This is the Principle The Democrats Don't Understand

[Viktor]

presumption of innocence

www.law.cornell.edu

The accused is innocent until proven guilty

 

[occupied]

presumption of innocence

www.law.cornell.edu

The accused is innocent until proven guilty

You are certain every democratic leader is guilty of something without proof. You are certain the election was stolen without proof. You certain Trump is a great leader without proof. What's your point?

 

[Penelope]

presumption of innocence

www.law.cornell.edu

The accused is innocent until proven guilty

They know it, that is why they had the MN Freedom Fund.

 

[theHawk]

presumption of innocence

www.law.cornell.edu

The accused is innocent until proven guilty

You are certain every democratic leader is guilty of something without proof. You are certain the election was stolen without proof. You certain Trump is a great leader without proof. What's your point?

Hey dumbass, there is a ton of evidence and proof that the election was stolen. You repeating “there’s no proof” over and over doesn’t make it true.

 

[Agit8r]

I assume this is about Eric Holder not charging cops who executed suspects without trial?

 

[Coyote]

presumption of innocence

www.law.cornell.edu

The accused is innocent until proven guilty

You mean like Hilary Clinton?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" High Tech Forensics "

* Internet Vulnerabilities Are Real And Not Apparent Threats *

You are certain every democratic leader is guilty of something without proof. You are certain the election was stolen without proof. You certain Trump is a great leader without proof. What's your point?

It has been presented that dominion voting machines have back doors that allows monitoring of elections real time and also allows the changing of votes , which should lead anyone to ask , " If that is true , why is such a system acceptable for voting tabulation ? " .

Thus , the democrat leadership may not be aware of the action , rather the action requires only a committed network of individuals trained to complete the task .

All the drama about foreign influence in us elections drummed up by the left dealt only with them targeting social media which is nowhere near to influencing elections when compared with literally changing votes .

The hacking of network communications happens every day and is a very real and not an imagined threat .

Would democrats have enough integrity to accept the outcomes should it be proven that the results were modified ?

 

[Skylar]

presumption of innocence

www.law.cornell.edu

The accused is innocent until proven guilty

You are certain every democratic leader is guilty of something without proof. You are certain the election was stolen without proof. You certain Trump is a great leader without proof. What's your point?

Hey dumbass, there is a ton of evidence and proof that the election was stolen. You repeating “there’s no proof” over and over doesn’t make it true.

Then why hasn't this 'tons of evidence' been presented in court?

 

[schmidlap]

Hey dumbass, there is a ton of evidence and proof that the election was stolen.

Why have Trump's lawyers presented none of it before judges in courts of justice to expose the vast bipartisan conspiracy perpetrated by the nation's governors, secretaries of state, election officials, and 80 million Americans?

Surely, their being scoffed at from the bench in case after case and ridiculed for their blatant lack of supportive data and credible arguments would dispose them to produce it rather than quit as firm after firm is doing.

"Next, yaw onna, I'm gunna drop trou
and flash a Hunter 'laptop from hell'!"​