They Didn't Have To Look At One Ballot To Prove That The Left Rigged This Election...And The Evidence Is Clear As Day

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Jul 21, 2009
130,814
66,969
2,645
Headmaster's Office, Hogwarts
It all depends on how long Biden wants to act innocent:


"Here’s the summary: For the election returns in many precincts to happen the way they did, Biden would have to flip a coin 1,000 times and get heads every time. We aren’t done here.
He would also have to do it over and over again, in scores, perhaps hundreds of precincts.
Welcome to big data analysis.
In Michigan they dumped 138,000 votes for Biden in the middle of the night.
Not one vote went for Trump.
michigan-steal-.jpg
Industrial fraud is always discovered with statistical analysis like Andrea’s subjects do quite well in this video. Industrial fraud is pretty cool because from the outside, it is invisible. Remember the doctor getting paid in prison, above.
When subject to statistical analysis against known patterns, industrial fraud stands out like a dinosaur walking through a field of peanut butter. It is unmistakable.
Is such analysis proof?
Yes, it is proof that there is an anomaly of such proportions that it must be investigated. And this isn’t hard. Remember, all the data you need to do the analysis is after-the-fact voting data. You do not need to see a single ballot.
Like Andrea’s subjects, you just need to know that in precinct after precinct, there is an unmistakable pattern that the more people vote for Trump over Biden the greater the number of Trump votes the counting machines scoop from Trump to Biden."


Why did these states halt counting? Because they all needed to upload a program that they planned on using if the election wasn't going the way they hoped.​
 
It all depends on how long Biden wants to act innocent:


"Here’s the summary: For the election returns in many precincts to happen the way they did, Biden would have to flip a coin 1,000 times and get heads every time. We aren’t done here.
He would also have to do it over and over again, in scores, perhaps hundreds of precincts.
Welcome to big data analysis.
In Michigan they dumped 138,000 votes for Biden in the middle of the night.
Not one vote went for Trump.
Industrial fraud is always discovered with statistical analysis like Andrea’s subjects do quite well in this video. Industrial fraud is pretty cool because from the outside, it is invisible. Remember the doctor getting paid in prison, above.
When subject to statistical analysis against known patterns, industrial fraud stands out like a dinosaur walking through a field of peanut butter. It is unmistakable.
Is such analysis proof?
Yes, it is proof that there is an anomaly of such proportions that it must be investigated. And this isn’t hard. Remember, all the data you need to do the analysis is after-the-fact voting data. You do not need to see a single ballot.
Like Andrea’s subjects, you just need to know that in precinct after precinct, there is an unmistakable pattern that the more people vote for Trump over Biden the greater the number of Trump votes the counting machines scoop from Trump to Biden."


Why did these states halt counting? Because they all needed to upload a program that they planned on using if the election wasn't going the way they hoped.​

How many times will this crap be re-posted?
 
It all depends on how long Biden wants to act innocent:


"Here’s the summary: For the election returns in many precincts to happen the way they did, Biden would have to flip a coin 1,000 times and get heads every time. We aren’t done here.
He would also have to do it over and over again, in scores, perhaps hundreds of precincts.
Welcome to big data analysis.
In Michigan they dumped 138,000 votes for Biden in the middle of the night.
Not one vote went for Trump.
Industrial fraud is always discovered with statistical analysis like Andrea’s subjects do quite well in this video. Industrial fraud is pretty cool because from the outside, it is invisible. Remember the doctor getting paid in prison, above.
When subject to statistical analysis against known patterns, industrial fraud stands out like a dinosaur walking through a field of peanut butter. It is unmistakable.
Is such analysis proof?
Yes, it is proof that there is an anomaly of such proportions that it must be investigated. And this isn’t hard. Remember, all the data you need to do the analysis is after-the-fact voting data. You do not need to see a single ballot.
Like Andrea’s subjects, you just need to know that in precinct after precinct, there is an unmistakable pattern that the more people vote for Trump over Biden the greater the number of Trump votes the counting machines scoop from Trump to Biden."


Why did these states halt counting? Because they all needed to upload a program that they planned on using if the election wasn't going the way they hoped.​

How many times will this crap be re-posted?

So, you just want the facts to go away, huh? Figures
 
It all depends on how long Biden wants to act innocent:


"Here’s the summary: For the election returns in many precincts to happen the way they did, Biden would have to flip a coin 1,000 times and get heads every time. We aren’t done here.
He would also have to do it over and over again, in scores, perhaps hundreds of precincts.
Welcome to big data analysis.
In Michigan they dumped 138,000 votes for Biden in the middle of the night.
Not one vote went for Trump.
Industrial fraud is always discovered with statistical analysis like Andrea’s subjects do quite well in this video. Industrial fraud is pretty cool because from the outside, it is invisible. Remember the doctor getting paid in prison, above.
When subject to statistical analysis against known patterns, industrial fraud stands out like a dinosaur walking through a field of peanut butter. It is unmistakable.
Is such analysis proof?
Yes, it is proof that there is an anomaly of such proportions that it must be investigated. And this isn’t hard. Remember, all the data you need to do the analysis is after-the-fact voting data. You do not need to see a single ballot.
Like Andrea’s subjects, you just need to know that in precinct after precinct, there is an unmistakable pattern that the more people vote for Trump over Biden the greater the number of Trump votes the counting machines scoop from Trump to Biden."


Why did these states halt counting? Because they all needed to upload a program that they planned on using if the election wasn't going the way they hoped.​

How many times will this crap be re-posted?

So, you just want the facts to go away, huh? Figures


We are waiting for some to be presented.
 
It all depends on how long Biden wants to act innocent:


"Here’s the summary: For the election returns in many precincts to happen the way they did, Biden would have to flip a coin 1,000 times and get heads every time. We aren’t done here.
He would also have to do it over and over again, in scores, perhaps hundreds of precincts.
Welcome to big data analysis.
In Michigan they dumped 138,000 votes for Biden in the middle of the night.
Not one vote went for Trump.
Industrial fraud is always discovered with statistical analysis like Andrea’s subjects do quite well in this video. Industrial fraud is pretty cool because from the outside, it is invisible. Remember the doctor getting paid in prison, above.
When subject to statistical analysis against known patterns, industrial fraud stands out like a dinosaur walking through a field of peanut butter. It is unmistakable.
Is such analysis proof?
Yes, it is proof that there is an anomaly of such proportions that it must be investigated. And this isn’t hard. Remember, all the data you need to do the analysis is after-the-fact voting data. You do not need to see a single ballot.
Like Andrea’s subjects, you just need to know that in precinct after precinct, there is an unmistakable pattern that the more people vote for Trump over Biden the greater the number of Trump votes the counting machines scoop from Trump to Biden."


Why did these states halt counting? Because they all needed to upload a program that they planned on using if the election wasn't going the way they hoped.​

How many times will this crap be re-posted?

So, you just want the facts to go away, huh? Figures


We are waiting for some to be presented.

It's there, but as always, you and your ilk are in denial.
 
It all depends on how long Biden wants to act innocent:


"Here’s the summary: For the election returns in many precincts to happen the way they did, Biden would have to flip a coin 1,000 times and get heads every time. We aren’t done here.
He would also have to do it over and over again, in scores, perhaps hundreds of precincts.
Welcome to big data analysis.
In Michigan they dumped 138,000 votes for Biden in the middle of the night.
Not one vote went for Trump.
Industrial fraud is always discovered with statistical analysis like Andrea’s subjects do quite well in this video. Industrial fraud is pretty cool because from the outside, it is invisible. Remember the doctor getting paid in prison, above.
When subject to statistical analysis against known patterns, industrial fraud stands out like a dinosaur walking through a field of peanut butter. It is unmistakable.
Is such analysis proof?
Yes, it is proof that there is an anomaly of such proportions that it must be investigated. And this isn’t hard. Remember, all the data you need to do the analysis is after-the-fact voting data. You do not need to see a single ballot.
Like Andrea’s subjects, you just need to know that in precinct after precinct, there is an unmistakable pattern that the more people vote for Trump over Biden the greater the number of Trump votes the counting machines scoop from Trump to Biden."


Why did these states halt counting? Because they all needed to upload a program that they planned on using if the election wasn't going the way they hoped.​

And your proof is....
 
I'm sure all these accusations will be proven to be correct in court.

No doubt they can prove all of it. I mean, why else would they bring it all up?
And by court, you mean assholes on Parler posting in a ignorance thread.

that’s all they have
 
Keep strokin' it!
Keep denying it. :eusa_whistle:
Some of y’all keep making the same claims over and over again.
In Michigan they dumped 138,000 votes for Biden in the middle of the night.

This didn’t happen. Someone added a digit to a vote total. It was noticed 20 minutes later by the election commission and corrected. The two photos are out of order. Biden’s vote total went DOWN by 138,000 votes.

 
The hilarious thing is that a GOP clerk provided Biden with all those 'votes'.

Just north of Lansing in Shiawassee County, Republican Clerk Caroline Wilson says she accidentally
boosted Democrat Joe Biden’s unofficial lead from 15,371 to 153,710 — more than twice the
number of registered voters in the county — during the early morning of Nov. 4.

Trump's number was correct however Biden's number was overstated by 138,339.

 
I'm sure all these accusations will be proven to be correct in court.

No doubt they can prove all of it. I mean, why else would they bring it all up?
And by court, you mean assholes on Parler posting in a ignorance thread.

that’s all they have
If you look at it.....anything on Parler has as much validity as anything the mainstream puts out.
But unfortunately for Biden......the evidence that they rigged the election is stacking up....and because of that there's this mad push to end any discovery by recounts and legal actions through fake news.
 
The hilarious thing is that a GOP clerk provided Biden with all those 'votes'.

Just north of Lansing in Shiawassee County, Republican Clerk Caroline Wilson says she accidentally
boosted Democrat Joe Biden’s unofficial lead from 15,371 to 153,710 — more than twice the
number of registered voters in the county — during the early morning of Nov. 4.

Trump's number was correct however Biden's number was overstated by 138,339.

The 130k votes people are talking about is not that incident which I have never heard of. The huge bump we are talking about was done in the middle of the night and was never reversed.

 
It all depends on how long Biden wants to act innocent:


"Here’s the summary: For the election returns in many precincts to happen the way they did, Biden would have to flip a coin 1,000 times and get heads every time. We aren’t done here.
He would also have to do it over and over again, in scores, perhaps hundreds of precincts.
Welcome to big data analysis.
In Michigan they dumped 138,000 votes for Biden in the middle of the night.
Not one vote went for Trump.
Industrial fraud is always discovered with statistical analysis like Andrea’s subjects do quite well in this video. Industrial fraud is pretty cool because from the outside, it is invisible. Remember the doctor getting paid in prison, above.
When subject to statistical analysis against known patterns, industrial fraud stands out like a dinosaur walking through a field of peanut butter. It is unmistakable.
Is such analysis proof?
Yes, it is proof that there is an anomaly of such proportions that it must be investigated. And this isn’t hard. Remember, all the data you need to do the analysis is after-the-fact voting data. You do not need to see a single ballot.
Like Andrea’s subjects, you just need to know that in precinct after precinct, there is an unmistakable pattern that the more people vote for Trump over Biden the greater the number of Trump votes the counting machines scoop from Trump to Biden."


Why did these states halt counting? Because they all needed to upload a program that they planned on using if the election wasn't going the way they hoped.​

How many times will this crap be re-posted?

as long as administrators and moderators enable and condone it. trumptards will cover for trumptards.
 
It all depends on how long Biden wants to act innocent:


"Here’s the summary: For the election returns in many precincts to happen the way they did, Biden would have to flip a coin 1,000 times and get heads every time. We aren’t done here.
He would also have to do it over and over again, in scores, perhaps hundreds of precincts.
Welcome to big data analysis.
In Michigan they dumped 138,000 votes for Biden in the middle of the night.
Not one vote went for Trump.
Industrial fraud is always discovered with statistical analysis like Andrea’s subjects do quite well in this video. Industrial fraud is pretty cool because from the outside, it is invisible. Remember the doctor getting paid in prison, above.
When subject to statistical analysis against known patterns, industrial fraud stands out like a dinosaur walking through a field of peanut butter. It is unmistakable.
Is such analysis proof?
Yes, it is proof that there is an anomaly of such proportions that it must be investigated. And this isn’t hard. Remember, all the data you need to do the analysis is after-the-fact voting data. You do not need to see a single ballot.
Like Andrea’s subjects, you just need to know that in precinct after precinct, there is an unmistakable pattern that the more people vote for Trump over Biden the greater the number of Trump votes the counting machines scoop from Trump to Biden."


Why did these states halt counting? Because they all needed to upload a program that they planned on using if the election wasn't going the way they hoped.​

How many times will this crap be re-posted?

So, you just want the facts to go away, huh? Figures


We are waiting for some to be presented.

It's there, but as always, you and your ilk are in denial.


So are the Republican governors and SOS on denial as well, because they can't find any voter fraud at all. To Trump Humpers it has to be since Trump lost.
 

Forum List

Back
Top