This is one reason i love Trump

the American dream is dead. but Trump will make it bigger and better and stronger than ever before!
Found basque below. Oh, my, Just found she gets to spend the night with Donald and dressed up for it.

370190


America will fall if Donald becomes President.
 
the American dream is dead. but Trump will make it bigger and better and stronger than ever before!
Found basque below. Oh, my, Just found she gets to spend the night with Donald and dressed up for it.

370190


America will fall if Donald becomes President.

Ditto for Hill-Beast, too! (Not a Trump fan-boy). Looks like we're falling............just accept the inevitable!
 
boss, you are a psychologist because you could not learn math.

Now STFU and learn.

LMAO... YOU telling ME to learn is kind of like a Special Olympics participant telling Peyton Manning to be competitive.

Liberals remind me of glow sticks... you just want to break them and shake them like hell until the light comes on.
 
boss, you are a psychologist because you could not learn math.

Now STFU and learn.

LMAO... YOU telling ME to learn is kind of like a Special Olympics participant telling Peyton Manning to be competitive.

Liberals remind me of glow sticks... you just want to break them and shake them like hell until the light comes on.
You are a mindless puppy compared to me, son.

You have no idea of what you are discussing. But hang on, because we are going to educate your ass, whether you want or not.
 
How many "conservative values" are being sold out to back this guy?

:desk: NONE! Because conservatism is NOT an ideology. That's the great thing about it... you can be conservative and have any number of different values.
That's interesting.
boss is an idiot. Indeed, conservatism is an ideology as well as a political process. The idiot's way would allow the ideology to approve of anything, anything at all, if it facilitated change that lead to power.
upload_2015-11-26_18-18-7.png
Hail, boss!
 
How many "conservative values" are being sold out to back this guy?

:desk: NONE! Because conservatism is NOT an ideology. That's the great thing about it... you can be conservative and have any number of different values.
That's interesting.
boss is an idiot. Indeed, conservatism is an ideology as well as a political process. The idiot's way would allow the ideology to approve of anything, anything at all, if it facilitated change that lead to power.View attachment 55697 Hail, boss!

And you're full of shit as usual. I gave a perfect example of how conservatism is not ideologically driven. Libertarians and social conservatives are often very different in their values and ideological beliefs but they are both conservatives with conservative philosophy.

Conservatism is not an abstraction. We are not agenda-driven ideologues like liberals are. It is a process of thought which weighs all the variables and relies on a pragmatic wisdom of history and experience, individual virtue and personal freedom. Our individual ideologies can vary across a wide spectrum.

You have simply drank too much liberal kool-aid and want to reject that. I can't help it... that's YOUR problem, not mine. It doesn't change the facts or validity of what I am saying in any way. But like the typical liberal, you don't think any other viewpoint is valid except the liberal one. If it doesn't march in lockstep with your liberal ideology and agenda it's deemed "racist and bigoted."
 
boss, as usual, has no idea of what is conservatism.

It is an ideology, a philosophy, and a proces.

It is not whatever he wants it to be at the moment.

A true believer, boss is certainly a symptom of what is wrong in America.
 
I don't give a damn how you explain it, moron. If two separate polls are conducted and they each have a 3% margin of error, the margin of error in the combined polls is still 3%.

Why would it make much of a difference?

Since the math is the same, explain this difference to me.

Instead of polls, if one is trying to estimate the average height of Americans, and two surveys are each conducted of an unbiased cross-section of 1,000 individuals, and no individual is in both surveys, how is that meaningfully different than one study with a sample size of 2,000 individuals?

BluePhantom
Statistikhengst

And even IF Clinton does lead by 4% or whatever, that's not "trouncing Trump" by any stretch of the imagination.

Possibly. But I said Clinton was leading, not trouncing.

And oh by the way, you should avoid using the word "cognitive" in any conversation, moron.

Your cognitive biases are obvious. Your ideological biases cause you to make assertions about others with whom you disagree.
 
boss's hatred of anything he does not understand, which is almost everything under the sun, makes any of his conclusions very doubtful.
 
Libertarians and social conservatives are often very different in their values and ideological beliefs but they are both conservatives with conservative philosophy.

Conservatism is not an abstraction. We are not agenda-driven ideologues like liberals are. It is a process of thought which weighs all the variables and relies on a pragmatic wisdom of history and experience, individual virtue and personal freedom. Our individual ideologies can vary across a wide spectrum.

You have simply drank too much liberal kool-aid and want to reject that. I can't help it... that's YOUR problem, not mine. It doesn't change the facts or validity of what I am saying in any way. But like the typical liberal, you don't think any other viewpoint is valid except the liberal one. If it doesn't march in lockstep with your liberal ideology and agenda it's deemed "racist and bigoted."

^^^^^^^^
This is what I mean about your cognitive biases being really obvious.

"Look at how awesome we smart conservatives are, whereas you liberals are emotional and stupid."

No, not biased at all.

:clap:

Outstanding.
 
I don't give a damn how you explain it, moron. If two separate polls are conducted and they each have a 3% margin of error, the margin of error in the combined polls is still 3%.

Why would it make much of a difference?

Since the math is the same, explain this difference to me.

Instead of polls, if one is trying to estimate the average height of Americans, and two surveys are each conducted of an unbiased cross-section of 1,000 individuals, and no individual is in both surveys, how is that meaningfully different than one study with a sample size of 2,000 individuals?

BluePhantom
Statistikhengst

And even IF Clinton does lead by 4% or whatever, that's not "trouncing Trump" by any stretch of the imagination.

Possibly. But I said Clinton was leading, not trouncing.

And oh by the way, you should avoid using the word "cognitive" in any conversation, moron.

Your cognitive biases are obvious. Your ideological biases cause you to make assertions about others with whom you disagree.

It makes a difference because you using trickery to boost Hillary's popularity. You're taking her bogus total in one poll of 600 people and averaging it with the same weight as the other polls then you are combining the total number of all polls to calculate a false margin of error. So now you have one poll showing her up by 15%, which is obviously about 11% off the mark with the other polls and it suddenly has a smaller margin of error because it is added to the others. It's just totally dishonest manipulating of polling data. And EVERYONE who is not a partisan koolaid-drinking Hillary ass kisser knows it.

I don't know what idiot said she was "trouncing" or going to trounce Trump but that's where this whole argument began. It's questionable as to whether she is even leading. But again, this is how liberals "tag-team" an argument. One makes some outrageous bonehead claim, when it is debunked, another lib jumps in to interject their bogus propaganda and argue something else, running away from the original claim. You people are like a pit of snakes.
 
Libertarians and social conservatives are often very different in their values and ideological beliefs but they are both conservatives with conservative philosophy.

Conservatism is not an abstraction. We are not agenda-driven ideologues like liberals are. It is a process of thought which weighs all the variables and relies on a pragmatic wisdom of history and experience, individual virtue and personal freedom. Our individual ideologies can vary across a wide spectrum.

You have simply drank too much liberal kool-aid and want to reject that. I can't help it... that's YOUR problem, not mine. It doesn't change the facts or validity of what I am saying in any way. But like the typical liberal, you don't think any other viewpoint is valid except the liberal one. If it doesn't march in lockstep with your liberal ideology and agenda it's deemed "racist and bigoted."

^^^^^^^^
This is what I mean about your cognitive biases being really obvious.

"Look at how awesome we smart conservatives are, whereas you liberals are emotional and stupid."

No, not biased at all.

:clap:

Outstanding.

There is no "cognitive bias" I am a conservative thinker who uses conservative philosophy and YOU are the quintessential extremist liberal ideologue. The only way you can sell your destructive ideology is to turn my philosophy into a worse ideology. I'm exposing that lie and you don't like it. You ARE emotional and stupid, those are your two biggest problems.
 
Which brings up the question as to whether this sort of ignorance and stupidity...

ROFLMNAO!

Can you imagine, an Irony SO SWEET... that a SOCIALIST SUPPORTER OF BILL CLINTON'S WIFE is questioning the INTELLIGENCE OF VOTERS?

LOL!

You can NOT make this crap up!
 
There is no "cognitive bias" I am a conservative thinker who uses conservative philosophy and YOU are the quintessential extremist liberal ideologue. The only way you can sell your destructive ideology is to turn my philosophy into a worse ideology. I'm exposing that lie and you don't like it. You ARE emotional and stupid, those are your two biggest problems.

LOL!

Sweet Mother...

Now THAT was a BEAT DOWN... right there.
 
boss's hatred of anything he does not understand, which is almost everything under the sun, makes any of his conclusions very doubtful.

Why don't you name something you don't think I understand and let's debate it, instead of you sitting in the peanut gallery taking cheap pot shots like the sniveling coward you are?
 
boss's hatred of anything he does not understand, which is almost everything under the sun, makes any of his conclusions very doubtful.

Why don't you name something you don't think I understand and let's debate it, instead of you sitting in the peanut gallery taking cheap pot shots like the sniveling coward you are?
You have been making silly statements. They are pointed out. You double down, clown. Trot along.
 
Libertarians and social conservatives are often very different in their values and ideological beliefs but they are both conservatives with conservative philosophy.

Conservatism is not an abstraction. We are not agenda-driven ideologues like liberals are. It is a process of thought which weighs all the variables and relies on a pragmatic wisdom of history and experience, individual virtue and personal freedom. Our individual ideologies can vary across a wide spectrum.

You have simply drank too much liberal kool-aid and want to reject that. I can't help it... that's YOUR problem, not mine. It doesn't change the facts or validity of what I am saying in any way. But like the typical liberal, you don't think any other viewpoint is valid except the liberal one. If it doesn't march in lockstep with your liberal ideology and agenda it's deemed "racist and bigoted."

^^^^^^^^
This is what I mean about your cognitive biases being really obvious.

"Look at how awesome we smart conservatives are, whereas you liberals are emotional and stupid."

No, not biased at all.

:clap:

Outstanding.

There is no "cognitive bias" I am a conservative thinker who uses conservative philosophy and YOU are the quintessential extremist liberal ideologue. The only way you can sell your destructive ideology is to turn my philosophy into a worse ideology. I'm exposing that lie and you don't like it. You ARE emotional and stupid, those are your two biggest problems.

I'm a Republican, and an ex-libertarian.

But thanks for demonstrating once again your HUGE cognitive biases.

Boss

lol
 

Forum List

Back
Top