This Is Too Good!

[PoliticalChic]

If we are taking less money from Americans but we are spending the same amount where does the difference come from?

From reducing regulatory burden. That kind of paperwork often costs more than direct taxation.

Spot on, willie.....

Can you provide an example of a regulation that wasn't created to address an existing problem? And how will removing the regulation not allow the same problem to re-emerge?

Of course.

1. The Spotted Owl campaign, as is so very many other environmental campaigns, a deceit. It is a way of advancing the real agenda, confiscating property, making land off-limit, and eliminating any human presence. No matter the cost. No matter the result.
2. Take the spotted owl case….One of the people instrumental in shutting down the forests told me that ‘if the spotted owl hadn’t existed, we would have had to invent it.’ The goal was to stop logging….It is totally questionable whether owls were endangered by logging. Was it good for the overall health of the forest? Probably not. Was it good for the spotted owl? It probably didn’t make a difference. Did it hurt the overall economies of the West? Yes.” Nickson, “Eco-Fascists,” p.129.

How is it that I teach you on a daily basis....yet you never learn?


Never mind.....the answer is obvious.

So the Spotted Owl campaign was a vast, left-wing conspiracy? Are you saying the habitat of the Spotted Owl is not shrinking? You may not think the extinction of a species is a loss to mankind but others will disagree and were able to make a case in spite of the pressure of the lumber industry.

You may not like the regulation and it may be a complete failure but it is a perfect example of a regulation being imposed to solve a very real problem, in this case habitat loss.

Soooo......you're stung by the revelation that you're a dunce???


I thought you knew.

 

[alang1216]

Soooo......you're stung by the revelation that you're a dunce???

I thought you knew.

Stock insults again? You really need to up your game but after all this time it seems you can't. As Trump would say, 'Sad'.

 

[william the wie]

The Greens are simply trying to cause existing real estate prices to sky-rocket so they can get rich.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

We are not borrowing money and redistributing it. We are taking less money from Americans.

If we are taking less money from Americans but we are spending the same amount where does the difference come from?

What difference does that make? It's not redistribution when you allow people to keep what they created.

 

[Dschrute3]

Spot On. The Democratic Party needs more folks in poverty and fully dependent on Government. The last thing the Party wants, is happy prosperous citizens.

Folks really should check out the fascinating documentary 'Agenda.' You can see it on places like Amazon Prime. It clearly articulates what the Communist/Democrat Agenda is all about. Check it out when you get a chance.

 

[william the wie]

Actually it does matter a great deal where the tax/blockage is as in if Trump had not made pipelines and reversal of Obama's land grab a very high priority the economy would be in much worse shape.