These Douche Bag Professor are allowed to continue to preach their propaganda...

[Mac1958]

.

...
.

 

[Asclepias]

Exactly. Get your cave chimps to understand the rules.

The First Amendment is the rule, moron, and it says they can't be expelled.

Notice how all the liberal turds are defending this blatant assault on the freedom of speech.

No stupid. They broke another rule by advocating violence against people due to skin color. You dont get to shout fire in a crowded room nor do you get to incite violence. Too bad so sad for the little feral racists. Its about time they learned that running their mouths in that manner will not be tolerated.

That's still protected speech, you boot-licking moron. Anyone can write a book saying the same thing.

"Inciting violence" means saying something like "burn this bitch down," which is what Michael Brown's step dad said right before the Ferguson riots. It's a command or plea to take immediate action. Of course, all you scumbag liberal turds defended that guy, didn't you?

No its not protected speech. Thats why they got expelled moron. If they had a case against Browns step dad why havent they expelled him? Oh wait....he isnt subject to the rules at OU nor does he attend the school.

Duh, wrong. They got expelled because the school is run by a gang of commies who wipe their asses on the Constitution. They are about to get sued big time.

Public universities cannot have rules that violate the Constitution, moron. That means OU.

Dont play message board attorney. Thats why you guys were wrong about Sterling. You never seem to understand the law sufficiently enough to form an argument that makes sense. You dont realize that there a laws on the books that basically provide exclusions to the first amendment like yelling fire in a crowded movie theater. Such ignorance is pretty much why you sound so hopelessly lost when attempting to discuss issues outside your realm of knowledge.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Am I the only one here who thinks the little rats got what they deserved, but that the number of seditious leftist professors is also a problem?

People are so fucking predictable. Those who view politics as identity defend their turf no matter how extreme. Those who see themselves as left defend anything as long as it is labeled left and those on the right likewise.

It gets pretty ridiculous, sometimes.

 

[Asclepias]

II have to admit there are a few of you that fall into the wild cave chimp category that don't love everything Black people invent. I know for a fact your women love it though.

Again, the watermelon cannot be counted as an "invention".

Again white people didnt invent the watermelon. Its a naturally growing fruit.

 

[bripat9643]

The First Amendment is the rule, moron, and it says they can't be expelled.

Notice how all the liberal turds are defending this blatant assault on the freedom of speech.

No stupid. They broke another rule by advocating violence against people due to skin color. You dont get to shout fire in a crowded room nor do you get to incite violence. Too bad so sad for the little feral racists. Its about time they learned that running their mouths in that manner will not be tolerated.

That's still protected speech, you boot-licking moron. Anyone can write a book saying the same thing.

"Inciting violence" means saying something like "burn this bitch down," which is what Michael Brown's step dad said right before the Ferguson riots. It's a command or plea to take immediate action. Of course, all you scumbag liberal turds defended that guy, didn't you?

No its not protected speech. Thats why they got expelled moron. If they had a case against Browns step dad why havent they expelled him? Oh wait....he isnt subject to the rules at OU nor does he attend the school.

Duh, wrong. They got expelled because the school is run by a gang of commies who wipe their asses on the Constitution. They are about to get sued big time.

Public universities cannot have rules that violate the Constitution, moron. That means OU.

Dont play message board attorney. Thats why you guys were wrong about Sterling. You never seem to understand the law sufficiently enough to form an argument that makes sense. You dont realize that there a laws on the books that basically provide exclusions to the first amendment like yelling fire in a crowded movie theater. Such ignorance is pretty much why you sound so hopelessly lost when attempting to discuss issues outside your realm of knowledge.

There is no such law, moron. If you are so sure there is, then you'll have no trouble producing a link to one. Even if there was, that wouldn't make it legal for a public university to expel a student because the administration finds his speech offensive.

For someone who attacks "message board attorneys," you sure do a good imitation of one.

 

[NoNukes]

This fails as a false comparison fallacy and is comprehensively ignorant and idiotic – American citizens can't be 'expelled' from the United States because an authoritarian conservative doesn't like what they say.

Yeah, but they can be expelled from a public university because some lib doesn't like what they say?

Exactly. Get your cave chimps to understand the rules.

The First Amendment is the rule, moron, and it says they can't be expelled.

Notice how all the liberal turds are defending this blatant assault on the freedom of speech.

They were advocating lynching Blacks. guess that is OK with you.

So anyone who defends the First Amendment supports lynching blacks?

You're obviously an idiot, and so predictable.

Syllogisms à la Mode — If you are against labor racketeers, then you are against the working man. If you are against demagogues, then you are against democracy. If you are against Christianity, then you are against God. If you are against trying a can of old Dr. Quack's Cancer Salve, then you are in favor of letting Uncle Julius die.

- H.L. Mencken - ​

No, anyone who supports these guys and their actions, like you, is an asshole.

 

[NoNukes]

Have you ever heard of freedom of speech?

have you ever heard of sedition, insurrection, mutiny, treason ?

..............libertard................

So, that is what you think of freedom, of speech. You must be a commie.

 

[Asclepias]

No stupid. They broke another rule by advocating violence against people due to skin color. You dont get to shout fire in a crowded room nor do you get to incite violence. Too bad so sad for the little feral racists. Its about time they learned that running their mouths in that manner will not be tolerated.

That's still protected speech, you boot-licking moron. Anyone can write a book saying the same thing.

"Inciting violence" means saying something like "burn this bitch down," which is what Michael Brown's step dad said right before the Ferguson riots. It's a command or plea to take immediate action. Of course, all you scumbag liberal turds defended that guy, didn't you?

No its not protected speech. Thats why they got expelled moron. If they had a case against Browns step dad why havent they expelled him? Oh wait....he isnt subject to the rules at OU nor does he attend the school.

Duh, wrong. They got expelled because the school is run by a gang of commies who wipe their asses on the Constitution. They are about to get sued big time.

Public universities cannot have rules that violate the Constitution, moron. That means OU.

Dont play message board attorney. Thats why you guys were wrong about Sterling. You never seem to understand the law sufficiently enough to form an argument that makes sense. You dont realize that there a laws on the books that basically provide exclusions to the first amendment like yelling fire in a crowded movie theater. Such ignorance is pretty much why you sound so hopelessly lost when attempting to discuss issues outside your realm of knowledge.

There is no such law, moron. If you are so sure there is, then you'll have no trouble producing a link to one. Even if there was, that wouldn't make it legal for a public university to expel a student because the administration finds his speech offensive.

For someone who attacks "message board attorneys," you sure do a good imitation of one.

United States free speech exceptions - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[FA_Q2]

...but these kids get expelled for a racist 9 sec clip. Unfuckingbelievable! That call our flag a symbol of racism! We should expel these fuckers from our country!


Professors US flag symbolizes racism should not be displayed on campus Fox News

This fails as a false comparison fallacy and is comprehensively ignorant and idiotic – American citizens can't be 'expelled' from the United States because an authoritarian conservative doesn't like what they say.

Yeah, but they can be expelled from a public university because some lib doesn't like what they say?

Exactly. Get your cave chimps to understand the rules.

The First Amendment is the rule, moron, and it says they can't be expelled.

Notice how all the liberal turds are defending this blatant assault on the freedom of speech.

They were advocating lynching Blacks. guess that is OK with you.

So you have abandoned the argument that it is not against the first amendment?

The Wesburo idiots also had a message that was full of hate and vitriol yet it applies to them. What is in the message is rather irrelevant.

 

[FA_Q2]

...but these kids get expelled for a racist 9 sec clip. Unfuckingbelievable! That call our flag a symbol of racism! We should expel these fuckers from our country!


Professors US flag symbolizes racism should not be displayed on campus Fox News

And people jeered when I said you can always count on Fox News to throw up a shield for racists by going out and looking for some Leftists doing what they believe is something similar.

Ta-daaaaaaaa!

Every. Single. Time.

So, attack the messenger but not the message.

Care to actually address the point of the thread rather than whine about a news station.

 

[bripat9643]

...but these kids get expelled for a racist 9 sec clip. Unfuckingbelievable! That call our flag a symbol of racism! We should expel these fuckers from our country!


Professors US flag symbolizes racism should not be displayed on campus Fox News

This fails as a false comparison fallacy and is comprehensively ignorant and idiotic – American citizens can't be 'expelled' from the United States because an authoritarian conservative doesn't like what they say.

Yeah, but they can be expelled from a public university because some lib doesn't like what they say?

Exactly. Get your cave chimps to understand the rules.

The First Amendment is the rule, moron, and it says they can't be expelled.

Notice how all the liberal turds are defending this blatant assault on the freedom of speech.

They were advocating lynching Blacks. guess that is OK with you.

No, actually they just said "you can hang him by a tree." That's not actually advocating lynching.

 

[bripat9643]

That's still protected speech, you boot-licking moron. Anyone can write a book saying the same thing.

"Inciting violence" means saying something like "burn this bitch down," which is what Michael Brown's step dad said right before the Ferguson riots. It's a command or plea to take immediate action. Of course, all you scumbag liberal turds defended that guy, didn't you?

No its not protected speech. Thats why they got expelled moron. If they had a case against Browns step dad why havent they expelled him? Oh wait....he isnt subject to the rules at OU nor does he attend the school.

Duh, wrong. They got expelled because the school is run by a gang of commies who wipe their asses on the Constitution. They are about to get sued big time.

Public universities cannot have rules that violate the Constitution, moron. That means OU.

Dont play message board attorney. Thats why you guys were wrong about Sterling. You never seem to understand the law sufficiently enough to form an argument that makes sense. You dont realize that there a laws on the books that basically provide exclusions to the first amendment like yelling fire in a crowded movie theater. Such ignorance is pretty much why you sound so hopelessly lost when attempting to discuss issues outside your realm of knowledge.

There is no such law, moron. If you are so sure there is, then you'll have no trouble producing a link to one. Even if there was, that wouldn't make it legal for a public university to expel a student because the administration finds his speech offensive.

For someone who attacks "message board attorneys," you sure do a good imitation of one.

United States free speech exceptions - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Your reference doesn't list yelling fire in a movie theater as an exception.

 

[bripat9643]

Yeah, but they can be expelled from a public university because some lib doesn't like what they say?

Exactly. Get your cave chimps to understand the rules.

The First Amendment is the rule, moron, and it says they can't be expelled.

Notice how all the liberal turds are defending this blatant assault on the freedom of speech.

They were advocating lynching Blacks. guess that is OK with you.

So anyone who defends the First Amendment supports lynching blacks?

You're obviously an idiot, and so predictable.

Syllogisms à la Mode — If you are against labor racketeers, then you are against the working man. If you are against demagogues, then you are against democracy. If you are against Christianity, then you are against God. If you are against trying a can of old Dr. Quack's Cancer Salve, then you are in favor of letting Uncle Julius die.

- H.L. Mencken - ​

No, anyone who supports these guys and their actions, like you, is an asshole.

Defending their First Amendment rights is not "supporting them" any more than defending the right of Nazis to march through Skokie IL or the right of turds like you to spout your idiocies in this forum is supporting Nazis or you. .

 

[bripat9643]

II have to admit there are a few of you that fall into the wild cave chimp category that don't love everything Black people invent. I know for a fact your women love it though.

Again, the watermelon cannot be counted as an "invention".

Again white people didnt invent the watermelon. Its a naturally growing fruit.

The modern version was developed by white people, and it bares little resemblance to its naturally growing ancestor.

 

[Asclepias]

II have to admit there are a few of you that fall into the wild cave chimp category that don't love everything Black people invent. I know for a fact your women love it though.

Again, the watermelon cannot be counted as an "invention".

Again white people didnt invent the watermelon. Its a naturally growing fruit.

The modern version was developed by white people, and it bares little resemblance to its naturally growing ancestor.

Your fellow white guy seems to think the watermelon is an invention of Black people.

 

[bripat9643]

II have to admit there are a few of you that fall into the wild cave chimp category that don't love everything Black people invent. I know for a fact your women love it though.

Again, the watermelon cannot be counted as an "invention".

Again white people didnt invent the watermelon. Its a naturally growing fruit.

The modern version was developed by white people, and it bares little resemblance to its naturally growing ancestor.

Your fellow white guy seems to think the watermelon is an invention of Black people.

Wiki says it was probably invented by the Egyptians. It is native to Africa, however.

 

[Asclepias]

II have to admit there are a few of you that fall into the wild cave chimp category that don't love everything Black people invent. I know for a fact your women love it though.

Again, the watermelon cannot be counted as an "invention".

Again white people didnt invent the watermelon. Its a naturally growing fruit.

The modern version was developed by white people, and it bares little resemblance to its naturally growing ancestor.

Your fellow white guy seems to think the watermelon is an invention of Black people.

Wiki says it was probably invented by the Egyptians. It is native to Africa, however.

Like I told him, naturally growing things are not inventions. They already existed.

 

[williepete]

Part of the college experience is coming to the realization that not all college professors are wise. They may know their subject but living for years in an insulated bubble where the students they are 'over' have no recourse to whatever they say, act or do creates a strange, out of touch with reality individual who is convinced of his own infallibility. Most can handle it but a few go full retard.

The math and science types tend to be a little more down to earth because their area of discipline has rules. Moving into arts and literature, you get further into la la land.

The further I got away from the theory of college and into real life, the more I looked back realizing that place had a thin grasp on reality.

 

[williepete]

“U.S. nationalism often contributes to racism and xenophobia..."

A statement like that coming from a normal person would draw some odd looks in a social setting. After an awkward pause, the conversation would politely move on to another topic. If the person was known by the crowd to be a college professor, the reaction would be more of pity or as we say in the South, a bless your heart moment.

 

[bripat9643]

Again, the watermelon cannot be counted as an "invention".

Again white people didnt invent the watermelon. Its a naturally growing fruit.

The modern version was developed by white people, and it bares little resemblance to its naturally growing ancestor.

Your fellow white guy seems to think the watermelon is an invention of Black people.

Wiki says it was probably invented by the Egyptians. It is native to Africa, however.

Like I told him, naturally growing things are not inventions. They already existed.

Not entirely true. That's like saying a Doberman Pincer is "natural." It's not. You can't find a Doberman in the wild. It's the product of thousands of years of selective breeding. It's man-made, in other words. However, no single person created it.