There is only one issue for the right, transfer all the new wealth to the top

[Ray From Cleveland]

The primary goal of conservative economic policy is to widen the gap between rich and poor, widen the gap between richer and poorer.

I welcome any conservative to prove otherwise.

I welcome you to explain how Republicans are doing that.

1. by trying to reduce means tested benefits

2. by trying to flatten the tax system

3. by trying to weaken labor unions

lol, for starters...

Do you think government benefits widens the gap between the rich and poor? To my knowledge, if you need any kind of government benefit, you're poor already.

By flattening the tax system, you mean having the rich pay less? So you think US success is built on keeping the wealthy less wealthy?

Does weakening the labor unions widen the gap between the rich and poor or does weakening them keep jobs?

Government assistance to a poor person makes the person less poor.

Oh, so now we are measuring this "gap" using different levels? I always thought poor was poor and rich was rich.

 

[eddiew37]

The primary goal of conservative economic policy is to widen the gap between rich and poor, widen the gap between richer and poorer.

I welcome any conservative to prove otherwise.

What an idiot. Just look at obama years. Libs are clueless

During Obama’s Presidency Wealth Inequality has Increased and Poverty Levels are Higher

Obama has done more to reduce inequality, but the forces increasing inequality are strong, considering a GOP majority in the legislative branch during most of his time.

I agree.

I think everyone should make exactly the same in income.

But that will never happen.
What will happen is the Democrats will make sure they and their rich friends will be the only people with money, sort of the way all of the other countries are around the world.
That explains why they want to come here......just so they can bring their crappy economies to the US.

we didn't elect a billionaire moron with zero ability to govern,,,you did and now the rich will get richer still and the gap will grow larger

 

[mudwhistle]

The primary goal of conservative economic policy is to widen the gap between rich and poor, widen the gap between richer and poorer.

I welcome any conservative to prove otherwise.

What an idiot. Just look at obama years. Libs are clueless

During Obama’s Presidency Wealth Inequality has Increased and Poverty Levels are Higher

Obama has done more to reduce inequality, but the forces increasing inequality are strong, considering a GOP majority in the legislative branch during most of his time.

I agree.

I think everyone should make exactly the same in income.

But that will never happen.
What will happen is the Democrats will make sure they and their rich friends will be the only people with money, sort of the way all of the other countries are around the world.
That explains why they want to come here......just so they can bring their crappy economies to the US.

we didn't elect a billionaire moron with zero ability to govern,,,you did and now the rich will get richer still and the gap will grow larger

The Democrats have two primary voting blocks......the extremely rich and the poor. During the Obama administration the income gap widened....BY DESIGN.

Democrats never solve problems, they just create new ones and bitch about the old ones for eternity.
They had full control of Congress and the White House and did they ever try addressing illegal immigration or any of these other issues?
Heck no. They ignored them and just created more.

• Income inequality
• Bathroom choices
• Micro aggressions
• Obamacare
• Global Warming

One stupid issue after another created out of nothing just to cause divisions and hatred.

Democrats have been using envy of the rich as a wedge issue since before you were born, and you're still buying it.

Democrats only create problems just so they can take advantage of them. They never try to solve them. If they did solve them what would you the voter need them for.

They are supposedly the party that stands up for the little guy. They guy that is being screwed over. That's all they're there for. But after watching them for 60 years and reading about them. it looks like Democrats are just here to cause problems, and while they're doing this they're robbing you blind. Then they have the nerve to ask for donations so that they can stand up against the rich, yet who do you think they're primary donors are? It sure as heck isn't welfare cases because they don't have any money. It's the richest people in America.

• Harvey Weinstein (Hollywood Producer)
• Bill Gates (Microsoft CEO)
• Warren Buffett (Wall street Mogul)
• Jeff Bezos (Amazon)
• Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook)

 

[Norman]

The democrat agenda then?

Take money from those who earned it voluntarily by force.

Give it to your cronies for votes, and spend the rest on immediate gratification. And remember, fuck responsibility.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The primary goal of conservative economic policy is to widen the gap between rich and poor, widen the gap between richer and poorer.

I welcome any conservative to prove otherwise.

What an idiot. Just look at obama years. Libs are clueless

During Obama’s Presidency Wealth Inequality has Increased and Poverty Levels are Higher

Government poverty rate figures do not take into account most of the benefits that the poor receive, so those figures are meaningless.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The democrat agenda then?

Take money from those who earned it voluntarily by force.

Give it to your cronies for votes, and spend the rest on immediate gratification. And remember, fuck responsibility.

See? this poster, in an odd way, reinforces what I'm saying. If he had his way, the poor would get no help from the government,

which means they would be poorer than they are now. That is the conservative agenda.

 

[whitehall]

Don't lefties get tired of that old cliche? Didn't they see Hillary take about a quarter of a million dollars for 15 minute speeches to Wall Street bankers? Didn't lefties see Hussein and Hillary smooch it up with a H'wood corporate mogul and ignore and cover up his abuse of women in exchange for big donations? How about the secret billion dollar subsidies to insurance companies under Obamacare while premiums double and the deductible is as high as a new car? How about Hussein using taxpayer money to prop up big donor companies like Solyndra just before they went under. The DOW remained stagnant for the entire eight Hussein years and in less than nine months under Trump the 401k's of ungrateful hypocrite lefties became solvent while the DOW continues to be in record territory. Hussein never had a real job that wasn't paid by taxpayer money and Trump created jobs, met a payroll and paid a living wage to tens of thousands of workers before he even became president. Which one has the most meaningful experience?

 

[danielpalos]

They have achieved that for the last 35 years, where every dime of the new profits from the richest country in the world has gone to the top. While at the same time , the middle class and poor have had massive increases in debt. Again a transfer to the top but it's not fast enough, they want it all yesterday. That is what the small hands budget represents. There has been no time in history where more people have voted against their best interest then now.

Why do the rich, need to get richer, faster?

 

[danielpalos]

You forgot the issue of driving the Democrats from political power.

with nothing but repeal?

 

[danielpalos]

They have achieved that for the last 35 years, where every dime of the new profits from the richest country in the world has gone to the top. While at the same time , the middle class and poor have had massive increases in debt. Again a transfer to the top but it's not fast enough, they want it all yesterday. That is what the small hands budget represents. There has been no time in history where more people have voted against their best interest then now.

The rich earn their money just like everyone else. The money they receive back or deducted from their taxes was theirs to begin with. If you want a piece of that pie do something to earn it. Wealth is not finite and you are COMPLETELY FREE TO CREATE YOUR OWN via ingenuity, investment or hard work.

Stop being a whiney baby

the rich already have a lot of money and claim to be willing to work; why do they need a tax break?

 

[mudwhistle]

Don't lefties get tired of that old cliche? Didn't they see Hillary take about a quarter of a million dollars for 15 minute speeches to Wall Street bankers? Didn't lefties see Hussein and Hillary smooch it up with a H'wood corporate mogul and ignore and cover up his abuse of women in exchange for big donations? How about the secret billion dollar subsidies to insurance companies under Obamacare while premiums double and the deductible is as high as a new car? How about Hussein using taxpayer money to prop up big donor companies like Solyndra just before they went under. The DOW remained stagnant for the entire eight Hussein years and in less than nine months under Trump the 401k's of ungrateful hypocrite lefties became solvent while the DOW continues to be in record territory. Hussein never had a real job that wasn't paid by taxpayer money and Trump created jobs, met a payroll and paid a living wage to tens of thousands of workers before he even became president. Which one has the most meaningful experience?

The DOW wasn't stagnant during Obama.
It continues huge gains that were started under Obama.....but only because Obama was pumping billions into market by monetizing the debt.

 

[danielpalos]

You forgot the issue of driving the Democrats from political power.

First response, can't argue the thread, so off to another world, another subject. Stick to this one.

What's to argue? You want a piece of someone else's pie.

Seems like a personal problem to me. Creators get paid for their efforts. Freeloaders get mocked for their lack of effort.

did you know; having nothing but repeal, is "freeloading".

 

[danielpalos]

Yet another thread where disgruntled Democrats who got whipped in the last national election, tell each other lies about Republicans, solemnly agree with each other that the lies must be true, and feel really good about themselves.

(yawn)

Well, it keeps them off the streets while the adults come in and fix what the Dems broke for the last 8 years.

there is no drug war clause in the Republican doctrine. there is a Commerce Clause.

Let's end the drug war to pay for health care.

 

[Uncensored2008]

They have achieved that for the last 35 years, where every dime of the new profits from the richest country in the world has gone to the top. While at the same time , the middle class and poor have had massive increases in debt. Again a transfer to the top but it's not fast enough, they want it all yesterday. That is what the small hands budget represents. There has been no time in history where more people have voted against their best interest then now.

You're a dumb one, even as Communists go.

Do you live better than your parents? Count the number of cars, tv's, square feet in your house, and see if the 40 IQ points you have can process it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You forgot the issue of driving the Democrats from political power.

We will be back. Thanks to Trump, and Trump Care.

Power in America shifts. It always has and always will.

As for you of ISIS being back, I don't think so.

 

[Uncensored2008]

All that stands between the middle class and ruin.

Is the 2nd Amendment, to keep you traitor democrats at bay.

 

[danielpalos]

They have achieved that for the last 35 years, where every dime of the new profits from the richest country in the world has gone to the top. While at the same time , the middle class and poor have had massive increases in debt. Again a transfer to the top but it's not fast enough, they want it all yesterday. That is what the small hands budget represents. There has been no time in history where more people have voted against their best interest then now.

You're a dumb one, even as Communists go.

Do you live better than your parents? Count the number of cars, tv's, square feet in your house, and see if the 40 IQ points you have can process it.

If, the Romans had, had, better management; where would we be now?

 

[Uncensored2008]

They have achieved that for the last 35 years, where every dime of the new profits from the richest country in the world has gone to the top. While at the same time , the middle class and poor have had massive increases in debt. Again a transfer to the top but it's not fast enough, they want it all yesterday. That is what the small hands budget represents. There has been no time in history where more people have voted against their best interest then now.

You're a dumb one, even as Communists go.

Do you live better than your parents? Count the number of cars, tv's, square feet in your house, and see if the 40 IQ points you have can process it.

If, the Romans had, had, better management; where would we be now?

The Romans were an empire built upon the enslavement of others. They were doomed from the start.

 

[miketx]

You forgot the issue of driving the Democrats from political power.

We will be back. Thanks to Trump, and Trump Care.

What century?

 

[danielpalos]

They have achieved that for the last 35 years, where every dime of the new profits from the richest country in the world has gone to the top. While at the same time , the middle class and poor have had massive increases in debt. Again a transfer to the top but it's not fast enough, they want it all yesterday. That is what the small hands budget represents. There has been no time in history where more people have voted against their best interest then now.

You're a dumb one, even as Communists go.

Do you live better than your parents? Count the number of cars, tv's, square feet in your house, and see if the 40 IQ points you have can process it.

If, the Romans had, had, better management; where would we be now?

The Romans were an empire built upon the enslavement of others. They were doomed from the start.

They had a mechanism for achieving Individual Liberty; one Senatus, may not have been enough.