Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Show me a picture UP CLOSE of rebar that big. I sell rebar where I work and they don't make it big enough to see it from that distance.This is really HUGE rebar. And it surrounds the core. What is not real about it?
and your proof of that?If you were a governmental entity with lots of connections and you wanted the DOD to make special 3" high tensile steel rebar for you to be used in public buildings subjected to severe weather. You would get it.
well, clearly those buildings in front were only a few feet wideyou cant see something 3 inches thick from over a mile away. all this crap has already been debunked. you are a idiot
This what REAL rebar looks like. You can't see this from a mile away.Good proof. Evidence from the scene of the crime. Photos of rebar.
A global authority defines a concrete core and concrete uses rebar. Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992.
Why are you here?
What would you know about common sense? You think the CIA had C-4 coated rebar used in the central core of the WTC. Anyone with the power to plan that would be dead by now from old age.Evidence can be anywhere. I happen to have saved and used it in my web site. Nothing wrong with that.
You are supposed to criticize the evidence with counter evidence and reason logically using it. NOT bitch about where it is hosted. Fnnn' moronic agent with nothing, not even common sense/
and they dont even make 3" rebarThis what REAL rebar looks like. You can't see this from a mile away.Good proof. Evidence from the scene of the crime. Photos of rebar.
A global authority defines a concrete core and concrete uses rebar. Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992.
Why are you here?
Christopharter said:You are supposed to criticize the evidence with counter evidence and reason logically using it.
he has even posted some of this evidenceChristopharter said:You are supposed to criticize the evidence with counter evidence and reason logically using it.
There is no evidence of a concrete core.
Therefore there is no "supposed" need for counter evidence of a concrete core.
To reason logically about something which did not exist is an impossibility.
All evidence points to a steel core.
You should try to prove that the steel core did not exist. But you can't .. the logical reason can only be that you are a moron.
he has even posted some of this evidenceChristopharter said:You are supposed to criticize the evidence with counter evidence and reason logically using it.
There is no evidence of a concrete core.
Therefore there is no "supposed" need for counter evidence of a concrete core.
To reason logically about something which did not exist is an impossibility.
All evidence points to a steel core.
You should try to prove that the steel core did not exist. But you can't .. the logical reason can only be that you are a moron.
.Christopharter said:Since there is no link and no one can provide a link you have proven your self a co-liar
evidence has been posted to support the steel core even by YOUCorrect, in the entire thread, you nor anyone has posted evidence of steel core columns in the core area from 9-11.
Correct, in the entire thread, you nor anyone has posted evidence of steel core columns in the core area from 9-11.
Correct, in the entire thread, you nor anyone has posted evidence of steel core columns in the core area from 9-11.
So you agree it was a STEEL core.
it was already decided and he lostA filing at a U.S. District court was completed on February 18, 2010 disclosing misprision of treason.
Local court rules had no accommodation to present any letter to a judge. Such is specifically against the rules. U.S. code requirements did not matter. After a few trips to the court house a criminal filing was made pursuant to evidenced violations of law and actions constituting evasion or concealment of acts embodying treason. This page has links to all exhibits and photographic panels.
Title 18, part I, chapter 115, §2382
As can be seen on the below conformed face page, this made possible an "ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE" relating to Title 18 authority and duty of a judge within federal criminal procedure.
Accordingly, assertions of "steel core columns" in the core of the Twin towers is misprision of treason IF the violation of law enabling the deception by FEMA of NIST and the public is not observed AND evidence from 9-11 showing the supposed steel core columns in the core area is not provided to substantiate they existed.
All reference to steel core columns without such respective action is misprision of treason.
What do you believe will come of your filing?
