Think we'd have all this s--t if we'd a voted for Mitt?

its cool Mojo , I see what you mean . Course look at mrobamas advisers , spokespeople , hagel , Dempsey , Hilary , jeh Johnson . holder and all they are are yes men and unserious people with no love for America . He just nominated a producer of some soap opera as the ambassador to Hungary . -------- just a comment !!

And it is much more than an incompetent choice.

It is a crucially sensitive one and he has intentionally put the wrong person in there.

This article splains it nicely.


clown-car.jpeg

Yesterday, Barack Obama succeeded in pushing US foreign policy further down the crapper. The Senate voted to confirm two monumentally unqualified party hacks and bag-people as ambassador.

The Senate, rejecting an impassioned plea from Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)52% (R-Ariz.), on Tuesday confirmed two major Obama campaign contributors for ambassadorships to Hungary and Argentina.

The confirmations of Hollywood television producer Colleen Bell to Budapest and Noah Mamet to Buenos Aires had sparked unusual controversy — including a letter in opposition from 15 former presidents of the American Foreign Service Association, the union of career diplomats — after their faltering performances in their confirmation hearings.

Bell stumbled when Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)52% (R-Ariz.) asked her what America’s strategic interests were in Hungary, which has become a difficult posting in recent years as the government cracks down on dissenters.

McCain implored the Senate to vote against the nomination. He said he understood that “rewarding supporters to cushy jobs in the Caribbean is something both parties do.” But “this is a very important country where bad things are going on,” he said. McCain said that Bell’s experience “has been producing the television soap opera ‘The Bold and the Beautiful’” and that she is “totally unqualified for this position and this country.” (She has managed the on-and-off-again romantic tension between Ridge and Brooke for decades though …)

Giving ambassadorial positions to prominent political supporters has a long tradition and it isn’t necessarily a bad thing so long a there is a modicum of competence and the posting isn’t a challenging one. And career foreign service officers are often no better as ambassadors than amateurs. No presidential friend has single-handedly set off a war. The foreign service can’t make that claim. Those are not the facts here.

The critical nominee is Colleen Bell. Bell is a soap opera producer who bundled or donated nearly three million dollars for Obama. She is to be posted to Budapest. Budapest is not only a NATO ally, but one that is being wooed by Russia and seems poised to slip into Putin’s brand of neo-fascism. (reported on at RedState) Not only is Hungary making life increasingly difficult for anyone not getting with the program, Bell could not identify a single US strategic interest in Hungary.

Argentina is also in the throes of economic and social unrest — this is nearly a national pastime in Argentina — and it is a major power in Latin America. Given the unpleasant noises that keep emanating from Buenos Aires on things like the Falklands a prudent person would conclude that this is the job for someone with some ties to, or at least familiarity with, the existing Argentine power structure. But in the Time of Obama you would be wrong. In Obama’s very cloistered and parochial view, one foreign country, full of foreigners who can’t legally give him money or even vote for him unless they come here illegally, is pretty much like another. And if your ambassador can’t find it on a map, no problem, the only map he needs is the one to get him to the airport. The only requirement is that he’s raised boodles of cash for you.

Left in doubt is the fate of the nominee to Norway. hotel magnate George Tsunis. At his confirmation hearing he thought that Norway had a president — it doesn’t, it is a constitutional monarchy — and he labeled one party in the ruling parliamentary coalition as “extremist.”

McCain then turned to George Tsunis, founder and chief executive of Chartwell Hotels, who bundled or contributed more than $1.3 million for Obama in 2012 — and gave $50,000 to McCain in 2008! — and thus is the nominee for ambassador to Norway. His performance, one Norwegian news outlet said, was “faltering, incoherent” and displayed a “total ignorance” of the country.

McCain asked him about the “anti-immigration” Progress Party in Norway.

“You get some fringe elements that have a microphone and spew their hatred,” Tsunis said. “And I will tell you Norway has been very quick to denounce them.”
“The government has denounced them?” McCain said. They are “part of the governing coalition,” he said, so they were hardly being denounced.

“I have no more questions for this incredibly highly qualified group of nominees,” McCain derisively concluded after another minute or so.

His showing was so weak that the Senate didn’t vote on his nomination, putting it off until the new Congress convenes. In fact, Norwegian media has protested Tsunis’s nomination.

Everyone knows that ambassadorial appointments are presidential perquisites. But some level of competence in making these appointments is necessary before the nation and its foreign policy become laughingstocks. The appointments of Bell and Mamet represent the complete triumph of selfishness and greed over the needs of the nation.​

Two dangerously ignorant Obama ambassadors confirmed by lame duck Senate RedState
His patronage appointments are embarrassing - his excesses of which exceeded only by Ronald Reagan, but additionally, this points out another problem, the incredibly slow rate of Senate confirmations. It seems the only ones they want to do are those where they can score political points.

I haven't researched it at all but I was of the impression the GOP was trying to drag their heels on confirming his nominees in order to help slow the damage Obama is causing in every area he can. His leftists in key positions might aid his attempted (whatever) of America.
 
"Leftists in key positions" like -- Tim Geithner? Michael Taylor? Tom Wheeler? Chuck Hagel? Those commies?
 
"Leftists in key positions" like -- Tim Geithner? Michael Taylor? Tom Wheeler? Chuck Hagel? Those commies?

Weren't Geithner and Hagel confirmed??

Your argument is with a straw man of your own creation.
 
Think we'd have all this s--t if we'd a voted for Mitt?



America has opened the door to a Palestinian-Israeli divide which will never end.

Tell your Grandkids about our innocence, no, ignorance that allowed it to happen.


I know we'd not be in this shit if Gore had been POTUS and not GWB. Maybe even the WTC wiold still be standing!
 
Think we'd have all this s--t if we'd a voted for Mitt?



America has opened the door to a Palestinian-Israeli divide which will never end.

Tell your Grandkids about our innocence, no, ignorance that allowed it to happen.


I know we'd not be in this shit if Gore had been POTUS and not GWB. Maybe even the WTC wiold still be standing!


Let's take this to your thread.

Give us a link and we'll meet you there.
 
Mitt Romney once climbed Mt. Everest in 15 minutes, 14 of which he was building a snowman at the bottom.

Can't win an election though :badgrin:


yep a moron who wears magical underwear and thinks his god lives on the planet kolob is just what America needs :laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:
 
The fact is we would be infinitely better off had Mitt Romney been elected in 2012 instead of Obama. Yes Mitt would have made some mistakes because all humans do. Yes Mitt would have done some things even his staunchest supporters wouldn't like because nobody can do their job and please everybody all of the time. But there is no way in hell he would have been as destructive, divisive, racist, and incompetent as the current POTUS has been.
 
The fact is we would be infinitely better off had Mitt Romney been elected in 2012 instead of Obama. Yes Mitt would have made some mistakes because all humans do. Yes Mitt would have done some things even his staunchest supporters wouldn't like because nobody can do their job and please everybody all of the time. But there is no way in hell he would have been as destructive, divisive, racist, and incompetent as the current POTUS has been.

Spot on!



:)

M2
 
The fact is we would be infinitely better off had Mitt Romney been elected in 2012 instead of Obama. Yes Mitt would have made some mistakes because all humans do. Yes Mitt would have done some things even his staunchest supporters wouldn't like because nobody can do their job and please everybody all of the time. But there is no way in hell he would have been as destructive, divisive, racist, and incompetent as the current POTUS has been.


even your xtian fundy nutters stayed home rather then vote or what they considered a cultist

 
The fact is we would be infinitely better off had Mitt Romney been elected in 2012 instead of Obama. Yes Mitt would have made some mistakes because all humans do. Yes Mitt would have done some things even his staunchest supporters wouldn't like because nobody can do their job and please everybody all of the time. But there is no way in hell he would have been as destructive, divisive, racist, and incompetent as the current POTUS has been.

That's not a "fact" -- that's a speculation.

Combined with $2.25 and some optional cream and sugar.... :coffee:
 
Mitt Romney once climbed Mt. Everest in 15 minutes, 14 of which he was building a snowman at the bottom.

Can't win an election though :badgrin:


yep a moron who wears magical underwear and thinks his god lives on the planet kolob is just what America needs :laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

He might even fly the stars and bars on his drawers for all I care.

He would be a great POTUS and would put us on the path to repair, rehab, recuperation and revival as a country and as a people.
 
"Leftists in key positions" like -- Tim Geithner? Michael Taylor? Tom Wheeler? Chuck Hagel? Those commies?

Weren't Geithner and Hagel confirmed??

Your argument is with a straw man of your own creation.

It's your phrase, Doodles. I copied it from post 21.
I never cited people by name.

And I wouldn't have cited those who actually were confirmed.

Only a shumb dit would do that.
 
"Leftists in key positions" like -- Tim Geithner? Michael Taylor? Tom Wheeler? Chuck Hagel? Those commies?

Weren't Geithner and Hagel confirmed??

Your argument is with a straw man of your own creation.

It's your phrase, Doodles. I copied it from post 21.
I never cited people by name.

And I wouldn't have cited those who actually were confirmed.

Only a shumb dit would do that.

Exactly what part of "leftists in key positions" implies "cofirmed"?

Aren't you the same wag who tried to bring "Christians" and "LDS" in here?
Aren't you the same wag who has yet to define what "all this s--t" refers to?

All this ..... sleet? sport? salt?

:dunno:
 
its cool Mojo , I see what you mean . Course look at mrobamas advisers , spokespeople , hagel , Dempsey , Hilary , jeh Johnson . holder and all they are are yes men and unserious people with no love for America . He just nominated a producer of some soap opera as the ambassador to Hungary . -------- just a comment !!

And it is much more than an incompetent choice.

It is a crucially sensitive one and he has intentionally put the wrong person in there.

This article splains it nicely.


clown-car.jpeg

Yesterday, Barack Obama succeeded in pushing US foreign policy further down the crapper. The Senate voted to confirm two monumentally unqualified party hacks and bag-people as ambassador.

The Senate, rejecting an impassioned plea from Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)52% (R-Ariz.), on Tuesday confirmed two major Obama campaign contributors for ambassadorships to Hungary and Argentina.

The confirmations of Hollywood television producer Colleen Bell to Budapest and Noah Mamet to Buenos Aires had sparked unusual controversy — including a letter in opposition from 15 former presidents of the American Foreign Service Association, the union of career diplomats — after their faltering performances in their confirmation hearings.

Bell stumbled when Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)52% (R-Ariz.) asked her what America’s strategic interests were in Hungary, which has become a difficult posting in recent years as the government cracks down on dissenters.

McCain implored the Senate to vote against the nomination. He said he understood that “rewarding supporters to cushy jobs in the Caribbean is something both parties do.” But “this is a very important country where bad things are going on,” he said. McCain said that Bell’s experience “has been producing the television soap opera ‘The Bold and the Beautiful’” and that she is “totally unqualified for this position and this country.” (She has managed the on-and-off-again romantic tension between Ridge and Brooke for decades though …)

Giving ambassadorial positions to prominent political supporters has a long tradition and it isn’t necessarily a bad thing so long a there is a modicum of competence and the posting isn’t a challenging one. And career foreign service officers are often no better as ambassadors than amateurs. No presidential friend has single-handedly set off a war. The foreign service can’t make that claim. Those are not the facts here.

The critical nominee is Colleen Bell. Bell is a soap opera producer who bundled or donated nearly three million dollars for Obama. She is to be posted to Budapest. Budapest is not only a NATO ally, but one that is being wooed by Russia and seems poised to slip into Putin’s brand of neo-fascism. (reported on at RedState) Not only is Hungary making life increasingly difficult for anyone not getting with the program, Bell could not identify a single US strategic interest in Hungary.

Argentina is also in the throes of economic and social unrest — this is nearly a national pastime in Argentina — and it is a major power in Latin America. Given the unpleasant noises that keep emanating from Buenos Aires on things like the Falklands a prudent person would conclude that this is the job for someone with some ties to, or at least familiarity with, the existing Argentine power structure. But in the Time of Obama you would be wrong. In Obama’s very cloistered and parochial view, one foreign country, full of foreigners who can’t legally give him money or even vote for him unless they come here illegally, is pretty much like another. And if your ambassador can’t find it on a map, no problem, the only map he needs is the one to get him to the airport. The only requirement is that he’s raised boodles of cash for you.

Left in doubt is the fate of the nominee to Norway. hotel magnate George Tsunis. At his confirmation hearing he thought that Norway had a president — it doesn’t, it is a constitutional monarchy — and he labeled one party in the ruling parliamentary coalition as “extremist.”

McCain then turned to George Tsunis, founder and chief executive of Chartwell Hotels, who bundled or contributed more than $1.3 million for Obama in 2012 — and gave $50,000 to McCain in 2008! — and thus is the nominee for ambassador to Norway. His performance, one Norwegian news outlet said, was “faltering, incoherent” and displayed a “total ignorance” of the country.

McCain asked him about the “anti-immigration” Progress Party in Norway.

“You get some fringe elements that have a microphone and spew their hatred,” Tsunis said. “And I will tell you Norway has been very quick to denounce them.”
“The government has denounced them?” McCain said. They are “part of the governing coalition,” he said, so they were hardly being denounced.

“I have no more questions for this incredibly highly qualified group of nominees,” McCain derisively concluded after another minute or so.

His showing was so weak that the Senate didn’t vote on his nomination, putting it off until the new Congress convenes. In fact, Norwegian media has protested Tsunis’s nomination.

Everyone knows that ambassadorial appointments are presidential perquisites. But some level of competence in making these appointments is necessary before the nation and its foreign policy become laughingstocks. The appointments of Bell and Mamet represent the complete triumph of selfishness and greed over the needs of the nation.​

Two dangerously ignorant Obama ambassadors confirmed by lame duck Senate RedState
His patronage appointments are embarrassing - his excesses of which exceeded only by Ronald Reagan, but additionally, this points out another problem, the incredibly slow rate of Senate confirmations. It seems the only ones they want to do are those where they can score political points.

I haven't researched it at all but I was of the impression the GOP was trying to drag their heels on confirming his nominees in order to help slow the damage Obama is causing in every area he can. His leftists in key positions might aid his attempted (whatever) of America.
Real damage inflicted in response to perceived damage.
 
its cool Mojo , I see what you mean . Course look at mrobamas advisers , spokespeople , hagel , Dempsey , Hilary , jeh Johnson . holder and all they are are yes men and unserious people with no love for America . He just nominated a producer of some soap opera as the ambassador to Hungary . -------- just a comment !!

And it is much more than an incompetent choice.

It is a crucially sensitive one and he has intentionally put the wrong person in there.

This article splains it nicely.


clown-car.jpeg

Yesterday, Barack Obama succeeded in pushing US foreign policy further down the crapper. The Senate voted to confirm two monumentally unqualified party hacks and bag-people as ambassador.

The Senate, rejecting an impassioned plea from Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)52% (R-Ariz.), on Tuesday confirmed two major Obama campaign contributors for ambassadorships to Hungary and Argentina.

The confirmations of Hollywood television producer Colleen Bell to Budapest and Noah Mamet to Buenos Aires had sparked unusual controversy — including a letter in opposition from 15 former presidents of the American Foreign Service Association, the union of career diplomats — after their faltering performances in their confirmation hearings.

Bell stumbled when Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)52% (R-Ariz.) asked her what America’s strategic interests were in Hungary, which has become a difficult posting in recent years as the government cracks down on dissenters.

McCain implored the Senate to vote against the nomination. He said he understood that “rewarding supporters to cushy jobs in the Caribbean is something both parties do.” But “this is a very important country where bad things are going on,” he said. McCain said that Bell’s experience “has been producing the television soap opera ‘The Bold and the Beautiful’” and that she is “totally unqualified for this position and this country.” (She has managed the on-and-off-again romantic tension between Ridge and Brooke for decades though …)

Giving ambassadorial positions to prominent political supporters has a long tradition and it isn’t necessarily a bad thing so long a there is a modicum of competence and the posting isn’t a challenging one. And career foreign service officers are often no better as ambassadors than amateurs. No presidential friend has single-handedly set off a war. The foreign service can’t make that claim. Those are not the facts here.

The critical nominee is Colleen Bell. Bell is a soap opera producer who bundled or donated nearly three million dollars for Obama. She is to be posted to Budapest. Budapest is not only a NATO ally, but one that is being wooed by Russia and seems poised to slip into Putin’s brand of neo-fascism. (reported on at RedState) Not only is Hungary making life increasingly difficult for anyone not getting with the program, Bell could not identify a single US strategic interest in Hungary.

Argentina is also in the throes of economic and social unrest — this is nearly a national pastime in Argentina — and it is a major power in Latin America. Given the unpleasant noises that keep emanating from Buenos Aires on things like the Falklands a prudent person would conclude that this is the job for someone with some ties to, or at least familiarity with, the existing Argentine power structure. But in the Time of Obama you would be wrong. In Obama’s very cloistered and parochial view, one foreign country, full of foreigners who can’t legally give him money or even vote for him unless they come here illegally, is pretty much like another. And if your ambassador can’t find it on a map, no problem, the only map he needs is the one to get him to the airport. The only requirement is that he’s raised boodles of cash for you.

Left in doubt is the fate of the nominee to Norway. hotel magnate George Tsunis. At his confirmation hearing he thought that Norway had a president — it doesn’t, it is a constitutional monarchy — and he labeled one party in the ruling parliamentary coalition as “extremist.”

McCain then turned to George Tsunis, founder and chief executive of Chartwell Hotels, who bundled or contributed more than $1.3 million for Obama in 2012 — and gave $50,000 to McCain in 2008! — and thus is the nominee for ambassador to Norway. His performance, one Norwegian news outlet said, was “faltering, incoherent” and displayed a “total ignorance” of the country.

McCain asked him about the “anti-immigration” Progress Party in Norway.

“You get some fringe elements that have a microphone and spew their hatred,” Tsunis said. “And I will tell you Norway has been very quick to denounce them.”
“The government has denounced them?” McCain said. They are “part of the governing coalition,” he said, so they were hardly being denounced.

“I have no more questions for this incredibly highly qualified group of nominees,” McCain derisively concluded after another minute or so.

His showing was so weak that the Senate didn’t vote on his nomination, putting it off until the new Congress convenes. In fact, Norwegian media has protested Tsunis’s nomination.

Everyone knows that ambassadorial appointments are presidential perquisites. But some level of competence in making these appointments is necessary before the nation and its foreign policy become laughingstocks. The appointments of Bell and Mamet represent the complete triumph of selfishness and greed over the needs of the nation.​

Two dangerously ignorant Obama ambassadors confirmed by lame duck Senate RedState
His patronage appointments are embarrassing - his excesses of which exceeded only by Ronald Reagan, but additionally, this points out another problem, the incredibly slow rate of Senate confirmations. It seems the only ones they want to do are those where they can score political points.

I haven't researched it at all but I was of the impression the GOP was trying to drag their heels on confirming his nominees in order to help slow the damage Obama is causing in every area he can. His leftists in key positions might aid his attempted (whatever) of America.
Real damage inflicted in response to perceived damage.

We are witnessing the real damage up close and personal every day. It is obvious. Even some of the most staunch former supporters of President Obama are now admitting it. We can't know for sure about Mitt, but any THINKING person who is not an ideologically brainwashed idiot can look at Mitt's resume, his track record, and his reliability at doing what he says he will do and know that he would have done a much better job at helping things be better and would have done almost none of the destructive things Obama has done to make things worse.
 

Forum List

Back
Top