the fourth time. Our men cant even qualify

Mens soccer should be de-funded completely and all the money given to womens soccer, soccer is not for the masculine, so pull the funding and if they do the whiny thing then put them in quilting classes and toughen them up until they are prepared to participate in something else like sports.