Midnight Marauder
Rookie
- Feb 28, 2009
- 12,404
- 1,939
- 0
- Banned
- #61
The intent of the article was to excuse group-think.Yowza. Now that's what I call a fascinating surgical parsing of the intent of the editorial.
Because there was nothing to address, other than the sloppiness, laziness, and carelessness of the author. And the abject pablum he proposes.I think it's rather telling that your contribution did not actually address the crux of the editorial
The talent isn't what's in question. The sloppy thinking is. The idiot used a football quote, that was incorrect. Therefore, HE brought football into it, I did not.The topic isn't about football, genius, nor is it about the author's writing talent.
It's not inherent. The author merely tries to get us to believe it is. And he doesn't propose that it's mental, he says it's irrational emotion. But I do understand you cannot separate the two.It's about an inherent mental reaction
You continue to wallow in the mundane, the suspect, the pablum of group-think. This is likely because if you actually tried to think, the headaches would no doubt return.
Last edited: