They Told Me If I Voted for Trump Books Would Be Banned, and They Were Right!

[Weatherman2020]

Dem Rep. Keith Ellison Demands Amazon Ban Books Not Approved by Leftist SPLC.


Rep. Keith Ellison Slams Amazon for Selling 'Hate Group' Merchandise

Fahrenheit 451 was supposed to be a warning, not a how-to guide.

 

[Doc1]

Progressives are totalitarian to their core.

 

[bendog]

I thought you guys were good with boycotts

 

[Camp]

No one is asking for books to be banned. Amazon has had a policy of not promoting or selling hate products. Congressman simply wrote a letter to them asking them to keep their word and enforce their own policy.

 

[Doc1]

No one is asking for books to be banned. Amazon has had a policy of not promoting or selling hate products. Congressman simply wrote a letter to them asking them to keep their word enforce their own policy.

Who decides what is good and what isn't?

 

[Camp]

No one is asking for books to be banned. Amazon has had a policy of not promoting or selling hate products. Congressman simply wrote a letter to them asking them to keep their word enforce their own policy.

Who decides what is good and what isn't?

In this case, Amazon, but they have made public relation agreements with third parties to abstain from carrying specific products related to hate speech or promotion, hence the justification for the letter informing them that they might be perceived as violating the agreement.

 

[Doc1]

No one is asking for books to be banned. Amazon has had a policy of not promoting or selling hate products. Congressman simply wrote a letter to them asking them to keep their word enforce their own policy.

Who decides what is good and what isn't?

In this case, Amazon, but they have made public relation agreements with third parties to abstain from carrying specific products related to hate speech or promotion, hence the justification for the letter informing them that they might be perceived as violating the agreement.

You do realize that Mr. Ellison as advocated the the SPLC be the ones to decide, right?

 

[bendog]

No one is asking for books to be banned. Amazon has had a policy of not promoting or selling hate products. Congressman simply wrote a letter to them asking them to keep their word enforce their own policy.

Who decides what is good and what isn't?

In this case, Amazon, but they have made public relation agreements with third parties to abstain from carrying specific products related to hate speech or promotion, hence the justification for the letter informing them that they might be perceived as violating the agreement.

You do realize that Mr. Ellison as advocated the the SPLC be the ones to decide, right?

That's actually sort of the interesting part of this possible non-story. I checked three different links on this story and each of those times the embedded link to Ellison's letter came up dead. I'm not sure exactly what items/books he referenced.

Obviously, people would be offended if Amazon was selling Ole Reb battle flags and swastikas. I'm sure there are places you can buy that stuff, but Amazon aims for "bigger game."

 

[jc456]

No one is asking for books to be banned. Amazon has had a policy of not promoting or selling hate products. Congressman simply wrote a letter to them asking them to keep their word and enforce their own policy.

who decides what is hate?

 

[Camp]

No one is asking for books to be banned. Amazon has had a policy of not promoting or selling hate products. Congressman simply wrote a letter to them asking them to keep their word enforce their own policy.

Who decides what is good and what isn't?

In this case, Amazon, but they have made public relation agreements with third parties to abstain from carrying specific products related to hate speech or promotion, hence the justification for the letter informing them that they might be perceived as violating the agreement.

You do realize that Mr. Ellison as advocated the the SPLC be the ones to decide, right?

Makes no difference if that is what Amazon agreed to.

 

[Doc1]

No one is asking for books to be banned. Amazon has had a policy of not promoting or selling hate products. Congressman simply wrote a letter to them asking them to keep their word enforce their own policy.

Who decides what is good and what isn't?

In this case, Amazon, but they have made public relation agreements with third parties to abstain from carrying specific products related to hate speech or promotion, hence the justification for the letter informing them that they might be perceived as violating the agreement.

You do realize that Mr. Ellison as advocated the the SPLC be the ones to decide, right?

Makes no difference if that is what Amazon agreed to.

No, you mean it makes no difference because you personally would like to see all materials you don't like, or agree with banned. You and Mr. Muslim have that in common.

 

[whitehall]

God help us if the fringe (mainstream?) hate filled democrats ever get back in power. They even ban certain words on college campus that used to be centers for the exchange of ideas and opinions. Democrats authorize assault as a legitimate expression of free speech and Hollywood lefties even advocate arson and murder and even the kidnapping of children to achieve a political agenda.

 

[Camp]

No one is asking for books to be banned. Amazon has had a policy of not promoting or selling hate products. Congressman simply wrote a letter to them asking them to keep their word and enforce their own policy.

who decides what is hate?

In this case, the Congressman is informing Amazon he has decided to go along with a specific organizations analysis. Amazon can take his and their opinion or not. Amazon can be completely independent and risk being labeled as purveyors of hate if that is their choice.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Dem Rep. Keith Ellison Demands Amazon Ban Books Not Approved by Leftist SPLC.


Rep. Keith Ellison Slams Amazon for Selling 'Hate Group' Merchandise

Fahrenheit 451 was supposed to be a warning, not a how-to guide.

Has Amazon pulled any of them from their website yet?

 

[Camp]

No one is asking for books to be banned. Amazon has had a policy of not promoting or selling hate products. Congressman simply wrote a letter to them asking them to keep their word enforce their own policy.

Who decides what is good and what isn't?

In this case, Amazon, but they have made public relation agreements with third parties to abstain from carrying specific products related to hate speech or promotion, hence the justification for the letter informing them that they might be perceived as violating the agreement.

You do realize that Mr. Ellison as advocated the the SPLC be the ones to decide, right?

Makes no difference if that is what Amazon agreed to.

No, you mean it makes no difference because you personally would like to see all materials you don't like, or agree with banned. You and Mr. Muslim have that in common.

Stop your whining snowflake. Amazon is a big company and can and will do whatever they like. We can be pretty sure it will be based on a profit analysis and motive.

 

[bendog]

No one is asking for books to be banned. Amazon has had a policy of not promoting or selling hate products. Congressman simply wrote a letter to them asking them to keep their word enforce their own policy.

Who decides what is good and what isn't?

In this case, Amazon, but they have made public relation agreements with third parties to abstain from carrying specific products related to hate speech or promotion, hence the justification for the letter informing them that they might be perceived as violating the agreement.

You do realize that Mr. Ellison as advocated the the SPLC be the ones to decide, right?

Makes no difference if that is what Amazon agreed to.

You will now be trolled. LOL

 

[Doc1]

Who decides what is good and what isn't?

In this case, Amazon, but they have made public relation agreements with third parties to abstain from carrying specific products related to hate speech or promotion, hence the justification for the letter informing them that they might be perceived as violating the agreement.

You do realize that Mr. Ellison as advocated the the SPLC be the ones to decide, right?

Makes no difference if that is what Amazon agreed to.

No, you mean it makes no difference because you personally would like to see all materials you don't like, or agree with banned. You and Mr. Muslim have that in common.

Stop your whining snowflake. Amazon is a big company and can and will do whatever they like. We can be pretty sure it will be based on a profit analysis and motive.

(shrugs) You don't mind censorship as long as it involves things you don't agree with. There is no reason to take it out on me for pointing out the truth.

 

[Syriusly]

Dem Rep. Keith Ellison Demands Amazon Ban Books Not Approved by Leftist SPLC.


Rep. Keith Ellison Slams Amazon for Selling 'Hate Group' Merchandise

Fahrenheit 451 was supposed to be a warning, not a how-to guide.

What books have been banned?

 

[1stRambo]

Yo, Amazon agreed with a Communist Group, looking to control America, period!!! Last I heard, we live in America, and are "FREE" People! If Amazon is a "TRUE" American Business? They should decide for themselves, and not depend on a 3rd Party!!!!!

"GTP"
"""Find Some Balls Amazon"""

 

[Norman]

Ban this:

Trump 2020!