Theoretical model of evolution completely collapses...

The model of creation failed

It is scientifically impossible for all life to be created at once
 
I have a funny feeling that somebody with an agenda that isn't a scientist created this thread...You have an alternative to say, god spontaneously just pulled the universe from out of his...sleeve?
 
I have a funny feeling that somebody with an agenda that isn't a scientist created this thread...You have an alternative to say, god spontaneously just pulled the universe from out of his...sleeve?
I presented scientific evidence.. can you refute it? I may not be a scientists. Doesn't matter. What I posted is what scientists have discovered. Now, if you think you are smarter than they are, feel free to refute what they say, rather than engaging in childish insults.
 
I have a funny feeling that somebody with an agenda that isn't a scientist created this thread...You have an alternative to say, god spontaneously just pulled the universe from out of his...sleeve?
I presented scientific evidence.. can you refute it? I may not be a scientists. Doesn't matter. What I posted is what scientists have discovered. Now, if you think you are smarter than they are, feel free to refute what they say, rather than engaging in childish insults.
You did? I wasn't born yesterday. Evolution is a theory, a flawed one. But so far, it's the best one that fits the models. If you have one that explains everything, and fits, and ISN'T flawed, I am all ears. So is the scientific community.
 
I have a funny feeling that somebody with an agenda that isn't a scientist created this thread...You have an alternative to say, god spontaneously just pulled the universe from out of his...sleeve?
I presented scientific evidence.. can you refute it? I may not be a scientists. Doesn't matter. What I posted is what scientists have discovered. Now, if you think you are smarter than they are, feel free to refute what they say, rather than engaging in childish insults.
You did? I wasn't born yesterday. Evolution is a theory, a flawed one. But so far, it's the best one that fits the models. If you have one that explains everything, and fits, and ISN'T flawed, I am all ears. So is the scientific community.
It is painfully obvious that you didn't read the article.
 
I have a funny feeling that somebody with an agenda that isn't a scientist created this thread...You have an alternative to say, god spontaneously just pulled the universe from out of his...sleeve?
I presented scientific evidence.. can you refute it? I may not be a scientists. Doesn't matter. What I posted is what scientists have discovered. Now, if you think you are smarter than they are, feel free to refute what they say, rather than engaging in childish insults.
You presented a site that is highly biased is all you produced.
 
I have a funny feeling that somebody with an agenda that isn't a scientist created this thread...You have an alternative to say, god spontaneously just pulled the universe from out of his...sleeve?
I presented scientific evidence.. can you refute it? I may not be a scientists. Doesn't matter. What I posted is what scientists have discovered. Now, if you think you are smarter than they are, feel free to refute what they say, rather than engaging in childish insults.
You did? I wasn't born yesterday. Evolution is a theory, a flawed one. But so far, it's the best one that fits the models. If you have one that explains everything, and fits, and ISN'T flawed, I am all ears. So is the scientific community.
It is painfully obvious that you didn't read the article.
Nope, I stopped at the whole "Atheist" thingy. Which tainted this thread. Why...? You seriously want to debate how many angels can dance on the head of a pin now? You have a degree in Genetics...
 
Last edited:
I have a funny feeling that somebody with an agenda that isn't a scientist created this thread...You have an alternative to say, god spontaneously just pulled the universe from out of his...sleeve?
I presented scientific evidence.. can you refute it? I may not be a scientists. Doesn't matter. What I posted is what scientists have discovered. Now, if you think you are smarter than they are, feel free to refute what they say, rather than engaging in childish insults.
You did? I wasn't born yesterday. Evolution is a theory, a flawed one. But so far, it's the best one that fits the models. If you have one that explains everything, and fits, and ISN'T flawed, I am all ears. So is the scientific community.
It is painfully obvious that you didn't read the article.
Nope, I stopped at the whole "Atheist" thingy. Which tainted this thread. Why...? You seriously want to debate how many angels can dance on the head of a pin now?
Actually, I would be tickled pink if you would actually discuss the scientific findings presented in the article. But you refuse to do because it goes against your atheist religion.
 
Encode was launched by the US National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) in September 2003.[2][3][4][5][6] Intended as a follow-up to the Human Genome Project, the ENCODE project aims to identify all functional elements in the human genome.

The project involves a worldwide consortium of research groups, and data generated from this project can be accessed through public databases. The project is beginning its fourth phase as of February 2017.[7]

Humans are estimated to have approximately 20,000 protein-coding genes, which account for about 1.5% of DNA in the human genome. The primary goal of the ENCODE project is to determine the role of the remaining component of the genome, much of which was traditionally regarded as "junk." The activity and expression of protein-coding genes can be modulated by the regulome - a variety of DNA elements, such as the promoter, transcriptional regulatory sequences, and regions of chromatin structure and histone modification. It is thought that changes in the regulation of gene activity can disrupt protein production and cell processes and result in disease. Determining the location of these regulatory elements and how they influence gene transcription could reveal links between variations in the expression of certain genes and the development of disease.[8]

ENCODE is also intended as a comprehensive resource to allow the scientific community to better understand how the genome can affect human health, and to "stimulate the development of new therapies to prevent and treat these diseases".[3]
ENCODE - Wikipedia

Let us get back to basics and understand what and why is Encode.
 

Forum List

Back
Top