Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So Marty has laid out the solution. The United Negro College fund must accept all whites no matter grades, accomplishments etc in order to be "fair". So grab the drop outs and give them a scholarship and if you dont, Marty says you're racist because he doesnt know what the word means
Okay! So giving scholarships only to men is excluding and therefore wrong.No idea. The thing is, they exist. Is it sexist? Is giving scholarships to Latins, Asians, Blacks, etc. racist? How about scholarships to Christians, Jews, Muslims? Bigoted?Scholarships For Men - Scholarships By Type - College Scholarships - Financial Aid - Scholarships.comAre you also upset over scholarships that are only offered to men?
Which ones? Considering Title IX requires and equal # for women in college sports, I don't think that's where you are going.
Interesting, however are these balanced out or even exceeded by scholarships only for women?
Its not the GIVING, its the EXCLUDING.
So Marty has laid out the solution. The United Negro College fund must accept all whites no matter grades, accomplishments etc in order to be "fair". So grab the drop outs and give them a scholarship and if you dont, Marty says you're racist because he doesnt know what the word means
Stop typing for me, you dime-store hack.
The UNCF can do what it pleases, and it does good work. What I'm trying to point out is that if there was a UECF, people would be protesting them, boycotting them, and probably suing them.
Okay! So giving scholarships only to men is excluding and therefore wrong.No idea. The thing is, they exist. Is it sexist? Is giving scholarships to Latins, Asians, Blacks, etc. racist? How about scholarships to Christians, Jews, Muslims? Bigoted?Scholarships For Men - Scholarships By Type - College Scholarships - Financial Aid - Scholarships.comWhich ones? Considering Title IX requires and equal # for women in college sports, I don't think that's where you are going.
Interesting, however are these balanced out or even exceeded by scholarships only for women?
Its not the GIVING, its the EXCLUDING.
Thanks!
So Marty has laid out the solution. The United Negro College fund must accept all whites no matter grades, accomplishments etc in order to be "fair". So grab the drop outs and give them a scholarship and if you dont, Marty says you're racist because he doesnt know what the word means
Stop typing for me, you dime-store hack.
The UNCF can do what it pleases, and it does good work. What I'm trying to point out is that if there was a UECF, people would be protesting them, boycotting them, and probably suing them.
And if you had wheels you'd be a motorbike and slow
Cause they have a history of selling a few slaves and going to college... Seriously is this all you got to complain about?
Blacks enslaved more Blacks than did Whites. By a HUGE margin.
Whites enslaved Whites by an even bigger Margin.
In fact, during the 17th Century there were FAR more White Slaves sent to America than there were Black Slaves. FAR more.
Slavery back then was just another institution.
BTW, the Church that you scumbags hate so much? The Catholic Church outlawed Slavery in Europe a thousand years before any place or anybody else.
These things are FACTS.
But..... You're a dimocrap. Which means you're stupid and trying to educate you is a waste of time.
In the United States- whites owned more slaves- black and white than blacks ever owned.
White slaves in the United States were not 'chattel slaves'- they were essentially indentured servants- usually for a contracted period of time, and their children were not born slaves.
I don't hate any Church, but its hard to ignore the Catholic's various positions regarding slavery in the United States. Catholic missionaries in the United States enslaved native Americans to convert them. The Popes encouraged the slavery of Africans and Native Americans
Pope Nicholas V issued the papal bull Dum Diversas on 18 June, 1452. It authorised (King) Alfonso V of Portugal to reduce any “Saracens (Muslims) and pagans and any other unbelievers to perpetual slavery. The same pope wrote the bull Romanus Pontifex on January 5, 1455 to the same Alfonso. As a follow-up to the Dum diversas, it extended to the Catholic nations of Europe dominion over discovered lands during the Age of Discovery. Along with sanctifying the seizure of non-Christian lands, it encouraged the enslavement of native, non-Christian peoples in Africa and the New World.
“We weighing all and singular the premises with due meditation, and noting that since we had formerly by other letters of ours granted among other things free and ample faculty to the aforesaid King Alfonso -- to invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue all Saracens and pagans whatsoever, and other enemies of Christ wheresoever placed, and the kingdoms, dukedoms, principalities, dominions, possessions, and all movable and immovable goods whatsoever held and possessed by them and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery, and to apply and appropriate to himself and his successors the kingdoms, dukedoms, counties, principalities, dominions, possessions, and goods, and to convert them to his and their use and profit -- by having secured the said faculty, the said King Alfonso, or, by his authority, the aforesaid infante, justly and lawfully has acquired and possessed, and doth possess, these islands, lands, harbors, and seas, and they do of right belong and pertain to the said King Alfonso and his successors
This doesn't mean that the Catholic Church was any more- or any less complicit in slavery in the New World- but it does show your attempt to pretend that the Church was not complicit is just false.
Not sure what any of this has to do with the United Negro College Fund....but thems the facts.
They're a private organization; they can do what they want.
Link?someone tried. and it was declared to be racist by the Supreme Court.Start one.Is there a United Caucasian College Fund too? If not, why not?
And they wouldn't get sued in 5 seconds?
Well, it is. You can't tell me it isn't. If a white boy went there and asked for a college loan, he would be denied because of the color of their skin. That is the very definition of racism. Why is this racist organization allowed to exist? Can you imagine the outrage from the left if there was a college fund for whites only? Actually you don't have to imagine it. Someone tried to set one up, and the supreme court said it was racist. So why is it not racist for blacks to have one? Could someone please explain this? I'm a bit confused.
What a dumb ass. Your OP just failed.Well, it is. You can't tell me it isn't. If a white boy went there and asked for a college loan, he would be denied because of the color of their skin. That is the very definition of racism. Why is this racist organization allowed to exist? Can you imagine the outrage from the left if there was a college fund for whites only? Actually you don't have to imagine it. Someone tried to set one up, and the supreme court said it was racist. So why is it not racist for blacks to have one? Could someone please explain this? I'm a bit confused.
Nothing.There's no law that says you can't start a white only scholarship fund.What would that matter?Start one.
And they wouldn't get sued in 5 seconds?
Why would you start something with a purpose that would be struck down court? So you create a white college fund, you get sued, and then your only choice is to either fold or provide funds to whichever groups won said lawsuit.
If you are a protected class, you can sue anyone, if you are not, you are up shits creek, no paddle.
and what would happen if a black student applied and was turned down because they were black?
You wouldnt understand. Its a Black thing.Why it it that blacks are not picketing the HQ of The United NEGRO College fund for that racist word in their very name?
Where IS Al Sharpton when he should be mounting a hostile takeover to get that abomination fixed?
Sure it is. There are scholarships for all types of white ethnic groups. You guys are some fucking idiots.Well, it is. You can't tell me it isn't. If a white boy went there and asked for a college loan, he would be denied because of the color of their skin. That is the very definition of racism. Why is this racist organization allowed to exist? Can you imagine the outrage from the left if there was a college fund for whites only? Actually you don't have to imagine it. Someone tried to set one up, and the supreme court said it was racist. So why is it not racist for blacks to have one? Could someone please explain this? I'm a bit confused.
Of course it is. When in doubt, just reverse the races, if it would raise the ire of the minorities then it is racist.
There is no way to rationalize a reasonable explanation for this.
You wouldnt understand. Its a Black thing.
So it isn't "racist"? I can see the need for it, but as a person who's father got his ass laid off, and who could have really used a supplemental scholarship in college, but only saw ones for women and minorities, I have been directly impacted by it. I don't begrudge them being able to limit who they give the scholarship to, but it is a bit hypocritical not even consider it racial/sex preferences.
