This is one problem that is very easy to solve

[Seawytch]

Lots of words that boil down to abortion being a constitutional right...potato potato

Not at all. Lots of word that boils down to legalizing abortion. That’s a far cry from “constitutional”.

It’s legal because the SCOTUS recognized the constitutional right to privacy.

Still not “constitutional”. It is legal. But definitely not “constitutional”. The right to privacy has nothing to do with the abortion issue. That doesn’t even make sense.

The Supreme Court affirmed a man's constitutional right to abortion. You can pretend otherwise all you want to, but abortion remains a constitutionally protected right regardless.

 

[MisterBeale]

Lots of words that boil down to abortion being a constitutional right...potato potato

Not at all. Lots of word that boils down to legalizing abortion. That’s a far cry from “constitutional”.

It’s legal because the SCOTUS recognized the constitutional right to privacy. There is a constitutional right to seek an abortion. I support that while being personally opposed to abortion. I want to see an end to all abortions that are not medically necessary. I simply know you don’t do that by prohibiting abortion.

What the hell does abortion have to do with his OP?

Why are you trolling?

Why not just admit you support the untenable position of open borders?

You'd have to ask Patriot. He brought it up trying to derail his own thread.

Why would I say something that isn't true? I don't support open borders.

While I do agree with you, and the premise of his thread is rather silly, you did troll his thread with this;

You, like the illegitimate orange toddler that is your cult leader, have a twisted and immature view of the world. #sad

And, he has a legitimate POV, and as a liberal, if you know what empathetic listening is, and cared to try to put yourself in his shoes, you would have to concede, it is kind of hypocritical to say you care about these folks and not babies. (I know, you don't consider fetuses 'babies,' but that is not the issue here.)

It's a twisted view of reality, but a fair one.



I don't think you have listened to conservative media at all. I listen to both NPR and Limbaugh. They are miles apart on this issue and see this event in a totally different reality. The both present extremely important facts in need of consideration.

YOU see this as a humanitarian crises. He sees this as an enabled political invasion, though I am not sure he is being given the correct facts about who is sponsoring it. Both of you, rather than attack each other from these POV's, need to think about your respective media sources and ask as to how they are framing this, and from the folks that are making this caravan possible, Cui Bono?


We all need to stop being manipulated and start talking to one another and not let them manipulate us into attacking each other, that is not where solutions are found. You are both probably decent folk, and are both being manipulated to feel this way and attack each other just so.

These caravans will not be good for the Democrats, nor will they be good for the nation in general. Something untoward is going on, and I doubt we will hear about it in the corporate press.

 

[Seawytch]

Lots of words that boil down to abortion being a constitutional right...potato potato

Not at all. Lots of word that boils down to legalizing abortion. That’s a far cry from “constitutional”.

It’s legal because the SCOTUS recognized the constitutional right to privacy. There is a constitutional right to seek an abortion. I support that while being personally opposed to abortion. I want to see an end to all abortions that are not medically necessary. I simply know you don’t do that by prohibiting abortion.

What the hell does abortion have to do with his OP?

Why are you trolling?

Why not just admit you support the untenable position of open borders?

You'd have to ask Patriot. He brought it up trying to derail his own thread.

Why would I say something that isn't true? I don't support open borders.

While I do agree with you, and the premise of his thread is rather silly, you did troll his thread with this;

You, like the illegitimate orange toddler that is your cult leader, have a twisted and immature view of the world. #sad

And, he has a legitimate POV, and as a liberal, if you know what empathetic listening is, and cared to try to put yourself in his shoes, you would have to concede, it is kind of hypocritical to say you care about these folks and not babies. (I know, you don't consider fetuses 'babies,' but that is not the issue here.)

It's a twisted view of reality, but a fair one.



I don't think you have listened to conservative media at all. I listen to both NPR and Limbaugh. They are miles apart on this issue and see this event in a totally different reality. The both present extremely important facts in need of consideration.

YOU see this as a humanitarian crises. He sees this as an enabled political invasion, though I am not sure he is being given the correct facts about who is sponsoring it. Both of you, rather than attack each other from these POV's, need to think about your respective media sources and ask as to how they are framing this, and from the folks that are making this caravan possible, Cui Bono?


We all need to stop being manipulated and start talking to one another and not let them manipulate us into attacking each other, that is not where solutions are found. You are both probably decent folk, and are both being manipulated to feel this way and attack each other just so.

These caravans will not be good for the Democrats, nor will they be good for the nation in general. Something untoward is going on, and I doubt we will hear about it in the corporate press.

These caravans have been coming here every year for years. There's nothing going on except a bunch of people trying to flee a bad situation.

 

[danielpalos]

The power to provide for the general welfare is general and we have a Commerce Clause.

Right. Not specific. General.

All specific welfare is unconstitutional. Thus, socialism is unconstitutional and should be punishable by death, especially to illegal commie Mexicans. They should die immediately.

general means Comprehensive, not common.

 

[danielpalos]

lousy management; a multitude is not an invasion.

Thank you for your input, but I do not recognize you as having any expertise in determining what constitutes a foreign invasion. The definition does not include professional management.

You have to understand who you’re talking to here, boedicca. Daniel is a very low IQ Dumbocrat. He has a handful of phrases he uses in every situation - even when they don’t even remotely apply.

Prime example: “lousy management”. If you search that phrase with him as the poster, you’ll see it hundreds and hundreds of times. He likes to use it when you point out how 100% of nations fail that turned to socialism. But here he uses it when it makes absolutely 0 sense. A caravan left Honduras with intent on invading the U.S. and his response is “just lousy management”. Uh...what?!?

Here are the only other phrases he knows:

We have a general welfare clause

Only capital has to work in capitalism

Unemployment compensation for capitalism’s natural rate of unemployment

The people ARE the militia

Just lousy management

He will use those same idiotic phrases in every post of every thread, even when they don’t apply. It’s from a script. He’s a Paid Russian Troll.

lol. Everybody understands the concepts except for the right wing; who's side are y'all on.

 

[boedicca]

lousy management; a multitude is not an invasion.

Thank you for your input, but I do not recognize you as having any expertise in determining what constitutes a foreign invasion. The definition does not include professional management.

You have to understand who you’re talking to here, boedicca. Daniel is a very low IQ Dumbocrat. He has a handful of phrases he uses in every situation - even when they don’t even remotely apply.

Prime example: “lousy management”. If you search that phrase with him as the poster, you’ll see it hundreds and hundreds of times. He likes to use it when you point out how 100% of nations fail that turned to socialism. But here he uses it when it makes absolutely 0 sense. A caravan left Honduras with intent on invading the U.S. and his response is “just lousy management”. Uh...what?!?

Here are the only other phrases he knows:

We have a general welfare clause

Only capital has to work in capitalism

Unemployment compensation for capitalism’s natural rate of unemployment

The people ARE the militia

Just lousy management

He will use those same idiotic phrases in every post of every thread, even when they don’t apply. It’s from a script. He’s a Paid Russian Troll.

He's a blabbering moron; the solution to which is quite easy.

 

[danielpalos]

lousy management; a multitude is not an invasion.

Thank you for your input, but I do not recognize you as having any expertise in determining what constitutes a foreign invasion. The definition does not include professional management.

You have to understand who you’re talking to here, boedicca. Daniel is a very low IQ Dumbocrat. He has a handful of phrases he uses in every situation - even when they don’t even remotely apply.

Prime example: “lousy management”. If you search that phrase with him as the poster, you’ll see it hundreds and hundreds of times. He likes to use it when you point out how 100% of nations fail that turned to socialism. But here he uses it when it makes absolutely 0 sense. A caravan left Honduras with intent on invading the U.S. and his response is “just lousy management”. Uh...what?!?

Here are the only other phrases he knows:

We have a general welfare clause

Only capital has to work in capitalism

Unemployment compensation for capitalism’s natural rate of unemployment

The people ARE the militia

Just lousy management

He will use those same idiotic phrases in every post of every thread, even when they don’t apply. It’s from a script. He’s a Paid Russian Troll.

He's a blabbering moron; the solution to which is quite easy.

i might win any oil wrestling contest with you.

 

[g5000]

...said the guy who wants to murder women and children.

Oh Drama Queen...it’s not “murder” to defend against an invasion.

Said the guy who asked for an intelligent conversation.

 

[MisterBeale]

Not at all. Lots of word that boils down to legalizing abortion. That’s a far cry from “constitutional”.

It’s legal because the SCOTUS recognized the constitutional right to privacy. There is a constitutional right to seek an abortion. I support that while being personally opposed to abortion. I want to see an end to all abortions that are not medically necessary. I simply know you don’t do that by prohibiting abortion.

What the hell does abortion have to do with his OP?

Why are you trolling?

Why not just admit you support the untenable position of open borders?

You'd have to ask Patriot. He brought it up trying to derail his own thread.

Why would I say something that isn't true? I don't support open borders.

While I do agree with you, and the premise of his thread is rather silly, you did troll his thread with this;

You, like the illegitimate orange toddler that is your cult leader, have a twisted and immature view of the world. #sad

And, he has a legitimate POV, and as a liberal, if you know what empathetic listening is, and cared to try to put yourself in his shoes, you would have to concede, it is kind of hypocritical to say you care about these folks and not babies. (I know, you don't consider fetuses 'babies,' but that is not the issue here.)

It's a twisted view of reality, but a fair one.



I don't think you have listened to conservative media at all. I listen to both NPR and Limbaugh. They are miles apart on this issue and see this event in a totally different reality. The both present extremely important facts in need of consideration.

YOU see this as a humanitarian crises. He sees this as an enabled political invasion, though I am not sure he is being given the correct facts about who is sponsoring it. Both of you, rather than attack each other from these POV's, need to think about your respective media sources and ask as to how they are framing this, and from the folks that are making this caravan possible, Cui Bono?


We all need to stop being manipulated and start talking to one another and not let them manipulate us into attacking each other, that is not where solutions are found. You are both probably decent folk, and are both being manipulated to feel this way and attack each other just so.

These caravans will not be good for the Democrats, nor will they be good for the nation in general. Something untoward is going on, and I doubt we will hear about it in the corporate press.

These caravans have been coming here every year for years. There's nothing going on except a bunch of people trying to flee a bad situation.

If that is what you want to believe, reason and evidence will not convince you otherwise.

It seems you have your mind made up.

 

[Seawytch]

It’s legal because the SCOTUS recognized the constitutional right to privacy. There is a constitutional right to seek an abortion. I support that while being personally opposed to abortion. I want to see an end to all abortions that are not medically necessary. I simply know you don’t do that by prohibiting abortion.

What the hell does abortion have to do with his OP?

Why are you trolling?

Why not just admit you support the untenable position of open borders?

You'd have to ask Patriot. He brought it up trying to derail his own thread.

Why would I say something that isn't true? I don't support open borders.

While I do agree with you, and the premise of his thread is rather silly, you did troll his thread with this;

You, like the illegitimate orange toddler that is your cult leader, have a twisted and immature view of the world. #sad

And, he has a legitimate POV, and as a liberal, if you know what empathetic listening is, and cared to try to put yourself in his shoes, you would have to concede, it is kind of hypocritical to say you care about these folks and not babies. (I know, you don't consider fetuses 'babies,' but that is not the issue here.)

It's a twisted view of reality, but a fair one.



I don't think you have listened to conservative media at all. I listen to both NPR and Limbaugh. They are miles apart on this issue and see this event in a totally different reality. The both present extremely important facts in need of consideration.

YOU see this as a humanitarian crises. He sees this as an enabled political invasion, though I am not sure he is being given the correct facts about who is sponsoring it. Both of you, rather than attack each other from these POV's, need to think about your respective media sources and ask as to how they are framing this, and from the folks that are making this caravan possible, Cui Bono?


We all need to stop being manipulated and start talking to one another and not let them manipulate us into attacking each other, that is not where solutions are found. You are both probably decent folk, and are both being manipulated to feel this way and attack each other just so.

These caravans will not be good for the Democrats, nor will they be good for the nation in general. Something untoward is going on, and I doubt we will hear about it in the corporate press.

These caravans have been coming here every year for years. There's nothing going on except a bunch of people trying to flee a bad situation.

If that is what you want to believe, reason and evidence will not convince you otherwise.

It seems you have your mind made up.

It’s not a matter of wanting to believe. It is a fact. That you don’t want to believe a fact is on you.

The Central American caravan headed north toward the United States through Mexico may have attracted the attention of President Donald Trump and others for good reason — it’s one of the largest since the group Pueblo Sin Fronteras began staging its annual pilgrimage through Mexico a decade ago.

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/amp-subscribe

 

[ABikerSailor]

Violence is the only language commies understand. They will never accept defeat. They will never listen to reason. We are forced to beat the fucking shit out of them to stop them from illegally taking power, which they will do by any means necessary. Once they have complete control and we are disarmed, they will promptly make us Venezuela.

We must rid the world of commies. Defeating them at the ballot box is never enough. We must Kill a Commie for Mommy.

Kill a Commie for Mommy? Is that you Joe McCarthy?

 

[jc456]

Bad idea bombing families when you're the "family values" party...

then they should stop marching toward our country.

 

[jc456]

Jezuz Baby Krist. Talk about fucking overkill. Just close the god damned border already. Your republican pukes control the fucking federal government so just do it already.

no we don't, but don't let fking facts get in your stupid way. name what we have the majority in.

 

[Seawytch]

Jezuz Baby Krist. Talk about fucking overkill. Just close the god damned border already. Your republican pukes control the fucking federal government so just do it already.

no we don't, but don't let fking facts get in your stupid way. name what we have the majority in.

Republicans control the House, the Senate and the Presidency. The only thing stopping immigration reform are Republicans because they are incapable of governing

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

general means Comprehensive, not common.

In fairy land.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

i might win any oil wrestling contest with you.

ummmmm

yuck

 

[jc456]

Jezuz Baby Krist. Talk about fucking overkill. Just close the god damned border already. Your republican pukes control the fucking federal government so just do it already.

no we don't, but don't let fking facts get in your stupid way. name what we have the majority in.

Republicans control the House, the Senate and the Presidency. The only thing stopping immigration reform are Republicans because they are incapable of governing

Unless people like you don’t understand it takes 60 votes and they only have 51. You’re wrong! As normal

 

[P@triot]

The Supreme Court affirmed a man's constitutional right to abortion. You can pretend otherwise all you want to, but abortion remains a constitutionally protected right regardless.

Sweetie...the U.S. Supreme Court is a part of the judicial branch. It has no ability to alter the U.S. Constitution. And since the U.S. Constitution doesn’t say anything about abortion, the U.S. Supreme Court can’t “affirm” what is not there.

 

[P@triot]

These caravans have been coming here every year for years. There's nothing going on except a bunch of people trying to flee a bad situation.

1. Not like this, they haven’t

2. Not just weeks out from an election

3. Mexico has already confirmed that this was a planned political exercise

 

[P@triot]

YOU see this as a humanitarian crises. He sees this as an enabled political invasion, though I am not sure he is being given the correct facts about who is sponsoring it. Both of you, rather than attack each other from these POV's, need to think about your respective media sources and ask as to how they are framing this, and from the folks that are making this caravan possible, Cui Bono?