Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You're talking about laws. I'm talking about REAL LIFE. Doesn't matter what rules there are. If you don't know that AA has been discriminating against whites for 50 years, and continues to today, you are clueless on this subject.Nope, exactly the opposite; it prohibited using quotas. Thank Nixon for that, it came under his domestic policies and pandering to the Black Caucus, not the Affirmative Action clauses in the Civil Rights Act.
You are right. Affirmative Action is the prime example. That law assumes that blacks are not capable of bettering themselves on their own.It requires them to acknowledge the fact that sanctioned racism exists, racism practiced by much of their political base, where conservatives are loath to condemn that racism for fear of losing that political base.
Requiring positive ID for voting is voter suppression? One needs positive ID to buy a pack of cigarettes, to buy alcoholic beverages, to drive a vehicle on public roads, to board an airplane or even be a library member. Why don't you say that requiring a driver's license (positive ID) is discriminatory agains black people?And conservatives must acknowledge the fact that there are racist elements of their own political agenda, such as the GOP’s voter suppression efforts.
The idea of antisemitism was the brainchild of the Anti Defamation League what was established in 1913. Interestingly enough, in the same year the Federal Reserve was born. Coincidence? Furthermore, in the same year the taxation of income (Income Tax) became law. Coincidence?What is more important, racism or antisemitism?
She had no ammo. Plus she didn't let us lend her some. So whose loss?Our loss.Did anyone notices that the OP has quit USMB, because she encountered opinions that are different from hers? She went back to Facebook political forum where the most important political issue is the new knickers of Kim kardashian, and they are all passionate about it.
Boy are you in for a big disappointment.Hello I'm nobody or I'm everyone I'm not sure. The passion behind this subject is palpable. We must find a way to have this conversation and still hear each other. Passion steps in and anger follows.....conversation over.
Fact: The country is still run by old white men!
The poor, immigrants and blacks are at the bottom of the list of importance because they feel we have nothing to offer and so they can use us without conscience. Flint is a perfect reflection of what I speak.
Fact: We have glossed over these issues too long. That is why the conversation has to occur. The country is crying to be heard ....to be seen.
Of course this conversation is uncomfortable. If you're not uncomfortable then you're set in stone and angry no matter which side you're on. Where do we go from here?
Love, Understanding, Respect for differing viewpoints is the course necessary.....easy to say right?
This is our challenge.
You are right. Affirmative Action is the prime example. That law assumes that blacks are not capable of bettering themselves on their own.It requires them to acknowledge the fact that sanctioned racism exists, racism practiced by much of their political base, where conservatives are loath to condemn that racism for fear of losing that political base.
Requiring positive ID for voting is voter suppression? One needs positive ID to buy a pack of cigarettes, to buy alcoholic beverages, to drive a vehicle on public roads, to board an airplane or even be a library member. Why don't you say that requiring a driver's license (positive ID) is discriminatory agains black people?And conservatives must acknowledge the fact that there are racist elements of their own political agenda, such as the GOP’s voter suppression efforts.
/----/ Geeeze not this old broken record again.“Of course this conversation is uncomfortable.”
For most conservatives this conversation is uncomfortable.
It requires them to acknowledge the fact that sanctioned racism exists, racism practiced by much of their political base, where conservatives are loath to condemn that racism for fear of losing that political base.
And conservatives must acknowledge the fact that there are racist elements of their own political agenda, such as the GOP’s voter suppression efforts.
Is this some kind of mental stutter?/----/ Geeeze not this old broken record again.“Of course this conversation is uncomfortable.”
For most conservatives this conversation is uncomfortable.
It requires them to acknowledge the fact that sanctioned racism exists, racism practiced by much of their political base, where conservatives are loath to condemn that racism for fear of losing that political base.
And conservatives must acknowledge the fact that there are racist elements of their own political agenda, such as the GOP’s voter suppression efforts.
Hello I'm nobody or I'm everyone I'm not sure. The passion behind this subject is palpable. We must find a way to have this conversation and still hear each other. Passion steps in and anger follows.....conversation over.
Fact: The country is still run by old white men!
....
So are you saying that you need big daddy to spoon feed you because you are incapable of taking care of yourself?You are right. Affirmative Action is the prime example. That law assumes that blacks are not capable of bettering themselves on their own.It requires them to acknowledge the fact that sanctioned racism exists, racism practiced by much of their political base, where conservatives are loath to condemn that racism for fear of losing that political base.
Requiring positive ID for voting is voter suppression? One needs positive ID to buy a pack of cigarettes, to buy alcoholic beverages, to drive a vehicle on public roads, to board an airplane or even be a library member. Why don't you say that requiring a driver's license (positive ID) is discriminatory agains black people?And conservatives must acknowledge the fact that there are racist elements of their own political agenda, such as the GOP’s voter suppression efforts.
"Affirmative Action is the prime example. That law assumes that blacks are not capable of bettering themselves on their own."
So they assumed whites were incapable of bettering themselves when the government made sure whites had 400 years of AA?
No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart.So are you saying that you need big daddy to spoon feed you because you are incapable of taking care of yourself?You are right. Affirmative Action is the prime example. That law assumes that blacks are not capable of bettering themselves on their own.It requires them to acknowledge the fact that sanctioned racism exists, racism practiced by much of their political base, where conservatives are loath to condemn that racism for fear of losing that political base.
Requiring positive ID for voting is voter suppression? One needs positive ID to buy a pack of cigarettes, to buy alcoholic beverages, to drive a vehicle on public roads, to board an airplane or even be a library member. Why don't you say that requiring a driver's license (positive ID) is discriminatory agains black people?And conservatives must acknowledge the fact that there are racist elements of their own political agenda, such as the GOP’s voter suppression efforts.
"Affirmative Action is the prime example. That law assumes that blacks are not capable of bettering themselves on their own."
So they assumed whites were incapable of bettering themselves when the government made sure whites had 400 years of AA?
So you are saying that you are unable to take care of yourself. What headstart? Let me try to make sense of this. You assume a zero sum game. Whites started to walk on two legs 400 years earlier than blacks and they started to walk on two legs 400 years ago, while blacks started to walk on two legs just recently. Am I understanding you right?No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart.So are you saying that you need big daddy to spoon feed you because you are incapable of taking care of yourself?You are right. Affirmative Action is the prime example. That law assumes that blacks are not capable of bettering themselves on their own.It requires them to acknowledge the fact that sanctioned racism exists, racism practiced by much of their political base, where conservatives are loath to condemn that racism for fear of losing that political base.
Requiring positive ID for voting is voter suppression? One needs positive ID to buy a pack of cigarettes, to buy alcoholic beverages, to drive a vehicle on public roads, to board an airplane or even be a library member. Why don't you say that requiring a driver's license (positive ID) is discriminatory agains black people?And conservatives must acknowledge the fact that there are racist elements of their own political agenda, such as the GOP’s voter suppression efforts.
"Affirmative Action is the prime example. That law assumes that blacks are not capable of bettering themselves on their own."
So they assumed whites were incapable of bettering themselves when the government made sure whites had 400 years of AA?
No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart and held Blacks back to boot.So you are saying that you are unable to take care of yourself. What headstart? Let me try to make sense of this. You assume a zero sum game. Whites started to walk on two legs 400 years earlier than blacks and they started to walk on two legs 400 years ago, while blacks started to walk on two legs just recently. Am I understanding you right?No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart.So are you saying that you need big daddy to spoon feed you because you are incapable of taking care of yourself?You are right. Affirmative Action is the prime example. That law assumes that blacks are not capable of bettering themselves on their own.It requires them to acknowledge the fact that sanctioned racism exists, racism practiced by much of their political base, where conservatives are loath to condemn that racism for fear of losing that political base.
Requiring positive ID for voting is voter suppression? One needs positive ID to buy a pack of cigarettes, to buy alcoholic beverages, to drive a vehicle on public roads, to board an airplane or even be a library member. Why don't you say that requiring a driver's license (positive ID) is discriminatory agains black people?And conservatives must acknowledge the fact that there are racist elements of their own political agenda, such as the GOP’s voter suppression efforts.
"Affirmative Action is the prime example. That law assumes that blacks are not capable of bettering themselves on their own."
So they assumed whites were incapable of bettering themselves when the government made sure whites had 400 years of AA?
So you are saying that blacks were not developed in Africa? You are putting your own race down. Why?No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart and held Blacks back to boot.So you are saying that you are unable to take care of yourself. What headstart? Let me try to make sense of this. You assume a zero sum game. Whites started to walk on two legs 400 years earlier than blacks and they started to walk on two legs 400 years ago, while blacks started to walk on two legs just recently. Am I understanding you right?No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart.So are you saying that you need big daddy to spoon feed you because you are incapable of taking care of yourself?You are right. Affirmative Action is the prime example. That law assumes that blacks are not capable of bettering themselves on their own.
Requiring positive ID for voting is voter suppression? One needs positive ID to buy a pack of cigarettes, to buy alcoholic beverages, to drive a vehicle on public roads, to board an airplane or even be a library member. Why don't you say that requiring a driver's license (positive ID) is discriminatory agains black people?
"Affirmative Action is the prime example. That law assumes that blacks are not capable of bettering themselves on their own."
So they assumed whites were incapable of bettering themselves when the government made sure whites had 400 years of AA?
No. I'm saying Africa is not in the US.So you are saying that blacks were not developed in Africa? You are putting your own race down. Why?No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart and held Blacks back to boot.So you are saying that you are unable to take care of yourself. What headstart? Let me try to make sense of this. You assume a zero sum game. Whites started to walk on two legs 400 years earlier than blacks and they started to walk on two legs 400 years ago, while blacks started to walk on two legs just recently. Am I understanding you right?No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart.So are you saying that you need big daddy to spoon feed you because you are incapable of taking care of yourself?"Affirmative Action is the prime example. That law assumes that blacks are not capable of bettering themselves on their own."
So they assumed whites were incapable of bettering themselves when the government made sure whites had 400 years of AA?
Well we know that at least I hope considering nowadays educational requirements.No. I'm saying Africa is not in the US.So you are saying that blacks were not developed in Africa? You are putting your own race down. Why?No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart and held Blacks back to boot.So you are saying that you are unable to take care of yourself. What headstart? Let me try to make sense of this. You assume a zero sum game. Whites started to walk on two legs 400 years earlier than blacks and they started to walk on two legs 400 years ago, while blacks started to walk on two legs just recently. Am I understanding you right?No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart.So are you saying that you need big daddy to spoon feed you because you are incapable of taking care of yourself?
i dont just think that. I know that whites were not capable of taking care of themselves. History shows us this. Blacks educated whites and then were driven away. White civilization collapsed. Blacks came back to europe and taught whites it was ok to take baths and how to read and write. Whites drove them away again and tried to come over to the americas but needed Black men to help them navigate. I could go on and on but you get my point. Whites need help. It was smart of your ancestors to give you a head start. God knows that 400 years was still not enough. Thats why you still whine like bitches.Well we know that at least I hope considering nowadays educational requirements.No. I'm saying Africa is not in the US.So you are saying that blacks were not developed in Africa? You are putting your own race down. Why?No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart and held Blacks back to boot.So you are saying that you are unable to take care of yourself. What headstart? Let me try to make sense of this. You assume a zero sum game. Whites started to walk on two legs 400 years earlier than blacks and they started to walk on two legs 400 years ago, while blacks started to walk on two legs just recently. Am I understanding you right?No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart.
So, back to your original thought. You were saying that you were not capable to take care of yourself, why do you think that?
Do I come across whining? Interesting. I am just asking you that why do you think that you cannot take care of yourself and need the government to take care of you. You are consistently avoiding the answer to that. You alluded to blacks starting to walk in two legs 400 years later than whites, then the next post you said blacks taught everything what whites know. Then you said you needed somebody else to take care of you. You are very confused or trying to confuse me.i dont just think that. I know that whites were not capable of taking care of themselves. History shows us this. Blacks educated whites and then were driven away. White civilization collapsed. Blacks came back to europe and taught whites it was ok to take baths and how to read and write. Whites drove them away again and tried to come over to the americas but needed Black men to help them navigate. I could go on and on but you get my point. Whites need help. It was smart of your ancestors to give you a head start. God knows that 400 years was still not enough. Thats why you still whine like bitches.Well we know that at least I hope considering nowadays educational requirements.No. I'm saying Africa is not in the US.So you are saying that blacks were not developed in Africa? You are putting your own race down. Why?No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart and held Blacks back to boot.So you are saying that you are unable to take care of yourself. What headstart? Let me try to make sense of this. You assume a zero sum game. Whites started to walk on two legs 400 years earlier than blacks and they started to walk on two legs 400 years ago, while blacks started to walk on two legs just recently. Am I understanding you right?
So, back to your original thought. You were saying that you were not capable to take care of yourself, why do you think that?
Yes you do. I dont have a good answer other than whites are insecure and look to government to give them a head start.Do I come across whining? Interesting. I am just asking you that why do you think that you cannot take care of yourself and need the government to take care of you. You are consistently avoiding the answer to that. You alluded to blacks starting to walk in two legs 400 years later than whites, then the next post you said blacks taught everything what whites know. Then you said you needed somebody else to take care of you. You are very confused or trying to confuse me.i dont just think that. I know that whites were not capable of taking care of themselves. History shows us this. Blacks educated whites and then were driven away. White civilization collapsed. Blacks came back to europe and taught whites it was ok to take baths and how to read and write. Whites drove them away again and tried to come over to the americas but needed Black men to help them navigate. I could go on and on but you get my point. Whites need help. It was smart of your ancestors to give you a head start. God knows that 400 years was still not enough. Thats why you still whine like bitches.Well we know that at least I hope considering nowadays educational requirements.No. I'm saying Africa is not in the US.So you are saying that blacks were not developed in Africa? You are putting your own race down. Why?No. I'm saying whites needed help so the government gave them a 400 year headstart and held Blacks back to boot.
So, back to your original thought. You were saying that you were not capable to take care of yourself, why do you think that?
Why do you think whites need a headstart when just a couple of minutes ago you said blacks taught everything to whites?Yes you do. I dont have a good answer other than whites are insecure and look to government to give them a head start.Do I come across whining? Interesting. I am just asking you that why do you think that you cannot take care of yourself and need the government to take care of you. You are consistently avoiding the answer to that. You alluded to blacks starting to walk in two legs 400 years later than whites, then the next post you said blacks taught everything what whites know. Then you said you needed somebody else to take care of you. You are very confused or trying to confuse me.i dont just think that. I know that whites were not capable of taking care of themselves. History shows us this. Blacks educated whites and then were driven away. White civilization collapsed. Blacks came back to europe and taught whites it was ok to take baths and how to read and write. Whites drove them away again and tried to come over to the americas but needed Black men to help them navigate. I could go on and on but you get my point. Whites need help. It was smart of your ancestors to give you a head start. God knows that 400 years was still not enough. Thats why you still whine like bitches.Well we know that at least I hope considering nowadays educational requirements.No. I'm saying Africa is not in the US.So you are saying that blacks were not developed in Africa? You are putting your own race down. Why?
So, back to your original thought. You were saying that you were not capable to take care of yourself, why do you think that?
