They’re Cheating: Democrats Are Calling on Blacks in MISSISSIPPI to Vote in ALABAMA Senate Race

[hadit]

Are you referring to the suspension he received for not going against his religious beliefs, concerning the gay marriage thing? There's man's law and then there's God's law. He did the right thing.

He was a member of government...if he cannot do his job in government....he should quit and become a minister. (perfect position for preying on little girls too...a win/win for him)

Government is a gift from God. All of mankind's highest aspirations, liberties, and rights weren't merely thought up by those who didn't have a belief in a supreme creator. Even the Magna Carta existed only because of Christian influence.

Magna Carta - Wikipedia

Errr..not to burst your bubble..but the Magna Carta had a whole lot more to do with taxes and limiting the power of the King--defining the relationship between Barons and Royals--the popular myth that the Magna Carta established Civil Liberty for the common man..is just that..a myth:

"At the end of the 16th century there was an upsurge in interest in Magna Carta. Lawyers and historians at the time believed that there was an ancient English constitution, going back to the days of the Anglo-Saxons, that protected individual English freedoms. They argued that the Norman invasion of 1066 had overthrown these rights, and that Magna Carta had been a popular attempt to restore them, making the charter an essential foundation for the contemporary powers of Parliament and legal principles such as habeas corpus. Although this historical account was badly flawed, jurists such as Sir Edward Coke used Magna Carta extensively in the early 17th century, arguing against the divine right of kings propounded by the Stuart monarchs. Both James I and his son Charles I attempted to suppress the discussion of Magna Carta, until the issue was curtailed by the English Civil War of the 1640s and the execution of Charles. The political myth of Magna Carta and its protection of ancient personal liberties persisted after the Glorious Revolution of 1688 until well into the 19th century. It influenced the early American colonists in the Thirteen Colonies and the formation of the American Constitution in 1787, which became the supreme law of the land in the new republic of the United States.[c] Research by Victorian historians showed that the original 1215 charter had concerned the medieval relationship between the monarch and the barons, rather than the rights of ordinary people, but the charter remained a powerful, iconic document, even after almost all of its content was repealed from the statute books in the 19th and 20th centuries. Magna Carta still forms an important symbol of liberty today, often cited by politicians and campaigners, and is held in great respect by the British and American legal communities..."

Look at the opening lines:

"John, by the grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and Count of Anjou, to his archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justices, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants, and to all his officials and loyal subjects, greeting.

Know that before God, for the health of our soul and those of our ancestors and heirs, to the honour of God, the exaltation of the holy Church, and the better ordering of our kingdom, at the advice of our reverend fathers Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England, and cardinal of the holy Roman Church, Henry archbishop of Dublin, William bishop of London, Peter bishop of Winchester, Jocelin bishop of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh bishop of Lincoln, Walter Bishop of Worcester, William bishop of Coventry, Benedict bishop of Rochester, Master Pandulf subdeacon and member of the papal household..."

You see no evidence of Christianity there? How about another clause from the Magna Carta?

"First, that we have granted to God, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired.."

Read more about it if you want to learn something:

The Forgotten Clauses of the Magna Carta - The American Vision

***yawn** have read it...all of it--and the Pro Forma invocations to God..have nothing at all with the intent of the document. The Church of the time..was interested in safeguarding its properties and holdings from the grasping of King John...who had bankrupted the country with a series of ruinous wars.
Not much noble about that.

If you wish to yak about history..perhaps you have some input on the fact that Pope Innocent III renounced the Magna Carta--so I guess that's the Christian take?

I get your point...and I reject it. Separation of Church and State..is one of the greatest things we have done as a country..and Judge Moore..is a prime example of why..we rule by law here..not by some religious fanatic's 'higher vision'. His actions were the same as an imman's rulings under Sharia law.

Oh..and your link..I completely disagree....I believe it to be unsupported Christian propaganda..devoid of historical accuracy. As i said..the invocation of God was Pro Forma..and the goal of the Church..was to secure their secular holdings.

Same as Sharia? How many hands did Moore command to be cut off? How many beheadings did he order? Get back to us when you have a real comparison to make.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

He was a member of government...if he cannot do his job in government....he should quit and become a minister. (perfect position for preying on little girls too...a win/win for him)

Government is a gift from God. All of mankind's highest aspirations, liberties, and rights weren't merely thought up by those who didn't have a belief in a supreme creator. Even the Magna Carta existed only because of Christian influence.

Magna Carta - Wikipedia

Errr..not to burst your bubble..but the Magna Carta had a whole lot more to do with taxes and limiting the power of the King--defining the relationship between Barons and Royals--the popular myth that the Magna Carta established Civil Liberty for the common man..is just that..a myth:

"At the end of the 16th century there was an upsurge in interest in Magna Carta. Lawyers and historians at the time believed that there was an ancient English constitution, going back to the days of the Anglo-Saxons, that protected individual English freedoms. They argued that the Norman invasion of 1066 had overthrown these rights, and that Magna Carta had been a popular attempt to restore them, making the charter an essential foundation for the contemporary powers of Parliament and legal principles such as habeas corpus. Although this historical account was badly flawed, jurists such as Sir Edward Coke used Magna Carta extensively in the early 17th century, arguing against the divine right of kings propounded by the Stuart monarchs. Both James I and his son Charles I attempted to suppress the discussion of Magna Carta, until the issue was curtailed by the English Civil War of the 1640s and the execution of Charles. The political myth of Magna Carta and its protection of ancient personal liberties persisted after the Glorious Revolution of 1688 until well into the 19th century. It influenced the early American colonists in the Thirteen Colonies and the formation of the American Constitution in 1787, which became the supreme law of the land in the new republic of the United States.[c] Research by Victorian historians showed that the original 1215 charter had concerned the medieval relationship between the monarch and the barons, rather than the rights of ordinary people, but the charter remained a powerful, iconic document, even after almost all of its content was repealed from the statute books in the 19th and 20th centuries. Magna Carta still forms an important symbol of liberty today, often cited by politicians and campaigners, and is held in great respect by the British and American legal communities..."

Look at the opening lines:

"John, by the grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and Count of Anjou, to his archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justices, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants, and to all his officials and loyal subjects, greeting.

Know that before God, for the health of our soul and those of our ancestors and heirs, to the honour of God, the exaltation of the holy Church, and the better ordering of our kingdom, at the advice of our reverend fathers Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England, and cardinal of the holy Roman Church, Henry archbishop of Dublin, William bishop of London, Peter bishop of Winchester, Jocelin bishop of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh bishop of Lincoln, Walter Bishop of Worcester, William bishop of Coventry, Benedict bishop of Rochester, Master Pandulf subdeacon and member of the papal household..."

You see no evidence of Christianity there? How about another clause from the Magna Carta?

"First, that we have granted to God, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired.."

Read more about it if you want to learn something:

The Forgotten Clauses of the Magna Carta - The American Vision

***yawn** have read it...all of it--and the Pro Forma invocations to God..have nothing at all with the intent of the document. The Church of the time..was interested in safeguarding its properties and holdings from the grasping of King John...who had bankrupted the country with a series of ruinous wars.
Not much noble about that.

If you wish to yak about history..perhaps you have some input on the fact that Pope Innocent III renounced the Magna Carta--so I guess that's the Christian take?

I get your point...and I reject it. Separation of Church and State..is one of the greatest things we have done as a country..and Judge Moore..is a prime example of why..we rule by law here..not by some religious fanatic's 'higher vision'. His actions were the same as an imman's rulings under Sharia law.

Oh..and your link..I completely disagree....I believe it to be unsupported Christian propaganda..devoid of historical accuracy. As i said..the invocation of God was Pro Forma..and the goal of the Church..was to secure their secular holdings.

Same as Sharia? How many hands did Moore command to be cut off? How many beheadings did he order? Get back to us when you have a real comparison to make.

LoL...you guys...***smiles***

It was a ruling based on religious law..Sharia is religious law...the consequences are irrelevant--Moore chose to abrogate the law of our country in favor of religious principle--But hey..I get that that sort of nuance is beyond you. Cool Beans.

 

[hadit]

Government is a gift from God. All of mankind's highest aspirations, liberties, and rights weren't merely thought up by those who didn't have a belief in a supreme creator. Even the Magna Carta existed only because of Christian influence.

Magna Carta - Wikipedia

Errr..not to burst your bubble..but the Magna Carta had a whole lot more to do with taxes and limiting the power of the King--defining the relationship between Barons and Royals--the popular myth that the Magna Carta established Civil Liberty for the common man..is just that..a myth:

"At the end of the 16th century there was an upsurge in interest in Magna Carta. Lawyers and historians at the time believed that there was an ancient English constitution, going back to the days of the Anglo-Saxons, that protected individual English freedoms. They argued that the Norman invasion of 1066 had overthrown these rights, and that Magna Carta had been a popular attempt to restore them, making the charter an essential foundation for the contemporary powers of Parliament and legal principles such as habeas corpus. Although this historical account was badly flawed, jurists such as Sir Edward Coke used Magna Carta extensively in the early 17th century, arguing against the divine right of kings propounded by the Stuart monarchs. Both James I and his son Charles I attempted to suppress the discussion of Magna Carta, until the issue was curtailed by the English Civil War of the 1640s and the execution of Charles. The political myth of Magna Carta and its protection of ancient personal liberties persisted after the Glorious Revolution of 1688 until well into the 19th century. It influenced the early American colonists in the Thirteen Colonies and the formation of the American Constitution in 1787, which became the supreme law of the land in the new republic of the United States.[c] Research by Victorian historians showed that the original 1215 charter had concerned the medieval relationship between the monarch and the barons, rather than the rights of ordinary people, but the charter remained a powerful, iconic document, even after almost all of its content was repealed from the statute books in the 19th and 20th centuries. Magna Carta still forms an important symbol of liberty today, often cited by politicians and campaigners, and is held in great respect by the British and American legal communities..."

Look at the opening lines:

"John, by the grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and Count of Anjou, to his archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justices, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants, and to all his officials and loyal subjects, greeting.

Know that before God, for the health of our soul and those of our ancestors and heirs, to the honour of God, the exaltation of the holy Church, and the better ordering of our kingdom, at the advice of our reverend fathers Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England, and cardinal of the holy Roman Church, Henry archbishop of Dublin, William bishop of London, Peter bishop of Winchester, Jocelin bishop of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh bishop of Lincoln, Walter Bishop of Worcester, William bishop of Coventry, Benedict bishop of Rochester, Master Pandulf subdeacon and member of the papal household..."

You see no evidence of Christianity there? How about another clause from the Magna Carta?

"First, that we have granted to God, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired.."

Read more about it if you want to learn something:

The Forgotten Clauses of the Magna Carta - The American Vision

***yawn** have read it...all of it--and the Pro Forma invocations to God..have nothing at all with the intent of the document. The Church of the time..was interested in safeguarding its properties and holdings from the grasping of King John...who had bankrupted the country with a series of ruinous wars.
Not much noble about that.

If you wish to yak about history..perhaps you have some input on the fact that Pope Innocent III renounced the Magna Carta--so I guess that's the Christian take?

I get your point...and I reject it. Separation of Church and State..is one of the greatest things we have done as a country..and Judge Moore..is a prime example of why..we rule by law here..not by some religious fanatic's 'higher vision'. His actions were the same as an imman's rulings under Sharia law.

Oh..and your link..I completely disagree....I believe it to be unsupported Christian propaganda..devoid of historical accuracy. As i said..the invocation of God was Pro Forma..and the goal of the Church..was to secure their secular holdings.

Same as Sharia? How many hands did Moore command to be cut off? How many beheadings did he order? Get back to us when you have a real comparison to make.

LoL...you guys...***smiles***

It was a ruling based on religious law..Sharia is religious law...the consequences are irrelevant--Moore chose to abrogate the law of our country in favor of religious principle--But hey..I get that that sort of nuance is beyond you. Cool Beans.

You might as well compare a rowboat bumping into a rock with the Titanic.

 

[TomParks]

This is appalling. This is what Democrats did in 1991 when they thought David Duke would defeat Edwin Edwards for Governor. They got negroes from Mississippi (even bussed them in) to vote for Edwards. This is right out of that playbook. Roy Moore has them in a sheer panic.

Could They Be This Bold? Democrats Are Reportedly Calling on Blacks in MISSISSIPPI to Vote in ALABAMA Senate Race

You were right Steve this is how they won the election

 

[Old Rocks]

Any lie to salve your ass, eh?

 

[Faun]

This is appalling. This is what Democrats did in 1991 when they thought David Duke would defeat Edwin Edwards for Governor. They got negroes from Mississippi (even bussed them in) to vote for Edwards. This is right out of that playbook. Roy Moore has them in a sheer panic.

Could They Be This Bold? Democrats Are Reportedly Calling on Blacks in MISSISSIPPI to Vote in ALABAMA Senate Race

The gatewaypundit???

 

[Faun]

....and once again, Democrats refuse to believe there's such a thing as "voter fraud", even when they're the biggest recipient of it.

Does anyone thing the liberal-biased media would even give something like this consideration? Of course not: They're too busy making up fake news and covering for the left. They won't touch a story until after it filters up through the maverick news sources like the Pundit, Breitbart, Townhall, Free Republic, and the Drudge Report, and finally reaches the FOX Network.

Here ya go... just for you cause you’re so special...

 

[TomParks]

They wont be so lucky in 2020...jones is a lame duck

 

[Faun]

They wont be so lucky in 2020...jones is a lame duck

That’s ok. We only need Jones until the next presidential election, along with at least 2 more Republican Senate seats next election, to prevent trump from installing any more conservatives onto the U.S. Supreme Court.